Search results

Василик В. В. Представления святителя Викторина Петавского о власти и царстве // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2021. Вып. 98. С. 25-49. DOI: 10.15382/sturI202198.25-49
This article deals with the doctrine of power of St. Victorinus of Pettau, the prominent Latin exegete of the 3rd c. and the author of the fi rst preserved commentary on the Apocalypse. The article looks at the level of his education, his intellectual horizon, the general trends of his works as well, his general knowledge of life and his political experience. It studies the issue of the wars and persecutions mentioned in the Commentary and proposes a hypothesis that the Commentary could have been written within the wide interval between 252 and 304. It is shown that in terms of theology St. Victorinus depends on the school of Asia Minor and is estranged from the conception of the symphony of the Roman Empire and the Church, which is present in its germinating form in St. Melitonus of Sardes. In spite of the links with the legacy of Tertullianus, he lacks the idea of the Roman state as the defense wall against Antichrist. On the contrary, the Antichrist concentrates the Roman power with its unlawfulness and crime because he is the resurrected Nero. The latter is, on the one hand, a symbol of the impious pagan Rome with its deifi cation of Man and, on the other hand, the symbol of the union of Jews and pagans directed against Christ and the Church. The image of Nero is connected with a certain numerology: the resurrected Nero will be the eighth emperor and the Antichrist; he will be the king of Jews and, at the same time, of the pagans, the most sordid and hideous parody of the resurrected Christ, his reign being the caricature of the eighth day of eternal life and glory of Christ. This image partly overlaps with the tradition refl ected in Commodianus, partly diff ers from it. The spiral model of history used by St. Victorinus is related to the theology of recapitulation, when one similar event precedes the following, which, in turn, takes places on a higher level. This allows one to suppose the presence of the idea of the “returning Nero”, when every eighth emperor is the forerunner of the resurrected Nero and, accordingly, of the Antichrist. This series includes the persecutors of the Christians: Traianus, Septimius Severus, Decius. The last in this series in Diocletianus, who almost completely corresponds to the features of the “resurrected Nero”, i.e. he comes from the East, kills three kings, behaves as an actor and hypocrite, and, most importantly, is the most ruthless persecutor of Christians of all the Roman emperors. The presence of his co-ruler Galerius may suggest an analogy with the false prophet of Antichrist, i.e. the Second Beast of the Revelation. The true power for St. Victorinus is theocracy, the reign of Christ, who is the only true king over heaven and the earth, and of Saints, who will co-reign with Christ.
St. Victorinus of Pettau, emperor, prinicipatus, dominatus, senate, Nero, Diocletian, historiosophy, catastrophism, persecution, wars, earthquakes, Antichrist, theology of recapitulation, spiral model of history
  1. Averintsev S. (1997) Poetika rannevizantiiskoi literatury [Poetics of early Byzantine literature]. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Bardy G. (1950) “Victorin de Poetovio”, in Dictionnaire de la Theologie Catholique, vol. 14, col. 2884–2886.
  3. Barnes T. (1982) The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  4. Bauckham R. (1993) The Climax of Prophecy. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
  5. Blois L. (1976) The Policy of the Emperor Gallienus. Leiden: Brill.
  6. Bradley K. R. (1978) Suetonius. Life of Nero. A Historical commentary. (Collection Latomus 157). Brussels: Latomus.
  7. Bratouhin A. (ed.) (2005) Tertullianus Quintus Septimius Florens. Apologeticum. Ad Scapulam. St. Petersrburg (Russian translation).
  8. Bratož R. (1990) “Die Geschichte des Fruher Christentums in Gebiete zwischen Sirmium und Aquilea in Licht der neuren Forschungen”. Klio, vol. 72, pp. 508–550.
  9. Bratož R. (1993) Kriscanstvo v Ogleju. Liubliana.
  10. Bratož R. (1999) Il cristianesimo aquileise prima di Costantino: fra Aquileia e Poetovio. Udine: Instituto Pio Paschini; Gorizia: Ist. di storia sociale e religiosa.
