/
Search results


Цыганков Д. А. Воспоминания профессора В. И. Герье. 1894 год в истории Московского университета // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2011. Вып. 1 (38). С. 131-154.
PDF
split University, University conflict, V. I. Guerrier, N. P. Bogolepov
Цыганков Д. А. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2012. Вып. 1 (44). С. 137-140. — Rev. op.: Феофанов А. М. Студенчество Московского университета XVIII — первой четверти XIX века. М.: Изд-во ПСТГУ, 2011. 253 с., с илл.
PDF
Цыганков Д. А. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 1 (50). С. 165-168. — Rev. op.: Панкрат Т. В. Благотворительная деятельность приходских попечительств Москвы. Вторая половина XIX – начало ХХ столетия. М.: Изд-во ПСТГУ. 2011. 192 с.
PDF
Цыганков Д. А. Трагедия учителя. В. И. Герье и М. С. Корелин: к истории интеллектуального диалога // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 4 (53). С. 53-67.
PDF
The article depicts the history of intellectual dialogue between teacher and student (V. I. Gerrier and M. S. Korelin). Purpose — to collect additional material for the study of the «Guerrier school,» — the special community of the historians of the Moscow University. The author comes to the conclusion that Gerrier regarded Korelin as a successor to his scientific tradition and after his successor death in fact was «childless», despite the large number of students in Russian universities and abroad.
V. I. Gerrier, M. S. Korelin, the scientific community of historians of the Moscow University, a research successor, intellectual dialogue
1. Antoschenko A. V. 2010. Mir istorika. Istoriografitscheskii vestnik (The World of historian. Gerald of history study.)., pp. 85-120.
2. Antoschenko A. V. Russkii liberal-anglofil Pavel Gavrilovich Vinogradov (Russian Liberal Anglophile Pavel Gavrilovich Vinogradov). Petrozavodsk, 2010.
3. Filimonov V. A. 2008. Istoria idey i vospitanie istoriey (The history of ideas and education from the history), pp. 174-189.
4. Ivanova T. N. Vladimir Ivanovich Gerrier:portret rossiyskogopedagoga i organizatora obrazovania (Vladimir Gerrier: a portrait of the Russian teacher and organizer of Education). Cheboksary, 2009.
5. Ivanova T. N. Nauchnoe naslediye V.I. Gerrier i formirovanie nauki vseobschey istorii v Rossii (The scientific legacy of Vladimir Gerrier and the formation of World history studies in Russia.). Cheboksary, 2010.
6. Ivanova T. N., Myagkov G. P. 2011. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Istoria ifilologia. no. 3, pp. 26-34.
7. Ivanova T. N., Myagkov G. P. 2011. Istoriki mezdu ochevidnym i voobrasgaemym (Historians between the obvious and the imaginary.), pp. 24-27.
8. Kirsanova E. S. Konservativnyi liberal v russkoy istoriografii: gisn' i istoricheskoe mirovosrenie V. I. Gerrier (Conservative liberal in Russian historiography: the life and historical outlook of Vladimir Gerrier.). Seversk, 2003.
9. Makushin A. V., Tribunskiy P. A. Pavel Nikolaevich Milukov: Trudy I dni (Pavel Milukov: Works and Days). Ryasan, 2001.
10. Pavlenko N. I. Michail Pogodin (Michail Pogodin). Moscow, 2003.
11. Tsigankov D. A. Professor V.I. Gerrierr i ego ucheniki (Professor Vladimir Gerrier and his followers). Moscow, 2010.
12. Tsimbaev N. I. Sergey Michailovich Soloviev (Sergey Solovyov). Moscow, 1990.
13. Zolotarev V. A. 2008. Istoria idey i vospitanie istoriey (The history of ideas and education through the history), pp. 152-173.

Цыганков Д. А. Семинар как место исследования в Московском университете второй половины ХIХ в // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2014. Вып. 4 (59). С. 117-132. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201459.117-132
Recently historian has been paid close attention to the different university institutions. Seminar is one of them. The main purposes of article is to reconstruct the history of the origin of this kind of practice, to determine the value of this Institute in the formation of the curriculum those or other scientific disciplines in the University’s and to explain role in communication and “schoolmaking” practice of the various communities of scientists. Comprehensively analyzing the sources for the study of the seminars: the reports of the persons sent for a scientific purpose abroad, status reports, some offi cial informations of Moscow univercity, memoirs and correspondence, the author comes to the conclusion that the seminars as a type of University institutions appeared at the Moscow University in the mid-1860-ies. The development of this institution in the University continued to 1884. According to the Charter of 1884 seminars are a mandatory form of institutions for historical education. Seminar become a mass, their content is washed out. At the same time Professor of Moscow University Gerier and P. G. Vinogradov tend to keep the research reputation of this institution and, in fact, are at the origin of the transfer of the seminar in a private space in organizing home workshop, original prototype by a team of researchers, seminar became a place for study. The crisis seminars in Moscow falls on the turn of the century. Gerier was not able to transfer accumulated in the framework of the seminar research practices in the Historical society at the Moscow University, and Vinogradov in 1901 leaves the University, enduring traditions of the Moscow seminar in the Anglo-Saxon world universities.
seminar, the community of historians, scientific school, V. I. Gerier, P. G. Vinogradov, Moscow University.

1. Антощенко А. В. (2009) “Das Seminar: немецкие корни и русская крона (о применении немецкого опыта «семинариев» московскими профессорами во второй половине XIX в.” (Das Seminar: German Roots and Russian Top (about Use of German Experience of “Seminaries” by Moscow Professors in Second Half of XIX Century)), in «Byt' russkim po duhu i evropejcem po obrazovaniju»: universitety Rossijskoj imperii v obrazovatel'nom prostranstve Central'noj i Vostochnoj Evropy XVIII — nachala XX v., Moscow, 2009, pp. 263–278.
2. Antoshhenko A. V., Sveshnikova A. V. (2012) “Istoricheskij seminar kak mesto znanija” (Historical Seminar as Place of Knowledge), in Istoricheskaja kul'tura imperatorskoj Rossii: formirovanie predstavlenij o proshlom, Moscow, 2012.
3. Vorob'eva I. G. Professor-slavist Nil Aleksandrovich Popov (Professor-slavist Nil Aleksandrovich Popov), Tver', 1999.
4. Mjagkov G. P. (2001) “«Nestor nemeckoj istoriografii» ili «kamerdiner istorii»? Istoriki Rossii v sporah o Ranke” („Nestor of German Hagiography“ or „Valet of History“? Russian Historians in Disputes about Ranke), in Dialog s proshlym: Al'manah intellektual'noj istorii, Moscow, 2001, vol. 6.
