/

Ermak Elena

Why is Jonah awake? An interpretation of the early Christian sarcophagus from the British museum in the modern art history


Ermak Elena (2023) "Why is Jonah awake? An interpretation of the early Christian sarcophagus from the British museum in the modern art history ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia V : Voprosi istorii i teorii hristianskogo iskusstva, 2023, vol. 51, pp. 9-28 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturV202351.9-28

Abstract

Although the sarcophagus No. 1957, 1011.1 is investigated in detail, to this day there are many questions in its study. In addition to the main problems facing the researcher in the study of early monuments the item has a unique iconographic solution: unlike other objects of this kind (3rd c.), the prophet Jonah, reproduced on the front wall, is represented awake. The authors put forward a number of hypotheses explaining this feature, but none of them is comprehensive. These aspects justify the choice of the monument as an object of study.A review of texts (2nd-4th cc.) and objects (3rd-5th cc.) showed that, probably, the Old Testament prophet is not literally represented in the relief, but rather an allegorical transmission of the theology of bodily Resurrection is presented. Although the early texts were only trying to comprehend the relationship between the image (εἰκών) and the Prototype (ἀρχέτυπον), nevertheless, perhaps understanding the images at that time could be more complicated and led to the formation of the theology of the image.

Keywords

Keywords: early Christian sculpture, sarcophagi, the theme of the Resurrection, iconography, methodology, interpretation, image theory, modern art history

References

  1. Anđelković J., Rogić D., Nikolić E. (2010) “Peacock as a Sign in the Late Antique and Early Christian Art”. Archaeology and Science, vol. 6, pp. 231–248.
  2. Bédoyère G. de la (2006) Roman Britain: A New History. London.
  3. Belousov A., Zhuravlev D., Kostromichev D. (2022) “Izobrazhenie proroka Iony na svetil’nike iz Khersonesa Tavicheskogo”. Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury, Moscow, vol. 1, pp. 66–89 (in Russian).
  4. Brink L., Green D. (eds) (2008) Commemorating the Dead. Texts and Artifacts in Context. Studies of Roman, Jewish and Christian Burials. Berlin; New York.
  5. Couzin R. (2018) “Invented Traditions: Latin Terminology and the Writing of Art History”. Journal of Art Historiography, vol. 19, pp. 1–29.
  6. Davis S. J. (2000) “Jonah in Early Christian Art: Allegorical Exegesis and the Roman Funerary Context”. Australian Religion Studies Review, vol. 13 (1), pp. 72–83.
  7. Dresken-Weiland J. (1998) Repertorium der christlich-antiken Sarkophage. Bd II: Italien, Dalmatien, Museen der Welt. Mainz.
  8. Ermak E. (2018) “Ikonograficheskij dialog Vostoka i Zapada v skul‘pturnom oformlenii rannekhristianskikh sarkofagov III–VI vv.” in Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii “Rannij zheleznyj vek Evrazii ot rubezha er do ser. I tys. n.e. Dinamika osvoeniia kul‘turnogo prostranstva”, pp. 51–54 (in Russian).
  9. Ermak E. (2018) “Na perekrestii pozdneantichnoj i rannekhristianskoj kul’tur. Rel’ef sarkofaga iz cerkvi Santa-Mariia–Antikva: opyt primeneniia kompleksnogo podkhoda k analizu skul’p tury III–IV vv.”, in Tezisy Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii molodykh uchenykh “Aktual‘naia arkheologiia 4: kompleksnye issledovaniia v arkheologii”, pp. 227–230 (in Russian).
  10. Ermak E. (2017) “Obraz proroka Iony. Otrazhenie bogosloviia telesnogo Voskreseniia v ikonografii rannekhristianskoj skul’ptury”, in Ergastirij : sbornik materialov Vserossij skoj letnej shkoly po vizantinovedeniiu, pp. 23–33 (in Russian).
  11. Grabar A. (1961) Christian Iconography: a Study of its Origins. A. W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts. Princeton.
  12. Jensen R. M. (2005) Face to Face. Portraits of the Divine in Early Christianity. Fortress Press.
  13. Jensen R. M. (2011) Living Water. Images, Symbols and Settings of Early Christian Baptism. Leiden.
  14. Kiilerich B. (2015) “The State of Early Christian Iconography in the Twenty-First Century”. Studies in Iconography, 2015, vol. 36, pp. 99–134.
  15. Kuvatova V. (2019) “Vozmozhnye istochniki rannekhristianskoj ikonografi i sceny ‘Iona pod tykvennoj lozoj’”. Vestnik RGGU. Seriia Literaturovedenie. Iazykoznanie. Kul’turologiia, vol. 1, pp. 59–69 (in Russian).
  16. Lawrence M. (1962) “Ships, Monsters and Jonah”. American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 66 (3), pp. 289–296.
  17. Losev A., Asmus V. (eds) (2007) Platon. Sochineniia v chetyrekh tomakh. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  18. Malcolm T. (ed.) (2004) A Companion to Roman Britain. Oxford.
  19. Narkiss B. (1978) The Sign of Jonah. Papers Related to Objects in the Exhibition “Age of Spirituality”. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, vol. 18 (1), pp. 63–76.
  20. Rice D. T. (2002) Byzantine Art. Moscow (Russian translation).
  21. Rosenau H. (1961) “The Jonah Sarcophagus in the British Museum”. Journal of the British Archaeological Association, vol. 24 (1), pp. 60–66.
  22. Stoliarov A., Shaburov N. (eds) (1994) Kvint Septimij Florent Tertullian. Izbrannye sochineniia. Moscow (in Russian).
  23. Sushkova O. (2009) “I tykva, i pliushch, i loza vinogradnaia”. Cerkov’ i vremia, vol. 48, pp. 169–184 (in Russian).
  24. Walker S. (1990) Catalogue of Roman Sarcophagi in the British Museum. London.
  25. Weitzmann K. (ed.) (1979) Age of Spirituality. Late Antique and Early Christian Art, Third to Seventh Century. Catalogue of the Exhibition at The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York.

Information about the author

Ermak Elena


Place of work: The State Hermitage Museum Russia; Saint-Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences;
Email: hel-erm@yandex.ru.