/

St. Tikhon’s University Review . Series IV: Pedagogy. Psychology

St. Tikhon’s University Review IV :60

PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCE

Sklyarova Tatiana

Educational activities of the Russian Orthodox Church in religious and state-municipal education in 1990–2015

Sklyarova Tatiana (2021) "Educational activities of the Russian Orthodox Church in religious and state-municipal education in 1990–2015 ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 11-21 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.11-21
The article describes the development of processes in religious education as well as educational initiatives, organisational and pedagogical conditions and administrative and managerial solutions of the Russian Orthodox Church in the sphere of education during the period of 1990–2015. The revitalisation of educational activity of the largest religious organisation in post-Soviet Russia is examined in the unity of the three directions, i.e. the religious education itself, established and implemented by church institutions as well as their interaction with state-run and municipal educational systems and institutions. The use of the method of longitudinal inclusive observation, analysis of offi cial records, the method of “oral history”, the method of historical reconstruction applied in the humanities-related studies was aimed at testing the hypothesis about the specifi city of development of educational activity of the Russian Orthodox Church. The results obtained have led to the following conclusions. The educational activity of the Russian Orthodox Church in the studied period was determined by the style of management of the ruling patriarch, which has conditioned the two stages in its study, i.e. from 1990 to 2008 and from 2009 to 2015. Religious education of the Russian Orthodox Church from 1990 to 2008 was arranged and implemented mostly on the level of parishes, while on the level of dioceses and on the church-wide level the existing attampts were mostly supported and, more rarely, not supported due to their non-conformity with the ideas about traditions of Orthodox education; from 2009 to 2015, the arrangement of the religious education of the Russian Orthodox Church developed in the direction from the church-wide to diocesan and parochial levels of administration. Educational initiatives of the Russian Orthodox Church from 1990 to 2008 were primarily implemented on the level of parishes, while on the diocesan and church-wide levels the educational initiatives of the Russian Orthodox Church were addressed to employees of the system of state and municipal administration; from 2009 to 2015, the educational initiatives of the Russian Orthodox Church prevailed over those parish-oriented, which was refl ected in making a package of church-wide documents that regulate the educational activity of the Russian Orthodox Church. Administrative and pedagogical conditions of education in 1990–2008 are characterised by strategies of “reconstructing” the preceding attempts in Orthodox education, in 2009–2015 they came to be accompanied by strategies of “state-driven” regulation in the sphere of education expressed in the organisationof processes of developing educational standards, church-wide publishing of study materials, church-based licensing and authentication of educational institutions and programmes. The development and adoption of administrative-managerial recisions in 1990–2008 was carried out in the process of interaction between the church-driven and state-municipal systems of administration, in 2009–2015 in running the educational activity of the Russian Orthodox Church prevailed decisions taken in the process of interaction of the church-wide and state systems of managing education.
religious education, state-municipal education, history of pedagogy, educational initiatives, educational activities of Russian Orthodox Church
  1. Andreia Fursenko osvistali v Kremle. Tserkovnosluzhiteli obvinili ministra v bezbozhii [Andrei Fursenko got booed in the Kremlin. Members of the clergy accused the minister of atheism], available at https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/645044 (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  2. Vorob'ev V. (2006) “Vstupitel'noe slovo na otkrytii konferentsii «Problemy razvitiia religioznogo obrazovaniia v vysshei shkole v svete ee reformirovaniia»” [Opening remarks at the conference “Problems of development of religious education in higher education in the light of its reform”]. Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 7–19 (in Russian).
  3. Dokumenty po voprosam religioznogo obrazovaniia i katekhizatsii [Documents in the sphere of religious education], available at https://pravobraz.ru/dokumenty/ (14.12.2020).
  4. Znakom'tes', gimnaziia “Radonezh”!, available at: http://gymnasia-radonezh.ru/about/ (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  5. Znamenskaia gimnaziia. O gimnazii [Znamenskaya Gymnasium. About the gymnasium], available at http://znamgimn.ru/ (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  6. Negosudarstvennoe obrazovatel'noe chastnoe uchrezhdenie sredniaia obshcheobrazovatel'naia shkola “Zhivonosnyi Istochnik”. Istoriia uchrezhdeniia [Non-state private educational insitution secondary school “Zhivonosny istochnik”. History of the institution], available at https:// zchivonosniy-istochnik.mskobr.ru/info_add/history/ (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  7. Obshchetserkovnaia aspirantura i doktorantura im. sviatykh ravnoapostol'nykh Kirilla i Mefodiia. Obshchaia informatsiia [SS Cyril and Methodius Theological Institute of Post-Graduate Studies. General information], available at http://www.doctorantura.ru/o-nas/common (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  8. Obshchie svedeniia o Sinodal'nom OROiK, available at: https://pravobraz.ru/informaciya-obotdele/obshhaya-informaciya/ (14.12.2020).
  9. “Pod shifrom 26.00.01. VAK priniala pod svoe krylo novuiu spetsial'nost' — teologiia” [Under the code 26.00.01. The Higher Attestation Committee has taken under its wing the new subject, theology]. Rossiiskaia gazeta, № 230 (6801) ot 12.10.2015, available at https://rg.ru/2015/10/13/teologiya.html (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  10. Pravoslavnaia klassicheskaia gimnaziia Ioanna Bogoslova. Istoriia [John the Theologian’s Orthodox Classical Gymnasium. An history], available at: https://orthoschool.ru/company/history/ (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  11. Pravoslavnaia Sviato-Petrovskaia Shkola — traditsionnaia gimnaziia. Istoriia shkoly [Orthodox Saint-Peter School — traditional gymnasium. History of the school], available at http://tgym.ru/istoriya#razdel2 (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  12. Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii Pravoslavnyi universitet. Ob universitete [St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities. About the university], available at: https://pstgu.ru/history/(14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  13. Rezoliutsiia konferentsii «Gosudarstvennye obrazovatel'nye standarty v kontekste formirovaniia nravstvennykh i dukhovnykh tsennostei obuchaiushchikhsia» [Decisions of the conference “State-related educational standards in the context of shaping moral and spiritual values of the student], available at: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/342017.html (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  14. Rossiiskii pravoslavnyi universitet. Istoriia [Russian Orthodox University. An history], available at: https://rpu-rf.ru/index.php/informatsiya/istoriya.html (14.12.2020) (in Russian).
  15. Skliarova T. V. (2016) “Pravoslavnoe obrazovanie v sovremennoi Rossii: struktura i soderzhanie” [Orthodox education in modern Russia: the structure and content]. Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2016, vol. 1 (40), pp. 9–16.