5. Sveshnikov A. V. Peterburgskaja shkola medievistov nachala XX veka. Popytka antropologicheskogo analiza nauchnogo soobshhestva (Petersburg School of Medieval Scholars of Begin of XX Century. Attempt of Anthropological Analysis of Scientific Society), Omsk, 2010.
6. Cygankov D. A. Professor V. I. Ger'e i ego ucheniki (Professor V. I. Ger’e and His Pupils), Moscow, 2010.




Цыганков Д. А., Ильяшенко Н. А. Протоиерей Александр Михайлович Иванцов-Платонов и историки Московского университета // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2015. Вып. 1 (62). С. 137-146. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201562.137-146
The question of the unifi ed field of Church history studies in Russia’s pre-revolutionary era recently became under hot discussion among historians and theologians. Suggesting that the approved program of Church-historical research in this period has not been formed, experts are trying to find the cause of this discrepancy between representatives of secular and ecclesiastical approach and facts about cooperation between them. The proposed publication shows the position of the Department of Church history at Moscow University at the end of 1894, when doctor of theology priest Alexander Ivantsov-Platonov decided to communicate his position to the secular historian and doctor of the universal history Mikhail Sergeyevich Corelin. For Ivantsov-Platonov it was a thought-out position. The Professor wanted to attract student attention and public interest to the problem of Church history. In this regard, in the absence of the nominee to vacancy from Theological Academy, Ivantsov-Platonov wanted to see on his chair secular historian, has already attracted the attention of students studying questions closely connected with the history of the Church. It was a risky option, because secular professors of the University were considered such an option primarily from the practical point of view, especially from the point of view of the curriculum of the faculty. Above all this project was not agreed by The Ministry of national education. This led to the failure of Ivantsov-Platonov project and final marginalization of the Department of Church history at the historical-philological faculty of Moscow University in the early 20th century.
Department of Church history at Moscow University, the curriculum, secularization, V. I. Guerier, M. S. Korelin, A. M. Ivantsov-Platonov, A. P. Lebedev

Tsygankov Dmitrii
Il'iashenko Nikolai
Андреев А. Ю., Цыганков Д. А. Попечитель Императорского университета в системе народного просвещения Российской империи первой половины XIX в // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2015. Вып. 4 (65). С. 70-97. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201565.70-97
The present article is devoted to the study of collective portrait of The Curator of the Imperial universities in Russia in the first half of the 19 th century in the context of domestic policy and on the background of the development of universities in the Europe. The author makes the conclusion about the existence of three generations of The Curators. Each generations of The Curators had a particular management skills, social connections and cultural competencies. The first generation of The Curators (the Curarors-founders) have tried to link the University world of Russia and Europe. A distinctive feature of the second generation of The Curator (the Curators-bureaucrats) began their intervention in the learning process within their own universities, which signifi cantly affected the freedom of teaching and learning in universities of Russia. Finally, the third generation of The Curators had created a new forms of University life after the introduction of the University Statute of 1835.
Curator, freedom of teaching, educational policy, University Charter, S. S. Uvarov, S. G. Stroganov

1. Andreev A. Ju. 2004 “Gumbol'dt v Rossii: ministerstvo narodnogo prosveshhenija i nemeckie universitety v pervoj polovine XIX veka” (Humboldt in Russia: Ministry of People Enlightenment and German Universities in First Half of XIX Century), in Rossijskaja istorija, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 37–55.
2. Andreev A. Ju. 1812 god v istorii Moskovskogo universiteta (1812 in History of Moscow University), Moscow, 1998.
3. Andreev A. Ju. Rossijskie universitety XVIII — pervoj poloviny XIX veka v kontekste universitetskoj istorii Evropy (Russian Universities of XVIII — First Half of XIX Centuries in Context of University History of Europe), Moscow, 2009.
4. Vitteker C. Graf S. S. Uvarov i ego vremja (Count S. S. Uvarov and His Time), Saint-Petersburg, 1999.
5. Galiullina R. H. 2009 “M. N. Musin-Pushkin — popechitel' Kazanskogo i Sankt-Peterburgskogo uchebnyh okrugov” (M. N. Musin-Pushkin — Curator of Education Districts of Kazan’ and Saint-Petersburg), in Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet v XVIII–XX vv.: evropejskie tradicii i rossijskij kontekst, Saint-Petersburg, 2009, pp. 90–91.
6. Zavgorodnjaja O. I. Formirovanie pravovogo statusa instituta popechitelej rossijskih universitetov v pervoj polovine XIX v.: Istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie (Forming of Law Status of Institute of Curators of Russian Universities in First Half of XIX Cent.: Historical-Law Study), Moscow, 2006.
7. Zajcev B. P., Posohov S. I. Popechiteli Har'kovskogo uchebnogo okruga (Curators of Har’kov Education District), Har'kov, 2000.
8. Zorin A. L. Kormja dvuglavogo orla… Literatura i gosudarstvennaja ideologija v Rossii v poslednej treti XVIII — pervoj treti XIX veka (Feeding of Two-Headed Eagle… Literature and State Ideology in Russia in Last Third of XVIII — First Third of XIX Century), Moscow, 2001.
9. Il'ina K. A. 2009 “Informacionnye resursy popechitelja uchebnogo okruga (pervaja chetvert' XIX veka)” (Information Resources of Curator of Educational District (First Quarter of XIX Century)), in Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet v XVIII–XX vv.: evropejskie tradicii i rossijskij kontekst, Saint-Petersburg, 2009.
10. Kostina T. V. 2010 “Akademik S. Ja. Rumovskij i Kazanskij universitet: Istoriograficheskij kontekst” (Academician S. Ja. Rumovskij and University of Kazan’: Historiographical Context), in Akademija nauk v istorii kul'tury Rossii XVIII–XX vekov, Saint-Petersburg, 2010, pp. 81–101.
11. Petrov F. A. Formirovanie sistemy universitetskogo obrazovanija v Rossii (Forming of System of University Education in Russia), Moscow, 2002–2003.
12. Posohov S. I. 2009 “Popechiteli Har'kovskogo uchebnogo okruga pervoj poloviny XIX veka: popytka reabilitacii” (Curators of Har’kov Educational District of First Half of XIX Century: Attempt of Rehabilitation), in Universitates — Universitety: nauka i prosveshhenie, 2009, vol. 4/9, pp. 40–42.
13. Andreev A. Ju., Posohov S. I. (eds.) Universitet v Rossijskoj imperii XVIII — pervoj poloviny XIX veka (University in Russian Empire in XVIII — First Half of XIX Centuries), Moscow, 2012.
14. Filippova Je. N. 2000 “Nikolaj Nikolaevich Novosil'cev” (Nikolaj Nikolaevich Novosil'cev), in Vo glave pervenstvujushhego uchenogo soslovija Rossii, Saint-Petersburg, 2000. S. 105–106.
