/
Search results


Семенов Л. Е. Преподаватели ПСТГУ приняли участие в IX Свято-Тихоновской конференции «Пастырь добрый» // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2012. Вып. 6 (49). С. 153-155.
PDF
Semenov Lev, archpriest
Семенова Е. С. Монашеская тема в росписях северной галереи церкви Богородицы Левишки в Призрене // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия V: Вопросы истории и теории христианского искусства. 2014. Вып. 3 (15). С. 77-95. DOI: 10.15382/sturV201415.77-95
The Cathedral Church of the Holy Virgin Ljeviška in Prizren is the unique monument of the medieval architecture and painting. In 2004, during the exacerbation of the ethnic conflict in Kosovo, the unprotected church was exposed to devastation and fl ames. The interior of the church was severely damaged, the frescoes were covered with soot. The urgent protection measures taken in 2005 saved the paintings of the church. Today we can view the images of the monks in the northern gallery, among them St. Pachomius and the venerable Mary of Egypt. In this article we examine these images in the waste context of the byzantine wall painting. Obviously, we are talking about the existence of the side-chapel in the church of Ljeviška, dedicated to the reverend monks.
church of the Holy Virgin Ljeviška, Prizren, the cathedral church, St. Pachomius, Mary of Egypt, Zosima, monks, entombments

1. Bihali O. Bogorodica Levishka (God Mother of Levishka), Beograd, 1963.
2. Voronova A. A. 2007 “Freski cerkvi v sele Don'ja Kamenica (Serbija)” (Frescos of Church in Village Don'ja Kamenica (Serbia)), in Iskusstvo hristianskogo mira, 2007, vol. 10, pp. 247–267.
3. Gaprindashvili G. Vardzia: Pamjatnik skal'noj arhitektury (Vardzia: Memorial of Rock Architecture), Leningrad, 1975.
4. Lazarev V. N. Andrej Rublev i ego shkola (Andrej Rublev and His School), Moscow, 1966.
5. Lazarev V. N. Istorija vizantijskoj zhivopisi (History of Byzantine Painting), 1947, vol. 1.
6. Lidov A. M. 1996 “Chudotvornye ikony v hramovoj dekoracii: o simvolicheskoj programme imperatorskih vrat Sofii Konstantinopol'skoj” (Miracle Icons in Church Decoration: about Symbolic Program of Emperor Gates of St. Sophia of Constantinople), in Chudotvornaja ikona v Vizantii i Drevnej Rusi, Moscow, 1996, pp. 44–75.
7. Lifshic L. I. Monumental'naja zhivopis' Novgoroda XIV–XV vekov (Monumental Painting of Novgorod of XIV–XV Centuries), Moscow, 1987.
8. Mavrodinova L. 1991 “Novootkriti srednovekovni stenopisi v c’rkvata «Sv. Georgi» v Kolushe, Kjustendil” (New Discovered Wall Paintings in Church of “St. George” in Kolusha, Kjustendil), in Starob’lgarska literature, 1991, vol. 25–26, pp. 194–210.
9. Mavrodinova L. Stennata zhivopis v B’lgarija do kraja na XIV vek (Wall Paintings in Bulgaria till End of XIV Century), Sofia, 1995.
10. Markovich M. 1995 “Pojedinachne figure svetitel'a u naosu i paraklisima” (Single Figures of St. Bishop in Naos and Chapels), in Zidno slikarstvo manastira Dechana, Beograd, 1995.
11. Nenadovich S. Bogorodica Levishka. Nen postanak i neno mesto u arhitekturi Milutinovog vremena (God Mother of Levishka. Its Genesis and Its Place in Architecture of Time of Milutinovy), Beograd, 1963.
12. Paniћ D., Babiћ G. Bogorodica Levishka (God Mother of Levishka), Beograd, 1988.
13. Pentkovskij A. 2002 “Pokajannaja disciplina hristianskoj Cerkvi v konce pervogo tysjacheletija” (Penance Discipline of Christian Church in End of the First Millenium), in Zhurnal Moskovskoj Patriarhii, 2002, vol. 10.
14. Pivovarova N. V. 2005 “Monastyrskie sjuzhety v hramovoj dekoracii Vizantii i Drevnej Rusi XII–XIV vv.: istochniki formirovanija i idejnyj smysl” (Monastic Subjets in Church Decoration of Byzantium and Old Russia of XII–XIV Cent.: Sources of Forming and Idea Sense), in Vizantijskij mir: iskusstvo Konstantinopolja i nacional'nye tradicii. K 2000-letiju hristianstva. Pamjati O. I. Podobedovoj (1912–1999): sb. statej, Moscow, 2005, pp. 309–318.
15. Pivovarova N. V. Freski cerkvi Spasa na Neredice: Ikonograficheskaja programma rospisi (Frescos of Church of Spas na Neredice: Iconographical Program of Painting), Saint-Petersburg, 2002.
16. Radoјchiћ S. 1965 “Una Poenitentium: Marija Egipatska u srpskoj umetnosti XIV veka” (Una Poenitentium: Maria of Egypt in Serbian Art of XIV Century), in Radoјchiћ S. Tekstovi i freske, Novi Sad, 1965, pp. 40–56.
17. Sarab'janov V. D. 2005 “Monasheskaja tema vo freskah sobora Rozhdestva Bogorodicy Antonieva monastyrja v Novgorode” (Monastic Theme in Frescos of Cathedral of Birth of God Mother of Antoniev Monastery in Novgorod), in Vizantijskij mir: iskusstvo Konstantinopolja i nacional'nye tradicii, Moscow, 2005, pp. 319–344.
18. Sarab'janov V. D. 2008 “Programma monasheskih izobrazhenij v rospisjah sobora Rozhdestva Bogorodicy Snetogorskogo monastyrja” (Program of Monastic Images in Paintings of Cathedral of Birth of God Mother of Snetogorskij Monastery), in Drevnerusskoe iskusstvo. Hudozhestvennaja zhizn' Pskova i iskusstvo postvizantijskoj jepohi. K 1100-letiju Pskova: sb. statej, Moscow, 2008, pp. 65–98.
19. Tatarchenko S. N. 2012 “«Prichashhenie prepodobnoj Marii Egipetskoj» v vizantijskoj monumental'noj zhivopisi” (“Communion of St. Maria of Egypt” in Byzantine Monumental Painting), in Vestnik PSTGU. Serija V: Voprosy istorii i teorii hristianskogo iskusstva, 2012, vol. 1/7, pp. 24–50.
20. Todiћ B., Chanak-Mediћ M. Manastir Dechani. Muzej u Prishtini (Dechani Monastery. Museum in Prishtina), Beograd, 2005.
21. Tomekovich S. 1991 “Monashka tradicija o zaduzhbinama i spisima arhiepiskopa Danila II” (Monastic Tradition about Endowment and Works of Archbishop Daniel II), in Arhiepiskop Danilo II i nevo doba, Beograd, 1991.
22. Connor C. L. 1999 “Female Saints in Church Decoration of the Troodos Mountains in Cyprus”, in Patterson N., Ševčenko Ch. (eds.) Medieval Cyprus: Studies in Art, Architecture and History in Memory of Doula Mouriki, Princeton, 1999, pp. 211–240.
23. Gerstel Sharon E. J. 2003 “Civic and Monastic Influences on Church Decoration in Late Byzantine Thessalonike”, in Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 2003, vol. 57, pp. 225–239.
24. Gregoriadou-Cabagnols H. 1970 “Le décor peint de l’église de Samari en Messénie”, in Cahiers Archéologiques, 1970, vol. 20, pp. 177–196.
25. Jerphanion G., de. Une nouvelle province de l’art byzantine: Les églises rupestres de Cappadoce, Paris, 1936, vol. 2.