Sklyarova Tatiana


Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 407, 9/2, Jlovaiskaya str., 109651, Moscow, Russian Federation;
Post: Senior Lecturer;
ORCID: 0000-0002-1169-5624;
Email: tsklyarova@mail.ru.

*According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 19-013-00228.
Loginova Marina

The philosophy of american education: from truth to the opinion

Loginova Marina (2021) "The philosophy of american education: from truth to the opinion ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 22-36 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.22-36
The article deals with the process of establishing of American system of education from the fi rst schools in the New World till the present time. Being an essential part of culture in any society, education forms a spiritual image of people, their system of values, and aspiration. The author analyses some features of the philosophy of American education, its religious foundation that comes from Christian Europe. In the 17th — 18th centuries, the opening of schools and colleges was a religious enterprise. Furthermore, the educationalists of the young republic considered education a cornerstone of the new-born culture; therefore, colleges and later universities started playing a role of spiritual centres for the nation. According to some researchers, science became a new religion, whereas universities came to be a new church that had power to unite people on the basis of spiritual community and spiritual growth of a person. In the 17th century, students went to colleges to know the truth, whereas in the 19th century, due to scientifi c developments, the emergence of the theory of evolution, and technical revolutions, the unchangeable and eternal category of truth is being changed into truths-facts that can transform and should be proven through scientific experiments. Throughout this period, at American educational institutions students acquire skills of critical thinking and learn how to prove their viewpoints. At the next stage of the development of the national educational system, truths-facts were replaced with opinions. At present, American colleges and universities off er ‘fluff ’ courses reflecting utilitarian wants and interests of students who are seen as consumers of educational services; opinions become a major product of the educational activity. This leads to the deintellectualisation of science on the whole and to erosion of knowledge.
history of American higher education, philosophy of education, American educational traditions, educational (academic) values, truth and truths, knowledge, opinions
  1. Weber M. (2016) Izbrannoe: Protestantskaia etika i dukh kapitalizma [Selected works: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]. Мoscow; St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  2. Filosofskaia entsiklopedia [Encyclopaedia of philosophy], available at https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/2857/ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ (01.05.2019) (in Russian).
  3. Ben-David J. (1972) American higher education. Directions old and new. New York.
  4. Brubacher J. S. (1982) On the philosophy of higher education. San Francisco.
  5. Butler N. M. (1908) The American as he is. New York.
  6. Counts G. S. (1952) Education and American civilization. New York.
  7. Cubberley Ellwood P. (1920) The history of education: Educational practice and progress considered as a phase of the development and spread of Western civilization. Boston; New York.
  8. Delbanco A. (2014) College. What it was, is, and should be. Berlin; Boston, available at http://www.degruyter.com.lprx.bates.edu/view/product/465840 (07.05. 2019).
  9. Finn Chester E., Jr., Ravitch D., Roberts P. H. (eds) (1985) Challenges to the humanities. New York; London.
  10. General education in a free society. Report of the Harvard Committee. With an introduction by James Bryant Conant. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1945.
  11. Herbst J. (1982) From crisis to crisis. American college government. 1636–1819. Cambridge, MA, and London.
  12. Lippman W. (1966) “The university.” New Republic, 1966, vol. 154, pp. 17–20.
  13. Pusey N. M. (1963) The age of the scholar; observations on education in a troubled decade. Cambridge, MA.
  14. Reuben J. A. (1996) The making of the modern university. Intellectual transformation and the marginalization of morality. Chicago; London.
  15. Rosenstock-Huessy E. (1938) Out of revolution. Autobiography of Western Man. New York.
  16. Rudolph F. (1991) American college and university: A history, available at https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bates/detail.action?docID=3039001 (25.04.2019).
  17. Rushdoony R. J. (1963) The messianic character of American education. Studies in the history of the philosophy of education. Nutley, New Jersey.
  18. Smith M. (1949) And madly teach. A layman looks at public school education. Chicago.
  19. Thelin J. R. (2004) A history of American higher education. Baltimore; London.
  20. Tocqueville A. de (2010) Letters from America. Edited, translated, and with an introduction by Frederick Brown. New Haven and London.
  21. Touraine A. (1974) The academic system in American society. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  22. Vine Ph. (1976) “The social function of eighteen-century higher education”: History of Education Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 409-424. History of Education Society, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/367723. (07.07.2016).
  23. Zmirak J. (ed.) (2000) Choosing the right college: The whole truth about America's top schools, available at https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bates/detail.action?docID=3316191. (03.11.2019).
  24. Zoch P. A. (2004) Doomed to fail. The built-in defects of American education. Chicago.

Loginova Marina


Place of work: Bates College; 2 Andrews Road, Lewiston, Maine, USA, 04240;
Post: Visiting Lecturer, Department of German and Russian Studies;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4772-1748;
Email: loginova.marina@gmail.com.
Demakova Irina; Popova Irina

