Suslova Evgeniia

The traditional territorial structure of Andoma parish in Olonets uyezd in the first half of the 18th century

Abstract

The article investigates the specific features in the territorial structure of the church parish on the Andoma pogost district of the Olonets uyezd during the first half of the 18th century. The set problem has not been the subject of close analysis in the historiography yet. Approving the idea that the parish on the North-West of Russia was coherent with the small district (volost’) in 17—18th centuries, emphasizing the unity of the parish, scientists mainly focused on the problem of identifying the general features of the parish and on classification of parishes. The study is based on a comparative analysis of data that were fixed in the reports of the local priests in 1708 and confessional records in 1769. The reconstruction of the grid of all mentioned in the sources villages were used for visualizing the groups of villages, inhabitants of which belonged to different parts of the parish. The revealing data as well as the reconstruction of peculiarities how the clergy was attached to one or another church and how the staff of the clergy was divided into two parts allow us to conclude that the church parish of the Andoma pogost district had significantly more complicated structure, especially in comparative with the structure of church parishes of not very vast districts (volosts). According to tradition the parish was divided into two parts for regulating mechanism of material support of the clergy, distributing obligations among them and satisfaction spiritual needs of the laity. Both parts of the parish had a significant degree of self-dependence: each had its own church, own clergy that was included in the common clergy staff (shtat), and the strictly geographically localized group of villages. The stable using of archaic practices in the territorial organization of the parish during the first half of the 18th century suggests that the local community managed to adapt them to the newly approved legislative principles, aimed at unifying and enlarging church parishes. This was largely possible as the state and church policy took into account archaic traditions of local communities and was aimed on results in the long term.

Keywords

Church parish, parochial district, parish standardization, territorial reorganization, Andoma district (pogost), Olonets uyezd, Russian Orthodox Church

