Izotova Olga
Five patriarchs in the "Chronicle" of Theophanes the Confessor
For citation
Izotova Olga (2020)
"Five patriarchs in the "Chronicle" of Theophanes the Confessor ",
Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Seriia II : Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi,
2020,
vol. 97,
pp. 40-52 (in Russian).
DOI of the paper:
10.15382/sturII202097.40-52
Abstract
The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor is known for its chronology. Theophanes dates all events in accordance with the years of ministry of the Pope and the four patriarchs. All these fi ve bishops are called «ecumenical» in preamble of the chronicle. These data make us to look for additional information about the five patriarchs in the writing. The title «ecumenical» is never used by Theophanes in relation to the Patriarch of Constantinople. The only exception is the elevation of Constantine to this see in 754. New patriarch is named «ecumenical» by iconoclast emperor. Theophanes speaks of all fi ve thrones as catholic. He means not so much the patriarchs themselves as the churches they lead. Theophanes objects to the application of the title «patriarch» to bishop of Thessalonica. Three observations can be made regarding the order of the patriarchal sees. First, the titles of the annual articles have names of Jerusalem patriarchs in third place, not the Alexandrian. Secondly, when describing the Ecumenical Councils, the chronicler, on the one hand, insists on the presidency of «catholic thrones» even in contradiction with the original sources of his chronicle, and on the other hand, he gives the names of the primates in an arbitrary order, in accordance with the requirement of the message plot. Third, St. Theophanes nevertheless does not ignore the problem of primacy: he says under 6042 from the creation of the world, that the name of the patriarch Mina was “shifted” and replaced in the first place with the name of Pope Vigilius. The Chronicler does not comment on this fact, but he probably retains Malala’s account showing that the order of the sees was often determined by a specifi c historical situation. The same can be said for the third place of Jerusalem in annual rubrics. Generally the system of the pentarchy of St. Theophanes is characterized by the complete equality of the patriarchal sees and the churches they head.
Keywords
Pentarchy, Theophanes the Confessor, Chronography, chronicle, patriarch, ecumenical, primacy, pope, bishop, ecclesiology
References
- Afi nogenov D. E. (1997) “Konstantinopolskii patriarkhat i ikonoborcheskii krizis v Vizantii” (784–847) [The Patriarchate of Constantinople and the Iconoclastic Crisis in Byzantium]. Moscow (in Russian).
- Afi nogenov D. E. (2013) «Mnogoslozhnyi svitok» — slaviianskii perevod poslaniiia trekh vostochnykh patriarkhov imperatoru Feofi lu [Mnogosložnyj Svitok: the Church Slavonic translation of the Letter of the Three Oriental Patriarchs to Emperor Theophilos], Bogoslovskie trudy, 2013, vol. 45, pp. 238–271 (in Russian).
- Afi nogenov D. E. (2018) “Rasskaz ob osade Konstantinopolya v 717—718 g. v hronike Feofana Ispovednika: sredy redaktorskoj raboty” [The story of the siege of Constantinople (717—718) in the Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor]. Indoevropejskoe yazykoznanie i klassicheskaya filologiya, 2018, vol. 22-1, pp. 60–67 (in Russian).
- Chichurov I. S. (2007) “Feofan Ispovednik — publikator, redaktor, avtor?” [Theophanes the Confessor — publisher, editor, author?], in Idem, Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Мoscow, pp. 181–194 (in Russian).
- Chichurov I. S. (2007) “Mesto “Hronografi i” Feofana v rannevizantij skoj istoriografi cheskoj tradicii (IV — nachalo IX v.)” [The position of Theophanes’ Chronography in the early Byzantine historiographic tradition (IV — early IX centuries)], in Idem, Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Мoscow, pp. 9–156 (in Russian).
- Chichurov I. S. (1980) Vizantij skie istoricheskie sochineniya: «Hronografi ya» Feofana, «Breviarij» Nikifora [Byzantine historical works: «Chronography» of Theophanes, «Breviarium» of Nicephorus]. Мoscow, (In Russian).