Humanities-related expertise as a method of scientific knowledge in pedagogy

Popova Irina, Demakova Irina (2021) "Humanities-related expertise as a method of scientific knowledge in pedagogy ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 37-48 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.37-48
The article is devoted to the topical problem of methodology in the field of scientific and pedagogical research, i.e. the analysis of the prerequisites for the design of humanities-related expertise as a method of scientifi c knowledge in pedagogy. The emphasis is on substantiating the role, purpose and instrumental support of humanities-related expertise in education. The three most signifi cant fundamental methods in pedagogy are hypothetically singled out and considered, which make it possible to determine the scientifi c foundations of the method of humanities-related examination and its instrumental part of application in pedagogical research. These include pedagogical observation, pedagogical refl ection, and pedagogical hermeneutics. The presented study refl ects the content of the experience and conclusions of Russian scientists who employed the method of humanities-related expertise in order to determine the risks of approbation and implementation of new technologies in human life. The special purpose of humanities-related expertise in providing an ethical dimension in the process of assessing risks associated with modern innovative projects is emphasised. The study raises the problem of the formation of the expert position of the teacher, focused on the application of the method of humanities-related expertise in the practice of pedagogical activity directly in the conditions of work with children. The article has a character of an analytical outline and forms an idea of the areas of scientifi c research in which the method of humanities-related expertise is presented as a subject of research. Based on the study, a signifi cant clarifi cation is made in the understanding of humanities-related expertise in education as a research method that is synergistic in nature and aimed at analysing the humanities-related potential of the process and the results obtained in the situation of introducing pedagogical innovations through the use of educational technologies, as well as in the context of the introduction of innovative pedagogical models and systems.
research activity, humanities-related expertise, Russian pedagogy, pedagogical research, methods of pedagogical research, method of humanities-related expertise, pedagogical observation, pedagogical refl ection, pedagogical hermeneutics
  1. Ashmarin I., Yudin B. (2012) “Osnovi gumanitarnoy expertisi” [Fundamentals of humanitiesrelated expertise]. Man, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 76–87 (in Russian).
  2. Belova S. (2012) “Gumanitarnaya expertisa kak forma professional'noy refl exsii pedagoga” [Humanities-related expertise as a form of professional refl ection of a teacher]. Bulletin of the Kalmyk University, 2012, vol. 1 (13), pp. 34–41 (in Russian).
  3. Bratchenko S. (1993) Vvedenie v gumanitarnuyu expertisu obrasovaniya (psychologicheskyi aspect) [Introduction to the humanities-related examination of education (psychological aspect)]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Bratchenko S. (2003) Vvedenie v gumanitarnuyu expertisu obrasovaniya: metod. posobie [Introduction to the humanities-related examination of education]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  5. Bryzgalina E., Alasania K., Sadovnichy V., Mironov V., Gavrilenko S., Varkhotov T., Shkomova E., Nabiulina E. (2016) “Social'no-gumaniytarnaya expertisa funkcionirovaniya nacional'nih depositariev biomaterialov” [Social and humanities-related examination of functioning of national depositories of biomaterials]. Questions of philosophy, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 18–21 (in Russian).
  6. Voronin A. (2014) “Konturi gumanitarnoy expertisi” [“Contours of humanities-related expertise”]. Man, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 81–92 (in Russian).
  7. Vygotsky L. (1999) Pedagogicheskaia psikhologiia. Glava XVIII. Osnovnye formy izucheniia lichnosti rebenka [Pedagogical psychology. Chaper 18: Main forms of studying personality of the child], available at http://a-mov.ru/books/vygotskij -pedagogicheskaja-psihologij a/116.html (10.06.2020) (in Russian).
  8. Demakova I. (2013) Yanusch Korchak: jivaya pedagogika izmenyayuschegosya mira [Janusz Korczak: Living pedagogy of a changing world]. Moscow (in Russian).
  9. Klimova S. (2017) “Gumanitarnaya expertisa i expertnoye soobschestvo: postanovka problemi” [Humanities-related expertise and expert community: problem statement]. Philosophical sciences, 2017, vol. 4, pp. 68–80. (in Russian).
  10. Kovrov V., Oganesyan N. “Teoreticheskiye podhodi k expertise processa vospitaniya v chkole v aspekte ego psichologicheskoy bezopasnosti” [Theoretical approaches to the examination of the process of education at school in the aspect of its psychological safety]. Portal of psychological publications PsyJournals.ru, available at: https://psyjournals.ru/cepp/issue/45358_full.shtml(12.06.2020) (in Russian).
  11. Skirbekk G. (1991) “Est' li u expertisi eticheskiye osnovi?” [Does examination have ethical foundations?]. Man, 1991, vol. 1, pp. 86–93 (in Russian).
  12. Yudin B. (2006) “Ot eticheskoy expertisi k expertise gumanitarnoy” [From ethical expertise to humanities-related expertise”] in Lukov V. (ed.) Gumanitarnoe znanie: tendentsii razvitiia v XXI veke. V chest' 70-letiia Igoria Mikhailovicha Il'inskogo [Humanities-related knowledge: development trends in the 21st century. In honour of the 70th birthday of Igor Mikhailovich Ilyinsky]. Moscow, pp. 214–237 (in Russian).
  13. Yasvin V. (2001) Obrazovatel'naya sreda: ot modelirovaniya k proektirovaniyu [Educational environment: from modelling to design]. Moscow (in Russian).

Demakova Irina


Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Moscow Pedagogical State University; 88 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-0861-2453;
Email: kpndp@yandex.ru.

*According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.


Popova Irina


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Federal Institute of Development of Education, RANEPA; 9-1 Cherniakhovskogo Str., Moscow, 125319, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0001-6523-4498;
Email: popova-in@ranepa.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

The article was supported by RFBR grant 20-013-00184.
Panteleeva Tatyana

Problems in teaching music at higher educational institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church and approaches to their solution (with theological academies and seminaries as examples)

