The article is the fi rst attempt to trace in details, basing on inedited archive materials from Russian and Rumanian archives, the history of the secularization of the so called “inclined” monastic properties in the united principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia during the reign of Alexander Kuza. Attempts (though without any suffi cient result) to reduce the rights of the foreign owners of the estates (1/4 of the territory of the country) were undertaken already in the fi rst half of the 19th century. After the Crimean war with weakening of Russian infl uence and strengthening of French one such an action could count on better results. According to Protocol 13 of the Paris Conference of 1858 the Principalities should have solved their problem with the Greek owners of the properties. In case of misunderstanding an international commission consisting of commissioners from the powers had to take place. Such a commission started its work in Constantinople in 1862, and as it’s well preserved documentation shows, did not bring any positive result. Russia was the only to support the rights of the Greek owners, while the position of Britain and Austria was wavering, and France was in open opposition to any actions against the secularization. The inconsistent behavior of the Greek Patriarchs and the attempts of Patriarch Joachim II to turn the aff air in his own benefi t only was in the way of solution of the question. Another idea, of a monetary compensation for the estates was not carried through either, though the Greek bankers of Constantinople seemed ready to support it. Meanwhile Kuza, basing on the support of Napoleon III, carried through the fi nal confi scation of the lands. This act became one of the most suffi cient in his policy for unifi cation of Rumania and creating an independent national state.
Inclinated properties, Romanian Church, Orthodox East, Russian foreign policy, Patriarchate of Constantinople, great powers, Ottoman Empire, United Principalities, Phanariots, monastic properties
1. Arsenij (Stadnickij), ep. Issledovanija i monografii po istorii Moldavskoj Cerkvi (Studies and Monographies on History of Moldavian Church), Saint-Petersburg, 1904.
2. Vinogradov V. V. Ocherki obshhestvenno-politicheskoj mysli v Rumynii (Essays on Social-Politician Thought in Rumania), Moscow, 1975.
3. Volkov M. 1863 “O posvjashhennyh monastyrjah” (About Devoted Monasteries), in Golos, Saint-Petersburg, 1863, vol 323, p. 127.
4. Vostochnyj vopros vo vneshnej politike Rossii. Konec XVIII — nach. XIX v. (Eastern Question in the Foreign Policy of Russia. End of XVIII — Begin of XIX Cent.), Moscow, 1978.
5. Grekov Ju. Rumynija v licah (Rumania in Persons), Kishinev, 1996.
6. Druzhinina E. I. Kjuchuk-Kajnardzhijskij mir (Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca), Moscow, 1955.
7. L. E. Semenova, V. N. Vinogradov i dr. Kratkaja istorija Rumynii s drevnejshih vremen do nashih dnej. Moscow, 1987.
8. Kurganov F. A. Nabroski i ocherki iz novejshej istorii Rumynskoj Cerkvi (Sketches and Essays on Newest History of Rumanian Church), Kazan', 1899.
9. Lopuhin A. P. Istorija Hristianskoj Cerkvi v XIX veke (History of Christian Church in XIX Century), Saint-Petersburg, 1901, vol. 2.
10. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija na Balkanah. 1856–1878 (International Relations in Balkans. 1856–1878), Moscow, 1986.
11. Nekljudov V. 1863 “Slovo o posvjashhennyh monastyrjah” (Word about Devoted Monasteries), in Moskovskie vedomosti, Moscow, 1863, vol. 181, p. 3.
12. Polozhenie Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi i monastyrej v Moldavii (Position of the Orthodox Church in Moldavia), Saint-Petersburg, 1864.
13. Chertan E. E. Velikie derzhavy i formirovanie Rumynskogo nezavisimogo gosudarstva (Great Powers and Forming of Rumanian Independent State), Kishinev, 1980.
14. Bobagno G. J. The Emergence of the Romanian National State, New York, 1979.
15. Bossy R. V. L’ Austriche et les Principautés Unies, Bucurest, 1938.
16. Davison R. H . 1976 “«Russian Skill and Turkish Imbecility»: the Treaty of Kuchuk Kainardji Reconsidered”, in Slavic Review, Sept. 1976, vol. 35/3, pp. 463–483.
17. [Ghika I.]. Mémoire sur les couvents Roumains placés sous l’invocation des Saints-Lieux d’ Orient, Bucurest, 1863.
18. Iancu C. 1974 “Napoleon III et la Politique Française à l’ égard de la Roumanie”, in Revue d’ Histoire Diplomatique, 1974, vol. 88/1–2, pp. 59–85.
19. Istoria Bisericii Romîne, Bucureşti, 1958.
20. Ivănescu D. 2011 “La France et la création de l’ État national Roumain modern”, in G. Leanca (ed.). La politique extérieure de Napoleon III, Paris, 2011, pp. 127–136.
21. Jelavich B. 1965 “Russia and the Double Election of Alexandru Cuza, 1858–1859. The letters of S. I. Popov to N. K. Giers” in Südost–Forschungen, 1965, Bd. 24.
22. Jelavich B. Russia and the Rumanian National Cause, 1858–1859, Bloomington: Indiana University, 1959.
23. Jelavich B. Russia and the Formation of the Romanian National State, 1821–1878, Cambridge, 1984.
24. Mémoire sur les Couvents Roumains, Constantinople, 1863.
25. Odobescu A. Étude sur les droits et obligations des monasteries dédiés aux Saint-Lieux, Bucurest, 1863.
26. Riker T. V., Oxon B. L. The Making of Roumania. A Study of an International Problem, 1836–1866, London, 1931.
27. Stamatopoulos D. 2008 “The Bulgarian schism revisited”, in Modern Greek Studies Yearbook, Minneapolis, 2008, pp. 106–120.