15. Cygankov D. A. 2010 “Universitetskij popechitel' v Rossii: mezhdu cennostjami evropejskoj nauki i gosudarstvennoj sluzhby (vtoraja polovina XVIII — pervaja tret' XIX veka)” (University Curator in Russia: between Values of European Science and State Service), in Polijetnichnost' Rossii v kontekste istoricheskogo diskursa i obrazovatel'nyh praktik XIX–XXI vv. III Arsent'evskie chtenija, Cheboksary, 2010, pp. 515–527.
16. Cherkaz'janova I. V. 2010 “Akademicheskie uchenye v roli gosudarstvennyh chinovnikov (na primere popechitelej uchebnyh okrugov)” (Academic Scientists in the Role of State Officials (on Example of Curators of Educational Districts)), in Akademija nauk v istorii kul'tury Rossii XVIII–XX vekov, Saint-Petersburg, 2010, pp. 102–124 (and Appendix: spisok popechitelej uchebnyh okrugov Rossijskoj imperii (1803–1917) (List of Curators of Educational Districts of Russian Empire (1803–1917)): ibid., pp. 125–134).
17. Gundelach E. Die Verfassung der Göttinger Universität in drei Jahrhunderten, Göttingen, 1955.
18. Kahl W. Hochschule und Staat. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Betrachtungen eines schwierigen Rechtvehältnisses unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Aufsichtsfragen, Tübingen, 2004.
Andreev Andrei
Tsygankov Dmitrii
Андреев А. Ю., Цыганков Д. А. Преподавание церковно-богословских дисциплин и подготовка историков в Императорском Московском университете // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2016. Вып. 1 (68). С. 45-64. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201668.45-64
The place of church and theology studies in the structure of the Imperial Moscow University (from its origins in 1755 up to 1917) is discussed in this article. The institutional development of the university chairs of theology and of the church history is shown: these chairs were provided by the all-Russian general University Statute 1804 and since then several times changed their faculty position and content. The portraits of the fi rst theology professors in Moscow University are given, the special attention is paid to the radical change of the teaching of these subjects after the introduction of the all-Russian general University Statute 1863, which was connected in Moscow University with a significant activity of archpriest Alexander Michailovich Ivantzov-Platonow, the professor of church history at the faculty of history and philology. The subsequent discussions are disclosed: the university historians attempted to pass this chair to the professor, whose background was not related with any theological Academy. The failure of such an attempt lead afterwards to the loose of significance of the church history courses for the program of special historical training in Moscow University.
Faculty of theology, Department of Church history, secularization of teaching, the training of historians

1. Andreev A. Ju. Rossijskie universitety XVIII — pervoj poloviny XIX veka v kontekste universitetskoj istorii Evropy (Russian Universities of XVIII — First Half of XIX Centuries in Context of University History of Europe), Moscow, 2009.
2. Aleksandrenko V. N. 1873 “Proekt Bogoslovskogo fakul'teta pri Ekaterine II. 1773 g.” (Project of Theological Faculty by Ekaterina II. 1773), in Vestnik Evropy, 1873, vol. 6/11, pp. 301–316.
3. Gerasimov O., diakon. 2008 “Istorija Cerkvi v sisteme nauchnyh disciplin v rossijskih universitetah XIX v.” (Church History in System of Academic Subjects in Russian Universities in XIX Cent.), in XVIII Ezhegodnaja Bogoslovskaja konferencija PSTGU, Moscow, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 353–358.
4. Petrov F. A. Formirovanie sistemy universitetskogo obrazovanija v Rossii (Forming of System of University Education in Russia), Moscow, 2002, vol. 1: Rossijskie universitety i Ustav 1804 goda (Russian Universities and Regulations of 1804).
5. Posohova L. Ju. Na perehresti kul'tur, tradicij, epoh. Pravoslavni kolegiumi Ukraini naprikinci XVII — na pochatku XIX st. (On Crossroad of Cultures, Traditions, Times. Orthodox Collegiums of Ukraine of End of XVII — Begin of XIX Cent.), Harkiv, 2011.
6. Rozhdestvenskij S. V. Ocherki po istorii sistem narodnogo prosveshhenija v Rossii v XVIII–XIX vekah (Essays on History of System of People Enlightenment in Russia in XVIII–XIX Centuries), Saint-Petersburg, 1912, vol. 1.
7. Suhova N. Ju. Vysshaja duhovnaja shkola: problemy i reformy (vtoraja polovina XIX veka) (High Spiritual School: Problems and Reforms (Second Half of XIX Century)), Moscow, 2006.
8. Suhova N. Ju. Sistema nauchno-bogoslovskoj attestacii v Rossii v XIX — nachale XX veka (System of Academic Theological Attestation in Russia in XIX — Begin of XX Century), Moscow, 2009.
9. Suhova N. Ju. Russkaja bogoslovskaja nauka (po doktorskim i magisterskim dissertacijam 1870–1918 gg.) (Russian Theological Science (according to Doctoral and Master Dissertations of 1870-1918)), Moscow, 2012.
10. Suhova N. Ju. 2013 “«Istoriko-bogoslovskaja revoljucija» v vysshej duhovnoj shkole v Rossii” (Historical-Theological Revolution in High Spiritual School in Russia), in Filaretovskij al'manah, vol. 9, Moscow, 2013.
11. Andreev A. Ju., Posohov S. I. (eds.) Universitet v Rossijskoj imperii XVIII — pervoj poloviny XIX veka (University in Russian Empire of XVIII — First Half of XIX Century), Moscow, 2012.
12. Cygankov D. A., Il'jashenko N. A. 2015 “Protoierej Aleksandr Mihajlovich Ivancov-Platonov i istoriki Moskovskogo universiteta” (Archpriest Aleksandr Mihajlovich Ivancov-Platonov and Historians of Moscow University), in Vestnik PSTGU. Serija II: Istorija. Istorija Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi, 2015, vol. 1. pp. 137–149.
13. Chesnokov V. I. 2012 “Puti formirovanija i harakternye cherty sistemy universitetskogo istoricheskogo obrazovanija v dorevoljucionnoj Rossii” (Ways of Forming and Characteristic Traits of System of University Historical Education in Russia before Revolution), in Istoricheskaja kul'tura imperatorskoj Rossii. Formirovanie predstavlenij o proshlom, Moscow, 2012, pp. 113–137.