Panteleeva Tatyana (2021) "Problems in teaching music at higher educational institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church and approaches to their solution (with theological academies and seminaries as examples) ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 49-62 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.49-62
Current decrease in the general musical culture is inevitably reflected in the level of musical skills of new students of higher spiritual educational institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church; it also creates diffi culties in music teaching. At the same time, possession of the required competencies in the area of music theory is an urgent need in professional activities of graduate students. Currently, the only discipline providing for music education of the future clergy at the seminaries and academies is Church Singing. This discipline, as compared to other disciplines of the curriculum, has its own specifi city that determines its class and independent work of students, inventory and logistics management, tools and methods in mastering the subject. In this article we undertake the analyses of the existing problems in the studying of liturgical singing; present factors that negatively aff ect the educational process; analyse various practices of teaching singing; consider issues of providing for necessary conditions in receiving a high-quality education. We propose a number of measures to improve the musical and vocal level of students of theological educational institutions. Among many possible ways of solving the majority of problems in education the following are of top priority: partitioning students into smaller groups according to the level of musical training; providing all students with an opportunity to practise in parallel to the course (contextual training); development of specifi c teaching techniques for autonomous training in singing and learning church singing, and development of effi cient school books and training aids; inclusion of a course on vocal training in the curriculum; increase in the number of hours for class and personal work; active usage of innovative technology and interactive tools. Introduction of distant learning technologies at the extramural training departments of the Orthodox higher educational organisations together with the development and approbation of authorised online courses, including those from the field of music education, should be considered as positive dynamics in education.
musical education of clergy, church singing, liturgical singing, specifics and problems of education, measures for increasing efficiency of musical education, Moscow Theological Academy, vocal training, distance learning technologies
  1. Aldoshina I., Pritts R. (2006) Muzykal'naja akustika: Uchebnik dlja vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij [Musical acoustics: A textbook for higher education]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  2. Denisov N., Filatov N. (eds) (2017). Rycar' regentskogo sluzhenij a otec Matfej (Mormyl'): Materialy. Vospominanija. Issledovanij a [Knight of regent’s ministry Revd. Matvei (Mormyl’): Materials. Memoirs. Studies]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  3. Glebov N. (2002) “Neskol'ko slov ob izuchenii cerkovnogo penij a v duhovnyh uchilishhah” [A few words about the study of church singing in theological schools], in Naumov A., Rahmanova M. (eds) Russkaja duhovnaja muzyka v dokumentah i materialah. T. III: Cerkovnoe penie poreformennoj Rossii v osmyslenii sovremennikov, 1861–1918 [Russian sacred music in documents and materials. Vol. 3 Church singing of post-reform Russia in the understanding of contemporaries, 1861–1918]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Kalinin S. (ed.) (1998) Pamjati Aleksandra Vasil'evicha Sveshnikova. Stat'i. Vospominanij a [In memory of Alexander Vasilievich Sveshnikov. Articles. Memoirs]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Kirill (Gundjaev), patriarh Moskovskij i vseja Rusi. (29 nojabrja — 2 dekabrja 2017) “Doklad na Arhierejskom Sobore Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi” [Report at the Bishops' Council of the Russian Orthodox Church], in Oficial'nyj sajt Moskovskogo Patriarhata RPC, available at http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/5072994.html (18.02.2020) (in Russian).
  6. Makarij (Veretennikov), arhim. (2007) Regentskaja shkola pri Moskovskoj duhovnoj akademii [Regents’ School at Moscow Theological Academy]. Sergiev Posad (in Russian).
  7. Morozov V. (2002) Iskusstvo rezonansnogo penija. Osnovy rezonansnoj teorii i tehniki [The art of resonant singing. Fundamentals of resonance theory and technology]. Moscow (in Russian).
  8. Morozov V. “Interv'ju s Dmitriem Hvorostovskim o tehnike penij a” [Interview with Dmitry Hvorostovsky on the technique of singing], in Mir iskusstva rezonansnogo penija [The world of resonant singing], available at http://vmorozov.ru/content/view/70/1/ (08.03.2020).
  9. Odoevskij V. F. (2002) “Mnenie kn. Odoevskogo po voprosam, vozbuzhdennym ministrom narodnogo prosveshhenij a po delu o cerkovnom penii” [“Opinion of Prince Odoevsky on issues raised by the Minister of Education as to church singing”], in Naumov A., Rahmanova M. (eds) Russkaja duhovnaja muzyka v dokumentah i materialah. T. III: Cerkovnoe penie poreformennoj Rossii v osmyslenii sovremennikov, 1861–1918 [Russian sacred music in documents and materials. Vol. 3. Church singing of post-reform Russia in the understanding of contemporaries, 1861–1918]. Moscow (in Russian).
  10. Panteleeva T. (2015) “Blizhe, chem dumaesh'… (O poseshhenii duhovnyh shkol Armjanskoj Apostol'skoj Cerkvi)” [Closer than you think ... (About visiting the theological schools of the Armenian Apostolic Church)]. Vstrecha: Studencheskij pravoslavnyj zhurnal Moskovskoj duhovnoj akademii. 1 (35), 32–35 (in Russian).
  11. Panteleeva T. (2017) “Opyt repeticionnoj raboty s neprofessional'nym horovym kollektivom: Na primere hora Troice-Sergievoj lavry pod upravleniem arhimandrita Matfeja (Mormylja)” [Rehearsal experience with an unprofessional choir group: On the example of the choir of Trinity-Sergius Lavra under the direction of Archimandrite Matvei (Mormyl’)]. Cerkov' i vremja: Nauchno-bogoslovskij i cerkovno-obshhestvennyj zhurnal, vol. 1 (78), pp. 249–274. Moscow (in Russian).
  12. Samarin P. “Zhelatel'no li i vozmozhno li dal'nejshee sushhestvovanie Obshhestva ljubitelej cerkovnogo penija?” [Is the Society of Church Singing Lovers desirable and possible?], in Naumov A., Rahmanova M. (eds) Russkaja duhovnaja muzyka v dokumentah i materialah. T. III: Cerkovnoe penie poreformennoj Rossii v osmyslenii sovremennikov, 1861–1918 [Russian sacred music in documents and materials. Vol. 3. Church singing of post-reform Russia in the understanding of contemporaries, 1861–1918]. Moscow (in Russian).
  13. Shaljapin F. (1956) Stranicy iz moej zhizni [Pages from my life]. Kiev (in Russian).
  14. Stulova G. (2016) Podgotovka regentov v Rossii: proshloe i sovremennost': Uchebnoe posobie [Training regents in Russia: Past and present: Study guide]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  15. Trofimchuk M. (2005) Akademija u Troicy. Vospominanij a o Moskovskih duhovnyh shkolah [Academy at the Trinity. Memories about Moscow theological schools]. Sergiev Posad (in Russian).

Panteleeva Tatyana


Place of work: Moscow Theological Academy; Sergiev Posad, 141300, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0001-8382-9620;
Email: pantavum@yandex.ru.
Rasskazova Irina; Ozhogova Elena

