/
Search results


Седанкина Т. Е. Теоцентрическая модель воспитания студента направления подготовки 48.04.01 «Теология»: теоретико-методологическое обоснование // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2022. Вып. 65. С. 78-99. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV202265.78-99
Aim. Implementation of the theoretical and methodological substantiation of the theocentric model of upbringing a student in the field of training 48.04.01 "Theology".Methodology. In this article, which is an introduction to the block of subsequent ones devoted to a detailed understanding of the elements of the theocentric model, the analysis of modern scientific research concerning the possibility of introducing elements of this model of education into the pedagogical process of higher education is carried out. In the process of research, the theoretical method of scientific knowledge, the general philosophical dialectical method, as well as abstraction, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, mental modeling were used.Results. To substantiate the theoretical and methodological base of the theocentric model of upbringing a student of the field of study 48.04.01 "Theology", an analysis of modern research, one way or another related to the declared topic, was carried out, as a result of which either the complete absence or insufficient development of issues related to the consideration of the possibilities of the theocentric model was revealed education, which indicates both the relevance and the possibility of mutual enrichment of ideas both about pedagogical methods and techniques of education, and about the methodology of theology. Also, the article presents a set of scientific approaches that make up the methodological basis of the theocentric model of education.Research implications. A methodological basis is proposed, which is the interaction of the systemic, hermeneutic, dialectical, phenomenological, philosophical and cultural, axiological, existential and theological approaches, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the theocentric model of education, which can become a step towards the further development of the methodology of theology.
theology, theocentric model of education, structure of the theocentric model, elements of the model of education, methodological basis, methodology of theology, theologian-researcher.
  1. Annushkin Iu. (2016) “Ekzistentsial′nyi podkhod v obrazovanii” [Existentional approach in education”. Vestnik Buriatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiia. 2016, no. 4, pp. 164–171 (in Russian).
  2. Anufrieva D. (2010) “Osnovnye podkhody k germenevticheskoi kontseptsii smysloobrazovaniia v protsesse obucheniia” [Main approaches to the hermeneutic conception of sense formation in study process]. Idei i idealy. 2010, no. 2 (4), рp. 93–98 (in Russian).
  3. Blauberg I., Iudin E. (1973) Stanovlenie i sushchnost′ sistemnogo podkhoda [The development and essence of the systematic approach]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Buttaeva A. (2017) “Adaptatsiia soderzhaniia i kachestva islamskogo obrazovaniia k sovremennym realiiam i potrebnostiam grazhdanskogo obshchestva” [Adaptation of the content and quality of Islamic education to present-day circumstances and demands of the civil society]. Vestnik Sotsial'no-pedagogicheskogo instituta. 2017, no. 3 (23), рp. 51–59 (in Russian).
  5. Darzhinova S., Baitumanova Z., Bembieva N. (2018) “O germenevticheskom podkhode v sovremennom obrazovanii” [On the hermeneutic approach in present-day education]. Vestnik kalmytskogo universiteta. 2018, vol. 40, рp. 134–140 (in Russian).
  6. Divnogortseva S. (2019) “Teologiia i pedagogika v sovremennom vuze: osnovy sinergii” [Theology and pedagogy in the present-day university: elements of synergy]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniia. 2019, vol. 2, рp. 18–27 (in Russian).
  7. Elenberger G. (2017) “Klinicheskoe vvedenie v psikhiatricheskuiu fenomenologiiu i ekzistentsial′ nyi analiz” [Clinical introduction to psychiatric phenomenology and existential analysis], in Teoriia i praktika ekzistentsial'noi psikhologii [Theory and practice of existential psychology]. Moscow, pp. 206–249 (in Russian).
  8. Fomicheva I. (2004) Filosofiia obrazovaniia: nekotorye podkhody k probleme [Philosophy of education: some approaches to the problem]. Novosibirsk (in Russian).
  9. Ibragimov I. (2020) “Polivariativnyi podkhod v strategii sovremennogo religioznogo obrazovaniia” [Multivariant approach in the strategy of modern religious education]. Sovremennoe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie. 2020, vol. 10, рp. 52–54 (in Russian).
  10. Kibalion (2007), in Sakral′nyi mistitsizm Zapada. Germeticheskaia filosofiia [Sacred mysticism of the West. Hermeticist philosophy]. Moscow (in Russian).
  11. Koletvinova N., Bichurina S. (2019) “Germenevticheskii podkhod kak vazhnaia sostavliaiushchaia professional′noi podgotovki studentov” [Hermeneutic approach as an important element in professional training of students]. Vestnik ChGPU im. I. Ia. Iakovleva. 2019, vol. 1 (101), рp. 137–145 (in Russian).
  12. Konacheva S. (2017) “Sovremennaia kontinental′naia fi losofskaia teologiia: fenomenologichesko-germenevticheskii podkhod” [Contemporary continental philosophical theology: phenomenological-hermeneutical approach]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriia I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie. 2017, vol. 73, pp. 106–119 (in Russian).
  13. Kozlova I. (2018) “Morfologiia religii Ioakhima Vakha” [Ioakhim Vakh’s morphology of religion], in Missiia Konfessii. 2018, 7/4, pp. 382–391 (in Russian).
  14. Kulikov S. (2013) “Fenomenologicheskii podkhod — kliuch k ponimaniiu prichin transformatsii filosofskikh obrazov nauki” [Phenomenological approach as a key to the understanding of causes of transformation of philosophical images of science]. HORIZON. 2013, vol. 2 (2), pp. 61–74 (in Russian).
  15. Kurylo O. (2018) “Germenevticheskii podkhod k sovremennomu obrazovaniiu” [Hermeneutic approach to the modern education]. Territoriia nauki. 2018, vol. 5, pp. 18–23 (in Russian).