Andreev Andrei
Tsygankov Dmitrii
Цыганков Д. А. Воспоминания В. И. Герье о Московской городской думе (публ., вступ. ст., коммент. Д. А. Цыганкова) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2016. Вып. 4 (71). С. 139-149. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201671.139-149
The Memoires of Vladimir Guerrier is still not published in full. This is largely due to the fact that the last copy of the manuscript was not prepared by the author. The part of Guerrier manuscript, which was dedicated to the memories of the Moscow municipal. Duma, was reworked by author many times again. In fact, Guerrier has prepared two versions of this Chapter or two parts of one Chapter. The First part was published early and was dedicated colleagues Guerrier at the Duma and focused readers attention on the problem of Duma politicization and radicalization. Below will be presented the second part of memories in which the historian has summed up the results of their own work in the Duma on a post of the Chairman of the Commission of social inventions for Moscow citizens.
Vladimir Guerrier, memories, Moscow city Duma, philanthropy, Commission of social inventions for Moscow citizens.
Цыганков Д. А. Маленькие люди русского подполья // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2018. Вып. 83. С. 149-155. — Rev. op.: Кириллов В. Л. Революционный терроризм, которого не было. Тайное общество «Сморгонская академия» в русском революционном движении 1860-х гг. М.: АИРО-XXI, 2016. 240 c.
PDF
Tsigankov Dmitry
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 23B Novokuznetskaia Str., Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation; Moscow State University; 27/4 Lomonosovskiy Prospect, Moscow 119192, Russian Federation; Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute of Postgraduate Studies; 4/2/5 Piatnitskaia Str., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of Departement of Russian History, Faculty of History; Associate Professor, Department of Russian History in the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Centuries; Associate Professor, Departement of Church History;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3005-503Х;
Email: tsdm@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Цыганков А. С. Немецкоязычное издание сочинений С. Н. Булгакова: от «Философии хозяйства» до библиографии // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2018. Вып. 80. С. 129-133. — Rev. op.: Werkausgabe von Sergij Bulgakov in deutscher Sprache. Münster: Aschendorff -Verlag1, 2017. Bd. 1–3. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201880.129-133
Tsygankov Alexander
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation;
Post: Researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0002-1216-1042;
Email: m1dian@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
I thank the scientific director of the Research Center Sergiy Bulgakov in Friborg Regula M. Zwahlen for the support rendered to her during the preparation of the review.
Наумов П. Ю., Цыганков Д. А. Ученики П. Г. Виноградова // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2019. Вып. 89. С. 115-147. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201989.115-147
This article is devoted to the problem of relations between professor of Moscow University P. G. Vinogradov and his students. During his work at the Department of World History, Faculty of History and Philology, Imperial Moscow University, Professor Vinogradov had the opportunity to off er candidates to be left at the university with the aim of preparation for professorship. We have identifi ed 14 instances when Vinogradov did this. The nominees were always students well known to the professor. He made their acquaintance during his seminars in World History, they wrote their dissertations under his supervision. Two of his students, A. N. Savin and M. M. Khvostov, became professors of Russian universities, having defended their master’s and doctoral theses before the revolution. D. N. Egorov was a teacher at Moscow University, he obtained professorship in summer 1917. Most students of Vinogradov did not succeed in master’s examinations. However, some of them continued their academic work during Soviet times and came to be prominent fi gures in the academia of the new era. This article identifies all students of Vinogradov at Moscow University (two students were not left for the preparation; one of them, who was considered Vinogradov’s student, was formally left by V. I. Ger’ye), gives an outline of their subsequent career, describes characteristic features of professor’s work with those he was in charge of.
P. G. Vinogradov, Vinogradov’s students, system of training of historians, academic community of historians of Moscow University, successor in science, intellectual dialogue, academic tradition
  1. Antoshchenko A. (2010) Russkii liberal-anglofi l P. G. Vinogradov [Russian Liberal Anglophile P. G. Vinogradov]. Petrozavodsk (in Russian).
  2. Boginskii A. (2012) Istoriya sem’i Gol’denveizer: XIX — XX vv. [History of the Goldenweiser Family: 19th — 20th Centuries], in Nauchnye trudy po iudaike, vol. III/42, pp. 218–234 (in Russian).
  3. Malygin O. (2015) “N. M. Nikol’skii i sozdanie pervogo sovetskogo uchebnika po drevnei istorii dlia shkol” [N. M. Nikolsky and Making the First Soviet Textbook on Ancient History for Schools], in Sbornik nauchnyh statei Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennyi 85-letiiu so dnia obrazovaniia Hanty-Mansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga — Iugry [Collection of Scientifi c Articles of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation in Honour of the 85th Anniversary of Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Region — Yugra]. Nizhnevartovsk, pp. 218–219 (in Russian).
  4. Miagkov G., Ivanova T. (2013) “Shkola V.I. Ger’e: osnovnye cherty i mesto v nauchnom prostranstve Rossii” [System of Training of V. I. Ger’e: Main Features and Place in the Scientifi c Space of Russia»], in Dialog so vremenem, 44, pp. 165–185 (in Russian).
  5. Moravskaya A. (1997) “130 let so dnia rozhdeniia Sergeia Pavlovicha Moravskogo (1866–1942)” [130th Anniversary of Sergei Pavlovich Moravsky (1866–1942)], in Biulleten’ Vserossijskoi Associacii medievistov i istorikov rannego novogo vremeni, 8, pp. 31–35 (in Russian).
  6. Naumov P. (2018) “Ucheniki R. Yu. Vippera” [Vipper’s students], in Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia II: Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi, 80, pp. 77–92 (in Russian).
  7. Sitnik V. (1976) M. N. Kovalenskii — istorik i pedagog [M. N. Kovalensky, Historian and Teacher]. Voronezh (in Russian).
  8. Shakhanov A. (2003) Russkaia istoricheskaia nauka vtoroi poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka [Russian Historical Science of the Second Half of the 19th — Early 20th Centuries]. Moscow (in Russian).
  9. Sharova A. (2012) “Aleksandr Nikolaevich Savin: neizvestnaia zhizn’ izvestnogo istorika” [Alexander Nikolaevich Savin: Unknown Life of the Famous Historian], in Odissei: chelovek v istorii, pp. 212–243 (in Russian).
  10. Sharova A. (2012) “«Otstal ot veka?» V.I. Ger’e i A.N. Savin” [“Behind the Century?” V.I. Ger’e and A.N. Savin], in Istoricheskaya nauka i obrazovanie v Rossii i na Zapade: sud’by istorikov i nauchnyh shkol [Historical Science and Education in Russia and the West: Fates of Historians and Academic Schools], pp. 35‒37 (in Russian).
  11. Starkova N. (2005) “Problemy istorii Drevnei Sparty v trudakh kazanskikh antikovedov rubezha 19‒20 vv.” [Problems of History of Ancient Sparta in Works of Scholars of Antiquity from Kazan of the Turn of 19th — 20th Centuries], in Kazanskii universitet kak issledovatel’skoe i sociokul’turnoe prostranstvo [Kazan University as an Academic and Socio-Cultural Space]. Kazan, pp. 266–273 (in Russian).
