Andreyev Alexey, priest

Bible, New Testament, Jesus Christ, historical Jesus, biblical studies, Quest for the Historical Jesus, historical science, theology, John Meyer, James Robinson

Abstract

This article deals with the historical Jesus as an object of biblical studies. It shows that, beginning with Reimarus, who is considered to be the founder of the “Quest for the Historical Jesus”, up to the middle of the 20th century, the participants of the “Quest...” had believed that they were reconstructing the life, teaching, and personality of the “real” Jesus of Nazareth. The article demonstrates that such understanding of the object of study gave rise to the controversy between the participants of the “Quest...” and the majority of traditional theologians who believed that the attempt to change the image of Christ attested in the Gospels undermines the very foundations of the faith. In the second half of the 20th century, J. Robinson and J. Meyer proposed to rethink the object of the “Quest...”. Both scholars argued that the programme of the “Quest for the Historical Jesus” requires changes in its paradigm. This is caused by the new understanding of historical science that had developed by the middle of the 20th century, and is also due to the very small amount of scientifi cally verifiable material in the Gospels. Robinson and Meyer claimed that in the modern context, the “historical Jesus” can no longer be understood as the “real” Jesus of Nazareth; the designation “historical Jesus” should become a specifi c term referring to a fragmented theoretical construct based on current methods of historical science. The article discusses the arguments of Robinson and Meyer, and shows how a paradigmatic rethinking of the concept of “historical Jesus” can infl uence the relationship between confessional theology and the project of the “Quest…”.

Keywords

Bible, New Testament, Jesus Christ, historical Jesus, Biblical Studies, Quest for the Historical Jesus, historical science, theology, John Meyer, James Robinson

References

1. Alfeev Ilarion, metropolitan (2016–2018) Iisus Khristos. Zhizn’ i uchenie [Jesus Christ. Life and Teaching], vols. 1–6. Moscow (in Russian).
2. Buchanan G. (1970) The Consequence of the Covenant. Leiden.
3. Bultmann R. (2009) “Jesus”, in Zagadka Khrista. Dve epokhal’nye raboty ob Iisuse [The Mystery of Christ. Two Ground-Breaking Works on Jesus], Moscow, pp. 219–458 (Russian translation).
4. Crossan J. (1991) The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant. San Francisco.
5. Deines R. (2009) “Can the “Real” Jesus be Identifi ed with the Historical Jesus? A Review of the Pope’s Challenge to Biblical Scholarship and the Various Reactions it Provoked”. DIDASKALIA, 2009, vol. 39, pp. 11–46.
6. Dibelius M. (1965) From Tradition to Gospel. New York.
7. Ehrman B. (2012) Did Jesus Exist: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth. Moscow (Russian translation).
8. Evans C. (2011) Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels. Moscow (Russian translation).
9. Farnell D. (2012) “Three Searches for the Historical Jesus”. Master’s Seminary Journal, 2012, vol. 1 (23), pp. 7–42.
10. Funk R. and the Jesus Seminar (1998) The Acts of Jesus. What Did Jesus Really Do? San Francisco.
11. Funk R., Hoover R. and the Jesus Seminar (1993) The Five Gospels. What Did Jesus Really Say? New York.
12. Habermas G. (2013) The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ. Simferopol (Russian translation).
13. Harnack A. (2010) Das Wesen des Christentums. Moscow (Russian translation).
14. Johnson L. (1997) The Real Jesus: The Misguided Quest for the Historical Jesus and the Truth of the Traditional Gospels. San Francisco.
15. Longenecker R. (2004) “Literary Criteria in Life of Jesus Research: An Evolution and Proposal”, in C. Evans (ed.) The Historical Jesus. Critical Concepts in Religious Studies. Vol. I, New York, pp. 451–464.
16. Ludemann G. (2001) Jesus after 2000 Years: What He Really Said and Did. New York.
17. Martin R. (1999) The Elusive Messiah. A Philosophical Quest for the Historical Jesus. Oxford.
18. McKnight E. (1969) What Is Form Criticism? Philadelphia.
19. Meier J. (2011) “Basic Methodology in the Quest for the Historical Jesus”, in T. Holmén, S. Porter (eds.) Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. Vol. I, Boston, pp. 291–331.
20. Meier J. (1991) A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Vol. I: The Roots of the Problem and the Person. New York.
21. Oakman D. (2012) The Political Aims of Jesus. Minneapolis.
22. Porter S. (2011) “The Criteria of Authenticity”, in T. Holmén, S. Porter (eds.) Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. Vol. I, Boston, pp. 695–714.
23. Postmodern Bible (1997). New York.
24. Ratzinger J. (2009) Jesus von Nazareth. Band 1: Von der Taufe im Jordan bis zur Verklärung. St. Petersburg (Russian translation).
25. Ratzinger J. (2014) Jesus von Nazareth. Band 2: Vom Einzug in Jerusalem bis zur Auferstehung. Moscow (Russian translation).
26. Ratzinger J. (2015) Jesus von Nazareth. Prolog. Die Kindheitsgeschichten. Moscow (Russian translation).
27. Reimarus H. (1970) “Concerning the Intention of Jesus and His Teaching”, in H. S. Reimarus Fragments, Philadelphia, pp. 59–269.
28. Robinson J. (1970) A New Quest for the Historical Jesus. London.
29. Schillebeeckx E. (1989) Jesus: An Experiment in Christology. New York.
30. Schlosser J. (2011) “Scholarly Rigor and Intuition in Historical Research into Jesus” in T. Holmén, S. Porter (eds.) Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. Vol. I, Boston, pp. 475–508.
31. Sravnitel’noe bogoslovie. Nemetskii protestantizm XX veka. Teksty s kommentariiami (2009) [Comparative Theology. German Protestantism of the 20th Century. Texts with Commentaries]. Moscow (in Russian).
32. Swales J. (2008) Historical Jesus: Quest, Methods and Criteria. Bristol.
33. Tatum B. (2009) Jesus. A Brief History. Oxford.
34. Walter K. (2005) Jesus the Christ. Moscow (Russian translation).
35. Wright N. T. (2013) The New Testament and the People of God. Cherkasy (Russian translation).

Information about the author

Andreyev Alexey, priest

Academic Degree: Master of Ttheology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Professor of the Department of Biblical Studies;
ORCID: 0000-0001-6034-9704;
Email: alexey.andreevtf@gmail.com.