  16. Kutsenko N. (2020) “K voprosu o stanovlenii ekzistentsial′nogo podkhoda v psikhologii: vklad S. K′erkegora” [The issue of developing existential approach in psychology: Kierkegaard’s contribution], in Sbornik konferentsii NITs Sotsiosfera. 2020, vol. 6, pp. 5–9 (in Russian).
  17. Leonova O. (2019) “Aksiologicheskie modeli obrazovaniia i problema ego nepreryvnosti” [Axiolo gical patterns of education and the problem of its continuity]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriia: Filosofskie nauki. 2019, vol. 4, pp. 83–94 (in Russian).
  18. Lobanova N. (2016) “O sistemnom podkhode v sovremennoi nauke” [On the systematic approach in contemporary science]. Obuchenie i vospitanie: metodika i praktika. 2016, vol. 29, pp. 7–12 (in Russian).
  19. Mamaev V. (2012) “Aksiologicheskii podkhod v vospitanii studenchestva” [Axiological approach in education of university students]. Vestnik IuUrGU. 2012, 41, pp. 134–136 (in Russian).
  20. Medvedeva E. (2018) “Mezhkul′turnoe ponimanie: germenevticheskii podkhod” [Intercultural understanding: hermeneutic approach]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. 2018, vol. 4 (14), pp. 19–27 (in Russian).
  21. Nikulina N., Devitian M., Shevchenko S. (2015) “Sistemnyi podkhod v pedagogike kak obshchemetodologicheskii printsip nauki” [Systematic approach in educational science as a general methodological scientific principle]. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015, 111, available at https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistemnyy-podhod-v-pedagogike-kak-obschemetodologicheskiyprintsip-nauki/viewer (data obrashcheniia: 14.08.2021) (in Russian).
  22. Oseledchik M. (2016) “Fenomenologicheskii podkhod k znaniiu” [Phenomenological approach to cognition]. Sotsial′no-gumanitarnye znaniia. 2016, vol. 4, pp. 303–318 (in Russian).
  23. Piliak S. (2020) “Razvitie germenevticheskogo podkhoda v izuchenii fenomenov kul′tury” [Development of hermeneutic approach in the study of culture phenomena], pt. 1. Filosofskaia mysl′. 2020, 8, pp. 30–38 (in Russian).
  24. Podliniaev O. (2012) “Ekzistentsial′nyi podkhod v psikhologii” [Existential approach in psychology]. Izvestiia irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012, 1/1, p. 62–68 (in Russian).
  25. Protopopov I. (2020) “Dialekticheskii metod i poniatie otritsaniia v fi losofi i Gegelia” [Dialectic method and the notion of negation in Hegel’s philosophy]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina. 2020, vol. 1, pp. 25–32.
  26. Sitarov V. (2018) “Tsennostnye orientiry v vospitanii sovremennoi molodezhi” [Axiological benchmarks in educating present-day young people]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2018, vol. 1, pp. 47–57 (in Russian).
  27. Smirnov V., Astakhov O., Shunkov A. (2019) “Aktualizatsiia kul′turnogo samosoznaniia kak uslovie razvitiia teologicheskogo obrazovaniia v vuzakh kul′tury” [Actualising cultural self-con sciousness as a condition of developing teological education in institutes of culture]. Vestnik KemGUKI. 2019, vol. 49, pp. 168–175 (in Russian).
  28. Teoriia kultury. Ch. 1. Vvedenie v teoriiu kul′tury (2009) [Theory of culture. Pt. 1. Introduction tomthe theory of culture]. St Petersburg (in Russian).
  29. Shibakova E. (2011) “Dialekticheskii metod poznaniia v filosofii” [Dialectic method of cognition in philosophy]. Intellektual'nyi potentsial XXI veka: stupeni poznaniia. 2011, vol. 5/2, pp. 114–117 (in Russian).
  30. Shmonin D. (2014) “Bogoslovie obrazovaniia: kontekstnyi poisk” [Theology of education: context-based search]. Khristianskoe chtenie. 2014, no. 5, pp. 112–134 (in Russian).
  31. Shubaro O. (2018) “Kategoriia sakral′nogo i fenomen sakral′nogo teksta v istorii i v sovremennoi kul′ture” [The category of the sacred and the phenomenon of the sacred text in history and in contemporary culture]. Filosofsko-kul'turologicheskie issledovaniia: sbornik statei. 2018, vol. 3. Minsk, pp. 261–295 (in Russian).
  32. Shutenko A. (2013) “Sotsiokul′turnye izmeneniia pedagogicheskogo protsessa v vysshei shkole” [Sociocultural shifts of the educational process in institutions of higher education]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2013, 4, pp. 249–251 (in Russian).
  33. Vakh I. (1994) “Sotsiologiia religii” [Sociology of religion], in Sotsiologiia religii: klassicheskie podkhody: khrestomatiia [Sociology of religion: classical approaches: an anthology]. Moscow (in Russian).
  34. Zakirova A. (2008) “Kontseptual′nye osnovaniia pedagogicheskoi germenevtiki” [Conceptual framework of educational hermeneutics]. Vestnik Tiumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008, vol. 5, pp. 8–18 (in Russian).
  35. Zakirova A., Semenova L. (2015) “Formirovanie rossiiskoi natsional′noi identichnosti studentov vuza: germenevticheskii podkhod” [Developing the Russian national identity in university students: hermeneutic approach]. Obrazovanie i nauka. 2015, no. 7 (126), pp. 165–180 (in Russian).
Sedankina Tatyana
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
ORCID: 0000-0001-5241-6479;
Email: tatiana-svetlaya@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
The article was prepared with the support of the grant program of the Institute for the Integration of Knowledge IKI Academy.