/

Kolykhalova Olga

Effects of innovative teaching techniques on students’ educational motivation in learning a foreign language (with students of non-linguistic specialisations as an example)


Kolykhalova Olga (2018) "Effects of innovative teaching techniques on students’ educational motivation in learning a foreign language (with students of non-linguistic specialisations as an example) ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia IV : Pedagogika. Psihologiia, 2018, vol. 51, pp. 11-25 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIV201851.11-25

Abstract

This paper carries out a comparative analysis of the infl uence of innovative teaching techniques on providing educational motivation for students of non-linguistic specialisations to study a foreign language. Teaching of foreign languages today is determined by the two main approaches, namely the development of communication skills and the use of online instruments. In fact, there takes place a rethink of the goals and objectives of education and, consequently, the roles of the professor and student. A student is no longer a passive recipient of a certain truth, but a full participant in the process of cognition. As a result of the development of online education, the technology of «blended learning» has emerged. It is based on a combination of classroom work with work in training Internet programmes, which allows every student to create flexible individual trajectories. The future of a foreign language at a university may also involve creating an individualised educational «hyperspace» in which instruction in the foreign language itself will be integrated into professional training, the so-called CLIL technology. We have chosen to compare the two technologies described above, i.e. the blended learning technology and CLIL technology, and have put forward a hypothesis that both technologies contribute to increasing students’ educational motivation and enhance various types of educational motives. The methods employed in the study include the one designed by A. Rean and V. Yakunin “Diagnostics of students' educational motivation”, academic motivation questionnaire for university students (by T. Ilyina). The article claims that the application of blended learning technology reinforces communicative motives as well as motives for creative self-realisation, while CLIL technology amplifi es social motives and reduces motives of avoidance, which indicates a greater activity and engagement of students in learning. At the same time, both innovative techniques of teaching a foreign language contribute to the increase in positive educational motivation of students.

Keywords

education, specialised training, foreign language teaching, blended learning, CLIL, teaching techniques, communication skills, online technologies, fl exible individual trajectories, motivation of students

