/
Search results


Тагунова И. А., Селиванова Н. Л., Исаева М. А. Теоретико-методологические ориентиры моделей воспитания в англоязычных странах // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2015. Вып. 3 (38). С. 20-36. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201538.20-36
The authors of the article identified and described the fundamental theoretical and methodological orientations of education models in the USA, England, Canada and Australia. Four basic areas of values (rational, evolving, intuitive and social) articulated in the writings of scholars in these countries were identified by the authors of the article as the fundamental theoretical and methodological orientations of the education models. The authors of the article described these values in the context of the books written by the philosopher John Bordley Rawls («A Theory of Justice»), psychologists Lawrence Kohlberg («The development of orientations toward a moral order») and Milton Rokeach («Theory of Values»), as well as the sociologist Aaron Wildavsky («Cultural Theory»). The article examined the key value systems of education models in each of the above areas. The authors argued and justified the idea that the education, based on all of these values, in general, can be considered as liberal education.
theory, methodology, directions, orientations, education models, rational values, evolving values, intuitive values, social values.

1. Balickaja I. V. Mul'tikul'turnoe obrazovanie v SShA, Kanade i Avstralii (Multicultural Education in USA, Canada and Australia), Moscow, 2008.
2. Vil'davski A. 1994 “Teorii vosprijatija riska: kto boitsja, chego i pochemu?” (Theories of Risk Perception: Who Is Afraid, What and Why?), in TESIS, 1994, vol. 5, pp. 268–276.
3. Voskresenskaja N., Shehter S. (eds.) Grazhdanskoe obrazovanie: soderzhanie i aktivnye metody obuchenija (Civil Education: Content and Active Methods od Education), Moscow, 2004.
4. Dzhurinskij A. N. Vospitanie v Rossii i za rubezhom (Education in Russia and Abroad), in http://www.prosv.ru/ebooks/dgur/index.html).
5. Manhejm K. Diagnoz nashego vremeni (Diagnosis of Our Time), Moscow, 2010.
6. Rolz Dzh. Teorija spravedlivosti (Theory of Justice), Novosibirsk, 1995.
7. Fahrutdinova A. V. Grazhdanskoe obrazovanie uchashhihsja v anglojazychnyh stranah na rubezhe XX–XXI vv. Doktorskaja dissertacija (Civil Education of Pupils in English-Speaking Lands at the Turning Points of XX–XXI Cent. Dissertation), Kazan', 2012.
8. Ericson E. Identity, Youth and Crisis, New York, 1968.
9. Kohlberg L. 1969 “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization”, in Goslin D. A. (ed.) Handbook of Socialization. Theory and Research, Chicago, 1969.
10. Kohlberg L. 1963 “The Development of Children’s Orientations Toward a Moral Order”, in Vita Humana, 1963, vol. 6, pp. 11–35.
11. Kohlberg L. The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice, San Francisco, 1981.
12. Levine P. Basic Theories of Civic Development, 2012, in http://peterlevine.ws.
13. Rokeach M. Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. A Theory of Organization and Change, San Francisco, 1972.
14. Wildavsky A. Culture and Social Theory, New Brunswick, London, 1998.
Tagunova Irina
Selivanova Nataliia
Isaeva Marina
Степанов П. В., Степанова И. В., Селиванова Н. Л. Теоретические основы подготовки будущих педагогов к воспитательной деятельности в системе общего и дополнительного образования // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2018. Вып. 49. С. 39-48. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201849.39-48
This article deals with topical reasons for the changes in the training of prospective teachers for their educational activity within the framework of general and supplementary education of children. These changes are mainly related to the integration of modern scientifi c knowledge about education into the process of teacher training for educational activities at school. The changes are also connected with the updating of educational and methodological background of teacher education. Besides, the process of upgrading teacher education should take into account not only the current achievements of educational science but also those changes in the teaching routine that have been introduced by new normative and methodical documents. The article examines advantages and drawbacks in the currently existing programme-related, educational and methodical background of teacher education. We also point to key problems in training prospective teachers for educational work. Solving these problems is supposed to increase the competitiveness of graduates. Special attention is paid to theoretical fundamentals of preparing future teachers for their work in the system of general and supplementary education.
character education, student, teacher, teacher training, educational organisation, systematisation, theoretical background
  1. Kolesnikova I. A., Titova E. V., Pedagogicheskaia praksiologiia: ucheb. posobie dlia stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenii, Moscow, 2005.
  2. Malenkova L. I., Teoriia i metodika vospitaniia: Ucheb. posobie, Moscow, 2002.
  3. Novikov A. M., Osnovaniia pedagogiki. Posobie dlia avtorov uchebnikov i prepodavatelei, Moscow, 2010.
  4. Selivanova N. L., Vospitanie v sovremennoi shkole: ot teorii k praktike, Moscow, 2010.
  5. Stepanov P. V., “Motivatsiia pedagogov kak vospitatelei”, in: Narodnoe obrazovanie, 2, 2009, 190–196.
Stepanov Paul
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Place of work: Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education; 5/16, Room 208, Makarenko Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation;
Post: Deputy head of the Center of strategy and theory of education of the personality;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4924-835X;
Email: semya-2005@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Stepanova Irina
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Rank: Senior Research Fellow;
Place of work: Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education; 5/16, Room 208, Makarenko Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation;
Post: Senior researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0001-9972-0267;
Email: semya-2005@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Selivanova Natalia
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Education;
Place of work: Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education; 5/16, Room 208, Makarenko Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of strategy and theory of education of the personality;
ORCID: 0000-0001-6654-5992;
Email: nselivanova2000@mail.ru. *According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.
The article is written in 2018 within the framework of the project № 27.7091.2017/ БЧ of Institute for strategy of education development of the Russian academy of education.