References

1. Cherkasova M. (2008) “Ekonomicheskaia i demografi cheskaia kharakteristika sel′skikh prikhodov Vologodsko-Belozerskoi eparkhii v XVII veke” [Economic and demographic characteristics of rural parishes of Vologda-Belozersk diocese in the 17th century], in Severo-Zapad v agrarnoi istorii Rossii: mezhvuzovskii tematicheskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [North-West in the agrarian history of Russia: collection of articles], Kaliningrad, pp. 234–251 (in Russian).
2. Chernyakova I., Chernyakov O. (1988) “Pistsovye i perepisnye knigi XVI–XVII vv. kak istochnik po istorii dereviannogo zodchestva Karelii” [Scribes’ and census books of the 16th — 17th centuries as a source on the history of wooden architecture in Karelia], in Problemy issledovaniia, restavratsii i ispol′zovaniia arkhitekturnogo naslediia Russkogo Severa: mezhvuzovskii sbornik [Current issues in research, restoration, and use of the architectural heritage of the Russian North: collection of articles], Petrozavodsk, pp. 55–73 (in Russian).
3. Chernyakova I. (1998) Kareliia na perelome epokh: Ocherki sotsial′noi i agrarnoi istorii XVII veka [Karelia at the turn of epochs: essays on the social and agrarian history of the 17th century]. Petrozavodsk (in Russian). Available at: http://carelica.petrsu.ru/mediateka/home/reading-hall/monographs/id-14/id.html (13.09.2021).
4. Freeze G.L. (1977) The Russian Levites: parish clergy in the eighteenth century. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.
5. Kamkin A. (1994) “Severnorusskii sel′skii prikhod XVIII veka: prostranstvo, naselennost′, klir” [The North-Russian rural parish of the 18th century: territory, population, clergy], in Kul′tura Russkogo Severa: mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Culture of the Russian North: collection of articles]. Vologda, pp. 91–108 (in Russian).
6. Kolesnikov P. (1976) Severnaia derevnia v XV — pervoi polovine XIX veka: k voprosu ob evoliutsii agrarnykh otnoshenii v Russkom gosudarstve [Northern village in the 15th — fi rst half of the 19th century: on the issue of the evolution of agrarian relations in the Russian State]. Vologda (in Russian).
7. Milchik M. (1989) “Remonty dereviannykh tserkvei v XVII veke po poriadnym zapisiam” [Renovation of wooden churches in the 17th century according to poryadnaya records], in Problemy issledovaniia, restavratsii i ispol′zovaniia arkhitekturnogo naslediia Russkogo Severa: mezhvuzovskii sbornik [Current issues in research, restoration, and use of the architectural heritage of the Russian North: collection of articles], Petrozavodsk, pp. 120–127 (in Russian).
8. Pulkin M. (2009) Pravoslavnyi prikhod i vlast′ v seredine XVIII — nachale XX v. (po materialam Olonetskoi eparkhii) [The Orthdox parish and the government in the middle of the 18th — beginning of the 20th cc. Based on materials of Olonets diocese]. Petrozavodsk (in Russian).
9. Sannikov A. (2015) “Pravoslavnyi prikhod Pribaikal′ia i ego kolichestvennye kharakteristiki v kontse XVII–XVIII v.” [Orthodox parishes of Baikal Region and its Quantitative Characteristics at the End of th 17th — 18th cc]. Izvestiia Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politologiia. Religiovedenie, 2015, vol. 11, pp. 219–230 (in Russian).
10. Selin A. (2003) Istoricheskaia geografi ia Novgorodskoi zemli v XVI–XVIII vv. Novgorodskii i Ladozhskii uezdy Vodskoi piatiny [Historical geography of the Novgorod land in the 16th — 17th cc. Novgorod and Ladoga uyezds of the Vodskaya pyatina]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
11. Sobolev A. (2015) “Vepsskoe toponimicheskoe nasledie Iugo-Vostochnogo Obonezh′ia v sootnoshenii s arkheologicheskimi i istoricheskimi istochnikami” [Vepses’ heritage in the toponymy of the south-eastern Onega area in correlation with archaeological and historical sources]. Severnorusskie govory, 2015, vol. 14, pp. 89–111 (in Russian).
12. Staritsyn A. (2009) “Kurzhenskaia pustyn′” [Kurzhenskaia hermitage]. Vestnik tserkovnoi istorii, 2009, no. 3–4, pp. 191–205 (in Russian).
13. Staritsyn A. (2014) “Otnoshenie k tserkovnoi reforme XVII v. v severnykh monastyriakh Novgorodskoi mitropolii” [The attitude to the Church reform of the 17th century in the northern monasteries of Novgorod archdiocese]. Trudy instituta rossiiskoi istorii RAN, 2014, no. 12, pp. 61–82 (in Russian).
14. Stefanovich P. (2002) Prikhod i prikhodskoe dukhovenstvo v Rossii v XVI–XVII vv. [The parish and the parish clergy in Russia in the 16–17th centuries]. Moscow (in Russian).
15. Suslova E. (2013) Tserkovno-prikhodskaia sistema v Karelii kontsa XV — nachala XVIII veka [Church and the peasant community in Karelia at the end of the 15th — beginning of the 18th c.]. Petrozavodsk (in Russian). Available at http://carelica.petrsu.ru/Reading_hall/Suslova/Titul.pdf (13.09.2021).
16. Timoshenkova Z. (1999) Sotsiokul′turnyi oblik severo-zapadnoi derevni XVII — nachala XVIII vv. [Sociocultural profi le of the North-Western village of the 17th — early 18th centuries]. Pskov (in Russian).
17. Tormosova N. (2011) Kargopol′e: istoriia ischeznuvshikh volostei [Kargopolye: the history of defunct villages]. Kargopol (in Russian).
18. Tormosova N. (2009) “Pogosto-volosti Kargopol′ia” [Pogosto-volosti of Kargopol uyezd], in Il′inskii Vodlozerskii pogost: materialy nauchnoi konferentsii (6–10 avgusta 2007 g.) [Ilyinskii pogost of Vodlozero: conference proceedings (6–10 august 2007)], Petrozavodsk, pp. 246–252 (in Russian).
19. Vitov M. (1962) Istoriko-geografi cheskie ocherki Zaonezh′ia XVI–XVII vv. Iz istorii sel′skikh poselenii [Historical and geographical studies of Zaonezhie of the 16th — 17th centuries. From the history of rural settlements]. Moscow (in Russian).
20. Zol′nikova N. (1990) Sibirskaia prikhodskaia obshchina v XVIII veke [The Siberian parish community in the 18th century]. Novosibirsk (in Russian).

Information about the author

Suslova Evgeniia

Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: Petrozavodsk State University (PetrSU);
ORCID: 0000-0003-1017-8761;
Email: evgeniasus@rambler.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.