Zakharov Georgii

The Roman Synodal Letter Confi dimus Quidem in the Context of Relations Between the Churches of East and West (370–379)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the project of the Arian crisis’s resolution proposed by the Roman and Italian Churches to the local Churches of Illyricum and East (370(1)). According to the author, this project was fixed in the letter of one of the Roman councils in the pontificate of Pope Damasus I (366–384), known as Confi dimus quidem. This text was originally perceived with little enthusiasm by eastern Neo-Nicene bishops and probably also by St. Athanasius the Great, because it attempted to supplement the Nicene creed by theological formula expressed in Latin theological categories. In particular, the letter used the concept of substantia, which could be translated into Greek, not only as οuσία, but also as uπόστασις, while the eastern Neo-Nicene bishops insisted on the distinction between these terms. In addition, in the text there were elements of the ecclesiological conception of Roman centralism. For example the letter proclaims the dependence of ecumenical council decisions’ authority from its reception by Roman bishop. The Church of Rome, apparently, regarded Confi dimus quidem as a document which had to endorse any bishop who wanted to be received in Roman communion. In 379, the Council of Antioch included Confi dimus quidem in the collection of approved Roman doctrinal fragments. This action probably helped to restore communion between the eastern and western Nicene bishops.

Keywords

Roman Church, Roman councils, Arian controversy, Confi dimus quidem, Damasus I, St. Basil the Great, St. Meletius of Antioch, St. Athanasius the Great.

References

1. Zaharov G. E. 2016 “Papa Liberij kak uchastnik arianskih sporov” (Pope Liberius as Participant of Arian Controversies), in Zaharov G. E. (ed.) Bozhestvennaja vlast', cerkovnaja ierarhija i duhovnyj avtoritet v rannehristianskoj latinskoj tradicii, Moscow, 2016, pp. 31–73.
2. Amand de Mendieta E. 1963 “Basile de Cesarée et Damase de Rome: Les cause de l’échec de leurs négociations”, in Biblical and Patristic Studies: in Memory of R. P. Casey, Freiburg, 1963, pp. 122–166.
3. Amand de Mendieta E. 1954 “Damase, Athanase, Pierre, Mélèce et Basile. Les rapports de communion ecclésiastique entre les Églises de Rome, d’Alexandrie, d’Antioche et de Césarée de Cappadoce”, in L’Église et les Églises, Chevetogne, 1954, vol. 1, pp. 261–277.
4. Bardy G. 1933 “La concile d’Antioche (379)”, in Revue Bénédictine, 1933, vol. 45, pp. 196–213.
5. Caspar E. Geschichte des Papsttums von den Anfängen bis zur Höhe der Weltherrschaft, Tübingen, 1930, vol. 1.
6. Cavallera F. Le Schisme d’Antioch (IVe–Ve siècle), Paris, 1905.
7. Courtonne Y. Un témoin du IVe siècle oriental. Saint Basile et son temps d’après sa correspondence, Paris, 1973.
8. Duval Y.-M. 1998 “Aquilée et Sirmium durant la crise arienne (325–400)“, in Duval Y.-M. L’extirpation de l’Arianisme en Italie du Nord et en Occident, Aldershot; Brookfield; Singapore; Sydney, 1998, pp. 331–379.
9. Fedwick P. J. The Church and the Charisma of Leadership in Basil of Caesarea, Toronto, 1979.
10. Field L. L. On the Communion of Damasus and Meletius: Fourth-Century Synodal Formulae in the Codex Veronensis LX (with critical edition and translation), Toronto, 2004.
11. Grumel V. 1922 “Saint Basile et le Siège Apostolique”, in Échos d’Orient, 1922, vol. 21, pp. 280–292.
12. Hanson R. P. C. The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God. The Arian Controversy, 318–381, London, 2005.
13. Hefele K. J. Histoire des Conciles d’après les documents originaux, vol. 1/2, Paris, 1907.
14. Joannou P.-P. Die Ostkirche und die Cathedra Petri im 4. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart, 1972.
15. Kannengiesser Ch. 1993 “(Ps.-)Athanasius, Ad Afros Examined“, in Brennecke H. C., Grasmück E. L., Markschies Ch. (eds.) Logos: Festschrift für Luise Abramowski, Berlin, New York, 1993, pp. 264–280.
16. Markschies Ch. Ambrosius von Mailand und die Trinitätstheologie: Kirchen- und theologiegeschichtliche. Studien zu Antiarianismus und Neunizänismus bei Ambrosius und im lateinischen Westen (364–381 n. Chr.), Tübingen, 1995.
17. Marot H. 1957 “Les conciles romains des IVе et Vе siècles et le développement de la primauté”, in Istina, 1957, vol. 4, pp. 435–462.
18. Martin A. Athanase d’Alexandrie et l’Église d’Egypte au IVe siècle (328–373), Rome, 1996.
19. Meslin M. Les Ariens d’Occident, 335–430, Paris, 1967.
20. Monachino V. 1959 “II primato nella controversia Ariana”, in Miscellanea Historiae Pontificiae, Vol. 21: Saggi storici intorno al Papato, Roma, 1959, pp. 17–89.
21. 1911 “Einleitung“, in Parmentier L. Theodoret. Kirchengeschichte, Leipzig, 1911, pp. IX–CVIII.
22. Pietri Ch. Roma Christiana. Recherches sur l’Eglise de Rome, son organisation, sa politique, son idéologie de Miltiade à Sixte III (311–440), Rome, 1976.
23. Reutter U. Damasus, Bischof von Rom (366–384). Leben und Werk, Tübingen, 2009.
24. Richard M. 1951 “La lettre “Confi dimus quidem” du Pape Damase“, in Annuaire de l’Institut de Philologie et d’Histoire Orientales et Slaves, 1951, vol. 11, pp. 323–340.
25. Richard M. 1949 “Saint Basile et la mission du diacre Sabinus”, in Annalecta Bollandiana, 1949, vol. 67, pp. 178–202.
26. Rousseau Ph. Basil of Caesarea, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London, 1994.
27. Scheidweiler F. 1966 “Besitzen wir das latenische Original des römischen Synodalschreibens vom Jahre 371?“, in Annuaire de l’Institut de Philologie et d’Histoire Orientales et Slaves, 1966, vol. 13, pp. 573–586.
28. Schwartz E. 1936 “Über die Sammlung des Cod. Veronensis LX“, in Zeitschrift für neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 1936, vol. 35, pp. 1 –23.
29. Schwartz E. 1960 “Zur Kirchengeschichte des vierten Jahrhunderts“, in Schwartz E. Gesammelte Schriften 4: Zur Geschichte der alten Kirche und ihres Rechts, Berlin, 1960, pp. 1–110.
30. Simonetti M. La crisi ariana nel IV secolo, Roma, 1975.
31. Stockhausen A., von. Athahasius von Alexandrien Epistula ad Afros: Einleitung, Kommentar und Übersetzung, Berlin; New York, 2002.
32. Taylor J. 1973 “St. Basil the Great and Pope Damasus”, in Downside Review, 1973, vol. 91, pp. 186–203, 262–274.
33. Williams D. H. Ambrose of Milan and the End of the Nicene-Arian Conflicts, Oxford, 1995.
34. Zeiller J. Les origines chrétiennes dans les provinces danubiennes de l’Empire Romain, Paris, 1918.

Information about the author

Zakharov Georgii