Batanova Polina

On Forthcoming Perspectives of Solidarity: Religion and Morality in E. Durkheim’ Social Theory

Abstract

Usually religion is placed at the center of Emile Durkheim’ theory as it performs the function of solidarity production and maintenance within a community. However, this way of perception of durkheimian conception gets useless regarding present reality because today religion hardly remains the common element of the social life for individuals living together. In «Elementary forms of religious life...» (1912). Durkheim quite superficially touches upon the topic of solidarity in contemporary society, but the reader has every reason to believe that durkheimian theory implies the upgrade of the fundamental bases and solidarity mechanisms. This article proposes to rebuild durkheimian social theory in order to demonstrate the continuity between religion and morality, as Durkheim supposes. Key to successful shift in emphasis from religion to morality is a return to the very key category of «sacred». Sacred is viewed as an integral part of the religious system which is true, but not comprehensive. The interpretation of «sacred» via «religious» overshadows an important fact, that the first one is a generator for the latter. This weighty remark allows us to take the next step and say that just as for religious system of representations, sacred becomes the basis of morality. Here and now the author undertakes an attempt to release the category of «sacred» from a strict religious interpretation, traces the line of functional continuity between religion and morality and reveals a new perspective on the mechanisms of solidarity in contemporary society.

Keywords

Durkheim, solidarity, sacred, morality, religion, moral community.

References

1. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshhestva: Razmyshlenija ob istokah i rasprostranenii nacionalizma (Imaginated Communities: Thoughts about Origins and Spread of Nationalism), Moscow, 2001.
2. Ban'kovskaja S. P. Teoreticheskaja sociologija (Theoretical Sociology), Moscow, 2002.
3. Burd'e P. Sociologija social'nogo prostranstva (Sociology of Social Space), Saint-Petersburg, 2007.
4. Kurakin D. Ju. 2010 “«Sil'naja programma» v kul'tursociologii: istoriko-sociologicheskie, teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie kommentarii. Posleslovie redaktora vypuska” (“Strong Program in Culture Sociology: Historical-Sociological, Theoretical and Methodological Commentaries. Afterword of Issues’ Editor”), in Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 2010, vol. 9/2, pp. 155–178.
5. Kurakin D. 2011 “Uskol'zajushhee sakral'noe: problema ambivalentnosti sakral'nogo i ee znachenie dlja «sil'noj programmy» kul'tursociologii” (Slipped Away Sacred: Problem of Ambivalence of Sacred and Its Meaning for the “Strong Program” of Cultural Studies), in Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 2011, vol. 10/3, pp. 41–70.
6. Makljujen G. M. Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshirenija cheloveka (Understanding of Media: External Widenings of Human), Moscow, 2003.
7. Smit U. “Lekcija 1. Vvedenie: predmet i metod issledovanija” (Lecture 1. Introduction: Subject and Method of Study), in Lekcii o Robertson religii semitov, in http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Relig/klass/07.php (Date: 16.06.2016).
8. Roulz Je. 2005 “Djurkgejmovskaja traktovka praktiki: al'ternativa konkretnyh praktik i predstavlenij kak osnovanij razuma” (Durkheim’s Interpretation of Practice: Alternative of Concrete Practices and Presentations as Grounds of Reason), in Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 2005, vol. 4/1, pp. 3–30.
9. Frjezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaja vetv' (Golden Branch), Moscow, 1980.
10. Bellah R. N. 1959 “Durkheim and History”, in American Sociological Review, 1959, vol. 24/4, pp. 447–461.
11. Bellah R. N. 1967 “Civil Religion in America”, in Dædalus, 1967, vol. 96/1, pp. 1–21.
12. Casanova J. Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago, 2011.
13. Cheal D. 1992 “Ritual: Communication in Action”, in Sociological Analysis, 1992, vol. 53/4, pp. 363–374.
14. Douglas M. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London; New York, 2001.
15. Pickering W. S. F. (ed.) Durkheim and Representations, Routledge, 2000, pp. 11–23.
16. Fields K. E. 1996 “Durkheim and the Idea of Soul”, in Theory and Society, 1996, vol. 25/2, pp. 193–203.
17. Glock Ch. Y., Stark R. American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment, Berkeley, 1968.
18. Jones R. A. 1981 “Robertson Smith, Durkheim, and Sacrifice: An historical context for The Elementary Forms of Religious Life”, in Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1981, vol. 17, pp. 184–205.
19. Jones R. A. 1986 “Durkheim, Frazer, and Smith: The Role of Analogies and Exemplars in the Development of Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion”, in American Journal of Sociology, 1986, vol. 92/31, pp. 596–627.
20. Lukes S. Émile Durkheim: His Life and Works, Middlesex, 1973.
21. Myerhoff B., Moore S. F. Secular Ritual, Assen, 1977.
22. Pickering W. S. F. Durkheim and Representations, London, 2000.
23. Pickering W. S. F. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion, Cambridge, 2009.
24. Rawls A. W. 1989 “Interaction Order or Interaction Ritual: Comment on Collins”, in Social Interaction, 1989, vol. 12/1, pp. 103–109.
25. Rawls A. W. Epistemology and Practice. Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Cambridge, 2004.
26. Rawls A. 2009 “Two Conceptions of Social Order”, in Journal of Classical Sociology, 2009, vol. 9/4, pp. 500–520.
27. Robertson Smith W. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites (Second and Third Series), Sheffield, 1995.
28. Olaveson T. 2001 “Collective Effervescence and Communitas: Processual Models of Ritual and Society in Emile Durkheim and Victor Turner”, in Dialectical Anthropology, 2001, vol. 26/2, pp. 89–124.
29. Stedman-Jones S. Durkheim Reconsidered, Cambridge, 2001.
30. Stedman-Jones S. 2003 “Représentations”, in Durkheimian Studies, 2003, vol. 9, pp. 14–19.
31. Stedman-Jones S. 2006 “Action and the Question of the Categories: A Critique of Rawls”, in Durkheimian Studies, 2006, vol. 12, pp. 37–67.
32. Stedman-Jones S. 2012 “Forms of thought and forms of society: Durkheim and the question of the categories”, in L’Année sociologique, 2012, vol. 62/2, pp. 387–407.
33. Weiss R. 2012 “From Ideas to Ideals: Effervescence as the Key to Understanding Morality”, in Durkheimian Studies, 2012, vol. 18, pp. 81–97.

Information about the author

Batanova Polina

Place of work: St. Tikhon Orthodox University;
Email: email: pvrublevskaya@gmail.com.

Acknowledgments

Исследование осуществлено в рамках гранта РГНФ No16-23-41006 «Религия и модели социальной и экономической организации Избирательное сродство религии и хозяйства на примере христианских конфессий в Швейцарии и России»