/

Shokhin Vladimir

Philosophical Theology and Biblical Hermeneutics: a Discourse on the Post-structuralist Challenge


Shokhin Vladimir (2014) " Philosophical Theology and Biblical Hermeneutics: a Discourse on the Post-structuralist Challenge ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia, 2014, vol. 56, pp. 41-57 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201456.41-51

Abstract

Given that philosophical theology has two basic missions, i.e. apologetic and hermeneutic, the author avows that it is because of its philosophical nature that it realizes the first task via critical analysis of not only antitheistic but also theistic propositions and the second one by exegesis of the exegesis itself. The paper deals with the exegesis of the contemporary Christian (both Roman Catholic and Orthodox) concern conditioned by the intervention into Biblical studies of a very fashionable trend, i.e. reader-response criticism whose extreme (readers are virtually regarded as the authors of the text) corresponds to Roland Barth’s postmodernist conception of the death of the author. The paper detects not only the logical self-refutation of this theory, but also its profound inconsistency. Indeed, while positioning their liberation of a text from an author as an antitheological revolution, the champions of deconstructivism don’t realize that in the historical perspective they only parody one of the very ancient and infl uential trends of theological Biblical hermeneutics, which the author of the paper designates as “Alexandrism” and whose origins he tries to discover.

Keywords

philosophical theology, apologetics, hermeneutics, exegesis, Biblical studies, reader-response criticism, post-structuralism, the death of the author, Alexandrism, allegorical method

References


1. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Pojetika (Selected Works: Semiotics, Poetics), Moscow, 1994.
2. Brek I., prot. 2006 “Pravoslavie i Biblija segodnja” (Orthodoxy and Bible Today), in Pravoslavie i Biblija segodnja: Sb statej, Kiev, 2006. pp. 250–290.
3. Djevis S. T. 2013 “Otkrovenie i bogoduhnovennost'” (Revelation and God Inspiration), in Flint T. P., Rej M. K. (eds.) Oksfordskoe rukovodstvo po filosofskoj teologii, Moscow, 2013, pp. 66–98.
4. Karavidopulos I. Vvedenie v Novyj Zavet (Introduction to New Testament), Moscow, 2010.
5. Shohin V. K. 2014 “Filosofskaja teologija i osnovnoe bogoslovie” (Philosophical Theology and Fundamental Theology), in Vestnik PSTGU. Serija I. Bogoslovie. Filosofija, 2014, vol. 1/51, pp. 57–79.
6. Breck J. The Power of the Word in the Worshipping Church. N. Y., 1986.
7. Fiedrowicz M. Prinzipien der Schriftauslegung in der Alten Kirche, Bern; Berlin, 1998.
8. McKnight E. V. Postmodern Use of the Bible. The Emergence of Reader-Oriented Criticism, Nashville, 1988.
9. Montague G. T. Understanding the Bible. A Basic Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, Mahwah, 1997.
10. Montague G. T. 2003 “Hermeneutics, Biblical”, in New Catholic Encyclopedia, Detroit, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 791–797.
11. Tompkins J. P. (ed.) Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism, [Baltimore], 1980.

Information about the author

Shokhin Vladimir