26. Kaftal G. Iconography of the Saints in Central and South Italian Schools of Painting, Florence, 1965.
27. Lafontaine-Dosogne J. Peintures mediévales dans le Temple dit de la Fortune Virile, Rome, Bruxelles, 1959.
28. Nicolaidès A. 1996 “L’église de la Panagia Arakiotissa а Lagoudéra, Chypre: Etude iconographique des fresques de 1192”, in Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 1996, vol. 50, pp. 122–123.
29. Pelekanidis S., Chatzidakis M. Byzantine Art in Greece. Mosaics-Wall Paintings. Kastoria, Athenes, 1985.
30. Spatharakis I. Dated Byzantine Wall Paintings of Crete, Leiden, 2001.
31. Stylianou A. 1976 “The Communion of St. Mary of Egypt and Her Death in the Painted Churches of Cyprus”, in Actes du XIVe CIEB, Bucharest, 1976, vol. 3, pp. 435–441.
32. Stylianou A. & J. The Painted Churches of Cyprus: Treasures of Byzantine Art, Nicosia, 1997.
33. Tomeković S. 1993 “Formation de l’iconographie monastique orientale (VIIIe — Xe siècles)”, in Revue bénédictine. Le monachisme а Byzance et en Occident du VIIIe au Xe siècle, 1993, vol. 103/1–2, pp. 131–152.
34. Tomeković S. Les saints ermites et moines dans la peinture murale byzantine, Paris, 2011.
35. Tomeković S. 1989 “Place des saints ermites et moines dans le décor de l’église Byzantine”, in Liturgie, conversion et vie monastique: Conférences Saint-Serge. XXXVe semaine d’études liturgiques, Roma, 1989.
36. Wharton Epstein A. Tokali Kilise: Tenth-Century Metropolitan Art in Byzantine Cappadocia, Washington, 1986.
Семенова Е. С. Цикл Крещения и проповедей Иоанна Предтечи в росписях экзонартекса церкви Богородицы Левишки // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия V: Вопросы истории и теории христианского искусства. 2015. Вып. 4 (20). С. 125-144. DOI: 10.15382/sturV201520.125-144
On the central vault of the exonarthex of the Holy Vigrin Ljeviška church in Prizren (1307–1313) there is a cycle of Baptism and of John the Precursor’s preachings, that is situated near the composition «The Last Judgement» and near the images of the Old Testament prophets. The cycle consists of six episodes and of a scene «The Baptism of Christ», including the personifications of Sea and river Jordan. Every episode has the inscription commenting the scene, some texts on the the Precursor’s scroll are conservated. One composition, that represents the Savior with a shovel on the barn fl oor, is particulary interesting, it was popular in the Serbian painting of the 14th century. The article briefly traces the history of the formation of the cycle of Baptism and of John the Precursor’s preachings and discuss the topography of the cycle in the church painting. The early cycles of Precursor’s preachings and of Baptism are known in Cappadocia churches in the 8th–11th centuies. We found the scenes of this cycle in byzantine miniatures of 11th–12th centuies. In the 14th century, we found the detailed depiction of this cycle in the mural paintings of the Balkan churches: St. Apostles in Thessaloniki, Žiča, Hilanrar, Dečani, Lesnovo, Matejče and others. Normally, the cycle is depicted in the narthex, where the agiasma (holy water, blessed on the Feast of Baptism) was situated. The emplacement of this cycle on the intersecting vault in the exonarthex of the cathedral church in Prizren is unique and is connected with the composition «The Last Judgement».
Virgin Ljeviška church, Prizren, exonarthex, Baptism, preachings, John the Precursor, Jordan, personifi cation, agiasma.

1. Lazarev V. N. Istorija vizantijskoj zhivopisi (History of Byzantine Painting), Moscow, 1986.
2. Mokrecova I. P. 1983 “O nekotoryh osobennostjah miniatjur Nikomidijskogo Evangelija” (About Some Features of Miniatures of Nicomedia Gospel), in Drevnerusskoe iskusstvo. Rukopisnaja kniga, Moscow, 1983, vol. 3, pp. 303–330.
3. Pivovarova N. V. 1999 “K istolkovaniju programmy rospisi diakonnika cerkvi Spasa na Neredice v Novgorode” (To Explanation of Program of Painting of Diaconnik of Church Spasa na Neredice in Novgorod), in Drevnerusskoe iskusstvo: Vizantija i drevnjaja Rus', Saint-Petersburg, 1999, pp. 210–227.
4. Pivovarova N. V. Freski cerkvi Spasa na Neredice v Novgorode: Ikonograficheskaja programma rospisi (Frescos of Church Spasa na Neredice in Novgorod. Iconographical Program of Painting), Saint-Petersburg, 2002.
5. Sarab'janov V. D. 2003 “Rospisi bokovyh apsid sobora Mirozhskogo monastyrja i istoki ih ikonograficheskoj programmy” (Painting of Side Vaults of Cathedral of Mirozhskij Monastery and Origins if Their Iconographical Program), in Iskusstvo hristianskogo mira, 2003, vol. 7, pp. 75–84.
6. Tkachenko A. A., Je. P. A., Lisovoj N. N., Artjuhova T. A., Koroljov A. A., Turilov A. A., Ustinova Ju. V., Ivanova Ju. V. 2010 “Ioann Predtecha” (John Baptist), in Pravoslavnaja jenciklopedija, Moscow, 2010, vol. 24, pp. 528–577.
7. Carevskaja T. Ju. Freski cerkvi Blagoveshhenija na Mjachine («v Arkazhah») (Frescos of Annunciation Church on Mjacnina (“in Arkazhy”)), Novgorod, 1999.
8. Babich G. 1978 “Ikonografski program zhivopisa u pripratima krala Milutina” (Iconographical Problem of Painting and Vestibule of King Miluti), in Vizantiјska umetnost pochetkom XIV veka. Grachanica, 1973, Beograd, 1978, pp. 105–121.
9. Bogdanovich D., Dzurich V. Ј., Medakovich D. Hilandar, Beograd, 1978.
10. Boshkovich Dz., Petkovich V. Manastir Dechani, II (Monastery of Dechani, II), Beograd, 1941.
11. Voјvodich D. 2010 “Na tragu izgublenih fresaka Zhiche (I)“ (Following Tracks of Lost Frescos of Zhiche (I)), in Zograf, 2010, vol. 34, pp. 71–86.
12. Voјvodich D. 1998–1999 “O vremenu nastanka zidnog slikarstva u Palezhu” (About Time of Origin of Wall Painting in Palezh), in Zograf, 1998–1999, vol. 27, pp. 129–130.
13. Gabelich S. Manastir Lesnovo. Istoriјa i slikarstvo (Monastery of Lesnovo. History and Painting), Beograd, 1998.
14. Gligoriјevich-Maksimovich M. 2007 “Antichki elementi u slikarstvu Bogorodice Levishke u Prizrenu” (Antique Elements in Painting of God Mother in Levishka in Prizren), in Zbornik Matice srpske za klasichne studiјe, 2007, vol. 9, pp. 203–221.
15. Dimitrova E. Manastir Matejche (Monastery of Matejche), Skopje, 2002.
16. Dzhurich V. Ј. Zidno slikarstvo manastira Dechana. Gradzha i studiјe (Wall Painting of Dechan Monastery. Creation and Study), Beograd, 1995.
17. Dzhurich V. Ј. Crkva Svete Sofiјe u Ohridu (Church of St. Sophia in Ochrid), Beograd, 1963.
18. Kashanin M., Boshkovich Dzh., Miјovich P. Zhicha. Istoriјa, arhitektura, slikarstvo (Zhicha. History, Architecture, Painting), Beograd, 1969.