  12. Tsygankov D. (2014). “Soobshchestvo moskovskikh vseobshchikh istorikov vo vtoroi polovine XIX veka” [Academic Community of World Historians in Moscow], in Terra Europa: Intellektual’noe prostranstvo moskovskikh istorikov vtoroi poloviny XIX veka [Terra Europa: Intellectual Space of Moscow Historians of the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Moscow, pp. 11–173 (in Russian).
  13. Volobuev O. (2014) “Shkol’nye uchebniki nachala XX veka po russkoi istorii: funktsional’nost’ i tipologiia” [School Textbooks on Russian History of the Early Twentieth Century: Functionality and Typology], in Rossiiskaya istoriia, vol. 1, pp. 95–110 (in Russian).
  14. Zabugina E. (2017) “Pedagogicheskaia i obshchestvennaia deiatel’nost’ istorika S. P. Moravskogo” [Pedagogical and Social Work of the Historian S. P. Moravskiy], in Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriia, pedagogika, filologiia, 23/l, pp. 21–25 (in Russian).
  15. Zubkov I. (2011) “Nauchnye pedagogicheskie obshchestva. Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo pri Moskovskom universitete” [Scientific Educational Societies. Educational Society at Moscow University], in Samoorganizaciya rossiiskoi obshchestvennosti v poslednei treti XVIII — nachale XX v. [Self-Organisation of the Russian Public in the Last Third of the 18th — Early 20th Centuries]. Moscow, pp. 651–661 (in Russian).
Naumov Pavel
Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: Moscow State University; 1 Leninskie Gory str., Moscow, 119192, Russian Federation;
Post: assistant lecturer at the faculty of history at St.Tikhon's Orthodox University;
ORCID: 0000-0002-4353-8711;
Email: pavel_fcsm_1922@mail.ru.
Tsigankov Dmitry
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 23B Novokuznetskaia Str., Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation; Moscow State University; 27/4 Lomonosovskiy Prospect, Moscow 119192, Russian Federation; Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute of Postgraduate Studies; 4/2/5 Piatnitskaia Str., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of Departement of Russian History, Faculty of History; Associate Professor, Department of Russian History in the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Centuries; Associate Professor, Departement of Church History;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3005-503Х;
Email: tsdm@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Цыганков А. С., Гапоненков А. А. «Симфоническое философствование» (биографические реалии переписки С. Л. Франка и Л. Бинсвангера) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2019. Вып. 85. С. 88-107. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201985.88-107
The article analyses biographical features in the correspondence between the Russian philosopher S. L. Frank and the Swiss psychiatrist L. Binswanger. It is one of the most notable examples of philosophical dialogue between Russia and Western Europe. It lasted for almost 16 years from November 1934 to December 1950. The correspondents make a very open and intimate conversation on various topics, e. g. elevated understanding of true male friendship, scientifi c interests in the fi elds of psychology, philosophy, religion, psychoanalysis, medicine, travels, conferences, presentations, meetings of philosophers, mutual friends, circle of reading (Russian literature and contemporary European authors), history of Europe, everyday life, everyday concerns about children and spouse, illness, notifi cations of the death of loved ones. The correspondence between Frank and Binswanger has a character of confession and helps not only clarify certain facts of the life of the Russian philosopher in emigration, but also provides new valuable materials for understanding his personal, spiritual and philosophical evolution, as well as the creative history of published and unpublished works. Currently, this correspondence, kept in the archive of the University of Tübingen, is being prepared for publication both in Russian translation and in the original languages (German, French, English).
philosophical dialogue between Russia and Western Europe, S. L. Frank’s philosophy, biography, correspondence, L. Binswanger, psychoanalysis, Russian émigré philosophy
  1. Aliaev G., Rezvykh T. (2016) “Druzhba, ispytuemaia zhizn’iu: K perepiske S. Franka i V. El’iashevicha” [Friendship Trialled by Life: On the Correspondence between S. Frank and V. El’iashevich], in: M. Kolerov (ed.) Issledovaniia po istorii russkoi mysli. Ezhegodnik za 2015 god [Studies in History of the Russian Thought. Annual for 2015]. Moscow, рp. 7–39 (in Russian).
  2. Boobbyer Ph. (2001) S.L. Frank. The Life and Work of a Russian philosopher 1877–1950. Moscow (Russian translation).
  3. Gaponenkov A. (2010) “Epistoliarnyi dialog Petra Struve i Semena Franka (1922–1944)” [Epistolary Dialogue of Petr Struve and Semen Frank (1922‒1944). Obshchaia tetrad’. Vestnik Moskovskoi shkoly politicheskikh issledovanii, 1(51) (in Russian). Available at otetrad.ru/article-109.html (accessed 04.10.2019).
  4. Gaponenkov A. (2014) “Epistoliarnyi dialog S. L. Franka i N. A. Berdiaeva (1923–1947)” [Epistolary Dialogue of S. L. Frank and N. A. Berdiaev (1923‒1947)]. Voprosy filosofii, 2, pp. 119–130 (in Russian).
  5. Gaponenkov A. (2017) “Religioznaia fi losofi ia Vl. S. Solov’eva v retseptsii S.L. Franka” [Religious Philosophy of Vl. Solovyev as Refl ected by S.L. Frank]. Voprosy filosofii, 6, pp. 105–121 (in Russian).
  6. Tsygankov A., Obolevich T. (2018) “«Germaniia uzhe stala dlia menia moei vtoroi rodinoi»: zhiznennyi i tvorcheskii put’ S.L. Franka v perepiske s F. Khailerom et circum” [“Germany has Already Become my Second Homeland”: S.L. Frank’s Life and Work in Correspondence with F. Heiler et circum]. Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik. Pp. 293–313 (in Russian).
  7. Tsygankov A., Obolevich T. (2018) “Istoriia sem’i i tvorchestva S. L. Franka v perepiske L. Binsvangera i T.S. Frank” [History of S. L. Frank’s Family and Work in Correspondence between L. Binswanger and T. S. Frank]. Filosofiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, II (2), pp. 134–155 (in RUssian).
  8. Tsygankov A., Obolevich T. (2019) Nemetskii period fi losofskoi biografi i S.L. Franka (novye materialy) [German Period in S.L. Frank’s Philosophical Biography (New Materials)]. Moscow (in Russian).