  11. Bratož R. (2002) “Der Bischof Victorinus und die Kirchengemeinde von Poetovio”. Zalai Museum, vol. 11, pp. 1–11.
  12. Bratož R. (2003) Ptuj. Liubliana.
  13. Bratož R. (2014.) “Episkop Viktorin i khristianskaia obshchina Petavia (vtoraia polovina III veka)” [Bishop Victorinus and the Christian community of Petavium (the second half of the 3rd century]. Khristianskoie chtenie, vol. 2/3, pp. 9–24 (in Russian).
  14. Brent A. (1999) “The Imperial cult and development of Church order: concepts and images of authority in Paganism and Early Christianity before the age of Cyprian”. Vigiliae Christianae,. vol. 45, suppl., pp. 164–209.
  15. Bruce F. F. (1938) “The Earliest Latin Commentary on the Apocalypse”. The Evangelical Quarterly. vol. 10, p. 352–366.
  16. Dubois J. (1965) Le Martyrologe d Usuard. Bruxelles.
  17. Dulaey M. (1993) Victorin de Poetovio. Premier exégète latin. (Collection des Études Augustiniennes. Série Antiquité, vol. 139.) Paris: Cerf.
  18. Dulaey M. (ed.) (1997) Victorin de Poetovio “De la Construction du Monde”, in Sources Chretiennes, vol. 423, Paris: Cerf, pp. 137–149.
  19. Dulaey M. (ed.) (1997) Victorin de Poetovio “Trait sur l’Apocalypse”, in Sources Chretiennes, vol. 423, Paris: Cerf, pp. 45–135.
  20. Fokin A.R. (2006) Latinskaia Patrologiia [Latin patrology] Moscow (in Russian).
  21. Frend W. H. C. (1965) Martyrdom and Persecution in the Early Church: A Study of a Confl ict from the Maccabees to Donatus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  22. Frend W. H. C. (1974) “Open Questions Concerning the Christians and the Roman Empire in the Age of the Severi”. Journal of Theologica Studies, vol. 1, pp. 110–140.
  23. Gibson E. L. (2001) “Jewish Antagonism or Christian Polemic: The Case of the Martyrdom of Pionius Journal of Early Christian Studies”. Journal of Early Christian Studies, vol. 9, pp. 339–358.
  24. Gibson E. L. (2003) “The Jews and Christians in the Martyrdom of Polycarp: Entangled or Parted Ways?”, in A. H. Becker, A. Y. Reed (eds) The Ways that Never Parted Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, Thuebingen, pp. 145–158.
  25. Halfmann H. (1986) Itinera principum. Geschichte und Typologie der Kaiserreisen im römischen Reich (Heidelberger althistorische Beiträge und epigraphische Studien, II). Stuttgart: Steiner.
  26. Helm R. (ed.) (1956) Eusebius Werke VII. Die Chronik des Hieronymus. (Griechische Christiliche Schriftsteller. Bd. 47.) Berlin: Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
  27. Jones A. H. M. (1964) The Later Roman Empire. 284–602. Vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  28. Khandoga N. (2017) “Kosmologiia sviatitelia Viktorina Petaviiskogo: bogoslovsko-fi lologicheskii analiz latinskikh terminov” [St. Victorinus’ cosmology: theological and philological analysis of Latin terms]. Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoi dukhovnoi seminarii, vol. 2 (18), pp. 13–33 (in Russian).
  29. Klauck J. H. (2001) “Do they never come back? Nero redivivus and the Apocalypse”. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, vol. 63, pp. 684–698.
  30. Kniazkii I., Khrapov A. (2006) “Gonenia na Khristian v Rimskoi Imperii” [Persecutions of Christians in the Roman Empire], in Pravoslavnaia Entsiklopedia [The Orthodox encyclopaedia], vol. 12, Moscow, pp. 50–69 (in Russian).
  31. Kolb F. (1987) Diocletian und die Erste Tetrarchie. Improvisation oder Experiment in der Organisation monarchischer Herrschaft? (Untesuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte). Berlin; New York: de Gruyter.
  32. Kos P. (1986) The Monetary Circulation in the Southeastern Alpine Region ca. 300 BC — AD 1000. (Situla. Dissertationes musaei Labanicensis. Vol. 24.) Liubliana.