19. Kisas S. 1976 “O vremenu nastanka fresaka u crkvi Svetih Apostola u Solunu” (About Time of Origin of Frescos in Church of St. Apostles in Thessaloniki), in Zograf, Beograd,1976, vol. 7, pp. 52–57.
20. Markovich M. 1998 “Prvobitni zhivopis glavne manastirske crkve”, in Subotich G. (ed.) Manastir Hilandar, Beograd, 1998, pp. 221–242.
21. Miљkovik-Pepek P. 1956 “Materijali za makedonskata srednovekovna umetnost. Freskite vo svetilishteto na crkvata sv. Sofija vo Ohrid” (Materials for Macedonian Medieval Art. Frescos in Church of St. Sophia in Ochrid), in Zbornik na Arheoloshkiot muzej (1955-1956), Skopje, 1956, pp. 58–61.
22. Nitich A. Dzhurich V. Ј. 1995 “Ciklus propovedi sv. Јovana Preteche” (Cycle of Sermon of St. John Baptist), in Zidno slikarstvo manastira Dechana. Gradzha i studiјe, Beograd, 1995, pp. 161–164.
23. Nitich A. 1993–1994 “Ciklus sv. Јovana Preteche u Mateichu i vizantiјska tradiciјa” (Cycle of St. John Baptist in Mateichu and Byzantine Tradition), in Zograf, 1993–1994, vol. 23, pp. 75–87.
24. Panich D., Babich G. Bogorodica Levishka (God Mother in Levishka), Beograd, 1988.
25. Petkovich V. Spasova crkva u Zhichi. Arhitektura i zhivopis (Spas Church in Zhichi. Architecture and Painting), Beograd, 1911.
26. Petkovich V. R. 1909 “Zhicha”, in Starinar, 1909, vol. 4, pp. 27–106.
27. Petkovich V. R. Manastir Dechani, II (Monastery of Dechani, II), Beograd, 1941.
28. Petkovich S. 1978 “Slikarstvo spolashne priprate Grachanice” (Painting of Vestibule in Grachanica), in Vizantiјska umetnost pochetkom XIV veka. Grachanica, 1973, Beograd, 1978, pp. 201–211.
29. Radoјchich S. Staro srpsko slikarstvo (Old Serbian Painting), Beograd, 2010.
30. Todich B. Grachanica: Slikarstvo (Grachanica: Painting), Beograd, 1988, pp. 251–253.
31. Todich B. Srpsko slikarstvo u doba krala Milutina (Serbian Painting in Epoch of King Milutin), Beograd, 1998.
32. Chanak-Medich M. 2000 “Arhitektura i program eksonarteksa zhichke Spasove crkve” (Architecture and Program of Exonartex of Spas Church in Zhicha), in Subotich G. (ed.) Manastir Zhicha. Zbornik radova, Kralevo, 2000, pp. 57–81.
33. Babić G. Les chapelles annexes des églises Byzantines: Fonction liturgique et programmes iconographiques, Paris, 1969.
34. Bank A. 1967 “Les monuments de la peinture byzantine du XIII siècle“, in Symposium de Sopočani, 1965, Beograd, 1967, pp. 91–101.
35. Deichmann F. W. Frühchristlichen Bauten und Mosaiken von Ravenna, Baden-Baden, 1958.
36. Galavaris G. The Illustrations of the Homilies of Gregory Nazianzenus, Princeton, 1969.
37. Huskinson J. 2005 ‘Rivers of Roman Antioch. Personification in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium”, in Stafford E. and Herrin J. (eds.) Personifiсations in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium, 2005, pp. 247–264.
38. Jerphanion G. de. Les églises rupestres de Cappadoce. Texte, I–II. Planches, 1–3, Paris, 1925–1942.
39. Jolivet-Lévy C. Sacred Art of Cappadocia. Byzantine Murals from the Sixth to 13th Centuries (en coll. avec A. Ertug), Istanbul, 2006.
40. Kandić O. 1998–1999 “Fonts for the Blessing of the Waters in Serbian Medieval Churches”, in Zograf, 1998–1999, vol. 27, pp. 61–77.
41. Leroy J. Les manuscrits Syriaques à peintures conservés dans les bilbiothèques d’Europe et d’Orient, Paris, 1964.
42. Mango C. The Art of Byzantine Empire 321–1453, New Jersey, 1972.
43. Millet G. La peinture du Moyen Age en Yougoslavie, 1954, vol. 1.
44. Millet G. Monuments de l’Athos, Paris, 1927.
45. Musicescu M. A., Ionescu G. Biserica domneasca din Curtea de Argeş, Bucharesy, 1976.
46. Petkovic V. R. La peinture serbe du moyen âge, Paris, 1934, vol. 2.
47. Popović Lj. Personifications in Paleologan Painting 1261–1453. Phil. Diss, Bryn Mawr College, 1963.
48. Restle M. Byzantine Wall Painting in Asia Minor, New York, 1967.
49. Restle M. Die Byzantinische Wandmalerei in Kleinasien, Bongers, 1967, vol. 2.
50. Stephan Ch. Ein byzantinisches Bildensemble. Die Mosaiken und Fresken der Apostelkirche zu Thesaloniki, Worms, 1986.
51. Stoyanova M. Le cycle de la vie de Saint Jean-Baptiste dans l’Orient chrétien, Venise, 1990.
52. Thierry N. 1991/1992 “Importance du culte de Jean Prodrome à Cappadoce“, in Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 1991/1992, vol. 84/85, pp. 94–116.
53. Thierry N. 1972 “Art byzantin du Haut Moyen Age en Cappadoce: l’église no 3 de Mavruçan”, in Journal des Savants, 1972, pp. 233–269.
54. Thierry N. Haute Moyen age. Cavusin, Paris, 1983, vol. 1.
55. Underwood P. A. The Kariye Djami, New York, 1966, 1975, vol. 1–4.
56. Underwood Р. 1975 “Some Problems in Programs and Iconography of Ministry Cycles” in Underwood P. A. (ed.) The Kariye Djami, Princeton, 1975, vol. 4, pp. 243–302.
57. Weyl Carr А. 1982 “A group of Provincial Manuscripts”, in DOP, 1982, vol. 36, pp. 39–66.
58. Weyl Carr А. Byzantine Illumination 1150–1215. The Study of Provincial Tradition, Chicago, 1987.
59. Xyngopoulos A. 1971 “Les fresques de l’église des Saints Apôtres à Thessalonique”, in Art et société à Byzance sous les Paléologues, Venise, 1971, pp. 83–90.
60. Yota E. Le tétraévangile Harley 1810 de la British Library. Contribution à l’étude de l’illustration des tétraévangiles du Xe au XIIIe siècle. Thèse de doctorat, Fribourg, 2001.
61. Xyngopoulos A. Ai toichographiai tou katholikou tes mones Prodromou para tas Serras (Wall Paintings of Cathedral of Prodromos Monastery in Serras), Thessalonike, 1973.
Марьясина Н. С. Певческий ряд Литургии Преждеосвященных Даров в партесных рукописях XVIII в. // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия V: Вопросы истории и теории христианского искусства. 2016. Вып. 3 (23). С. 86-99. DOI: 10.15382/sturV201623.86-99
This article is devoted to several aspects of the liturgy of The Presanctifi ed Gifts existance in the polyphony of the 18th century. The main attention is paid to the structure of the cycle, and the reflection of the multimelodiousness principle in it. On the grait prokeimenon «Let my prayer be set forth» example, the usage of the traditional chants in the Liturgy of The Presanctified gift's, some features of its harmonization, and evolution of its performance practice are considered. This research is performed on the material of the partes manuscripts, mainly permanent partes polyphony.