Tsygankov Alexander
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation;
Post: Researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0002-1216-1042;
Email: m1dian@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Gaponenkov Alexey
Academic Degree: Doctor of sciences* in Philology;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya Str., Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation;
Post: Professor, Department of Russian and Foreign Literature;
ORCID: 0000-0003-2177-1835;
Email: gaponenkovaa@info.sgu.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
This work was supported by grant 19-011-00918 А from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research.
Цыганков Д. А. Т. Н. Грановский в коммеморативной практике сообщества московских историков // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2020. Вып. 93. С. 57-76. DOI: 10.15382/sturII202093.57-76
Present-day scholars invariably point out that by the turn of the 19th — 20th centuries, the process of self-identifi cation of historians within the framework of specific scientific communities had been fi nished. Very often, the role of textsmarkers playing an important role in the course of such intellectual self-defi nition is played by memorial and anniversary publications dedicated to prominent scholars who stand at the beginning of a certain community of scholars. The history of memory about Granovsky in Moscow University allows one to study the process of forming the identity of the community of Moscow historians during a long period of time. All generations of pre-revolution university professors (S. M. Soloviev as Granovsky’s younger contemporary, he is accompanied by B. N. Chicherin and V. I. Guerrier; V. O. Klyuchevsky, the fi rst generation after Granovsky who did not witness Granovsky’s lectures; P. G. Vinogradov and R. Yu. Wipper, the second generation after Granovsky) left their texts about Granovsky. It is obvious that memory about Granovsky was used instrumentally. The interest in the personality and intellectual experience of the Moscow professor was particularly typical of the younger contemporaries of the scholar. Historians at Moscow University of the turn of the centuries desired to make Granovsky’s experience more topical in dealing with issues of the contemporary agenda. As an example, in the situation of methodological choice that was to face Russian historians at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, Vinogradov and Wipper in their reasoning about Granovsky showed the infl uence of shared European intellectual processes on Russian historical science and emphasised that the Russian historian always came to be independent as to the foreign intellectual experience. But a certain unity in the idea about Graovsky who was seen as a founder of the professional community of historians at the university was nevertheless observed. Following Granovsky, the historian at Moscow University, so thought the champions of his cause, must have a general historical view of his subject and stand close to young people at the university, on whom he should have a moral infl uence. The duty of Granovsky’s heir is to struggle for science at the university and to form a specific subculture of professors.
T. N. Granovsky, traditions of Granovsky, community of Moscow historians, commemorative practice
  1. Asinovskaia S. (1955) Iz istorii peredovykh idei v russkoi medievistike (T. N. Granovskii) [From the history of progressive ideas in the Russian medieval studies (T. N. Granovsky)]. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Belen’kii I. (2011) “Rossiiskoe nauchno-istoricheskoe soobshchestvo v kontse XIX — nachale XXI v.: publikatsii i issledovaniia 1940-kh — 2010-kh gg.” [Russian scientific and historical community in the late 19th — early 21st centuries: publications and studies of the 1940s — 2010s], in G. Bordiugov (ed.) Nauchnoe soobshchestvo istorikov Rossii: 20 let peremen [Scientifi c community of Russian historians: 20 years of change]. Pp. 372–373 (in Russian).
  3. Tsygankov D. (2009) “Traditsii T. N. Granovskogo i formirovanie ‘moskovskoi shkoly istorikov’: skladyvanie professional’noi nauchnoi sredy v Moskovskom universitete kak problema transfera kul’tur” [Traditions of T. N. Granovsky and the formation of ‘Moscow school of historians’: creating a professional scientifi c environment at Moscow University as a problem of cultural transfer], in “Byt’ russkim po dukhu i evropeitsem po obrazovaniiu”. Universitety Rossiiskoi imperii v obrazovatel’nom prostranstve Tsentral’noi i Vostochnoi Evropy XVIII‒XX v. [“To be Russian in spirit and European in education”. Universities of Russian Empire in the educational space of Central and Eastern Europe of the 18th — 20th centuries]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Kirsanova E. (2014) “Obraz T. N. Granovskogo v rossiiskoi istoriografi i vtoroi poloviny XIX — nachala XX v.” [The image of T. N. Granovsky in Russian historiography of the second half of the 19th — early 20th centuries]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 387, pp. 121–126 (in Russian).
  5. Korzun V. (2000) Obrazy istoricheskoi nauki na rubezhe XIX–XX vekov. Analiz otechestvennykh istoriograficheskikh kontseptsii [Images of historical science at the turn of the 19th — 20th centuries. Analysis of Russian historiographic concepts]. Yekaterinburg; Omsk (in Russian).
  6. Korzun V., Kolevatov D. (2009) “Memorial’nye i iubileinye sobytiia v zhizni nauchnogo soobshchestva kak kul’turnye praktiki samoidentifi katsii” [Memorial and anniversary events in the life of the scientific community as cultural practices of self-identifi cation], in Kul’tura i intelligentsiia Rossii: Innovatsionnye praktiki, obrazy goroda, iubileinye sobytiia. Istoricheskaia pamiat’ gorozhan. Materialy VII Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posviashchennoi 35-letiiu osnovaniia OmGU im. F.M. Dostoevskogo (Omsk, 20–22 oktyabria 2009 g.) [Culture and intelligentsia of Russia: Innovative practices, images of the city, anniversary events. Historical memory of citizens. Materials of the 7th all-Russian scientific conference with international participation dedicated to the 35th anniversary of the foundation of Omsk State University]. Omsk. Pp. 197–200 (in Russian)
  7. Levandovskii A. (1989) T. N. Granovskii v russkom obshchestvennom dvizhenii [T. N. Granovsky in the Russian social movement]. Moscow (in Russian)
  8. Sveshnikov A. (2006) “Mif o Granovskom. Popytka diskursivnogo analiza” [The Myth of Granovsky. An attempt at discursive analysis], in Timofej Nikolaevich Granovskii: ideia vseobshchei istorii [Timofey Nikolaevich Granovsky: an idea of universal history]. Moscow. Pp. 69‒81.
  9. Roosevelt P. (1986) Apostle of Russian Liberalism: Timofei Granovsky. Newtonville.
  10. Valk S. (2000) “Istoricheskaia nauka v Leningradskom universitete za 125 let” [Historical science at Leningrad University during 125 years], in Izbrannye trudy po istoriografi i i istochnikovedeniiu: Nauchnoe nasledie [Selected works on historiography and source criticism: Scientifi c heritage]. St Petersburg. Pp. 7–106.