- Gahbauer F. R. (1993) Die Pentarchietheorie. Ein Modell der Kirchenleitung von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Frankfurt am Main [Frankfurter theologische Studien, Bd. 42].
- Gratsianskiy M. V. (2019) “Chetvertyj Vselenskij Sobor i problema pervenstva Rimskogo episkopa” [The Fourth Ecumenical Council and the Issue of the Bishop of Rome]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 24, n. 6, pp. 255–271 (in Russian).
- Kuzenkov P. V. (2020) “Ponimanie «vselenskosti» v pravoslavnoj tradicii” [Conception of «universality» in the Orthodox tradition], in Prichiny i vyzovy tekushchego krizisa mezhpravoslavnyh otnoshenij : Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (PSTGU, 25–26 fevralya 2019 goda). Мoscow, pp. 97–114 (in Russian).
- Kuzenkov P. V. (2012) “O proiskhozhdenii aleksandrij skoj ery: (Po povodu novoj knigi A. Mosskhammera)” [The origin of the Alexandrian era: (On the new book by A. Mosshammer)], in ΘΕΟΔΟΥΛΟΣ. Sbornik pamyati prof. I. S. Chichurova. Мoscow, pp. 116–170 (in Russian).
- Kuzenkov P. V. (2007) “Spory o vozraste mira v Vizantii VII-XI vv. (o trekh mirovyh erah: aleksandrijskoj, «protovizantij skoj» i vizantij skoj” [Arguments on the age of the world in Byzantium of the 7th–11th centuries: on the three world eras: Alexandrine, «Protobyzantine» and Byzantine]. Vizantijskij vremennik, vol. 66 (91), pp. 93‒124 (in Russian).
- Kompa A. (2015) “In search of Syncellus’ and Theophanes’ own words: the authorship of the Chronographia revisited”, in M. Jankowiak, F. Montinaro (eds.) Studies in Theophanes. Paris [Travaux et mémoires 19], pp. 73–93.
- Lilie R. (Hrsg.) (1999) Die Patriarchen der ikonoklastischen Zeit: Germanos I. — Methodios I. (715—847) Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; Bern; New York; Paris; Wien [Berliner byzantinistische Studien, bd. 5].
- Mango C. (1978) “Who wrote the Chronicle of Theophanes?” Zborknik Radova Vizantinoškog Instituta, 1978, XVIII, pp. 9–17.
- Mango C., R. Scott, (eds.) (1997) The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor: Byzantine and Near Eastern History AD 284–813. Oxford.
- Queenan A. (1967) “The Pentarchy: Its Origin and Initial Development”, Diakonia, 1967, n. 2, pp. 338–351.
- Turlej S. (2016) Justiniana Prima. An underestimated aspect of Justinian’s church policy”. Kraków [=Jagiellonian studies in history, vol. 7].
- Turtledove H. (ed.) (1982) The Chronicle of Theophanes. An English translation of anni mundi 6095—6305 (A. D. 602—813). Philadelphia.
- Uspenskij K. N. (1950, 1951) “Ocherki po istorii ikonoborcheskogo dvizheniya v Vizantij skoj imperii VIII–IX vv.: Feofan i ego Hronografi ya” [Essays on the history of the iconoclasm in the Byzantine Empire of the 8th–9th centuries: Theophanes and his Chronography]. Vizantijskij Vremennik, 1950–1951, vol. 3, 4, pp. 396–439; pp. 211–263 (in Russian).
- Zuckerman C. (2015) “Theophanes the Confessor and Theophanes the Chronicler or A story of square brackets”, in M. Jankowiak, F. Montinaro (eds) Studies in Theophanes. Paris [Travaux et mémoires 19], pp. 31–53.
Information about the author
Izotova Olga
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences
* in Philosophy;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 23B Novokuznetskaya Str., Moscow 115184, Russian Federation;
Post: lecturer;
ORCID: 0000-0002-0953-5752;
Email: matroskin2@list.ru.
*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.