The Liturgy of The Presanctified Gifts, the great prokeimenon, partesny harmonizations, a constant polyphony, the Synodal singing collection, manuscripts, Greek chant, Kievan chant

1. Afanas'eva T. I. Liturgija Prezhdeosvjashhennyh Darov v slavjanskoj rukopisnoj tradicii XII–XV vekov: Lingvotekstologicheskij analiz: Dis. … kand. Iskusstvovedenija (Liturgy of Presanctified Gifts in Slavonic Manuscript Tradition of XII–XV Centuries: Linguistic-Textual Analysis: Dissertation), Saint-Petersburg, 2000.
2. Buckaja S. B. Problemy partesnogo mnogogolosija v Rossii: Po pamjatnikam vtoroj poloviny XVII–XVIII v.: Dis. … kand. Iskusstvovedenija (Problems of Partes Polyphony in Russia: on Monuments of Second Half of XVII–XVIII Cent.: Dissertation), Moscow, 1991.
3. Gur'eva N. V. Sistema osmoglasija v russkoj liturgii konca XVII — nachala XVIII vv.: Dis. … kand. Iskusstvovedenija (Octoichos System in Russian Liturgy of End of XVII — Begin of XVIII Cent.: Dissertation), Moscow, 2000.
4. Zahar'ina N. B. Russkie bogosluzhebnye pevcheskie knigi XVIII–XIX vekov. Sinodal'naja tradicija (Russian Liturgical Chant Books of XVIII–XIX Centuries. Synodic Tradition), Saint-Petersburg, 2003.
5. Kovrova I. V. 2013 “K probleme organizacii pevcheskogo rjada liturgii (na materiale partesnyh rukopisej XVIII veka)”, (To Problem of Organization of Chant Row of Liturgy (on Material of Partes Manuscripts of XVIII Century)) in Vestnik PSTGU. Serija V: Voprosy istorii i teorii hristianskogo iskusstva, 2013, vol. 3/12, pp. 67–90.
6. Plotnikova N. Ju. Russkoe partesnoe mnogogolosie konca XVII — serediny XVIII veka: Istochnikovedenie, istorija, teorija (Russian Partes Polyphony of End of XVII — Middle of XVIII Century: Source Study, History, Theory), Moscow, 2015.
7. Plotnikova N. Ju. 2011 “Kompozitor XVIII veka Nikolaj Bovykin” (Composer of XVIII Century Nikolaj Bovykin), in Vestnik PSTGU. Serija V: Voprosy istorii i teorii hristianskogo iskusstva, 2011, vol. 1/4, pp. 182–196.
8. Protopopov V. V. Muzyka russkoj Liturgii. Problema ciklichnosti (Music of Russian Liturgy. Cycling Problem), Moscow, 1999.
Семенов В. Б. "Buona pulcella fut Eulalia": "германский" след во "французском" памятнике // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2017. Вып. 50. С. 44-59. DOI: 10.15382/sturIII201750.44-59
The article deals with stereotypical ideas as to the poem Buona pulcella fut Eulalia... According to these, it is a song-type text; it consists of couplets; is decorated by a typical French assonance; belongs to the sphere of syllabic versification; represents a Romance example of the Latin genre of sequence, namely its subgenre «with double cursus». The paper considers these stereotypic judgments controversial and gives a general description of reasons that had led to inaccurate interpretations of the text. The main reason is traditionally established correlation between the Romance text and the preceding text, i.e. a Latin sequence, in Valenciennes MS. The latter text was written by another scribe, but it also employs the Eulalia theme. The paper argues in favour of the need to consider the poem not with the preceding Latin text as the background, but in the light of the following German text, which was written by the hand that included the Romance poem into the manuscript. The two texts, Romance and German, demonstrate parallels in the genre and the form. They are both narratives and are both shaped as a verse column, unusual for the Middle Ages, with no notation. Some lines of the Romance text contain specifically German alliteration, while final parts of the German text are strangely linked by a specific Romance assonance. In its conclusion, the paper draws attention to the fact that the shape of the Romance text manifests the presence of the organising principle of accentual versification to a much greater extent than syllabic. The paper is concluded by an assumption about possible existence of presyllabic Romance accentual versification as a system of folk verse form.
cantilena, sequence, Buona pulcella fut Eulalia…, syllabic verse, syllabic vocalisation, accentual verse, alliteration, assonance, epic poem, Romance literature

Berger R., Brasseur A. Les Séquences de Sainte-Eulalie. Genève, 2004.
Blakesley J. A Garland of Faith: Sequences, Prayers and Poems of the Medieval Church arranged for the Three Year Lectionary. Leominster, 1998.
Chartier Y. L’auteur de la Cantilène de sainte Eulalie // Chant and its Peripheries. Essays in Honour of Terence Bailey (Musicological Studies, vol. LXXII). Ottawa, 1998. P. 159–178.
Dronke P. The Latin and French Eulalia sequences // Nova de Veteribus. Mittel-und neulateinische Studien für Paul Gerhard Schmidt / Ed. A. Bihrer, E. Stein. Leipzig, 2004. S. 218–229.
Dronke P. The Medieval Lyric. Cambridge, 1996.
Gasparov M. L., Ocherk istorii evropejskogo stiha, Moscow, 2003.
Gasparov M. L., Ocherk istorii russkogo stiha, Moscow, 2000.
Gasparov M. L., Sillabicheskoe stihoslozhenie, in: Literaturnaja jenciklopedij a terminov i ponjatij, ed. Nikoljukin A. N., Moscow, 2001.
Gasparov M. L., Sovremennyj russkij stih, Moscow, 1974.
German Literature of the Early Middle Ages / Ed. B. Murdoch. New York, 2004. Vol. 2.
Norberg D. L. An Introduction to the Study of Medieval Latin Versification. Washington, 2004.
Porteau P. Cantilène de sainte Eulalie serait-elle un poème strophique? // Revue de Linguistique Romane. Paris, 1933. T. 9. P. 156–157.
Purczinsky J. Germanic Influence in the «Saint Eulalia» // Romance Philology. Los Angeles, 1965. Vol. 19. T. 2. P. 271–275.
Марьясина Н. С. Богослужение Литургии Преждеосвященных Даров в творчестве композиторов Нового направления (рубеж XIX–XX вв.) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия V: Вопросы истории и теории христианского искусства. 2017. Вып. 28. С. 141-158. DOI: 10.15382/sturV201728.141-158
This article is devoted to the Liturgy of Presanctifi ed Gifts as an artistic and musical cycle in works of Russian composers of the so-called New Direction. The Liturgy of Presanctifi ed Gifts is a special rite of the Russian Orthodox Church which belongs to the period of the Great Lent and is performed only on certain specifi cally prescribed weekdays. The ascetic character of this period of the church year, rarity of the church service as well as the minor role of chanting in it were the reasons why the Liturgy of Presanctifi ed Gifts did not attract much attention of religious composers during the whole Synod period of the history of the Russian Orthodox Church. Even so, every period has a certain number of liturgical cycles of the Lent. Among the New Direction composers there are several who turned to the Liturgy of Presanctifi ed Gifts, namely A. Nikol’skiy, P. Chesnokov, A. Grechaninov. Each of them created one cycle of this type. The aim of this article is to give a short comparative analysis of these cycles, to identify their common features and at the same time to reveal the vivid individual character in each of them, which is carried out for the fi rst time. We have found several common features in these cycles. These include stylistic orientation towards ancient chants, common to the New Direction, being revived in the new, modern, form. One should also note the impact of the emotional atmosphere of the Great Lent and of the semantic features of the Liturgy of Presanctifi ed Gifts on the musical style of the works in question; this impact, however, receives very individual manifestation in each case. For the fi rst time, we have traced the new interpretation given by the composers to the structure of the chanting range of the Liturgy of Presanctifi ed Gifts, which in this case begins by the Celebration of the Typika; this is unique in the whole history of Russian liturgical singing. This observation allowed us to make a conclusion about the domination in the New Direction of the emotional and aesthetic perception of the church service.