Tsigankov Dmitry
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 23B Novokuznetskaia Str., Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation; Moscow State University; 27/4 Lomonosovskiy Prospect, Moscow 119192, Russian Federation; Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute of Postgraduate Studies; 4/2/5 Piatnitskaia Str., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of Departement of Russian History, Faculty of History; Associate Professor, Department of Russian History in the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Centuries; Associate Professor, Departement of Church History;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3005-503Х;
Email: tsdm@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Наумов П. Ю., Цыганков Д. А., Андреев А. Ю. Крыловская история: формирование этики профессорского служения // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2020. Вып. 94. С. 112-130. DOI: 10.15382/sturII202094.112-130
The Krylov story, consequences of which are discussed in the letters of the trustee of Moscow school district Pavel Dmitrievich Golokhvastov to the minister of education, Count Sergei Semenovich Uvarov, can be read at diff erent levels and, depending on this, be subject to various scientifi c interpretations. One of the fi rst scholars who studied this topic, N. P. Barsukov, considered it to be a private family history, disassociated with the university environment, but, following religious discussions of T. N. Granovsky and A. I. Gertsen in 1845 and 1846, it is regarded to be undermining the unity of the circle of Westerners (Russ. западники). D. A. Tsygankov, on the contrary, sees the confl ict around Krylov as a landmark event in the history of the university which separates the era of the Great Disputes of the 1840s from the Dreary Seven Years («мрачное семилетие»). However, no matter how one evaluates Krylov’s story, there are practically no studies that would make the chronology of events associated with this confl ict more precise. The documents published below, together with documents that have already been made public but not suffi ciently studied, allow one to look at this university aff air in more detail. The Krylov story began in August 1846 and kept in tension all those involved up to the summer of 1848. This situation demonstrates that the university milieu is extremely confl ict-ridden, unpredictable, subject to abrupt changes.
Krylov story, university milieu, era of Great Disputes of 1840s, Dreary Seven Years, T. N. Granovskiy
  1. Levandovskii A. (1989) T. N. Granovskii v russkom obshchestvennom dvizhenii [T. N. Granovsky in the Russian public movement]. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Petrov F. (2003) Formirovanie sistemy universitetskogo obrazovaniia v Rossii [The emergence of the university education system in Russia]. Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Tsygankov D. (2014) “Upivshis' vinami do besstydstva…” [“Drunk on wine to the point of shamelessness...”]. Rodina, 9, pp. 73–76 (in Russian).
Naumov Pavel
Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: Moscow State University; 1 Leninskie Gory str., Moscow, 119192, Russian Federation;
Post: assistant lecturer at the faculty of history at St.Tikhon's Orthodox University;
ORCID: 0000-0002-4353-8711;
Email: pavel_fcsm_1922@mail.ru.
Tsigankov Dmitry
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 23B Novokuznetskaia Str., Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation; Moscow State University; 27/4 Lomonosovskiy Prospect, Moscow 119192, Russian Federation; Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute of Postgraduate Studies; 4/2/5 Piatnitskaia Str., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of Departement of Russian History, Faculty of History; Associate Professor, Department of Russian History in the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Centuries; Associate Professor, Departement of Church History;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3005-503Х;
Email: tsdm@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Andreev Andrei
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Lomonosov Moscow State University; 27/4 Lomonosovskiy prospekt, Moscow, 119992, Russian Federation; Ss. Cyril and Methodius Institute of Postgraduate Studies; 4/2/5 Piatnitskaya Str., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation; St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 23B Novokuznetskaia Str., Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation;
Post: Professor;
ORCID: 0000-0001-7075-6637;
Email: andrejev-goetting@yandex.ru. *According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.
Цыганков Д. А. Мировоззренческие основы профессорского служения С. М. Соловьева // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2021. Вып. 99. С. 36-49. DOI: 10.15382/sturII202199.36-49
Sergey Mikhailovich Solovyov, professor of Russian history and rector of Moscow University, was one of the few University teachers of the mid-19th century who openly declared their commitment to the values of the Christian worldview in the University milieu. In many ways, this view was the result of his refl ections on the role of religion in modern society. He argued that under the infl uence of, for example, the revolution in France, the values of faith are pushed to the periphery of public consciousness, which has created the illusion that the old faith and the new social order oppose each other. However, Solovyov associated this situation not with the values of the faith itself, but with the inability of its missionaries to reach the hearts of their fellow citizens, with broadcasting the truths of school theology in public discourse, and with the lack of cordiality and warmth in sermons of Christian missionaries. Solovyov believed that in the new conditions, the truths of faith should be taught not only by the people of the Church, but also by the University professors who infl uence the formation of public morals, at least during the training of young people at the University. As a result, Professor Solovyov demanded monastic asceticism in his professional work in the quiet of the study room as well as sacrifi cial service and eff orts aimed at harmonising relations between representatives of diff erent generations of society during lectures. A certain challenge to Solovyov was the lack of consensus on this issue among professors and Westerners in the mid-1840s. However, neither the radical spiritual experience of the Russian intelligentsia, nor the spread of materialistic ideas by the generation of the 1860s forced Solovyov to reconsider his attitude to the matters of faith. Under the infl uence of his own religious experience in his later essays, Solovyov refuses to interpret progress as an eternal process of positive changes, which was characteristic of the liberal doctrine and, in fact, raised the question of the dependence of progress in public relations on the eternal truths of the faith.
S. M. Solovyov, progress, faith, social change, liberalism, progress, professorship
  1. Dubrovskii A., Kuchurin V. (1992) “”Feosofiia” S. M. Solov’eva” [S. M. Solovyov’s “Theosophy”], in G. Nevelev (ed.) Teoreticheskaia kul’turologiia i problemy istorii otechestvennoi kul’tury [Theoretical cultural studies and problems of the history of the Russian culture]. Bryansk. Р. 98–107 (in Russian).
  2. Formozov A. (2004) “Sud’ba “Zapisok” istorika S. M. Solov’eva” [The fate of the “Notes” of the historian S.M. Solovyov], in A. Formozov. Rasskazy ob uchenykh [Stories about scholars]. Kursk. Р. 42–51 (in Russian).
  3. Illeritskii V. (1980) Sergei Mikhailovich Solov’ev. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Ivonina I. (2000) Vremia svobody. Problema napravlennosti istorii v khristianskoi istoricheskoi mysli Rossii XIX — ser. XX vv. [Time of freedom. The problem of the orientation of history in the Christian historical thought of Russia in the 19th — mid-19th centuries]. Novosibirsk (in Russian).
  5. Kiseleva Y., Antoshchenko A. (2019) “Emotsional’nyi mir avtobiografi i S.M. Solov’eva” [The emotional world of S.M. Solovyov’s autobiography], in A.M. Dubrovskii (ed.) Otechestvennaia kul’tura i istoricheskaya mysl’ [Russian culture and historical thought], 5. Bryansk. Р. 30–53 (in Russian).
  6. Kuchurin V. (2001) S. M. Solov’ev: khristianin i uchenyi [S.M. Solovyov: a Christian and a scholar]. St Retersburg (in Russian).