  33. Lawrence J.M. (1978) “Nero redivivus”. Fides et Historia, vol. 11, pp. 54–66.
  34. Maier H.O. (2013) “Nero in Jewish and Christian Tradition from the 1st Cent. to the Reformation”, in E. Buckley, M. Dinter (eds) A Companion to the Neronian Age, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwella, pp. 385–404.
  35. Meyendorf J. (1989) Imperial unity and the Christian divisions. New York: St. Vladimir Seminary Press.
  36. Millar F. (1964) A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  37. Minear P. S. (1953) “The Wounded Beast”. Jounal of Biblica Literatures, vol. 72.2, pp. 93–107.
  38. Minors R. A. (ed.) (1966) C. Plini Caecili Secundi epistularum libri decem. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  39. Nebolsin A. (2010) “Ioanna Bogoslova Otkrovenie” [The Revelation of St. John the Theologian], in Pravoslavnaia Entsiklopedia [The Orthodox encyclopaedia], vol. 24, Moscow, pp. 705–745 (in Russian).
  40. North J. (1992) “The Development of Religious Pluralism”, in J. Lieu, J. North, T. Rajak (eds) The Jews among Pagans and Christians in the Roman Empire, London: Routledge, pp. 180–200.
  41. Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies (2020). Kar′kov (Russian translation).
  42. Pohlsander H. A. (1986) “The Religious Policy of Decius”, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Roemische Welt, vol. 2, Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1826–1842.
  43. Popov I. (2018) “Neron” [Nero], in Pravoslavnaia Entsiklopedia [The Orthodox encyclopaedia], vol. 49, Moscow, pp. 40–46 (in Russian).
  44. Popovich R. (1995) Rano hrishchanstvo na Balkanu [The Early Christianity in Balcans]. Belgrade (in Serbian).
  45. Rissi M. (1995) Die Hure Babylon und die Verführung der Heiligen. Ein Studium zur Apokalypse des Johannes. (Beiträge zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament, 136) Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
  46. Rostovtsev M. (2001) Obshchestvo i khoziaistvo Drevnego Rima [Society and household of the Ancient Rome], vol. 1–2. Мoscow (in Russian).
  47. Salvadore I. (ed.) (2011) Commodiano. Carmen de duobus populis. Bologna: Patron.
  48. Shtaerman M. (1985) “Ot grazhdanina k poddannomu” [From a citizen to a subject], in Kul′tura Drevnego Rima [Culture of the Ancient Rome], vol. 1, Moscow, pp. 22–100 (in Russian).
  49. Stein A. (1937) “Ofonius Tigellinus”, in Pauly-Wissowa Reallexicon fuer Antike und Christentum, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, vol. XVII, 2, col. 2056–2061.
  50. Strecker G., Schnelle U. (1996) Texte zur Briefl iteratur und zur Johannesapokalypse. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  51. Thompson L. (1990) The book of Revelation. Apocalypse and the Empire. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  52. Tuplin Ch. (1979) “The False Neros of the First Century A.D”. Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 5, Brussels: Latomus, pp. 364–404.
  53. Utchenko S. L. (1977) Politicheskaia teoria Rimskoi imperii [Political theory of the Roman Empire]. Moscow.
  54. Victorini Poetovionensis “Opera quae supersunt” (2017), in Сorpus Christianorum. Series Latina, vol. 5. Turnhout: Brepols.
  55. Waltraud J.-S. (1990) Untersuchungen zum Nero-Bild der Spätantike. (Altertumwissenschaftliche Texte und Studien, Bd. 18.) Hildesheim; Zurich; New York: Olms.
  56. Watson A. (1999) Aurelian and the third century. London; New York.
  57. Williams S. (2000) Diocletian and the Roman Recovery. New York: Routledge.
  58. Zakharov G. (2014) Illiriiskie tserkvi v epokhu arianskikh sporov [The Illyrian churches in the time of Arian controversies]. Moscow (in Russian).
Vasilik Vladimir, protodeacon
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: St. Petersburg State University; 5 Mendeleevskaya liniya, St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation;
Post: assistant professor;
ORCID: 0000-0001-5051-829;
Email: fvasilik@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Great thanks to dr. of history Fr. Pavel Ermilov, dr. of philosophy (habilitated) Alexey Fokin, dr. of history Alexey Panteleev.