The Liturgy of The Presanctifi ed Gifts, the Lent, the Typika, New direction, choral cycle, A. Nikol’skiy, P. Chesnokov, A. Grechaninov
  1. Gulianitskaia N. S., Poetika muzykal'noi kompozitsii: Teoreticheskie aspekty russkoi dukhovnoi muzyki XX veka, Moscow, 2002.
  2. Malatsai L. V., Aleksandr Nikol'skiy: tvorcheskaia biografiia, Moscow, 2010.
  3. Paisov Iu. I., Aleksandr Grechaninov. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo, Moscow, 2004.
  4. Plotnikova N. Iu., Russkaia dukhovnaia muzyka XIX — nachala XX veka: stranitsy istorii, Moscow, 2007.
  5. Rakhmanova M. P., A. T. Grechaninov, in: Istoriia russkoi muzyki, Moscow, 1997, 10A, 170–216.
  6. Rakhmanova M. P., Novoe napravlenie v dukhovnoi muzyki: istoricheskie tendentsii i khudozhestvennye protsessy, in: Istoriia russkoi muzyki, Moscow, 2004, 10Б, 392–456.
  7. Russkaia dukhovnaia muzyka v dokumentakh i materialakh, Moscow, III, 2002.
Mariasina Nonna
Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
Email: nonna888@yandex.ru.
Аляев Г. Е., Оболевич Т. С. «Истина во вселенскости»: переписка С. Л. Франка с о. Климентом Лялиным (1937–1948) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2021. Вып. 93. С. 93-130. DOI: 10.15382/sturI202193.93-130
This article makes public the archive correspondence between S. L. Frank and Father Clement Lialine, a monk from the Catholic monastery Amay-Chevetogne. The preface to the publication traces the history of S. L. Frank’s relations with Clement Lialine which is refl ected in their correspondence of 1937–1948. The topics discussed in the letters concern the involvement of S. L. Frank in his cooperation with the journal Irénikon, his unrealised plans of lecture trips to Belgium, as well as the edition of English anthology of V.S. Soloviev’s works by S. L. Frank’s and his reasearch into the issue of the supposed conversion of V. S. Soloviev to Catholicism. Of particular interest is S. L. Frank’s and Fr. Clement’s position of Christian universalism expressed in the letters, i. e. the desire to consider both Orthodoxy and Catholicism not as two diff erent denominations, but as two cultural-historical branches of the “universal” church, which should stand together in “brotherhood”. Also of interest is response from the Greek Catholic priest Cyril Korolevsky (received to the inquiry of Lialine) concerning the canon regulations of joining the Catholic Church by the Orthodox. The foreword also shows the role of the Benedictine monastery of Amay-Chevetogne and the journal Irénikon as an ecumenical centre of Catholicism, including the links of the journal with Russian émigré philosophers. We also present a bibliography of the articles and reviews of S. L. Frank’s works printed in the journal Irénikon. The published correspondence allows one to supplement the knowledge about the church-related position of S. L. Frank, his attitude to Orthodoxy, Catholicism and Protestantism as the three “fraternal” branches of the “united” Christian faith, as well as the specifi c participation of Russian philosophers in the development of ecumenical dialogue in the mid- 20th century.
S. L. Frank, Clement Lialine, journal Irénikon, Christian universalism, ecumenism, religious philosophy, Russian philosophy in emigration, V. S. Soloviev
  1. Alexander, hieromonk (1933) “Rim i irenisty (pis’mo v redaktsiiu)” [Roma and Irenists (Letter to the editors)]. Vestnik RSHD, no. 1, pp. 20–22 (in Russian).
  2. Aliaev G., Rezvykh T. (2018) “«Problema teoditsei — istochnik russkogo revoliutsionnogo sotsializma». Parizhskii doklad Semena Franka 1938 goda” [“Theodicy problem — source of Russian revolutionary Socialism». S. Frank’s Paris Paper of 1938”]. Vestnik Russkoi Khristianskoi Gumanitarnoi Akademii, no. 19, vol. 2, pp. 20–25 (in Russian).
  3. Aliaiev G., Rezvych T. (2016). “Perepiska S.L. Franka s V.B. El’ashevichem i F.O. El’ashevich” [Correspondence between S.L. Frank and V.B. Eliashevich and F.O. Eliashevich], in Kolerov M. (ed.) Studies in Russian intellectual History [13]: Yearbook for 2016–2017, Moscow, pp. 40–240 (in Russian).
  4. Aliaiev G. (2015) “The Universalism of Catholicity (Sobornost): Metaphysical and Existential Foundations for Interdenominational Dialogue in Semyon Frank’s Philosophy”, in Mrowczynski-Van Allen A., Obolevitch T., Rojek P. (ed.) Apology of Culture. Religion and Culture in Russian Thought, Eugene, pp. 218–226.
  5. Beauduin L. (1926) Dans quel esprit nous voudrions travailler. Irénikon, vol. I, No 2.
  6. Berdiaev N. (1933) “Vselenskost’ i konfessionalizm” [Ecumenism and Confessionalism],in Khristianskoe vossoedinenie. Ekumenicheskaia problema v pravoslavnom soznanii [Christian Reunion. Ecumenical problem in Orthodox consciousness], Paris, pp. 63–81 (in Russian).
  7. Boobbyer Ph. (2001). S. L. Frank: the life and work of a Russian philosopher. Moscow (Russian translation).
  8. Florovsky G. (1951) “Solovyov Anthology, edited by S. L. Frank. Translated from the Russian by Nathalie Duddington. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1950”. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology, vol. 5 (3).
  9. Frank S. (1992) “S nami Bog. Tri razmyshleniia” [God with us. Three speculations], in Dukhovnye osnovy obschestva [Spiritual foundations of society], Moscow, pp. 217–404 (in Russian).
  10. Lambrechts A. (2005) “Kontakty mezhdu Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkov’u i monastyr’om Amay-Chevetogne v 1926–2004 gg.” [Contacts between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Amay-Chevetogne Monastery in 1926–2004”]. Stranitsy: bogoslovie, kul’tura, obrazovanie, no. 3, vol. 9, pp. 349–365 (in Russian).
  11. Rousseau O. (1958) “In memoriam: Dom Clément Lialine”. Irénikon, vol. XXXI, no 2.
  12. Sapozhnikov S. (1993) “Potomstvo velikogo kniazia Konstantina Nikolaevicha (1827–1892) ot Anny Vasil’evny Kuznetsovoi” [The off spring of Grand Duke Konstantin Nikolaevich from Anna Vasilyevna Kuznetsova], in Istoricheskaia genealogiia, no. 2, Yekaterinburg, pp. 22–27 (in Russian).
  13. Troitskii A. (2011) “Irénikon”, in Pravoslavnaia Entsiklopediia [Orthodox encyclopaedia], vol. XXVI, pp. 367–370 (in Russian).
  14. Tsygankov A., Obolevich T. (2018) “«Germaniia uzhe stala dlia menia moei vtoroi rodinoi»: zhiznennyi i tvorcheskii put’ S. L. Franka v perepiske s F. Khailerom et circum” [“«Germany has already become my second motherland»: Frank’s biography and work in correspondence with F. Heiler et circum”]. Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik, vol. 33, pp. 293–313 (in Russian).
