The present article is devoted to research in genesis and evolution of views of medieval thinker Ahmad b. al-Ha’it (d. 847). Being a unique figure for his time, Ibn al-Ha’it played a significant role in the formation of Arabic philosophy, which, unfortunately, is ignored to this day by specialists-medievalists: so, for the first time in the history of intellectual thought of the medieval Middle East, the Mu’tazilli philosopher made an attempt of an exit from a strict theologism of Kalam to the tradition, which was issued in Falsafah. Justification of the reincarnation theory within the Islamic theological field which is initially constructed on postulates of singularity and an extremity of any terrestrial human life became a separate merit of Ahmad. Along with it, the thinker attracted the arianistic doctrine, which allowed by him to develop his own Christology and ontology in neoplatonic paradigmatics. Thereby, the pupil of a great Basrian thinker Ibrahim b. Sayyar an-Nazzam anticipated the great synthesis of Kalam and Arabic peripatetizm realized by late Ash’arites — al-Ghazali (d. 505/1111), Fakhruddin ar-Razi (d. 606/1210) and ʻUdud ad-Din al-Iji (d. 756/1355).
Islam, Neoplatonism, Arabic Peripatetism, Ahmad b. al-Ha’it, an-Nazzam, Reincarnation, Kalam, Mu’tazilism, Arianism, Classical Arabic Philosophy.
1. ʻAbd al-Dzhabbār, al-ḳāḍī. Sharḥ al-uṣūl al-ẖamsa, Kair, 1996.
2. Aflōṭīn ʻind al-ʻarab, Kair, 1955.
3. Al-ʻAsḳalānī, Ibn Ḥadzhar. Lisān al-mīzān, Bejrut, 2002.
4. Al-ʼAshʻarī, ʼAbū al-Ḥasan. Maḳālāt al-islāmijjīn va iẖtilāf al-muṣallīn, Kair, 2000.
5. Badavī, ʻA. Min tārīẖ al-ilḥād fī al-islām, Kair, 1993.
6. Al-Bag̣dādī, ʻAbdulḳāhir. Al-Farḳ bajn al-firaḳ, Kair, 1988.
7. Al-Buẖārī, Muḥammad. Ṣaḥīḥ, Bejrut, 1996.
8. Al-Dzhāḥiẓ, ʻAmr. Kitāb al-ḥajavān, Kair, 1966.
9. Ibn al-Malāhimi ̣ ̄. Tuḥfat al-mutakallimīn fī ar-radd ʻalā al-falāsifa, Teheran, 2008.
10. Ibn Ṭufajl. Ḥajj b. Jaḳẓān, Doha, 2014.
11. Ibn Ḥazm. Al-Fiṣal fī al-milal va al-ahvāʼ va an-niḥal, Kair, 1321 Hidzra Year.
12. Al-Kindī. Ar-Rasāʼil al-falsafijja, Kair, 1955.
13. Al-Kulajnī, Muḥammad. Al-ʼUṣūl min al-Kāfī, Bejrut, 2005.
14. Al-Maḳrīzī, ʼAbū al-ʻAbbās. Al-H̱uṭaṭ, Kair, 1987.
15. Nofal F. Mu ʻammar b. ʻAbbād as-Sulamī va ārāʼu-hu al-kalāmijja al-falsafijja, Bejrut, 2015.
16. As-Samʻānī, ʼAbū Saʻd. Al-Ansāb, Bejrut, 1988.
17. Aṣ-Ṣafadī. Al-Vāfī bi-l-vafijjāt, Bejrut, 2000.
18. Aṭ-Ṭabarānī, as-Sulajmān. Al-Muʻdzham al-avsaṭ, Er-Rijad, 1985.
19. Al-H̱ajjāṭ, ʻAbdurraḥīm. Al-Intiṣār va ar-radd ʻalā Ibn ar-Rāvandī al-mulḥid, Kair, 1925.
20. Ash-Shahrastānī, ʼAbū al-Fatḥ. Kitāb al-milal va an-niḥal, Bejrut, 1992.
21. Efremova N. V. 1998 “Noologija vostochnyh peripatetikov” (Noology of Eastern Peripatetics), in Frolova A. (ed.) Srednevekovaja arabskaja filosofija: problemy i reshenija, 1998.
22. Nofal F. Ibrahim ibn Sajjar an-Nazzam, Moscow, 2015.
23. Florovskij G. V. Vostochnye otcy IV veka: Iz chtenij v Pravoslavnom Bogoslovskom institute v Parizhe (Eastern Fathers of IV Century: From Readings in Orthodox Theological Institute in Paris), Paris, 1931.
24. Crown P. The Nativist Prophets of Early Islamic Iran: Rural Revolt and Local Zoroastrianism, Cambridge, 2014.
25. Guthrie W. К. С. Orpheus and Greek Religion, New York, 1966.
26. Pellat Ch. 1986 “Ahmad b. Ḥābiṭ”, in The Encyclopaedia of Islam, Leiden, 1986, vol. 1, p. 272.