  7. Kuchurin V. (2007) “Religioznyi mir S.M. Solov’eva” [Religious world of S.M. Solovyov], in Mir istorika [The world of the historian], 3. Omsk. Р. 107–136 (in Russian).
  8. Kuchurin V. (2018) “Nachalo formirovaniia nauchno-pedagogicheskikh vzgliadov S. M. Solov’eva” [The beginning of the formation of academic and pedagogical views of S. M. Solovyov]. Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, p. 96–101 (in Russian).
  9. Shakhanov A. (1996) Stanovlenie uchenogo [Becoming a scholar], in S. Solov’ev. Pervye nauchnye trudy. Pis’ma [First academic works. Letters]. Moscow. P. 138–153 (in Russian).
  10. Shakhanov A. (2005) S.M. Solov’ev i ego sem’ia [S.M. Solovyov and his family], in Mir istorika: Istoriografi cheskii sbornik [The world of the historian: a historiographical collection], 1. Tomsk. P. 198–239. (in Russian).
  11. Tsimbaev N. (1990) Sergei Solov’ev. Moscow (in Russian).
  12. Volkova I. (1992) “Sergei Mikhailovich Solov’ev. Ocherki zhizni i tvorchestva” [Sergey Mikhailovich Solovyov. Essays on his life and creative works], in S.M. Solov’ev. Obshchedostupnye chteniia o russkoi istorii [Public readings in Russian history]. Р. 24–41 (in Russian).
Tsigankov Dmitry
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 23B Novokuznetskaia Str., Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation; Moscow State University; 27/4 Lomonosovskiy Prospect, Moscow 119192, Russian Federation; Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute of Postgraduate Studies; 4/2/5 Piatnitskaia Str., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of Departement of Russian History, Faculty of History; Associate Professor, Department of Russian History in the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Centuries; Associate Professor, Departement of Church History;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3005-503Х;
Email: tsdm@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Цыганков А. С., Черняев А. В. Н. А. Бердяев в Голландии: к истории католической рецепции русской мысли 1920-х–1930-х гг. // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2021. Вып. 97. С. 59-72. DOI: 10.15382/sturI202197.59-72
This article proposes a historical and philosophical reconstruction of the Catholic reception of Nikolai A. Berdyaev in the Netherlands in the 1920s–1930s. It draws on materials from Dutch periodicals (newspaper articles, interviews and lecture programmes) from the studied period and reconstructs the history of the Dutch speeches of the philosopher in 1929, 1931 and 1937, as well as the history of his contacts with representatives of the Dutch intellectual community. Specifi cally, the article analyses of the thematic directions of the Catholic reception of Nikolai A. Berdyaev’s ideas, among which one should particularly note the criticism of Soviet Communism and the secularisation processes within the liberal capitalist system. It is established that the concept of Nikolai A. Berdyaev was positively received by Dutch Catholics, who held the position of “integral humanism” and strove to overcome the cultural crisis that affected Western Europe by revitalising religiosity. The signifi cance of the Dutch episode in Nikolai A. Berdyaev’s biography is determined in the context of his ideological evolution. The historical and philosophical analysis of the philosopher’s presentations given in the Netherlands allows us to make more clear the history of the formation and implementation of the conception of a number of his key works. It is shown that lecture trips to Holland gave Nikolai A. Berdyaev the opportunity for a fruitful dialogue with representatives of the Dutch philosophical and religious community, during which the philosopher could disseminate, clarify and develop his ideas.
Russian philosophy in emigration, foreign reception of Russian philosophy, New Middle Ages, Nikolai A. Berdyaev, Jacques Maritain
  1. Berdyaev N. (1926) “Le Destin de la culture”, in: Le Roseau d’or, no. 10, pp. 73–100.
  2. Berdyaev N. (1930) “Vostok i Zapad” [East and West]. Put′, no. 23, pp. 97–109 (in Russian).
  3. Berdyaev N. (1932) “Psychologie der russischen Gottlosigkeit”. Hochland, bd. 2, h. 29, pp. 193–206.
  4. Berdyaev N. (1937) Sinn und Schicksal des Russischen Kommunismus. Lucerne, Switzerland: Vita Nova Verlag.
  5. Berdyaev N. (1955) Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma [The origins and meaning of Russian communism]. Paris: Ymca-Press (in Russian).
  6. Iantsen V. V. (2002) “Pis′ma russkikh myslitelei v Bazel′skom arkhive Fritsa Liba: N. A. Berdyaev, Lev Shestov, S. L. Frank, S. N. Bulgakov (1926‒1948)” [Letters of Russian thinkers in the Basel archives of Fritz Lieb: N. A. Berdyaev, Lev Shestov, S. L. Frank, S. N. Bulgakov (1926‒1948)], in: Issledovaniia po istorii russkoi mysli. Ezhegodnik za 2001‒2002 gg. [Studies on the history of Russian thought, yearbook for 2001‒2002], Moscow: Tri Kvadrata Publ., pp. 227‒563 (in Russian).
  7. Jacobs F., Jacobs F. (2016) Markante denkers. 100 jaar fi losofi e aan de Internationale School voor Wijsbegeerte. Leusden.
  8. Khazan V., Janzen V. (eds) (2019) Nikolai Berdiaev and Yehoshua Shor: A correspondence between two corners (1927–1946). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2019.
  9. Maritain R. (1954) Die großen Freundschaften. Begegnungen mit Henri Bergson, Léon Bloy, Jacques Maritain, Pierre van der Meer de Walcheren, Charles Péguy, Ernest Psichari, Georges Rouault, Pierre Termier und anderen Zeugen des Glaubens. Heidelberg.
  10. Maters M. (1998) Van zachte wenk tot harde hand: persvrij heid en persbreidel in Nederlands-Indië, 1906–1942. Amsterdam.
  11. Tsygankov A. S., Obolevich T. (2020) Gollandskii episod v fi losofskoi biografi i S. L. Franka (novye materialy) [Dutch episode in the philosophical biography of S. L. Frank (new materials)]. Moscow (in Russian).
  12. Vermeulen Н. (1994) De Maasbode. De bewogen geschiedenis van «de beste courant van Nederland». Zwolle: Waanders.
  13. Volkogonova O. D. (2010) Berdyaev. Moscow (in Russian).
  14. Witte R. (1998) De Indische radio-omroep: overheidsbeleid en ontwikkeling, 1923–1942. Amsterdam.
Tsygankov Alexander
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation;
Post: researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0002-1216-1042;
Email: m1dian@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Chernyaev Anatoly
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation;
Post: leading researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0002-2019-5330;
Email: chernyaev@iph.ras.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
This article has been prepared for publication with the fi nancial support from The Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant № 19‒011‒00764 А.