  15. Van Parys M. (2003) “Dom Clément Lialine, théologien de l’unité chrétienne”. Irénikon, no 76.
Aliaiev Gennadii
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Dnipro University of Technology; Golovko St. 18, 36004, Poltava, Ukraine;
ORCID: 0000-0001-6713-2014;
Email: gealyaev@gmail.com. *According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.
Nun Тереза (Obolevitch T.)
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow; Poland, 31-002, Krakow, Kanonicza Str. 9;
Post: Professor, Chair of Department of Russian and Byzantine Philosophy;
ORCID: 0000-0002-6834-6142;
Email: teresa.obolevitch@gmail.com. *According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.
Семенов И. Н. Философско-психологическая и организационно-преподавательская деятельность С. Л. Рубинштейна в академической науке и университетском образовании // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2021. Вып. 61. С. 119-144. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV202161.119-144
This article analyses from an institutional and personological perspective the creativity of life and professional activity of the leader of Soviet psychology of the mid- 20th century, director of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Education, founder of the Department of Psychology of Lomonosov Moscow State University, philosopher and psychologist S. L. Rubinshtein, the 130th anniversary of whom has recently been celebrated by the academic community. It discusses in a sociocultural context the new sides of his biography and demonstrates for the fi rst time their causal influence on his research in philosophy, psychology and pedagogy. It characterises the main periods in the development and the heyday of his scientific, organisational and social activity and shows the fundamental signifi cance of his achievements and achievements of his large academic school in the further development of psychological science and the present-day study of man.
S. L. Rubinshtein, philosophy, psychology, personology, pedagogy, methodology, activity, growth, individuality, thinking, refl ection, mentality, consiousness, academic work, academic institutions, scientifi c school, A. N. Leontiev, B. L. Pasternak, B. M. Teplov, M. G. Yaroshevsky
  1. Abul’khanova K. (ed.) (2010) “Sergei Leonidovich Rubinshtein”. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Abul'khanova K., Petrovskii V., Semenov I. et al. (2009) Psikhologiia individual'nosti: novye modeli i podkhody [Psychology of individuality: new models and approaches]. Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Abul'khanova K., Slavskaia A. (2009) Sergei Leonidovich Rubinshtein: Detstvo. Iunost'. Molodost' [Sergei Leonidovich Rubinshtein: His childhood, adolescence, young age]. Moscow; Voronezh (in Russian).
  4. Abul'khanva-Slavskaia K., Brushlinskii A. (1989) Filosofsko-psikhologicheskaia kontseptsiia S. L. Rubinshteina [Philosophical and psychological conception of S.L. Rubinshtein]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Andreeva G., Zhdan A., Semenov I. et al. (1993) Progress v psikhologii: kriterii i priznaki [Progress in psychology: Criteria and signs]. Moscow (in Russian).
  6. Arsen'ev A. (1993) “Razmyshleniia o rabote S. L. Rubinshteina “Chelovek i mir”” [Reflections on S. L. Rubinshtein’s work “Man and the world”]. Voprosy filosofii, 5, p. 130–160 (in Russian).
  7. Basov M. (1975) “Razvitie cheloveka kak aktivnogo deiatelia v okruzhaiushchei srede” [Development of man as an active actor in his environment], in Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniia [Selected works in psychology]. Moscow. P. 209–399 (in Russian).
  8. Brushlinskii A. (1999) “Filosofiia i psikhologiia: S. L. Rubinshtein i S. L. Frank” [Philosophy and psychology: S. L. Rubinshtein and S.L. Frank]. Psikhol. zhurn., 20, 6, p. 6–12 (in Russian).
  9. Brushlinskii A., Tikhomirov O. (2013) “O tendentsiiakh sovremennoi psikhologii myshleniia” [Trends in contemporary psychology of thinking]. Nats. psikhol. zhurn., 2, p. 10–16 (in Russian).
  10. Diukov V., Semenov I., Shaikhutdinova R. (2010) Refleksivno-deiatel'nostnaia pedagogika: uchitel' dlia novoi shkoly [Reflective and activity-based pedagogy: A teacher for the new school]. Krasnoiarsk (in Russian).
  11. Forverg M. (1989) “Individualizatsiia lichnosti” [Individualisation of personality], in Primenenie kontseptsii S.L. Rubinshteina v razrabotke voprosov obshchei psikhologii [Applying S. Rubinshtein’s theory to the study of issues in general psychology]. Moscow. P. 176–191 (in Russian).
  12. Iaroshevskii M. (1957) “O razvitii psikhologicheskikh vzgliadov I. M. Sechenova” [On the development of I. Sechenov’s psychological views]., in S. Rubinshtein (ed.) I. M. Sechenov i materialisticheskaia mysl' [Sechenov and the thought in materialism]. Moscow. P. 31–94 (in Russian).
  13. Lektorskii V. (2004) “Nemetskaia fi losofi ia i russkaia mysl': S.L. Rubinshtein i G. G. Shpet” [German philosophy and the Russian thought: S.L. Rubinshtein and G. G. Shpet], in Filosofiia i istoriia filosofii. Aktual'nye problemy [Philosophy and history of philosophy: Current issues]. Moscow. P. 365–381 (in Russian).
  14. Leont'ev A., Zaporozhets A. (1945) Vosstanovlenie psikhofi ziologicheskikh funktsii posle ranenii [Recovery of psychological functions after being wounded]. Moscow.
  15. Mattshaus W. (1988) Sowjetische Psychologie des Denkens. Frankfurt am Main.
  16. Natorp P. (2006) “Filosof ia kak osnova pedagogiki” [Philosophy as a basis for pedagogy], in P. Natorp. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Moscow (Russian translation).
  17. Pasternak B. (2002) Izbrannye sochineniia [Selected works]. Moscow (in Russian).
  18. Payne T. R. S. (1968) S. L. Rubinshtein and philosophical foundation of Soviet psychology. Dordrecht.
  19. Petrovskii A., Iaroshevskii M. (2003) Teoreticheskaia psikhologiia [Theoretical psychology]. Moscow (in Russian).
  20. Rubinshtein S. (1922) “Printsip tvorcheskoi samodeiatel'nosti (Filosofskie osnovy pedagogiki)” [Principle of creative self-initiated activity (Philosophical foundations of pedagogy)]. Uchenye zapiski vysshei shkoly Odessy, 2, p. 148–154; Voprosy psikhologii, 1986, 4, p. 101–107; Voprosy filosofii, 1989, 4, p. 89–95 (in Russian).
  21. Rubinshtein S. (1923) “Predislovie redaktora perevoda” [Editor’s note], in A. Bine, T. Simon. Metody izmereniia umstvennoi odarennosti [Methods of estimating mental talent]. Khar'kov (in Russian).
  22. Rubinshtein S. (1930) Sovremennoe sostoianie i ocherednye zadachi nauchnoi bibliografi i v SSSR [Current state and further tasks of scientifi c bibliography in the USSR]. Moscow (in Russian).
  23. Rubinshtein S. (1934) “Voprosy psikhologii v trudakh Karla Marksa” [Issues in psychology in the works of Karl Marx]. Sovetskaia psikhotekhnika, 1, p. 3–21 (in Russian).
  24. Rubinshtein S., Svadkovskii I., Raskina S. (1937) Protiv pedologicheskikh izvrashchenii v pedagogike [Against pedological perversions in pedagogy]. Leningrad; Moscow (in Russian).
  25. Rubinshtein S. (1939) “Nauchno-issledovatel'skaia rabota kafedry psikhologii Leningr. gos. ped. in-ta im. A. I. Gertsena” [Academic and research activity of the Department of Psychology at Leningrad State University]. Leningrad, vol. 18. p. 141–144 (in Russian).
