/

Anashkin Anton

Epistle of Pope Zosimus to bishops of Galliae and Septem provinciae


Anashkin Anton (2023) "Epistle of Pope Zosimus to bishops of Galliae and Septem provinciae ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia II : Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi, 2023, vol. 114, pp. 107-118 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturII2023114.107-118

Abstract

The paper includes a publication of a Latin translation of the Epistle Placuit apostolicae of Pope Zosimus to the bishops appointed in the dioceses of Galliae (Northern Gaul) and of Septem Provinciae (Southern Gaul), as well as a historical commentary and an introductory article. At the beginning of the paper, the historical context of the Epistle is described, then its content is considered. The Epistle sheds light on the relationship between the see of Rome and the sees of churches of Gaul (primarily, the Church of Arelate). Placuit apostolicae was written in the early days of the pontificate of Pope Zosimus (March 22, 417), probably as a reaction to the appeal of Patroclus of Arles who wanted to expand his influence and jurisdiction over the province of Viennensis and neighboring provinces of the South Gallic diocese, which contradicted the decisions of the synod of Turin in 398. In his letter to the Gallic bishops, Pope Zosimus expresses support for Patroclus and confirms special rights of the see of Arles: the right of the metropolitan bishop of Arles to ordinate bishops in the provinces of Viennensis, Narbonnensis I and Narbonnensis II; the privilege of issuing to Gallic bishops special cover letters (formatae) and recognition of primacy of the metropolitan bishop of Arles in Gaul (although the latter is not said expressiss verbis, but is implied); transfer of some controversial parishes in favor of Arles. With the help of these decisions, Zosimus was able to strengthen the influence of the Roman see in Gaul. Realizing that administrative decisions alone are not enough to fulfill these aspirations, Zosimus substantiates the rights of the see of Arles by appealing to the authority of Saint Trophimus, who, according to the legend first set forth in the letter, founded the first episcopal see in the Gallic lands and became the first bishop of Arles. It follows from this that the bishop of Arles enjoys the advantage of power in the region as Trophimus' heir. Through this narrative, Zosimus defended the interests of the see of Rome, which had sent Trophimus to christianize Gaul, and in the letter he actually constituted a hierarchical connection between the Churches of Gaul and Rome, asserting for Patroclus the right to issue formatae. Trying to change the ecclesiastical and administrative structure of Southern Gaul, Zosimus delegitimizes the decisions of the synod of Gallic Bishops in Turin.

Keywords

Pope Zosimus, Patroclus of Arles, Apostle Trophimus, Synod of Turin, Church of Gaul, Roman Gaul, Arles, Church organization

