The author attempts to reconstruct the context surrounding the projects for a reformed epistemology and an affi rmation of the Christian faith by Alvin Plantinga. An analysis of Plantinga’s epistemological presuppositions reveals how they are intertwined. The basic problem surrounding the dispute between fundamentalists and anti-fundamentalists concerning the nature of knowledge constituted the background against which the theistic philosophy of Plantinga began to take form. Examining this dispute, the author of this article attempts to define the position of the philosophers in question and to clarify the differences in terminology which are found in the appropriate literature. The relationship between evidentialism and reliabilism on the one hand and internalism and externalism on the other is noted. The author distinguishes between an early (weak) and later (strong) type of reformed epistemology. In the former type, Plantinga was concerned with refuting the classical version of epistemological fundamentalism; in the latter, he concentrated his attention on constructing a philosophical scheme which could grant to the basic teachings of theism an epistemological foundation. The author discusses and analyses the main objections to Plantinga. These objections are of two kinds: theological and philosophical. The philosophical objections are aimed at the epistemological presuppositions suggested by Plantinga. The author concludes that, in spite of the value and longevity of Plantiga’s arguments, the solutions to the questions which he raised are dependent on contemporary discussions of analytical epistemology.
Alvin Plantinga, reformed epistemology, affi rmation, affi rmation of Christian faith, fundamentalism. anti-fundamentalism, basic dogmas, model of Aquinas/ Calvin, objection de jure, objection de facto, Great Pumpkin Objection
1. Basinger D. 1991 “Plantinga, Pluralism, and Justified Religious Belief” in: Faith and Philosophy, 1991, vol. 8, pp. 67–80.
2. DeRose K. Voodoo Epistemology in: Ресурс: http:in:pantheon.yale.edu/~kd47/voodoo.htm
3. Fales E. 2003 “Critical Notice of Warranted Christian Belief by Alvin Plantinga” in: Nous, 2003, vol. 37, pp. 419-432.
4. Fales E. 2001 “Reformed Epistemology and Biblical Hermeneutics” in: Philo, 2001, pp. 169–184;
5. Grigg R. 1990 “The Crucial Disanalogies Between Properly Basic Belief and Belief in God” in: Religious Studies, 1990, vol. 26, pp. 389–401.
6. Helm P. 2001 “Review of Warranted Christian Belief by Alvin Plantinga” in: Mind, 2001, vol. 110, vol. 440, pp. 1110–1111.
7. Clark K. J. (ed.) Philosophers Who Believe: The Spiritual Journey of 11 Leading Thinkers, Downers Grove (Ill.), 1993.
8. Jeffreys D. S. 1997 “How Reformed is Reformed epistemology? Alvin Plantinga and Calvin’s «Sensus Divinitatis»” in: Religious Studies, 1997, vol. 33, pp. 419–432.
9. Le Morvan P., Radcliffe D. 2003 “Plantinga on Warranted Christian Belief” in: The Heythrop Journal, 2003, vol. 44, pp. 345-351.
10. LeBlanc J. Aquinas and Plantinga, 2000.
11. Macintosh J. J. Locke, Plantinga, and the A/C model, 2000.
12. 1980 “Modernizing the Case for God” in: Time, 5 April, 1980.
13. Flew A., MacIntyre A. (eds.) New Essays in Philosophical Theology, London, 1955.
14. Plantinga A. 1984 “Advice to Christian Philosophers” in: Faith and Philosophy, 1984, vol. 1, pp. 253–271.
15. Plantinga A. Does God Have a Nature? Wisconsin, 1980.
16. Plantinga A. 1983 “Reason and Belief in God” in: Plantinga A., Wolterstorff N. (eds.) Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, Notre Dame, 1983.
17. Silver D. 2001 “Religious experience and the facts of religious pluralism” in: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2001, vol. 49, pp. 1-17.
18. Strawson P. Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, London, 1959.
19. Swinburne R. 2001 “Plantinga on Warrant” in: Religious Studies, 2001, vol. 37, pp. 203-214.
20. Tilley T. W. 1990 “Reformed Epistemology and Religious Fundamentalism: How Basic are our Basic Beliefs?” in: Modern Theology, 1990, vol. 6, pp. 237–238.
21. Willard J. 2003 “Plantinga’s Epistemology of Religious Belief and the Problem of Religious Diversity” in: The Heythrop Journal, 2003, vol 44, pp. 59-74.
22. Sennet Dzh. F., Karpov K. V. (ed.) Analiticheskij teist: antologija Alvina Plantingi (Analytical Theist: Plantinga’s Anthology), Moscow, 2014.
23. Borodin F. Ju. 2001 “«Reformistskaja jepistemologija» v istorii analiticheskoj filosofii religii” (“Reformist Epistemology” in History of Analytical Philosophy of Religion) in: Universitas: Nauka v kontekste sovremennoj kul'tury. Mezhdisciplinarnyj sbornik nauchnyh trudov molodyh uchenyh SPbGU, Saint-Petersbourg, 2001, pp. 13–24.
24. Gorbatova Ju. V. 2010 “Alvin Plantinga i Foma Akvinskij o prostote i bolee slozhnyh svojstvah Boga” (A. Plantinga and Thomas Aquinas on Simplicity and More Complicated God’s Property) in: Filosofija. Jazyk. Kul'tura. Materialy nauchnoj konferencii aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh, Moscow, 2010, pp. 40–52.
25. Gorbatova Ju. V. 2011 “Alvin Plantinga o kosmologicheskom dokazatel'stve bytija Boga svjatogo Fomy Akvinskogo. Kriticheskij obzor nekotoryh aspektov” (A. Plantinga on Cosmological Argument for Existence of God by Thomas Aquinas) in: Voprosy filosofii, 2011, vol. 1, pp. 150–159.
26. Gorbatova Ju. V. 2011 “Ob otozhdestvlenii ob’ektov cherez vozmozhnye miry v koncepcii Alvina Plantingi” (On Identification of Objects through Possible Worlds in A. Plantinga’s Conception) in: Imenovanie, neobhodimost' i sovremennaja filosofija, Moscow, 2011, pp. 241–253.
27. Gorbatova Ju. V. 2012 “Plantinga i ego modal'naja versija ontologicheskogo dokazatel'stva” (A. Plantinga and His Modal Version of Ontological Proof) in: Istorija filosofii, 2012, vol. 17, pp. 243–261.
28. Kezin A. V. (trans.) 1993 “Karnap R. Preodolenie metafiziki logicheskim analizom jazyka” (R. Carnap. The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language) in: Vestnik MGU. Ser. 7 «Filosofija», 1993, vol. 6, pp. 11-26.
29. Plantinga A. Bog, svoboda i zlo (God, Freedom and Evil), Novosibirsk, 1993.
30. Plantinga A. 1994 “Metodologicheskij naturalizm?” (Methodological Naturalism?) in: Kimelev Ju. A. (trans.) Problemy hristianskoj filosofii: Materialy pervoj konferencii Obshhestva hristianskih filosofov, Moscow, 1994, pp. 75–124.
31. Tolstoj A. B. (trans.) 2010 “Plantinga A. Reformatskoe vozrazhenie protiv estestvennoj teologii” (Plantinga A. The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology) in: Filosofija religii: Al'manah. 2008–2009, Moscow, 2010, pp. 210–227.