  26. Rubinshtein S. (1945) “Predislovie. Voprosy pedagogicheskoi psikhologii” [Foreword. Issues in pedagogical psychology]. Trudy nauchno-issledovatel'skogo in-ta psikhologii Akad. ped. nauk. Moscow. P. 3–6 (in Russian).
  27. Rubinshtein S. (1945) “Problema deiatel'nosti i soznaniia v sisteme sovetskoi psikhologii” [Problem of activity and consiousness in the system of Soviet psychology]. Psikhologiia. Dvizhenie i deiatel'nost'. Uchenye zapiski MGU, 90, p. 6 –23 (in Russian).
  28. Rubinshtein S. (1946) “Fiziologiia i psikhologiia v nauchnoi deiatel'nosti I. M. Sechenova” [Physiology and psychology in I.M. Sechenov’s academic work]. Fiziologicheskii zhurnal SSSR, 1, p. 149–156 (in Russian).
  29. Rubinshtein S. (1947) “Psikhologiia i problema vosstanovleniia funktsii posle raneniia” [Psychology and the problem of recovery of a function after being wounded]. Uchenye zapiski MGU, 2/3, p. 5–8 (in Russian).
  30. Rubinshtein S. (1948) “Problemy psikhologii vospriiatiia (vmesto predisloviia)” [Issues in psychology of perception (In lieu of an introduction)], in S. Rubinshtein (ed.) Issledovaniia po psikhologii vospriiatiia. Moscow; Leningrad. P. 322 (in Russian).
  31. Rubinshtein S. (1952) “Uchenie I.P. Pavlova i nekotorye problemy perestroiki psikhologii” [I.Pavlov’s doctrine and several issues in transformation of psychology]. Voprosy filosofii, 3, p. 197–210 (in Russian).
  32. Rubinshtein S. (1958) O myshlenii i putiakh ego issledovaniia [Mental process and ways to study it]. Moscow (in Russian).
  33. Rubinshtein S. (1960) “Problemy sposobnostei i voprosy psikhologicheskoi teorii” [Problems of abilities and issues in psychological theory]. Voprosy psikhologii, 3, p. 5–11 (in Russian).
  34. Rubinshtein S. (ed.) (1960) Protsess myshleniia i zakonomernosti analiza, sinteza i obobshcheniia. Eksperimental'noe issledovanie [Mental process and regularities of analysis, synthesis, and generalisation]. Moscow (in Russian).
  35. Rubinshtein S. (1976) “Teoreticheskie voprosy psikhologii i problema lichnosti” [Theoretical issues in psychology and the problem of personality]. Voprosy psikhologii, 3, p. 30–38 (in Russian).
  36. Rubinshtein S. (1976) Problemy obshchei psikhologii [Issues in general psychology]. Moscow (in Russian).
  37. Rubinshtein S. (1989, 2002) Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [Elements of general psychology]. Moscow; St. Petersburg (in Russian).
  38. Rubinshtein S. (1994) “O filosofskoi sisteme G. Kogena” [On G. Kogen’s philosophical system]. Istoriko-filosofskii Ezhegodnik-92. Moscow. P. 230–259 (in Russian).
  39. Rubinshtein S. (1997) Izbrannye filosofsko-psikhologicheskie trudy [Selected works in philosophy and psychology]. Moscow (in Russian).
  40. Rubinstein aujourd'hui. Nouvelles figures de l'activité humaine. Anthologie de textes choisis et edites par Nosulenko V. et Rabordel P. Toulouse—Paris: Octores de la Maison des Sciences de I'Homme, 2007.
  41. Semenov I. (1989) “The psychology of reflexion in the scientific work of S. L. Rubinshtein”. The Psychology Journal, 4, p. 67–74.
  42. Semenov I. (2006) “Vzaimodeistvie moskovskoi i peterburgskoi nauchnykh shkol psikhologii tvorchestva i refleksii” [Interaction between the Moscow and St. Petersburg academic schools of psychology of creativity and reflection]. Psikhologiia pered vyzovom budushchego [Psychology challenged by the future]. Moscow. P. 61–64 (in Russian).
  43. Semenov I. (2009) “S.L. Rubinshtein izvestnyi i neizvestnyi: istoriko-kul'tural'naia refl eksiia zhiznetvorchestva. Panorama razvitiia filosofsko-psikhologicheskoi sistemy S. L. Rubinshteina v sovremennom chelovekoznanii” [S.L. Rubinshtein known and unknown: Historical and cultural reflection of creativity of life. Panorama of the development of S. L. Rubinshtein’s philosophical and psychological system in the present-day study of man]. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 6/3, p. 63–89, 106–116 (in Russian).
  44. Semenov I. (2011) “Ekzistentsial'no-kul'tural'naia refl eksiia vo vzaimodeistvii khudozhestvennogo i nauchnogo tvorchestva v Serebrianom veke” [Existential and cultural refl ection in the interaction of artistic and scientific creative work of Silver Age], in D. Ushakov (ed.) Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskikh osnovanii k sotsial'nym i kul'turnym fenomenam [Creativity: From biological foundations to social and cultural phenomena]. Moscow. P. 606–624 (in Russian).
  45. Semenov I. (2012) “Vekhi, metodologiia i napravleniia issledovanii refl eksii v Psikhologicheskom institute na Mokhovoi” [Milestones, methodology and directions in the study of refl ection at the Institute of Psychology in Mokhovaya]. Mir psikhologii, 4, p. 262–275 (in Russian).
  46. Semenov I. (2012) “Kafedra obshchei psikhologii MGU kak kolybel' universitetskogo professional'nogo obrazovaniia psikhologov i izucheniia refl eksii” [Department of general psychology at MGU as a cradle of university-based professional training of psychologists and of the study of refl ection]. Psikhologiia. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovaniia, 5–6, p. 112–133 (in Russian).
  47. Semenov I. (2014) Sistemodeiatel'nostnaia metodologiia i refl eksivnaia psikhologiia myshleniia [System- and activity-based methodology and reclective psychology of thinking]. Noginsk (in Russian).
  48. Semenov I. (2015) “Personologiia Mikhaila Grigor'evicha Iaroshevskogo kak istorika, teoretika, metodologa psikhologii razvitiia lichnosti i tvorchestva v nauke” [Personology of M. G. Yaroshevsky as a historian, theorist, methodologist of psychology of personal development and of creative work in science]. Razvitie lichnosti, 4, p. 19–52 (in Russian).
  49. Semenov I. (2016) “Akmeologicheskie aspekty psikhologii tvorchestva i diff erentsial'noi psikhofi ziologii vydaiushchikhsia lichnostei v nasledii B.M. Teplova” [Acmeological aspects of psychology of creative work and diff erential psychopsysiology of an extraordinary personality in B.Teplov’s legacy]. Akmeologiia, 4, p. 8–22 (in Russian).
  50. Semenov I. (2017) “Tipologiia psikhologicheskikh shkol B.M. Teplova i refl eksivnaia personologiia razvitiia ego odarennoi lichnosti” [Typology of P. Teplov’s psychological schools and refl ective personology of development of his talented personality], in B.M. Teplov i sovremennoe sostoianie differentsial'noi psikhologii i differentsial'noi psikhofi ziologii [B. Teplov and present-day state of differential psychology and differential psychophysiology]. Moscow. P. 87–101 (in Russian).
  51. Semenov I. (2017) “Personologicheskaia refl eksiia zhiznetvorchestva P.Ia. Gal'perina i ego psikhologo-pedagogicheskoi i istoriko-metodologicheskoi deiatel'nosti v Moskovskom universitete” [Personological refl ection of P. Galperin’s creativity of life and his psychological, pedagogical, historical and methodological activity at Moscow University]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 14: Psikhologiia, 2, p. 3–28 (in Russian).