Prospective teachers’ ideas about information technology in education

Rasskazova Irina, Ozhogova Elena (2021) "Prospective teachers’ ideas about information technology in education ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 63-77 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.63-77
The article presents the results of an empirical study of the features of various components of future educators' ideas about digital education: cognitive, motivational, and activity. The highest average values for all courses were obtained by the cognitive component (the importance of the IT for modern education and the prospects for their introduction into education in the future) and the motivational component (children's interest in the IT and their own motivation to use them in their professional activities). The lowest average values were obtained for the cognitive component (the introduction of IT in modern education and the level of own knowledge about IT) and the activity (the formation of the necessary skills for using the IT in their future professional activities). The presence of a direct relationship between the various components of the future educators' ideas about digital education has been revealed. The most signifi cant is the relationship between assessing the level of students' knowledge about central heating and the level of their motivation to master and implement these technologies in their professional activities. There is a contradiction between students' awareness of the importance and prospects of digital education in the present and future (as a whole for the education system, for their own professional activities, for children) and their insuffi cient knowledge and skills in this area. This is an obstacle to the use of digital technology by students in their educational activities in the present and in future pedagogical activities.
knowledge, motivation, activity, performance, digital education, digital technology, digital competence
  1. Vaindorf-Sysoeva M. E., Subocheva M. L. (2018) “«Tsifrovoe obrazovanie» kak sistemoobrazuiushchaia kategoriia: podkhody k opredeleniiu” [“Digital education” as a backbone category: approaches to defi nition]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriia: Pedagogika, 2018, vol. 3, pp. 25–36 (in Russian).
  2. Verbitskii A. A. (2019) “Tsifrovoe obuchenie: problemy, riski i perspektivy” [Digital learning: problems, risks and prospects]. Elektronnyi nauchno-publitsisticheskii zhurnal “Homo Cyberus”, 2019, vol. 1 (6), available at: http://journal.homocyberus.ru/Verbitskiy_AA_1_2019 (20.04.2020) (in Russian).
  3. Emel'ianova T. P. (2006) Konstruirovanie sotsial'nykh predstavlenii v usloviiakh transformatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva [The construction of social representations in the conditions of transformation of the Russian society]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Kamenev S. V. (2017) “Obrazovanie v tsifrovom mire: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy” [Education in the digital world: opportunities and prospects]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017, vol. 425, pp. 85–90 (in Russian).
  5. Podymova L. S. (2012) Psikhologo-pedagogicheskaia innovatika: lichnostnyi aspect [Psychological and pedagogical innovation: personal aspect]. Moscow (in Russian).
  6. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti pokoleniia Z [Psychological features of Generation Z], available at http://mansa-uroki.blogspot.com/2016/04/z_12.html (16.04.2020) (in Russian).
  7. Safuanov R. M., Lekhmus M. Iu., Kolganov E. A. (2019) “Tsifrovizatsiia sistemy obrazovaniia” [Digitalisation of the education system]. Vestnik UGNTU. Nauka, obrazovanie, ekonomika. Seriia ekonomika, 2019, vol. 2 (28) (16.04.2020) (in Russian).
  8. Slastenin V. A. (2006) “Sub̓ektno-deiatel̓nostnyi podkhod v obshchem i professional̓nom obrazovanii” [The subject-activity approach in general and professional education]. Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal, 2006, vol. 5, pp. 17–30 (22.12.2020) (in Russian).
  9. Travkin I. Iu. O tsifrovoi obrazovatel'noi srede i drugie soputstvuiushchie mysli [On the digital environment in education and other accompanying thoughts], available at http://funofteaching.tumblr.com/post/160011857841/ (18.04.2020).
  10. Khazova S. A. (2010) Kompetentnost' konkurentosposobnogo spetsialista po fi zicheskoi kul'ture i sportu [Competence of an employable specialist in physical education and sports]. Moscow (in Russian).
  11. “Tsifrovaia sreda na kalendare [Elektronnyi resurs]” [The digital environment on the calenda]. Rossiiskaia gazeta, available at https://rg.ru/2016/08/24/medvedev-nazval-prioritety-v-sfereobrazovaniia.html (15.04.2020).
  12. Norton P. (1983) “Computer Potential and Computer Educators: a Proactive View of Computer Education”. Educаtional Technology, 1983, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 25–28.
  13. Olofsson A. D., Fransson G., Lindberg J. O. A study of the use of digital technology and its conditions with a view to understanding what ‘adequate digital competence’ may mean in a national policy initiative, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1651694 (01.04.2020).

Rasskazova Irina


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Omsk State Pedagogical University; 14 Naberezhnaya im. Tukhachevskogo, Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation;
Post: associate professor;
ORCID: 0000-0003-1343-8741;
Email: irnikras@rambler.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.


Ozhogova Elena


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Omsk State Pedagogical University; 14 Naberezhnaya im. Tukhachevskogo, Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-5176-5965;
Email: oeg80@yandex.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Solovtsova Irina; Avramov Vladimir, priest; Patrin Viacheslav, priest

The principles of educational communication of an orthodox teacher and students at a secular university

Solovtsova Irina, Patrin Viacheslav, Avramov Vladimir (2021) "The principles of educational communication of an orthodox teacher and students at a secular university ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 78-96 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.78-96
The article presents the system of principles of educational communication based on the comparative analysis of the educational principles of Orthodox and secular pedagogy and proceeds from the humanities-based pedagogical paradigm of the ontological essence of education and from the value-semantic nature of pedagogical interaction. The principles regulate the activity of an Orthodox teacher at a secular university and ensure the transition from theoretical pedagogical knowledge to normative. The principles meet the following requirements: 1) they refl ect the “territory of agreement” between Orthodox and secular pedagogy, 2) they comply with the characteristics of students as a socio-demographic group and 3) they meet the secular nature of the educational process at the university. The principles are formulated in three groups: 1) basic principles (culture-building, systematic, adaptive, related to life and future professional activities of students, co-transformation of the teacher and students); 2) the principles that determine the logic of pedagogical activity (“cultural elevator”, the preliminary destruction of stereotypes); 3) the principles that determine the forms of educational interaction (dialogism, imagery, appeal to personal experience, versatility).
Orthodox Christianity, traditional values, education, educational communication, principle of education, student, humanities-based pedagogical paradigm, dialogue
  1. Borytko N. M., Solovtsova I. A., Baybakov A. M. (2007) Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Danilyuk A. Ya., Kondakov A. M., Tishkov V. A. (2009) Kontseptsiya duhovno-nravstvennogo razvitiya i vospitaniya lichnosti grazhdanina Rossii [The theory of spiritual and moral development of the Russian citizen]. Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Divnogortseva S. Yu. (2004) Teoreticheskaya pedagogika [Theoretical pedagogy]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Kraevskiy V. V., Berezhnova E. V. (2008) Metodologiya pedagogiki. Noviy etap [Methodology of pedagogy. The new stage]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Luzina L. M. (2008) Chelovek v problemnom pole vospitaniya [The person in the problematic field of education]. Pskov (in Russian).
  6. Maslov N. V. (2006) Osnovy russkoy pedagogiki [Fundamentals of Russian pedagogy]. Moscow (in Russian).
  7. Muhina V. S. (2004) Vozrastnaya psihologiya: fenomenologiya razvitiya, detstvo, otrochestvo [Agerelated psychology: Phemenology of its development, childhood, adolescence]. Moscow (in Russian).
  8. Plugar O. A. (2015) “Molodezh kak sotsialnaya gruppa: opredelenie, socialno-demodrafi cheskiye harakteristiki i perspektivniye napravleniya issledovaniya” [Youth as a social group: Sociodemographic characteristics and promising areas of reseach]. Sovremenniye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 11–17 (in Russian).
  9. Schurkova N. E. Pedagogika. Vospitatelnaya deyatelnost pedagoga [Pedagogy. Educational Activity of Teacher]. Moscow (in Russian).
  10. Skliarova T. V. (2019) Vozrastnaya psihologiya. Ot rozhdeniya do starosti [Age-related psychology: From the birth to old age]. Moscow (in Russian).
  11. Slobodchikov V. I., Isaev E. I. (2014) Vvedeniye v psihologiyu sub’ektivnosti [Introduction to psychology of subjectivity]. Moscow (in Russian).
  12. Solovtsova I. A., Sirotina E. A. (2019) “Kulturologicheskiy podhod k prepodavaniyu osnov pravoslavnoy kultury v obcsheobrazovatelnoy shkole” [Culturological approach to teaching the basics of Orthodox Christian culture at a secondary school”]. Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psihologiya, 2019, vol. 52, pp. 9–21 (in Russian).
  13. Strayegiya razvitiya vospitaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2015 goda [Strategy of development of moral education in the Russian Federation up to 2015], available at: http://council.gov.ru/media/fi les/41d536d68ee9fec15756.pdf (12.04.2020) (in Russian).
  14. Studencheskaia molodezh kak osobaya sotsialno-demografi cheskaya kategoriya [Students as a specific social and demographic category], available at: https://scientificarticle.ru/images/PDF/2017/21/studencheskaya-molodezh.pdf (19.05.2020).

