/ 
The canonical status of Constantinople and its interpretation in Byzantium
DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201453.25-51
Abstract
The author subjects to thorough consideration the gradual change in the status of the Patriarch of Constantinople from the bishop of a minor town to the Ecumenical Patriarch possessing a certain set of administrative privileges. After giving a definition of the status of a bishop and ecclesiastical provinces in the ancient Church, the author, basing his conclusions upon canonical sources and their expositions in the Early Byzantine period, proceeds to develop the idea that the change in the bishop’s status went through several successive stages and that each new stage had its own causes, not the least important of which were of political nature. After both Rome and Constantinople, as political centers of the Roman Empire, received in the 4th century certain «privileges of honor» peculiar to capital cities, these privileges were consecutively modified into mandate of power. This process took several centuries to reach completion and was connected with the activities of the Emperors Zeno I and Justinian the Great (5th–6th centuries) who legally secured the new status of the bishop of the capital city and granted him the title of Ecumenical Patriarch. After the patriarchate of Photius and the confl ict with the bishops of Rome the Patriarch of Constantinople receives the right to intrude — in certain cases — into the canonical jurisdiction of other Churches, which becomes the key change in understanding the nature of supremacy. In later times this tendency was enhanced and reached its climax in the 20th century when the Ecumenical Patriarchate began testing the ground to expand its authority to the whole of the Orthodox world, with the further perspective of turning into a kind of «Orthodox Rome».
Keywords
Constantinople, Rome, bishop, episcopal see, primacy, primatus, privileges, (Roman) Pope, Patriarch, diptychs, the Byzantine Empire, the Christian Church, Ecumenical Patriarch.
References
1. Jugie M. 1918 “Le plus ancien recueil canonique slave et la primauté du pape” in : Bessarione, 1918, vol. 34, pp. 47–55.
2. Kapterev N. F. Snoshenija ierusalimskih patriarhov s russkim pravitel'stvom (Relations of Patriarchs of Jerusalem and Russian Goverment), Saint-Petersbourg, 1895, vol. 1.
3. Maksimovich K. A. 2005 “Spor o pervenstve «starogo» i «novogo» Rima v slavjanskom mire: («papisticheskie» sholii v drevneslavjanskoj kormchej Efremovskoj redakcii)” (Disput on Priority of “Old” and “New” Rome in Slavic World (Papal Scholia in Old-Slavonic Kórmchaia Book in Ephraim’s Version)) in: Ezhegodnaja bogoslovskaja konferencija PSTBI, 2005 g. Moscow, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 370–378.
4. Maksimovich K. A. 2007 “Novella CXXIII sv. imperatora Justiniana I (527–565 gg.) «O razlichnyh cerkovnyh voprosah»: Perevod i kommentarij” (Novella CXXIII of St. Emperor Justinian I (527–565) “On Different Church Matters”: Translation and Commentary)) in: Vestnik PSTGU. Serija 1. Bogoslovie. Filosofija, 2007, vol. 3 (19), pp. 22–54.
5. Pavlov A. S. 1897 “Anonimnaja grecheskaja stat'ja o preimushhestvah Konstantinopol'skogo patriarshego prestola i drevneslavjanskij perevod ee s dvumja vazhnymi dopolnenijami” (Anonymous Greek Article on Privileges of Constantinople Patriarchal See and Its Old-Slavonic Translation with Two Important Addition) in: Vizantijskij vremennik, 1897, vol. 4, pp. 143–154.