Periodization of the history of interreligious dialogue at the modern stage
Melnik Sergey (2021)
"Periodization of the history of interreligious dialogue at the modern stage ",
Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie
pp. 95-118 (in Russian).
DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI202196.95-118
Interreligious dialogue at the modern stage is understood as a positive, constructive interaction between followers of diff erent religions, which is carried out on a regular basis. The beginning of the modern stage of interreligious dialogue is the World Parliament of Religions of 1893 in Chicago. The Second World War had a great impact on humanity in various aspects, including the fact that its end can be associated with the beginning of another period of interreligious dialogue. A great impetus to the development of interreligious dialogue was given by the Second Vatican Council and the adoption of the declaration Nostra aetate of 1965, dedicated to the attitude towards non-Christian religions. During this period, interreligious dialogue develops within the framework of two main thematic areas. The fi rst of them, which was emphasised by the Catholic Church, was to understand dialogue as a mutual study of diff erent religions, comparing their ideas and religious experience. The second direction was a dialogue with the aim of peacemaking, confl ict resolution and strengthening social harmony. Special attention is paid to the interreligious dialogue in the USSR, which can be attributed to the second of these areas. In recent decades, interreligious dialogue has been actively developing, which is expressed in the cooperation of believers not only in strengthening peace, but in various spheres, e.g. humanitarian, social, educational, environmental. The main factors contributing to the development of interreligious dialogue in each of these periods are identifi ed in the article. For example, among the factors of the last period of interreligious dialogue, which began after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the author highlights the following: the problem of the spread of terrorism under religious slogans, the discourse of a “clash of civilisations”, the increasing interdependence and interconnection of the modern world, post-secularism.
interreligious dialogue, history, interreligious relations, factors, World Parliament of Religions, Catholicism, Second Vatican Council, globalisation, terrorism
- Ad gentes, available at: http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vatii_decree_19651207_ad-gentes_en.html (08.01.2021).
- Ariel Y. (2013) “Jewish–Christian dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 205–223.
- Berger P. L. (1999) “Desecularization of the world: a global overview”, in P. L. Berger (ed.) The desecularization of the world: resurgent religion and world politics, Washington, pp. 1–18.
- Cheliukina A. G. (ed.) (1983) Religioznye deiateli za spasenie sviashchennogo dara zhizni ot iadernoi katastrofy. Vsemirnaia konferentsiia 10-14 maia 1982 goda [Conference of Religious Workers for Saving the Sacred Gift if Life from Nuclear Catastrophe May 10–14, 1982]. Moscow: Moskovskaia Patriarkhiia (in Russian).
- Cornille C. (2013) “Conditions for inter-religious dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 20–33.
- Efanova V. N. “Vsemirnyi parlament religii” [“The World’s Parliament of Religions”], in Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia [Orthodox Encyclopedia], available at: https://www.pravenc.ru/text/155516.html (08.01.2021) (in Russian).
- Fletcher J. H. (2013) “Women in inter-religious dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 168–184.
- Melnik Sergey V. (2017) Pravoslavie i khasidizm Хabad: Lichnostnaia model mezhreligioznogo dialoga [Orthodox Christianity and Chabad Hasidism: The personal model of interreligious dialogue]. Moscow: INION RAN (in Russian).
- Melnik Sergey V. (2020) “Diplomaticheskĳ mezhreligioznyj dialog” [“Diplomatic interreligious dialogue”]. Mission confessions. 2020, vol. 9.2 (no. 43), pp. 217–225 (in Russian).
- Melnik Sergey V. (2020) “Klassifi katsiia tipov mezhreligioznogo dialoga” [“Classifi cation of types of interreligious dialogue”]. Communicology, vol. 8 (2), pp. 25–51 (in Russian).
- Moyaert M. (2013) “Interreligious Dialogue”, in D. Cheetham, D. Pratt, and D. Thomas (eds) Understanding Interreligious Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–217. Nostra aetate, available at: http://www.agnuz.info/app/webroot/library/6/128/page10.htm (08.01.2021).
- Pushchaev YU.V. (2016) “Izmenenie pozicii Rimsko-Katolicheskoj Cerkvi po otnosheniyu k iudaizmu (analiticheskĳ obzor)” [“Changing the position of the Roman Catholic Church in relation to Judaism (analytical review)”]. Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 3, Filosofiya: Referativnyj zhurnal, vol. 4, pp. 79–91 (in Russian).
- Rybakov R. B. Vsemirnyi Parlament Religii. (Nabliudeniia i razmyshleniia) [The World’s Parliament of Religions (Observations and Refl ections)], available at: http://www.delphis.ru/journal/article/vsemirnyi-parlament-religii (08.01.2021).
- Seleznev N. (2015) “Istoriia ekumenizma: zabytyi rannii etap” [“History of Ecumenism: Forgotten Early Period”]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, vol. 2 (33), pp. 163–181 (in Russian).
- Shokhin Vladimir K. (1997) “Dialog religii: ideologiia i praktika (chast’ 1)” [“Dialogue of religions: ideology and practice (part 1)”]. Alfa i Omega, vol. 1(12), pp. 281–295 (in Russian).
- Shokhin Vladimir K. (1997) “Dialog religii: ideologiia i praktika (chast’ 2)” [“Dialogue of religions: ideology and practice (part 2)”]. Alfa i Omega, 1997, 2(13), pp.: 223–240 (in Russian).
- Silant’ev R. A. (2010) “Islamo-khristianskiĭ dialog v dosovetskii i sovetskii periody” [“Islamic-Christian dialogue in the pre-Soviet and Soviet periods”]. Religiia i sovremennyi mir, no. 8, pp. 65–73 (in Russian).
- Swamy M. (2019) “Revisiting the Antecedents of Interreligious Dialogue”. Current dialogue. The Ecumenical Review, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 719–738.
- Swidler L. (2000) “Interreligious dialogue: origins, problems, prospects”. Stranitsy, no. 5, vol. 3, pp. 452–461 (Russian translation).
- Swidler L. (2013) “The history of inter-religious dialogue”, in Cornille C. (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 3–19.
- Swidler L. (2015) “The «dialogue of civilizations» at the tipping point: The «dialogosphere»”. Journal of ecumenical Studies, vol. 50:1, pp. 3–17.
- Viviano R. (2016) “Benedict XVI, Islam and Christian-Muslim relations”. The downside review, vol. 135(1), pp. 1–21.
- Хoruzhii S. S. (2009) “Dialog religii: istoricheskii opyt i printsipial’nye osnovaniia” [“Dialogue of religions: historical experience and fundamental foundations”], in Mezhreligioznyi dialog v Rossii i na Blizhnem Vostoke [Interreligious dialogue in Russia and the Middle East], Saint-Petersburg; Beirut, pp. 160-171 (in Russian).
Information about the author
Melnik Sergey Academic Degree:
Candidate of Sciences*
in Philosophy; Place of work:
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Science (ISISS RAS); 1/21 Nakhimovsky Prospekt, 117418 Moscow, Russian Federation; Bolgar Islamic Academy; 1a st. Kul Gali, 422840, Republic of Tatarstan, Bolgar, Russian Federation; Post:
researcher; ORCID: 0000-0002-1491-7624
*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
The author expresses his gratitude to the "United Religions" (https://unitedreligions.org/).