/

Fadeyev Ivan; Shebalin Dmitry

Exarch L. Fedorov on the religious policy of soviet authorities: “The government themselves regulate the dogmata of the Church in a way that seems most beneficial...”


Shebalin Dmitry, Fadeyev Ivan (2021) "Exarch L. Fedorov on the religious policy of soviet authorities: “The government themselves regulate the dogmata of the Church in a way that seems most beneficial...” ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2021, vol. 95, pp. 109-122 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI202195.109-122

Abstract

This article analyses a document that has up to now been unknown to the present-day historiography, i.e. a letter from the head of the Russian Catholic Apostolic Exarchate of Russia Leonid Fedorov in which he reports about the state of aff airs in the Catholic community after the advent of Soviet authorities as well as about the measures being taken by the government towards the gradual limitation and then the actual elimination of the Greek-Catholic Church of the Byzantine Rite in the territory of Russia. The hopes of believers for the liberalisation of attitudes to the Catholic Church on the part of the Bolsheviks and the expansion of the range of their rights and opportunities after the change of the political regime in the country were not fulfi lled. The article concludes that Exarch L. Fedorov was one of the fi rst religious fi gures (given the date of writing the letter) to see this tragic trend for Greek Catholics through the prism of the features of the Soviet secularist project as a political religion; he did realise their destructive role for the development of Christianity in Russia. Drawing on the letter of the Exarch, the article concludes that the Soviet state acted consciously in order to deprive the church of its public status and authority. While at the offi cial level, during negotiations with representatives of the Holy See, Soviet diplomacy did not inform about the state’s intentions to interfere in the Catholic Church’s internal jurisdiction, L. Fedorov in his report described the real state of aff airs in the country, i.e. the essence of the anti-religious policies carried out by Soviet authorities and their intention to turn the Church into a social institution in the service of Soviet society. The article examines the phenomenon of the Soviet government through its attitudes to and relations with religious institutions and the ways of survival of the church in the new conditions.

Keywords

Roman Catholic Church, Russian Catholic Church of Byzantine Rite, Russia-Vatican relations, Russian Catholic Church, Leonid Feodorov, Soviet policies towards religion, religious freedom