Solovtsova Irina


Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Volgograd State Social-Pedagogical University; 27 Lenina Prospect, Volgograd, 400066, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-6191-5306;
Email: irina_solovcova@mail.ru.

*According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.


Avramov Vladimir, priest


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: Tsaritsyn Orthodox University of St. Sergius of Radonezh; 26 Chapaeva Str., Volgograd, 400012, Russian Federation;
Post: senior lecturer;
ORCID: 0000-0001-7889-3476;
Email: vlademiras@yandex.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.


Patrin Viacheslav, priest


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: St. Sergiy’s of Radonezh Tsaritsyn Orthodox University; 26 Chapaeva Str., Volgograd, 400012, Russian Federation;
Post: Dean of the Faculty of Theology;
ORCID: 0000-0001-6376-5076;
Email: patrin.viacheslav@gmail.com.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Romashina Ekaterina

The city is a not a village: a journey through the pages of russian ABC-books of 1900–1925

Romashina Ekaterina (2021) "The city is a not a village: a journey through the pages of russian ABC-books of 1900–1925 ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 97-118 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.97-118
The article presents the results of an analysis of Russian ABC-books, primers, readers, published in 1900–1925. Presentations of the space surrounding the child, which is arranged for him by adults in didactic literature are examined. At the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, the world was changing rapidly. The growth of cities, an increase in the number of their residents, the formation of a special urban discourse — all these processes aff ected the countries of Europe, the USA, and Russia. This process is refl ected in the pages of books for initial literacy. More often than others, the following characteristics of the city were represented in them: the number of houses and fl oors in them, long and wide paved streets, city lighting, new vehicles (car, tram, bicycle). Less commonly: a large number of people, their purely urban occupations and professions; trade, shopping on the market; work in a factory or plant. Mentioning the city as a centre of government, politics and ideology, a place of education and culture is very rare. The latter signs were characteristic only of the description of the capital cities, i.e. Moscow and St. Petersburg. These characteristics of the city were implemented by the authors both in the texts and in the illustrative materials of the manuals. Visual and textual narratives did not coincide, but complemented and explained each other. The images helped to compare the city with the village, identify diff erences, see the general and the special. A child could get a holistic view of the city as a complex social and cultural phenomenon.
textbook, ABC-book, primer, text, illustration, city, educational space, urban discourse
  1. (1923) Zelenyi shum. Khrestomatiia dlia trudovoi shkoly: pervyi god [Green noise. Textbook for labour school: the first year]. Moscow; Petrograd (in Russian).
  2. (1925) Novaia derevnia. Kniga dlia chteniia v 1 gr. sel'skoi shkoly [New village. A book for reading in the 1st group of a rural school]. Moscow; Leningrad (in Russian).
  3. (1993) European Urban History. London.
  4. (2001) Gorod v protsessakh istoricheskikh perekhodov: Teoreticheskie aspekty i sotsiokul'turnye kharakteristiki [The city in the processes of historical transitions: Theoretical aspects and socio-cultural characteristics]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Afanas'ev P. O. (1924) Chitai, pishi, schitai [Read, write, count]. Moscow; Leningrad (in Russian).
  6. Bezrogov V. (2020) “City images as presented in elementary schoolbooks in the middle of the 19th century”. Gumanitarnye vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 193–213.
  7. Bezrogov V. G., Tendriakova M. V. (2019) Ot dvenadtsati v “Detskom mire” K. D. Ushinskogo k tridtsati piati v “Nashem druge” N. A. Korfa: razgovor russkogo barona s nemetskimi uchiteliami [From twelve in K. D. Ushinsky's “Children's world” to thirty-fi ve in N. A. Korf's “Our friend”: a conversation between a Russian Baron and German teachers]. Psikhologopedagogicheskii poisk, 2019, vol. 3 (51), pp. 84–107 (in Russian).
  8. Bogoraz-Tan V. G. (1927) Bukvar' dlia severnykh narodnostei [A primer for Northern peoples]. Moscow (in Russian).
  9. Chernichkina A. A. (2016) “Naturfi losofi ia nemetskogo romantizma: kul'tura i estestvoznanie” [Natural philosophy of German romanticism: culture and natural science]. Metafizika, 2016, vol. 2 (20), pp. 153–166 (in Russian).
  10. Elson Ruth Miller (1966). Guardians Tradition. American Schoolbooks of the Nineteenth Century. Lincoln.
  11. Ford Derek (2017). Education and the Prodacion of Space. Political Pedagogy, Geography, and Urban Revolution. New York; London.
  12. Lynch K. (1960) The Image of the City. Harvard.
  13. Million Angela, Heinrich Anna Juliane, Coelen Thomas (eds) (2017). Education, Space and Urban Planning. Education as a Component of the City. Berlin.
  14. Mironositskii P. P. (1922) Slovechko. Knizhka dlia obucheniia gramote s metodicheskimi ukazaniiami dlia uchitelia [A tiny word. A book for teaching literacy with methodical instructions for the teacher]. Irkutsk (in Russian).
  15. Reinhard J. (1994) “Die Verbreitung von Schulen in Franken und in der Kuroberpfalz zwischen 1250 und 1520 unter historisch-geographischer Fragestellung” in Dickerhof Harald (hrsg). Bildungs- und schulgeschichtliche Studien zu Spätmittelalter, Reformation und konfessionellem Zeitalter. Wiesbaden, pp. 117–128.
  16. Reinhard J. (2005) “Spätmittelalterliche Schullandschaften in Franken und in Bayern 1250–1520: ein Vergleich anhand ausgewählter Perspektiven und Beispiele” in: Flachenecker Helmut (hrsg.). Schullandschaften in Altbayern, Franken und Schwaben: Untersuchungen zur Ausbreitung und Typologie des Bildungswesens in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. München, pp. 157–182.
  17. Tendriakova M. V., Bezrogov V. G. (2018) “‘Gab ihnen der liebe Gott…’, ili Bog i priroda v nemetskikh i russkikh uchebnikakh XVIII — nachala XIX v.” [“'Gab ihnen der liebe Gott...', or God and nature in German and Russian textbooks of the XVIII — early XIX centuries”]. Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2018, vol. 48, pp. 19–48 (in Russian).
  18. Tendriakova M. V., Bezrogov V. G. (2019) “Gorod i Korf: figura urbis novae v uchebnykh knigakh dlia zemskoi shkoly” [“Gorod and Korf: figura urbis romae in study books for the Zemstvo school”]. Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2019, vol. 55, pp. 110–127 (in Russian).
  19. Tendriakova M. V., Bezrogov V. G. (2019) Korf i Gorod: fi gura Urbis capitis v uchebnoi literature dlia zemskoi shkoly [Korf and the City: Figura urbis capitis in elementary textbooks for rural school of the 2nd half of the 19th century]. Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2019, vol. 54, pp. 96–117 (in Russian).
  20. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2005 Revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, in Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, available at https://www.webcitation.org/616JzmmHE (25.12.2020).