References

  1. Darn S. (2015) Content and Language Integrated Learning, available at: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/content-language-integrated-learning (11.11.2018).
  2. Ellis R. (2003) Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford.
  3. Galkina V. (2014) “O kompetentsiiakh i kompetentnostnom podkhode v protsesse obucheniia inostrannym iazykam v vuze” [“On Competences and Competence Approach in the Process of Teaching Foreign Languages in Higher Education”]. Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal «Kontsept». 2014, № S 1, pp. 6–10; available at http://e-koncept.ru/2014/14502.htm (10.11.2018) (in Russian).
  4. Gal'skova N. (2005) Teoriia obucheniia inostrannym iazykam [Theory of Teaching Foreign Languages]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Kelly K. (2014) Ingredients for successful CLIL. British Council, available at https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/keith-kelly-ingredients-successful-clil-0 (11.11.2018).
  6. Kobzeva N. (2011) “Kompetentnostnyi podkhod kak osnova v obuchenii inostrannomu iazyku v tekhnicheskom vuze” [“Competence Approach as a Basis for Teaching a Foreign Language at an Institution of Higher Techological Education”]. Molodoi uchenyi. 2011, № 2, vol. 2, pp. 89–92 (in Russian).
  7. Kolesnikova A. (2013) “O kompetentnostnom podkhode k prepodavaniiu inostrannykh iazykov v neiazykovom vuze” [“On Competence Appraoch in Teaching Foreign Languages at a Non-Linguistic University”]. Nauchnyi poisk. 2013. № 2.4, pp. 28–30 (in Russian).
  8. Kolykhalova O. (2016) “Rol' iazykovoi kommunikatsii v dialoge kul'tur” [“The Role of Linguistic Communication in Dialogue of Cultures”]. Inostrannye iazyki v shkole. 2016, № 12, pp. 39–45 (in Russian).
  9. Kolykhalova O., Shvarts E. (2016) “Traditsionnye i novye podkhody v integrirovannom obuchenii inostrannomu iazyku v vuze” [“Traditional and Innovative Approaches in Integrated Teaching of Foreign Languages at University”], in I. Lebedeva (ed.) «Uchitel', uchenik, uchebnik»: materialy VIII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: sbornik statei [“Teacher, Student, Textbook”: Proceedings of 8th International Conference], vol. 2. Moscow, pp. 443–452 (in Russian).
  10. Kondrat'eva I., Madiakina N., Valeev A. (2015) “Povyshenie eff ektivnosti protsessa obucheniia inostrannomu iazyku v neiazykovom vuze” [“Increase in Eff ectiveness of the Process of Teaching a Foreign Language at a Non-Linguistic University”]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia. 2015, № 6, available at http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23182 (11.11.2018) (in Russian).
  11. Kovylina E. (2010) “Prepodavanie inostrannogo iazyka v ramkakh kul'turologicheskogo podkhoda” [“Teaching a Foreign Language in the Framework of Culture Studies”]. Molodoi uchenyi. 2010, № 8, vol. 2, pp. 160–164; available at https://moluch.ru/archive/19/1916/ (11.11.2018) (in Russian).
  12. Khudaiberganova E., Gulimetova B. (2016) “Sovremennye metody i tekhnologii prepodavaniia inostrannykh iazykov v vysshei shkole” [“Current Methods and Techniques in Teaching Foreign Languages at Universities”]. Filologiia i lingvistika v sovremennom obshchestve: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [Philology and Linguistics in Present-Day Society: Proceeding of the 4th International Conference]. Moscow, pp. 94–97 (in Russian).
  13. Kuz'minskaia S., Gurova N. (2016) “Traditsii sovetskogo obrazovaniia i sovremennye didakticheskie tendentsii v prepodavanii inostrannykh iazykov” [“Traditions of Soviet Education and Contemporary Didactic Trends in Teaching Foreign Lanfguages”]. Nauka vchera, segodnia, zavtra: sbornik statei po materialam XXXIII mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [Science Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow: A Collection of Papers from 33rd International Conference], vol. 4 (26). Novosibirsk, 2016, pp. 97–102 (in Russian).
  14. Maksudova O. (2017) “Sovpemennye tendentsii v obuchenii inostrannomu iazyku” [“Current Trends in Teaching a Foreign Language”]. Molodoi uchenyi. 2017, vol. 15, pp. 603–604; available at https://moluch.ru/archive/149/42289/ (in Russian).
  15. Matukhin D., Zhitkova E. (2015) “Implementing Blended Learning Technology in Higher Professional Education”. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015, pp. 183–188.
  16. Moroz N. (2007) “Ispol'zovanie sovremennykh tekhnologii v protsesse prepodavaniia inostrannykh iazykov v vuze” [“Employment of Modern Technology in Teaching a Foreign Language at Universities”]. Akademicheskii vestnik. 2007, vol. 2, pp. 179–182 (in Russian).
  17. Popova N. (2010) “Samostoiatel'naia rabota s ispol'zovaniem informatsionnykh tekhnologii pri obuchenii inostrannomu iazyku v neprofi l'noi magistrature” [“Self-Study Work with Employment of IT in the Study of a Foreign Language in a Non-Linguistic Master Programme”]. Inostrannye iazyki v obrazovatel’nom prostranstve tekhnicheskogo vuza: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii (Novocherkassk) [Foreign Languages in Educational Space of Technological University: Proceedings of 4th International Conference]. Novocherkassk (in Russian).
  18. Solovova E. (2008) Metodika obucheniia inostrannym iazykam [Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages]. Moscow (in Russian).
  19. Shakirova A., Valeeva R. (2014) “Gumanizatsiia obucheniia inostrannomu iazyku: zarubezhnyi opyt” [“Making Teaching of Foreign Languages Human-Oriented: Experience from Abroad”]. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie. 2014, vol. 2 (40), pp. 72–75 (in Russian).
  20. Smirnov A. (2017) “Diagnosis Motivational Mechanism of Educational-Cognitive Motivation of Students”. American Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 6, № 5, 2017, pp. 138–141.
  21. Trubina G. (2015) “Sotsial'no-orientirovannyi i lichnostno orientirovannyi kharakter lingvisticheskogo obrazovaniia” [“Society-Oriented and Person-Oriented Character of Linguistic Education”]. European Social Science Journal, vol. 1 (52), pp. 132–139 (in Russian).
  22. Valeev A., Baranova A. (2015) “Psikhologicheskii komponent obucheniia inostrannomu iazyku na neiazykovykh fakul'tetakh vuza” [“Psychological Component in Teaching a Foreign Language at Non-Linguistic University Departments”]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia. 2015, vol. 2; available at http://www.science-education.ru/129-22391/ (10.11.2018) (in Russian).
  23. Veremeichik O. (2009) “Tsel' obucheniia inostrannym iazykam kak sotsial'no-pedagogicheskaia i metodicheskaia kategoriia” [“The Aim of Teaching Foreign Languages as a Socio-Pedagigocal and Methodological Category”]. Vestnik MGLU. 2009, vol. 1 (15), pp. 7–11 (in Russian).
  24. Van de Craen P. (2006) Content and Language Integrated learning, Culture of Education and Learning Theories, available at http://www.unifg.it/sites/default/fi les/allegatiparagrafo/21-012014/van_de_craen_clil_culture_of_education_and_learning_theories.pdf.
  25. Van de Craen P. et al. (2007) “Why and How CLIL Works. An Outline for a CLIL Theory”. Current Research on CLIL, vol. 16 (3).

Information about the author

Kolykhalova Olga


Academic Degree: PhD in Philosophy;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Department of Foreign Languages, National Research University Higher School of Economics; 21/4 Staraya Basmannaya Str., Moscow, 105066, Russian Federation;
Post: professor;
ORCID: 0000-0002-0452-5352;
Email: kolykhalova.o@mail.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.