Zakharov Georgy

The relationship between the sees of Rome, Thessalonica and Constantinople in the context of the development of synodal institutions in the first half of the 5th century

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the problem of the development of the church organization of the super-provincial level in the Balkan region and to the influence of the Roman and Constantinople Sees on this process. According to the author, the law of emperor Theodosius II, concerning church affairs in Illyricum (421), did not imply the liquidation of the vicariate of Thessalonica created by the Roman see and the transfer of this region to the jurisdiction of Constantinople. It was about endowing the Constantinopolitan see with the function of an alternative judicial instance (along with the see of Thessalonica), which was justified by the status of Constantinople as the New Rome. The protest of Pope Boniface I and the western emperor Honorius against this decision, apparently, led to the fact that the status quo remained in Illyricum. Nevertheless, this law was included in the Code of Theodosius. It is also possible that, along with the diocese of the Orient, Illyricum was meant as the sphere of implementation of the 9th and 17th canons of the Council of Chalcedon (451), which prescribe, in the case of litigation with the participation of the metropolitan, to apply for a trial to the exarch of the diocese or to the Constantinopolitan see. This rule, apparently, was associated with the existence in Constantinople of a "permanent synod", the organization of which did not require significant costs and efforts, in contrast to the synods of dioceses.

Keywords

church organization, councils, Illyricum, Roman See, See of Constantinople, Vicariate of Thessalonica, Council of Chalcedon.

References

1. Alberigo G. (ed.) (2006) Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Generaliumque Decreta, Editio Critica. I: The Oecumenical Councils from Nicaea I to Nicaea II (325–787). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
2. Blaudeau Philippe (2012) Le siège de Rome et l’Orient (448–536). Étude géo-ecclésiologique. Rome: École française de Rome.
3. Blaudeau Philippe (2020) “Podgotovka, vospriyatie i zashchita Halkidonskogo sobora so storony Rimskogo papy L’va Velikogo”. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia II: Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi, 2020, Iss. 94, pp. 11–30 (in Russian).
4. Dunn Geoff rey D. (2020) “Church and State in the Dispute over the Vicariate of Thessaloniki during the Pontifi cate of Boniface I”. Journal of Early Christian History, 2020, vol. 10, pt. 1, pp. 37–60.
5. Dunn Geoff rey D. (2007) “Innocent I and Anysius of Thessalonica”. Byzantion, 2007, vol. 77, pp. 124–148.
6. Gascou Jean (2012) “L’Égypte byzantine (284–641)”, in C. Morrisson, dir. Le monde byzantin. T. I: L’Empire romain d’Orient (330–641). Paris: PUF, pp. 409–441.
7. Gratsianskiy Mikhail V. (2020) “Tserkovno-administrativnoe soderzhanie termina “ekzarh diotseza” 9-go i 17-go pravil Khalkidonskogo sobora i vopros o podsudnosti del protiv mitropolita”. Antichnaia drevnost′ i srednie veka, 2020, vol. 48, pp. 53–73 (in Russian).
8. Greenslade Stanley L. (1945) “The Illyrian Churches and the Vicariate of Thessalonica, 378–95”. The Journal of Theological Studies, 1945, vol. 46, pp. 17–30.
9. Grumel Venance (1952) “Le Vicariat de Thessalonique et le premier rattachement de l’Illyricum oriental au patriarcat de Constantinople”, in Annuaire de l’École des Législations Religieuses, 1950–1951. Paris, pp. 49–63.
10. Grumel Venance (1964) “Les origines du vicariat apostolique de Thessalonique”, in Actes du XIIe Congrès international d’études byzantines, vol. II. Beograd: Naučno delo, pp. 451–461.
11. Hajjar Joseph (1962) Le synode permanent (σύνοδος QνδημοZσα) dans l’Église byzantine des origines au XIe siècle. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Orientalium Studiorum
12. L′Huillier Petr (2005) Pravila pervykh chetyrekh Vselenskikh soborov. Moscow: Izdatel′stvo Sretenskogo monastyrya (in Russian).
13. Pietri Charles (1976) Roma Christiana. Recherches sur l’Église de Rome, son organisation, sa politique, son idéologie de Miltiade à Sixte III (311–440). Rome: École française de Rome.
14. Streichhan Fritz (1922) “Die Anfänge des Vikariates von Thessalonich”. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Kanonistische Abteilung, 1922, vol. 12, pp. 330–384.
15. Price R., Gaddis M. (eds) (2005) The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, vol. III.
16. Zakharov Georgy E. (2020) “Rimskii prestol i Vostochnye Tserkvi v konflikte vokrug sv. Ioanna Zlatousta”. Vestnik drevnei istorii, 2020, vol. 80, iss. 3, pp. 697–711 (in Russian).

Information about the author

Zakharov Georgy

Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University; 23b, Novokuznetskaya st., Moscow 115184, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of the Department of Systematical Theology and Patrologу;
ORCID: 0000-0002-3406-2088;
Email: g.e.zakharov@gmail.com.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Acknowledgments

The article was prepared within the framework of the project "Correlation of the idea of ecumenical primacy with the regional consolidation of the episcopate in the 4th – 6th centuries", carried out with the support of the Living Tradition Foundation.