Gaginsky Aleksei

Onto-theology and the Overcoming of Metaphysics: M. Heidegger, J.-L. Marion and Christian Tradition

Abstract

The article considers concept of onto-theology, offered by Martin Heidegger, as well as its reception in postmetaphysical theology, in particular, in Jean-Luc Marion. (1) Onto-theology is an understanding of Being, which is reduced to beings and is founded in the top of hierarchy of beings (Ex 3. 14: He who is). This is «fate of Being» — it came to oblivion in metaphysics, which structure is the onto-theo-logic, i. e. «cross base» between the top being and the totality of beings. The consequence of the oblivion, says Heidegger, is loss of sacred and divine — nihilism. The desire to think truth of Being and open up access to the Divine leads to the need to overcome metaphysics, go to postmetaphysical thinking, which can reveal «the last God». (2) Author maintains that such ideas attract attention of philosophers and theologians in secular age. Vague hints at «the last God» are grasped like modern Christian philosophy, and the concept of onto-theology is seen as an opportunity to overcome atheism simply by removing it to a metaphysical problem. This is the starting point for the development of so-called post-metaphysical theology, i. e. theology after metaphysics. For example, philosophy of J.-L. Marion is based on the concept of onto-theology. However, he constricts the concept. As a result, onto-theology becomes more vulnerable to criticism.

Keywords

ontotheology, God, being, beings, metaphysics, Christianity, atheism, M. Heidegger, J.-L. Marion, F. Nietzsche

References

1. Gaginskij A. M. 2014 “Bytie i Edinoe u Platona” (Being and One by Plato), in Platonovskie issledovanija, Moscow, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 89–107.
2. Gaginskij A. M. 2012 “Imja Boga i bytie: Filon Aleksandrijskij i Iustin Filosof” (God Name and Being: Philo of Alexandria and Justin Philosopher), in Evrazija: Duhovnye tradicii narodov, Moscow, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 26–33.
3. Gadamer H.-G. 2007 “Religioznoe izmerenie” (Religious Dimension), in On zhe. Puti Hajdeggera: issledovanija pozdnego tvorchestva, Minsk, 2007, pp. 192–207.
4. Konacheva S. A. Bytie. Svjashhennoe. Bog: Hajdegger i filosofskaja teologija XX veka (Being. Sacred. God: Heidegger and Philosophical Theology of XX Century), Moscow, 2010.
5. Fal'k Je. 2013 “Fenomenologicheskaja praktika i srednevekovaja filosofija” (Phenomenological Practice and Medieval Philosophy), in Petrov V. V. (ed.) PLATONICA ZETEMATA: Issledovanija po istorii platonizma, Moscow, 2013, pp. 505–580.
6. Jampol'skaja A. 2011 “Fenomenologija kak snjatie metafiziki?” (Phenomenology as Dismissal of Metaphysics?), in Logos, Moscow, 2011, vol. 3/82, pp. 107–123.
7. Adams M. 2014 “What’s Wrong with the Ontotheological Error?”, in Journal of Analytic Theology, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 1–12.
8. Caputo J. The Religious, Oxford, 2002.
9. Carlson Th. 2003 “Postmetaphysical theology”, in Vanhoozer K. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 58–75.
10. Hankey W. 2004 “Why Heidegger’s «History» of Metaphysics Is Dead”, in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 2004, vol. 78/3, pp. 425–443.
11. Inwood M. 1999 “Difference, Ontological”, in Idem. A Heidegger Dictionary, Oxford, 1999, pp. 46–49.
12. Inwood M. 1999 “Ontotheology”, in Idem. A Heidegger Dictionary, Oxford, 1999, pp. 149–150.
13. Jaran F. 2006 “L’onto-théologie dans l’oeuvre de Martin Heidegger: Récit d’une confrontation avec la pensée Occidentale”, in Philosophie, 2006, vol. 91, pp. 37–62.
14. Janicaud D. Le tournant théologique de la phenomenology française, Combas, 1992.
15. Klun B. 2006 “Die Gottesfrage in Heideggers «Beiträgen»“, in Theologie und Philosophie: Vierteljahresschrift, Basel; Wien, 2006, vol. 4, pp. 529–547.
16. Kremer K. 1984 “Ontotheologie“, in Ritter J., Gründer K., Gabriel G. (eds.) Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Basel, 1984, vol. 6, p. 1207.
17. Jaran F., Perrin Ch. (eds.) The Heidegger Concordance, London; New York, 2013.
18. Thomson I. 2013 “Ontotheology”, in The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, London; New York, 2013, pp. 319–328.

Information about the author

Gaginsky Aleksei