Lavrent'ev Andrei

The Problem of God in History in the Works of Wolfhart Pannenberg (Its Philosophical, Dogmatic, and Ecumenical Aspects) .

Abstract

The author studies the problem of the working of God in history, a subject which was constitutive of the German Protestant theologian’s Wolfhart Pannenberg (*1928) theology of history. This article examines the philosophical, dogmatic, and ecumenical aspects of the problem. Philosophical aspects include the idea of God as both transcendent and imminent in the world, the eternal history of God in Himself, and the dependence of God on the history of the world. The contributions of Hegel, Kierkegaard, and the theologian Karl Barth are taken into account. The dogmatic aspect involves the doctrines concerning divine revelation and the Trinity. Pannenberg’s theory of the union between the historical revelation of the triune God and the inner (imminent) divine life of the Trinity is discussed. His idea of the historical-soteriological activity of the persons of the Blessed Trinity and the way in which the divine persons inter-relate in the unity of the Trinity is analyzed, especially in the way this is revealed in the action of the divine economy or history of salvation, the central events of which are the cross and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The author does not forget to mention the way Pannenberg explains the perichoresic rapport existing between the divine persons of the Trinity. The author continues with a survey of the later works of Pannenberg, in which the German theologian develops his ideas concerning the eschatological perspectives of the divine economy as related to the revelation of the world to come already anticipated in the Kingdom of God and in the being of the Trinity. The ecumenical aspects of Pannenberg’s theology include the way he sets forth the problem of the relationship between the imminent and economic doctrine of the Trinity, a question which has become a subject of inter-Christian dialogue. The author fi nally reflects on the arguments of western theologians who have identified the working of the imminent and economic Trinity, as well as those contemporary Orthodox theologians (John Meyendorff and Athanasios Vletsis) who have likewise commented on the problem.

Keywords

Wolfhart Pannenberg, contemporary German Protestantism, the historicity of God, imminent and economic doctrines of the Trinity, pantheism

References

1. Bart K. Kirchliche Dogmatik, Zürich, 1976, vol. IV/1.
2. Barth K. Die christliche Dogmatik im Entwurf. Die Lehre vom Worte Gottes, München, 1927.
3. Jenson J. W. The Triune Identity, Philadelphia, 1982.
4. Jüngel E. 1972 “Vom Tod des lebendigen Gottes (1968)” in: Idem. Unterwegs zur Sache. Theologische Bemerkungen, München, 1972, pp. 105–125.
5. Jüngel. Gott als Geheimnis der Welt, Tübingen, 1977.
6. Kasper W. Der Gott Jesu Christi, Mainz, 1982.
7. Macquarrie J. 1995 “Panenteismus” in: Theologische Realenzyklopädie, Berlin, 1995, vol. 25, pp. 611–615.
8. Moltmann J. Der gekreuzigte Gott, München, 1972.
9. Moltmann J. “Festvortrag für Wolfhart Pannenberg” in: Wege zu einer trinitarischen Eschatologie. Ansprachen anlässilich des Festaktes zur Feier des 75. Geburtstages von W. Pannenberg, München, 2004.
10. Moltmann J. 1975 “Gedanken zur «trinitarischen Geschichte Gottes»” in: Evangelische Theologie. 1975, vol. 35, pp. 208–223.
11. Moltmann J. Trinität und Reich Gottes, München, 1980.
12. Pannenberg W. Grundfragen Systematischer Theologie, Göttingen, 1980. vol. 2.
13. Pannenberg W. 1988 “Die Welt als Geschichte Gottes und die Einheit des göttlichen Wesens” in: Systematische Theologie, Göttingen, 1988, vol. 1.
14. Pfeil H. 1980 “Die Frage nach der Veränderlichkeit und Geschichtlichkeit Gottes” in: Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift, 1980, vol. 1, pp. 243–255.
15. Rahner K. 1960 “Bemerkungen zum dogmatischen Traktat «De Trinitate»” in: Schriften zur Theologie, Einsiedeln, 1960, vol. 4, pp. 103–133.
16. Schleiermacher F. Der christliche Glaube, nach den Grundsätzen der evangelischen Kirche im Zusammenhange dargestellt, Berlin, 19607, vol. 2.
17. Vletsis A. 2009 “Die immanente Trinität ist die «doxologische Trinität»” in: Una Sancta, 2009, vol. 1, pp. 8–28
18. Wendebourg D. Geist oder Energie. Zur Frage der innergöttlichen Verankerung des christlichen Lebens in der byzantischen Theologie, München, 1980.
20. Gegel' G. V. F. Filosofija religii (Philosophy of Religion), Moscow, 1977, vol. 2.
21. Zajcev V. Uchenie V. Losskogo o teozise (Lossky’s Teaching on Theism). Moscow, 2007.
23. Lavrent'ev A. V. 2012 “Istorizm i istoriko-kriticheskij metod v teologii V. Pannenberga” in: Vestnik PSTGU. Serija 1. Bogoslovie. Filosofija, 2012, vol. 3 (41), pp. 7–18.
24. Mejendorf I., protopr. 2013 “Svjataja Troica v palamitskom bogoslovii” (Holy Trinity in Palamites’ Theology) in: Pashal'naja tajna: stat'i po bogosloviju, Moscow, 2013, pp. 605–620.
25. Mejndorf I., protopr. 2013 “Po povodu «Edinstva Triedinogo Boga» Jurgena Mol'tmana” (Concerning J. Moltmann’ “The Unity of Triune God”) in: Pashal'naja tajna: stat'i po bogosloviju, Moscow, 2013, pp. 738–744
26. Obolevich T. Ot imjaslavija k jestetike. Koncepcija simvola Alekseja Loseva (From Imiaslavie to Esthetics. Conception of Symbol by A. Losev), Moscow, 2014.
27. Gestrih K., Ukolov K. I. (eds.) Sravnitel'noe bogoslovie: nemeckij protestantizm XX v. Teksty s kommentarijami (Comparative Theology: German Protestantism in XX Cent.: Texts and Commentaries), Moscow, 2009.
28. Ukolov K. I. 2011 “Bogoslovskaja antropologija Vol'fharta Pannenberga” (W. Pannenberg’s Theological Anthropology) in: Vestnik PSTGU. Serija 1. Bogoslovie. Filosofija, 2011, vol. 2 (34), pp. 34–46.
29. Chepurin K. V. 2012 “Antropologija, hristologija i jeshatologija Gegelja: sovremennyj vzgljad” (Hegel’s Anthropology, Christology and Eschatology: Modern View) in: Vestnik PSTGU. Serija 1. Bogoslovie. Filosofija, 2012, vol. 2 (40), pp. 95–110.

Information about the author

Lavrent'ev Andrei