Romashina Ekaterina


Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Education;
Place of work: Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University; 125 Pr. Lenina, Tula, 300026, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0003-0655-2183;
Email: katerinro@yandex.ru.

*According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.

The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Federal Property Fund in the framework of scientific project No. 20-013-00246.

PSYCHOLOGY

Andreeva Mariya

Some features of the idea about caring of students of psychological and pedagogical direction

Andreeva Mariya (2021) "Some features of the idea about caring of students of psychological and pedagogical direction ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 121-133 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.121-133
The article presents the results of studying the features of representations of care in students of psychological and pedagogical direction and gives their psychological interpretation. The data obtained in the course of the research allow us to identify some areas for the development of adequate ideas about care in the preparation of bachelors in the field of psychology and pedagogy at the university. This seems necessary, since their future professional activities are directly related to providing care for their wards. Features of students ideas about care were studied by comparing them with the ideas about this phenomenon in experienced teachers of preschool educational institutions, as well as scientifi c understanding of it. Based on the analysis of scientifi c literature, we assumed: 1) associations related to the emotional component of care in connection with the intensive development of emotional potential in youth, a way of life that does not involve responsibility for other people will prevail in the ideas about the care of students in the fi eld of psychological and pedagogical education; 2) teachers ideas about care will refl ect its connection with activities, work, and are more saturated with characteristics related to the behavioral component of care, since, due to their richer life and professional experience of its implementation, care for them appears as a contribution to another, requiring the investment of their own forces. The main method of research was a group associative experiment, the results of which confi rmed our hypothesis. It was concluded that care is deeply woven into the life and work of educators, future educators and is associated with the phenomena of goodness, love, and warmth that are important for every person. Scientifi c ideas can enrich the ordinary, revealing the connection of care with meaning, with self-fulfi llment, showing not only its signifi cance for human life, but also for the World in general. Students of psychological and pedagogical direction in the course of training at the University should be equipped with specifi c tools for caring for wards, expanding its behavioral component, and show that care is, fi rst of all, work that is important to perform even when it does not bring pleasure.
care, care in pedagogical activity, ideas about care, development of ideas about care, features of students ideas, implicit picture of the world, associative experiment
  1. Amonashvili Sh. A. (2017) Bez serdtsa chto poimem? [Without a heart, what will we understand?]. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Andreeva M. V., Baranov A. A. (2018) Psikhologiia zaboty cheloveka o cheloveke: fenomenologiia, ontogenez, empirika [Psychology of a person’s concern for a person: phenomenology, ontogenesis, empiricism]. Izhevsk (in Russian).
  3. Bystrova V. V. (2014) “Vospitatel̓naia sistema organizatsii pedagogicheskoi zaboty o podrostkakh, nakhodiashchikhsia v situatsii sotsial̓nogo neravenstva” [“The educational system of organizing pedagogical care for adolescents in situations of social inequality”]. Chelovek i obrazovanie, 2014, vol. 2 (39), pp. 140–144 (in Russian).
  4. Demina I. A. (2000) “Psikhologicheskie osobennosti planirovaniia budushchego v vozraste rannei iunosti” [“Psychological features of future planning in early adolescence”]. Izvestiia altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
  5. Fromm E. Iskusstvo liubit' (2020) [The art of loving]. Moscow: AST (Russian translation).
  6. Kon I. S. (1989) Psikhologiia rannei iunosti [Psychology of early youth]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie (in Russian).
  7. May R. Liubov' i volia (1997) [Love and will]. Moscow: Refl-buk, Vakler (Russian translation).
  8. Oleinikova A. V. (2011) “Aktualizatsiia problemy formirovaniia tsennostno-smyslovykh orientatsii v iunosheskom vozraste” [“Actualization of the problem of formation of value-semantic orientations in youth”]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo institutа, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 135–139 (in Russian).
  9. Ovcharova R. V. (2003) Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie roditel'stva [Psychological support for parenthood]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Instituta Psikhoterapii (in Russian).
  10. Petrenko V. F. (2005) Osnovy psikhosemantiki [Basics of psychosemantics]. St. Petersburg: Piter (in Russian).
  11. Platonova S. M., Dementei N. V. “Pedagogika obshchei zaboty kak prodolzhenie traditsii russkoi pedagogiki” [“Pedagogy of General care as a continuation of the traditions of Russian pedagogy”]. Sotsial'naia pedagogika, vol. 1–2, pp. 130–133 (in Russian).
  12. Popov L. M., Golubeva O. Iu., Ustin P. N. (2008) Dobro i zlo v eticheskoi psikhologii lichnosti [Good and evil in the ethical psychology of personality]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Institut psikhologii RAN (in Russian).
  13. Serkin V. P. (2008) Metody psikhologii sub»ektivnoi semantiki i psikhosemantiki [Methods of psychology subjective semantics and psychosemantics]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Pсhela (in Russian).
  14. Slobodchikov V.I., Isaev E.I. (1995) Osnovy psikhologicheskoi antropologii. Psikhologiia cheloveka: Vvedenie v psikhologiiu sub»ektivnosti [Fundamentals of psychological anthropology. Human psychology: Introduction to the psychology of subjectivity]. Moscow: Shkola-Press (in Russian).
  15. Tahka V. Psikhika i ee lechenie [Mind & Its Treatment: A Psychoanalytic Approach], available at: https://bookscafe.net/read/tehke_veykko-psihika_i_ee_lechenie_psihoanaliticheskiy_podhod-75057.html#p148 (08.12.2020).
  16. Volovikova M. I., Mustafi na L. Sh. (2017) “Issledovanie sotsial'nykh predstavlenii o sovesti uchashcheisia molodezhi» [«Research of social ideas about the conscience of students»]. Mir obrazovaniia — obrazovanie v mire, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 141–149 (in Russian).
  17. Winnicott D.W. (2005) Teoriia roditel'sko-mladencheskikh otnoshenii [The theory of the parentinfant relationship]. Zhurnal prakticheskoi psikhologii i psikhoanaliza, 2005, vol. 2, pp. 4–21 (in Russian).
  18. Yalom I. (2015) Ekzistentsial'naia psikhoterapiia [Existential psychotherapy]. Moscow: Кlass (Russian translation).