  52. Semenov I. (2018) “Vklad A.N. Leont'eva v razvitie psikhologii myshleniia, inzhenernoi psikhologii i ergonomiki” [A. Leontiev’s contribution in the psychology of thinking, psychological engineering and ergonomics]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 14: Psikhologiia, 3, p. 3–20 (in Russian).
  53. Semenov I. (2018) “Sotsiokul'turnaia refl eksiia stoletnego razvitiia rossiiskoi psikhologicheskoi nauki: K 100-letiiu sovetskoi psikhologii (1918–2018)” [Social and cultural refl ection of the 100-year long development of Russian psychological science: For the 100th anniversary of Soviet psychology (1918–2018)]. Vestnik MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. Seriia 14: Psikhologiia, 4, p. 4–31 (in Russian).
  54. Semenov I. (2019) “Pervoprokhodcheskaia rol' E. A. Budilovoi v realizatsii issledovatel'skikh programm S. L. Rubinshteina i metodologicheskie problemy periodizatsii rossiiskoi (dorevoliutsionnoi/ sovetskoi/postsovetskoi) psikhologii” [Piomeering role of E. Budilova’s role in the implementation of S. Rubinshtein’s research programmes and methodological problems of the periodisation of Russian psychology], in A. Zhuravlev et al. Istoricheskaia preemstvennost' v otechestvennoi psikhologii [Historical continuity in Russian psychology]. Moscow. P. 47–67 (in Russian).
  55. Semenov I. (2020) “Tipologiia ekzistentsial'nykh strategii i issledovatel'skikh programm v tvorchestve S. L. Rubinshteina” [Typology of existential strategies and research programmes in S. Rubinshtein’s creative work]. Psikhol. zh., 2, p. 105–113 (in Russian).
  56. Semenov I., Larionova L. (2020) “Napravleniia ekstremal'noi psikhologii razvitiia v period Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny” [Trends in the psychology of development in extreme conditions during the Great Patriotic War]. Mir psikhologii, 1, p. 237–256 (in Russian).
  57. Semenov I., Ssorin Iu. (2012) “Entsiklpedizm: vchera, segodnia, zavtra” [Ecyclopaedism: Yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Psikhologiia. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovaniia, 5–6, p. 7–46 (in Russian).
  58. Sirotkina I. (1996) “Nauka o cheloveke v istoricheskoi perspektive: dialog mezhdu Rossiei i zapadom vokrug rabot M. M. Bakhtina, L. S. Vygotskogo i S. L. Rubinshteina” [Study of man in a historical perspective: Dialogue between Russia and the West around the works of M. Bakhtin, L. Vygotsky, S. Rubinshtein]. Psikhol. zh., 2 (in Russian).
  59. Teplov B. (1944) “Psikhologicheskaia kharakteristika deiatel'nosti” [Psychological characterisation of activity]. Sovetskaia pedagogika, 11–12, p. 44–53 (in Russian).
  60. Teplov B. (1945) Um polkovodtsa [The mind of a military leader]. Moscow (in Russian).
Semenov Igor
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Politics;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Moscow City University; 16/1 Per. Sverchkova, Moscow, 123022, Russian Federation;
Post: profesor;
ORCID: 0000-0002-5823-2918;
Email: i_samenov@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Оболевич Т. С. Франку невозможно не «доверять»… Семен Франк и Георгий Флоровский // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2021. Вып. 98. С. 95-113. DOI: 10.15382/sturI202198.95-113
The article examines the life and creative connections of two prominent Russian thinkers of the 20th century, S. L. Frank and Revd. Georgy Florovsky. It fi rst looks the biographical aspects of their relationship and then analyses Revd. Georgy’s perception of Frank’s philosophy. There are several texts by Florovsky about Frank, dating from before 1950, i.e. during the philosopher’s lifetime. After Revd. Georgy’s participation in the Collection of the Memory, Frank entered even more into the orbit of Florovsky’s creative interests. The two thinkers communicated and valued each other, although one cannot speak of their close friendship. Frank’s name appears only rarely in Florovsky’s writings, although he wrote two reviews of Frank’s books, a preface to the American edition of Reality and Man. Florovsky also discussed his teaching in his other works, and corresponded extensively with his widow after Frank’s death. Despite appealing to diff erent traditions, both Frank and Florovsky emphasised the incomprehensibility of the divine essence, so this article also examines apophatic motifs in their work. Both philosophers noted the antinomian character of theology. While noting the importance of apophatic theology, they did not deny the importance of cataphatic theology. Florovsky appealed to the patristic doctrine of the distinction between the incomprehensible divine essence and the divine energies present in the created world. Frank, in turn, distinguished between the “unknowable in itself” and the “unknowable for us.” Both thinkers philosophised in the context of theology. Nevertheless, Florovsky, while admiring Frank’s “metaphysics of faith”, reproached him for his attachment to the Platonic tradition which in the Russian philosophy found its expression in the conception of unity that goes back to Soloviev. The conclusion is that Florovsky’s and Frank’s thought, while not strictly related or congenial, had some points of intersection.
S. L. Frank, Revd. Georgy Florovsky, religious philosophy, Russian philosophy in exile, apophaticism, panentheism, reception of Russian thought
  1. Bulgakov S. (2002) “Pis′ma k G.V. Florovskomu (1923–1938)” [Letters to G.V. Florovsky (1923–1938)], in M. Kolerov (ed.) Issledovaniia po istorii russkoi mysli. Ezhegodnik 2001–2002 [Studies in Russian intellectual history. Yearbook for 2001–2002], Moscow, pp. 175–223 (in Russian).
  2. Kiejzik L., Orlova N. (eds) (2019) “Mne nado, chtoby moya zhizn′ imela kakuiu-nibud′ tsel′ i smysl”.
  3. Klement′ev A. K. (2008) “Pedagogicheskaia i obshchestvenno-tserkovnaia deiatel′nost′ L.P. Karsavina v gody zhizni v Germanii i Frantsii (1922–1926)” [Pedagogical and social-ecclesiastical activities of L.P. Karsavin during his life in Germany and France (1922–1926)”]. Istoricheskie zapiski, no. 11 (in Russian).
  4. Kolerov M. (2018) Iznutri. Pis′ma Berdiaeva, Bulgakova, Novgorodtseva i Franka k Struve. Perepiska Franka i Struve (1898–1905/1921–1925) [Inside. Letters of Berdyaev, Bulgakov, Novgorodtsev and Frank to Struve. Correspondence between Frank and Struve (1898–1905/1921–1925)]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. “Perepiska S. L. Franka s V. B. El′ashevichem i F. O. El′ashevich” (2016) [Correspondence between S. L. Frank and V. B. Eliashevich and F. O. Eliashevich], in M. Kolerov (ed.) Issledovaniia po istorii russkoi mysli. Ezhegodnik 2015 [Studies in Russian intellectual history. Yearbook for 2015]. Moscow, pp. 40–240 (in Russian).
  6. “Pis′mo Semyona Franka Georgiiu Fedotovu” (1952) [Letter of Semyon Frank to Georgy Fedotov]. Novyi zhurnal, no. 28 (in Russian).
  7. Struve N. (ed.) (2000) Bratstvo sviatoi Sofi i. Materialy i dokumenty 1923–1939 [Brotherhood of St. Sophia. Materials and documents 1923–1939]. Moscow; Paris (in Russian).
Nun Тереза (Obolevitch T.)
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow; Poland, 31-002, Krakow, Kanonicza Str. 9;
Post: Professor, Chair of Department of Russian and Byzantine Philosophy;
ORCID: 0000-0002-6834-6142;
Email: teresa.obolevitch@gmail.com. *According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.