Zolotukhin Vsevolod

How is it possible to increase knowledge in theology?

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the question, is it possible to increase knowledge in the field of theology like as it is possible in humanities in general. The main difficulties first of all consist in (1) confessional character of each theology, (2) in its plurality when each theology has its own concept system and original epistemological framework, (3) in the resulting incomparability of theologies. Discussing the presumably scientific character of theology, it could be useful to discern between premodern and modern understanding of the term “science”. The author argues, there do not exist insurmountable obstacles for theology to strengthen its argumentative basis, namely, theology possesses opportunity to get closer to the human sciences if it relies on empirical researches, for instance, of psychology of religion. This thesis is illustrated on two different examples from different regions and contexts: the theory of structure of religious experience by K. Girgensohn and W. Gruehn, and the theory of political aspect of religious conversion by I. Martín-Baró. The both theologies base their generalization on correct empirical research data, — like it occurs in philosophy of religion or even human sciences. The both cases demonstrate increase of knowledge: the first on from which elements does religious experience consist and how it is developing; the second on how religious conversion is tied to change of political views and social behavior of believers. Such contact of theology with empirical science of religion is in no way harmful for the both sides; it can be initiated in various traditions, which adopt the focus of broadly understood Western-born rationality.

Keywords

epistemology of humanities, criteria of science, theology, psychology of religion, secularization, K. Girgensohn, W. Gruehn, I. Martín-Baró

References

1. Al-Khusht М. ‘U. (2001) Madkhal ʼilā falsafat al-dīn [Introduction to philosophy of religion]. Cairo (in Arabic).
2. Belzen A. van (2015) Religionspsychologie. Eine historische Analyse im Spiegel der Internationalen Gesellschaft. Berlin.
3. Canesi A. (1936) “Vorläufi ge Untersuchungen über die Psychologie des Gebets”. Archiv für Religionspsychologie, vol. 6, pp. 13–72.
4. Demmrich S., Wolfradt U. (2019) “Die ‘Gottesidee’ als Wesensmerkmal der Religion im Denken Karl Girgensohns”. Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte, vol. 26 (2), pp. 86–103.
5. Dussel E.D. (1994) “Teología de liberación y socialismo”, in I. Ellacuría, J. Sobrino (eds) Mysterium Liberationis. Conceptos fundamentales de la Teología de Liberación, 2 ed., vol. 1, Madrid, pp. 115–144.
6. Feil E. (1986–2007) Religio, in 4 vols. Göttingen.
7. Girgensohn K. (1924) Grundriss der Dogmatik. Leipzig.
8. Girgensohn K. (1925) Religionspsychologie, Religionswissenschaft und Theologie. 2 Aufl . Leipzig.
9. Gruehn W. (1924) Das Werterlebnis. Eine religionspsychologische Studie auf experimenteller Grundlage. Leipzig.
10. Gruehn W. (1925) Ein baltisches Gelehrtenleben. Karl Girgensohnʼs religionspsychologische Entwicklung. Hamburg.
11. Gruehn W. (1926) Religionspsychologie. Breslau.
12. Gruehn W. (1936) “Empirische Theologie. (Zur Einführung)”. Archiv für Religionspsychologie, vol. 6, pp. IX–XVIII.
13. Martín-Baró I. (1989) “Sólo Dios salva”. Sentido político de la conversión religiosa. El Salvador.
14. Martín-Baró I. (1998) Psicología de la liberación. Madrid.
15. Raitz von Frentz Е. (1925) “Das religiöse Erlebnis im psychologischen Laboratorium”, in Stimmen der Zeit. Monatsschrift für das Geistesleben der Gegenwart, vol. 109, Freiburg im Breisgau, pp. 200–214.
16. Wulff D. M. (1985) “Experimental Introspection and Religious Experience: the Dorpat School of Religious Psychology”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, vol. 21, pp. 131–150.
17. Zolotukhin Vs. V. (2020) “Rozhdenie nauk o religii iz dukha teologii” [The birth of religious studies from the spirit of theology]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriia I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, vol. 92, pp. 76–97 (in Russian).

Information about the author

Zolotukhin Vsevolod

Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; 21/4 Staraya Basmannaya Str., Moscow 105066, Russian Federation;
Post: assistant professor;
ORCID: 0000-0002-4405-5543;
Email: vakis2011@gmail.com.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.