Gayda Fyodor

“Orthodoxy” in the triad of S. S. Uvarov

Abstract

The article is devoted to the fi rst element of the Uvarov triad Orthodoxy. Autocracy. Nationality. The previous historiographic tradition tends to view it as a formality, completely subordinated to the political demands of the autocracy. This article examines the understanding by the Minister of Public Education S. S. Uvarov (1833–1849) of Orthodoxy in the context of his views on the world’s history and Russian history, as well as the views of the Uvarov circle. The greatest infl uence on Uvarov’s ideas was exerted by N. M. Karamzin; one can also talk about the infl uence of A. S. Shishkov and M. P. Pogodin. The article concludes that Orthodoxy was conceived by Uvarov as one of the Russian “national principles” that had been established throughout the entire previous history. The Orthodox Church in Russia was strong because it was the Church of the Russian people, the Orthodox faith became part of the national identity. However, the people themselves were brought up in the spirit of Orthodoxy, which became the guarantee of its correct development. As Uvarov believed, the Orthodox faith was distinguished by the certainty of doctrine and retained its intact appearance. Thanks to this, Orthodoxy had the ability to further spread in the crisis of the Christian world. In Orthodoxy, spiritual freedom was preserved, which Christianity possessed due to its divine nature. Uvarov believed that the rejection of Christian truths inevitably led to a world catastrophe.

Keywords

Uvarov`s triad, theory of offi cial nationality, Orthodoxy, Orthodox Church, Ministry of Public Education, S. S. Uvarov, N. M. Karamzin, A. S. Shishkov, M. P. Pogodin, Nicholas I

References

1. Bezhanidze G. (2019) “Sviatitel’ Filaret Moskovskii i ideologiia nikolaevskogo tsarstvovaniia” [St. Philaret of Moscow and the ideology of Nicholas’ reign]. Filaretovskii al’manakh, 2019, 15, pp. 61–76 (in Russian).
2. Gajda F. (2018) ““Za Veru, Tsaria i Otechestvo”: k istorii proishozhdenij a znamenitogo rossiiskogo voinskogo deviza” [“For Faith, Tsar and Fatherland”: to the history of the origin of the famous Russian military motto]. Istoriia. Nauchnoe obozrenie, 4. Moscow, pp 5–9 (in Russian).
3. Gajda F. (2020) “Sviazuiushchee nachalo: o ponimanii “narodnosti” v Rossii 1-oi poloviny XIX v.” [The connecting element: On the understanding of “nationality” in Russia in the first half of the 19th century], in O.R. Airapetov et al. Russkii Sbornik: Issledovaniia po istorii Rossii, vol. XXIX. Moscow, pp. 100–116 (in Russian).
4. Shevchenko M. (2002) “Poniatie “teoriia ofi tsial’noi narodnosti” i izuchenie vnutrennei politiki imperatora Nikolaia I” [The concept of “the theory of offi cial nationality” and the study of the domestic policy of Emperor Nicholas I]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 8. Istoriia, 2002, vol. 4, pp. 89–104 (in Russian).
5. Shevchenko M. (2018) “S. S. Uvarov. Politicheskii portret” [S. S. Uvarov. Political portrait], Tetradi po konservatizmu: Al’manakh, 1, pp. 26–50 (in Russian).
6. Uspenskii B. “Russkaia intelligentsiia kak spetsifi cheskii fenomen russkoi kul’tury” [Russian intelligentsia as a specifi c phenomenon of Russian culture]. Rossiia, 20: Russkaia intelligentsiia i zapadnyi intellektualizm: Istoriia i tipologiia [Russian intelligentsia and Western intellectualism: History and typology]. Moscow, pp. 7 –20 (in Russian).
7. Whittaker C. (1999) Graf Sergei Semenovich Uvarov i ego vremia [Count Sergei Semenovich Uvarov and his time]. St Petersburg (in Russian).
8. Zhivov V. (2008) “Chuvstvitelnyi natsionalizm: Karamzin, Rostopchin, natsionalnyi suverenitet i poiski natsionalnoi identichnosti” [Sensitive nationalism: Karamzin, Rostopchin, nationalsovereignty and the search for national identity]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 3 (91), pp 114–140 (in Russian).
9. Zorin A. (2001) “Kormia dvuglavogo orla... Russkaia literatura i gosudarstvennaia ideologiia v poslednei treti XVIII — pervoi treti XIX veka [“Feeding the two-headed eagle...” Russian literature and state ideology in the last third of the XVIII — fi rst third of the XIX century]. Moscow (in Russian).

Information about the author

Gayda Fyodor

Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Likhov per., Moscow, Russian Federation;
Post: Leading Researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0001-9586-8010;
Email: fyodorgayda@gmail.com.

*According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.