References

  1. Akopian O. (2018) “Pis’mo patriarkha Tikhona pape rimskomu Benediktu XV i drugie dokumenty iz istorii otnoshenii Sviatogo prestola s SSSR (1920-e gody)” [The letter of Patriarch Tikhon to Pope Benedict XV and other documents on the relations between the Holy See and the USSR in the 1920s]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, vol. 6 (154), pp. 141–159 (in Russian).
  2. Beglov A. L. (2007) “Ot sobornogo Opredeleniia — k Dekretu SNK. K voprosu o genezise gosudarstvenno-tserkovnykh otnoshenii sovetskogo perioda” [From the Council’s defi nition to the CPC’s Decree. On the question of the genesis of state-church relations in the Soviet era]. Al’fa i Omega, vol. 1 (48), pp. 146–170 (in Russian).
  3. Beglov A. L., Beliakova N.A. (2019) “Religiia, gosudarstvo i obshchestvo” [Religion, state, and society], in Vsemirnaia istoriia. T. 6. Mir v XX veke: Epokha global’nykh transformatsii [World history. Vol. 6: The world in the 20th century: Age of global changes], Moscow: Nauka, vol. 1, pp. 228–252 (in Russian).
  4. Beliakova E. V. (2004) Tserkovnyi sud i problemy tserkovnoi zhizni [Church court and church life issues]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Beliakova N. A. (2012) “Tserkov’ v sotsialisticheskom gosudarstve: osobennosti russkoi pravovoi traditsii” [The church in the socialist state: peculiarities of Russian legal tradition], in Religii mira. Istoriia i sovremennost’. 2006–2010 [World religions. History and the present day. 2006–2010], Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-istoriia, pp. 430–472 (in Russian).
  6. Boeckh K. (2017) “Katolicheskie obshchiny v SSSR v 1918–1939 gg.” [Catholic communities in the USSR in 1918–1939]. Vestnik tserkovnoi istorii, vol. 3/4 (47/48), pp. 332–335 (in Russian).
  7. Burman Vasiliy von (1966) Leonid Fedorov. Zhizn’ i deiatel’nost’ [Leonid Feodorov. Life and work]. Rome, Tipografia poliglota Vaticana (in Russian).
  8. Gentile E. (2021) Politicheskie religii. Mezhdu demokratiei i totalitarizmom [Political religions. Between democracy and totalitatiranism]. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ (in Russian).
  9. Iudin A. (2002) Leonid Fedorov. Moscow: Khristianskaia Rossiia (in Russian).
  10. Kozlov-Strutinskii S., Parfent’ev P. (2014) Istoriia Katolicheskoi Tserkvi v Rossii [History of the Catholic Church in Russia]. St. Petersburg: Belyi kamen’ (in Russian).
  11. Krivova N. A. (1997) Vlast’ i Tserkov’ v 1922–1925 gg. Politbiuro i GPU v bor’be za tserkovnye tsennosti i politicheskoe podchinenie dukhovenstva [Power and church in 1922–1925. Politbureau and the GPU in the struggle for church valuables and political subordination of the clergy]. Moscow (in Russian).
  12. Liubin V. P. (2005) “Sotsializm i natsionalizm — antireligii ХХ veka” [Socialism and Nationalism — anti-religions of the 20th century], in Religiya i politika v XX veke [Religion and politics in the 20th century], Moscow: IVI RAN, pp. 30–57 (in Russian).
  13. Osipova I. I. (1996) “«V iazvakh svoikh sokroi menia…»: Goneniia na Katolicheskuiu Tserkov’ v SSSR. Po materialam sledstvennykh i lagernykh del” [“Hide me within thy wounds”: the persecution of the Catholic Church in the USSR]. Moscow: Serebrianye niti (in Russian).
  14. Parfent’ev P. (2004) «S terpeniem my dolzhny nesti krest svoi...»: Dokumenty i materialy o zhizni i deiatel’nosti blazhennogo sviashchennomuchenika ekzarkha Leonida (Fedorova) [“With patience we must bear our cross...”: Documents and materials on the life and work of the Blessed Hieromartyr Exarch Leonid (Fedorov)]. St. Petersburg: Kerigma (in Russian).
  15. (1997–1998) Postanovlenie VTsIK ob iz’’iatii tserkovnykh tsennostei. Iz protokola zasedaniia Prezidiuma VTsIK № 13, p. 1 [The All-Russian Central Executive Committee’s Decree «On the Seizure of Church Jewelry». From the minutes of the Presidium of the The All-Russian Central Executive Committee № 13, 1], in Arkhivy Kremlia. Politbiuro i tserkov’. 1922–1925 gg. V 2 kn. [Kremlin Archives. Politbiuro and Church. 1922–1925. In 2 Vols], Moscow, Novosibirsk: ROSSPEN, «Sibirskii khronograf», vol. 2, pp. 15–18 (in Russian).
  16. Strada V. (2005) “Razmyshleniia o «politicheskikh religiiakh» XX veka” [Reflections on the “political religions” of the 20th century], in Religiia i politika v XX veke [Religion and politics in the 20th century], Moscow: IVI RAN, pp. 8–16 (in Russian).
  17. Tokareva E. S. (1988) Otnosheniia SSSR i Vatikana: ot peregovorov k razryvu. 1922–1929 [Relations between the USSR and the Vatican: from negotiations to rupture. 1922–1929]. Moscow (in Russian).
  18. Vorob’ev V., Miliakova L. B. (eds) (2016) Otdelenie tserkvi ot gosudarstva i shkoly ot tserkvi v Sovetskoi Rossii. Oktiabr’ 1917–1918 gg.: Sbornik dokumentov [Separation of church from state and school from church. October 1917–1918. Collection of documents]. Moscow (in Russian).
  19. Wenger A. (2000) Rome et Moscou. 1900-1950. Moscow: Russkii put’ (Russian translation).
  20. Zatko J. (1960) “A Contemporary Report on the Condition of the Catholic Church in Russia, 1922”. Harvard Theological Review, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 277–295.

Information about the author

Fadeyev Ivan


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 32A Leninskii prospekt, Moscow 119334, Russian Federation;
Post: senior research fellow;
ORCID: 0000-0003-2202-2246;
Email: london.rbw@gmail.com.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.


Shebalin Dmitry


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 32A Leninskii prospekt, Moscow 119334, Russian Federation;
Post: junior research fellow;
ORCID: 0000-0001-6082-1562;
Email: dmitry.shebalin@gmail.com.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation (no. 19-189-00482) for the project: “Entangled Histories: Russia and the Holy See, 1917–1958”.