References

  1. Anashkin A. (2022) “Poslanie rimskogo papy Siksta (Ksista) III k Proklu, arkhiepiskopu Konstantinopol¢skomu”. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia II: Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi, 2022, vol. 104, pp. 135–144 (in Russian).
  2. Bleckmann B. (2003) “Arelate metropolis: Überlegungen zur Datierung des Konzils von Turin und zur Geschichte Galliens im 5. Jahrhundert”. Römische Quartalschrift für christliche Altertumskunde und Kirchengeschichte, 2003, vol. 98, pp. 162–173.
  3. Caspar E. (1930) Geschichte des Papsttums von den Anfängen bis zur Höhe der Weltherrschaft, vol. 1, Tübingen.
  4. Dunn G. D. (2019) “Epistolary Sleight of Hand: Diplomatic Manipulation in Zosimus’ Letter to Patroclus of Arles (Quid de Proculi)”. Vigiliae Christianae, 2019, vol. 73, pp. 254–270.
  5. Dunn G. D. (2015) “Placuit apostolicae (Ep. 1) of Zosimus of Rome and the Ecclesiastical Reorganization of Gaul”. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 2015, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 559–581.
  6. Dunn G. D. (2015) “… quid habuerit antiqua consuetudo: Zosimus of Rome and Hilary of Narbonne”. Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique, 2015, vol. 110, pp. 31–55.
  7. Dunn G. D. (2016) “The Ecclesiastical Reorganisation of Space and Authority in Late Antique Gaul: Zosimus’ Letter Multa contra (JK 334 = J3 740)”. Journal of the Australian Early Medieval Association, 2016, vol. 12, pp. 1–33.
  8. Dunn G. D. (2015) “Zosimus’ Synod of Rome in September 417 and His Letter to Western Bishops (Cum aduersus)”. Antiquité Tardive: Revue internationale d’histoire et d’archéologie, 2015, vol. 23, pp. 395–405.
  9. Gratsianskii M. (2021) “Krizis avtoriteta Rimskoi Tserkvi v pontifi katy Zosima (417–418) i Bonifatsiia (418–422)”. Vizantiiskii vremennik, 2021, vol. 105, pp. 40–59 (in Russian).
  10. Gratsianskii M. (2022) “Popytka tserkovno-administrativnoi reorganizatsii Iuzhnoi Gallii v pontifi kat papy Zosima (417–418): motivy i posledstviia”, in Vizantiiskie ocherki. Trudy rossiiskikh uchenykh k XXIV Mezhdunarodnomu kongressu vizantinistov, St. Petersburg, pp. 24–52 (in Russian).
  11. Gratsianskii M. (2021) “Rimskie episkopy i razvitie tserkovno-administrativnykh struktur sverkhprovintsialnogo″ urovnia v nachale V v.”. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia II: Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi, 2021, vol. 101, pp. 9–33 (in Russian).
  12. Gratsianskii M., Norkin K. (2020) “Na sluzhbe imperii: papa Zosim i Rimskii sobor 417 goda”. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 4: Istoriia. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2020, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 6–23 (in Russian).
  13. Heinzelmann M. (1976) Bischofsherrschaft in Gallien. Zur Kontinuität römischer Führungsschichten vom 4. bis zum 7. Jahrhundert. Soziale, prosopographische und bildungsgeschichtliche Aspekte (Beihefte der Francia, vol. 5). Munich.
  14. Langgärtner G. (1964) Die Gallienpolitik der Päpste im 5. und 6. Jahrhundert. Eine Studie über den apostolischen Vikariat von Arles. Bonn.
  15. Mathisen R. W. (2013) “The Council of Turin (398/399) and the Reorganization of Gaulca. 395/406”. Journal of Late Antiquity, 2013, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 264–307.
  16. Mekhamadiev E. (2014) “Sobory Gallskoi tserkvi v kontse IV — pervoi chetverti V vv., nadpis Gally Platsidii i grecheskaya nadpis iz Arabii: novyi vzgliad na datirovku zapadnogo i vostochnogo spiska Notitia Dignitatum”. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Istoriia. Politologiia. Ekonomika. Informatika, 2014, vol. 30, no. 8 (170), pp. 34–42 (in Russian).
  17. Munier Ch. (1963) Concilia Galliae. A. 314 — A. 506 (CCSL 148). Turnhout.
  18. Norkin K. (2019) “Stanovlenie tserkovnogo pervenstva Arlia v Gallii i rimskie papy (398–432 gg.)”. Vizantiiskii vremennik, 2019, vol. 103, pp. 53–69 (in Russian).
  19. Panzram S. (2023) “Bishops under Threat — Between Ascetics and Combative Creatures″”, in Bishops under Threat. Contexts and Episcopal Strategies in the Late Antique and Early Medieval West (Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte, vol. 150), Berlin; Boston, pp. 1–24.
  20. Poveda Arias P. (2023) “Threatening Metropolitan Authority in Fifth-Century Gaul”, in Bishops under Threat. Contexts and Episcopal Strategies in the Late Antique and Early Medieval West(Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte, vol. 150), Berlin; Boston, pp. 27–54.
  21. Pietri Ch. (1976) Roma Christiana. Recherches sur l’Église de Rome, son organisation, sa politique, son idéologie de Miltiade à Sixte III (311–440). Rome.
  22. Sieben H.-J. (ed.) (2015) Vetustissimae epistulae Romanorum pontifi cum (Die ältesten Papstbriefe), vol. 3, Freiburg; Basel; Wien.
  23. Zaitsev D. (2014) “Zosima”, in Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia, Moscow, vol. 20, pp. 339–341 (in Russian).
  24. Zakharov G. (2022) “Ekkleziologicheskie osnovaniia i istoricheskie istoki Fessalonikiiskogo vikariata”, in Ekkleziologicheskaia traditsiia i tserkovnaia organizatsiia Illirika v konce IV — pervoi polovine V v.: Issledovaniia i perevody, Moscow, pp. 69–114 (in Russian).

Information about the author

Anashkin Anton


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Place of work: St.Tikhon's Orthodox University;
ORCID: 0000-0002-5246-2210;
Email: miles-an@rambler.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the grant of Russian Science Foundation № 23-28-00165 «The Correlation of Territorial and Ethnopolitical Principles of Church Organization in Late Antique Gaul»