Andreeva Mariya


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Place of work: Udmurt State University; 1 Udmurtskaya Str., Izhevsk, 426 034, Russian Federation;
Post: associate professor in the Institute of psychology, pedagogy and social technologies;
ORCID: 0000-0003-1995-3074;
Email: mariia_andreeva@mail.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Nine's gratitude to Devyatykh Svetlana Viktorovna for her help in collecting empirical data.
Borisova Irina

Motivating students with pedagogy as a major subject

Borisova Irina (2021) "Motivating students with pedagogy as a major subject ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 134-148 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV202160.134-148
The article discusses the results of a study of the motivation of students of the 1st — 4th years receiving pedagogical education in the subject Russian Language and Literature at Bryansk State University. 105 people were examined using a set of techniques aimed at studying the educational and professional motivation of students (“Educational motivation of students” by A. A. Rean and V. A. Yakunin modifi ed by N. Ts. Badmaeva, “Motives for choosing a profession” R.V. Ovcharova, “Motivation for studying at a university” by T. I. Ilyina). To determine the signifi cance of diff erences in the motivation of diff erent groups of students, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used. To establish the relationship between students̓ motives, the Pearson correlation criterion from the SPSS 17 package was used. The motivation of diff erent groups of students was studied and compared, depending on their desire to work at school and depending on the course of study. It was found that students who want to work at school have more expressed professional, educational, professional and social motives compared to other groups of students. Other diff erences were revealed that show students who are not going to work at school are less motivated than other groups of students. It is shown that by the 3rd course, the motivation decreases, and in the 4th year it rises again. Various relationships between students’ motives have been established.
communicative motives, avoidance motives, motives of prestige, professional motives, motives of creative self-realisation, educational and cognitive motives, social motives, internal individually important motives, internal socially important motives, external positive motives, external negative motives
  1. Atkinson J., Birch D. (1978) Introduction to motivation. New York.
  2. Bakshaeva N., Verbitskii A. (2006) Psikhologiia motivatsii studentov [Psychology of student motivation]. Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Borisova I. (2014) “Motivatsiya uchebnoi deyatel'nosti podrostkov s raznoi uspevaemost'yu” [Motivation of the educational activity of adolescents with diff erent academic achievements] in Y. Zinchenko, O. Karabanova, A. Podolsky, G. Glotova (eds) Deyatel'nostnaya teoriya ucheniya: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii 6–8 fevralia 2014 [Activity theory of teaching: current state and prospects. Proceedings of the International scientifi c conference held on 6–8 February 2014]. Moscow, pp. 156–158 (in Russian).
  4. Borisova I. V. Zhupieva E. I., Rabovalyuk L. N., Roslyakova N. I., Tsygankova T. N. (2016) N. V. Sidyacheva (eds) Psikhologiya razvitiya: v fokuse vnimaniya rebenok XXI veka. Monografiya. [Developmental psychology: the child of the XXI century as the focus of attention]. Novosibirsk (in Russian).
  5. Bozhovich L. I. (1972) “Problema razvitiya motivatsionnoi sfery rebenka” [“The problem of development of the child's motivational sphere”] in L. I. Bozhovich, L. V. Blagonadezhin (eds) Izuchenie motivatsii povedeniya detei i podrostkov [Studying the motivation of behaviour of children and adolescents]. Moscow, pp. 7–44 (in Russian).
  6. Il'in E. P. (2000) Motivatsiya i motivy [Motivation and motives]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  7. Karpova E. V., Makarycheva I. N. (2016) “Vzaimosvyaz' refl eksivnosti i motivatsii v determinatsii uchebnoi deyatel'nosti” [Interrelation of reflectivity and motivation in the determination of educational activity”]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 268–273 (in Russian).
  8. Khekkhauzen Kh. (2001) Psikhologiya motivatsii dostizheniya [Psychology of achievement motivation]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  9. Leont'ev A. N. (2003) Potrebnosti, motivy i soznanie [Needs, motives and consciousness]. Moscow (in Russian).
  10. Makkeland D. (2007) Motivatsiya cheloveka [Human motivation]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  11. Markova A. K., Matis T. A., Orlov A. B. (1990) Formirovanie motivatsii ucheniya [Formation of the motivation of learning]. Moscow (in Russian).
  12. Maslou A. (2008) Motivatsiya i lichnost' [Motivation and personality]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  13. Slepko Y. N. (2016) “Formirovanie motivov uchebnoi deyatel'nosti v period obucheniya v VUZe” [“Formation of the motives of educational activity during the period of study at the university”]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 188–193 (in Russian).
  14. Vilyunas V. K. (1990) Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy motivatsii cheloveka [Psychological mechanisms of human motivation]. Moscow (in Russian).
  15. Yakunin V. A. (1994) Psikhologiya uchebnoi deyatel'nosti studentov [Psychology of students’ learning activities]. Moscow (in Russian).
  16. Zeer E. F. (2003) Psikhologiya professional'nogo obrazovaniya: Uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of vocational education: Textbook]. Moscow; Voronezh (in Russian).
  17. Zubarev V. F., Bondarev G. A. (2016) “Sovremennoe predstavlenie o razlichnykh aspektakh uchebnoi motivatsii studentov” [A modern understanding of various aspects of students’ educational motivation]. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii, 2016, vol. 4–1, pp. 118–123 (in Russian).

Borisova Irina


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Place of work: Briansk State University; 14 Bezhitskaya Str., Bryansk, 241036, Russian Federation;
Post: associate professor in the department of general and professional psychology;
ORCID: 0000-0001-8754-3099;
Email: Irmarbor1@yandex.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

BOOK REVIEWS

Liubart Margarita

Rev. of Безрогов В. Г., Артемова Ю. А., Никулина Е. Н., Тендрякова М. В. «“Детский мир” Ушинского и западноевропейская учебная литература: диалог дидактических культур». СПб.: «Образовательные проекты», 2020. 328 с.

Liubart Margarita (2021) Rev. of Bezrogov V. G., Artemova Yu. A., Nikulina E. N., Tendriakova M. V. «“Detskiy mir” Ushinskogo i zapadnoevropeyskaia uchebnaia literatura: dialog didakticheskih kulytur». SPb.: «Obrazovatelynie proekti», 2020. 328 s., Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2021, Iss. 60, pp. 151-154 (in Russian).

PDF

Liubart Margarita


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 32 Leninskiy prospekt, Moscow, 119334, Russian Federation;
Post: senior researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3781-4422;
Email: margarita_lubart@mail.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.