/
Search results


Моисеева С. А. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2013. Вып. 5 (35). С. 163-169. — Rev. op.: Translating the Bible into Arabic: historical, text-critical and literary aspects / Ed. S. Binay, St. Leder. Beirut: Orient-Institut Beirut; Wurzburg: Ergon Verlag Wurzburg in Kommission, 2012. (Beiruter Texte und Studien; 131). - 150, 127 p
PDF
Моисеева С. А. XI Сирологический симпозиум и IX Конференция арабо-христианских исследований (Мальтийский университет, г. Валетта, 16–21 июля 2012 г.) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2013. Вып. 5 (35). С. 173-177.
PDF
Милакович Ж. В., Моисеева С. А. Забытый сирийский столпник Тимофей из Кахушты // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2014. Вып. 5 (40). С. 45-54. DOI: 10.15382/sturIII201440.45-54
The article is devoted to a little-known Syrian saint of the VIIIth — IXth century Timothy of Kakhushta, whose hagiographical «dossier» comprises texts in Arabic and Georgian. The analysis of his Arabic Life clearly reveals that he was a stylite. Therefore his Life can be used as a source for studing the history of Syrian stylitism in the Muslim era as well as its reception in the hagiography. The fact that the author of Timothy’s Life gives no accent to the stylitism of the saint is also typical of the Byzantine hagiography of the same period. The narration of saint’s miracles which occupies more than a half of the text demonstrates the life of the Christian countryside in Syria in the early Abbasid Caliphate. One can also find two particularly important episodes in the Life. The fi rst one mentions Maronites as Monothelites and the second one is related to caliph Harun ar-Rashid and Theodoretus, patriarch of Antioch and has a parallel in the chronicle of Eutychius, patriarch of Alexandria.
Timothy of Kakhushta, stylite, Syrian stylitism, the Church of Antioch, saint’s Life, miracles, Arabic Melkite hagiography, Maronites, Theodoretus patriarch of Antioch, Harun ar-Rashid.

1. Aleksij (Kuznecov), ierom. Jurodstvo i stolpnichestvo: religiozno-psihologicheskoe, moral'noe i social'noe issledovanie (Craziness and Stylitism: Religious-Phychological, Moral and Social Study), Moscow, 1913.
2. Gabidzashvili Je. Perevodnye pamjatniki drevnegruzinskoj literatury: Bibliogr. sprav. (Translated Works of Old Georgian Literature: Bibliographical Reference), Tbilisi, 2004, vol. 1: Agiografija (Hagiography) (na gruz. jaz.).
3. Kekelidze K. S. Jetjudy po istorii drevnegruzinskoj literatury (Etudes on History of Old Georgian Literature), Tbilisi, 1960, vol. 6 (na gruz. jaz.).
4. Mednikov N. A. Palestina ot zavoevanija ee arabami do krestovyh pohodov po arabskim istochnikam: Pril. 2/1 (Palestine from Arabic Conquer till Crusades according to Arabic Sources: Appendix 2/1), Saint-Petersburg, 1903. (Pravoslavnyj palestinskij sbornik, vol. 17/2/2).
5. Mejendorf I., protopr. 1996 “Vizantijskie predstavlenija ob islame“ (Byzantian Perceptions about Islam), in Al'fa i Omega, Moscow, 1996, vol. 2/3 (9/10), pp. 131–140.
6. Moiseeva S. A. Arabskaja mel'kitskaja agiografija IX–XI vekov (Araboc Melchite Hagiography of IX–XI Centuries) (in print).
7. Rodionov M. A. Maronity: Iz jetnokonfessional'noj istorii Vostochnogo Sredizemnomor'ja (Maronites: from Ethnic-Confessional History of Eastern Mediterranean Region), Moscow, 1982.
8. Kekelidze K. (ed.) 1940 “Timofej Antiohijskij, neizvestnyj sirijskij dejatel' VIII v.” (Timothy of Antiochia, Unknown Syriac Figure of VIII Cent.), in Moambe (Vestnik), Tbilisi, 1940, vol. 7, pp. 9–150 (na gruz. jaz.).
9. Blake R. 1965 “La littérature grecque en Palestine au VIII e siècle“, in Le Muséon, Louvain, 1965, vol. 78, pp. 367–380.
10. Brayk, Mīkhā’īl. Al-HWaḳā’iḳ al-wafi yyah fī tārīkh baṭārikat al-Kanīsah al-Anṭākiyyah, Bayrūt, 2006.
11. Caseau B., Fayant M.-Ch. Le renouveau du culte des stylites syriens au Xe et Xie siècles? La Vie abrégée de Syméon Stylite le Jeune (BHG 1691c) (in print).
12. Delehaye H. Les saints stylites, Bruxelles, Paris, 1923 (Subsidia hagiographica, vol. 14).
13. Karalevskу C. 1924 “Antioche”, in Dictionnaire d’histoire et de géographie ecclésiastiques, Paris, 1924, vol. 3, pp. 563–703.
14. Lamoreaux J. 2009 “The Life of Timothy of Kakhushta”, in Christian-Muslim Relations: A Bibliographical History, Leiden, 2009, vol. 1: 600–900, pp. 920–921.
16. Moosa M. The Maronites in History, Piscataway (N. J.), 2005.
19. Nasrallah J. Histoire du mouvement littéraire dans l’Eglise melchite du Ve au XXe siècles, Louvain, Рaris, 1999, vol. 2/2.
20. Peña I. et al. Les stylites syriens, Oxford, 1975.
21. Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit, Berlin, 1998–2009, vol. 1: 641–867.
22. Sansterre J.-M. 1989 “Les saints stylites du Ve au XIe siècle: Permanence et évolution d’un type de sainteté“, in Marx J. (ed.) Sainteté et martyre dans les religions du Livre, Bruxelles, 1989, pp. 33–45.
23. Sauget J.-M. Premières recherches sur l’origine et les caractéristiques des synaxaires melkites (XIe–XVIIe siècles), Bruxelles, 1969 (Subsidia hagiographica, vol. 45).
24. Schaсhner L. A. 1975 “The Archaeology of the Stylite”, in Religious Diversity in Late Antiquity, Leiden, 1975, pp. 329–400.
25. 1948 “St. Daniel the Stylite”, in Three Byzantine Saints: Contemporary Biographies of St. Daniel the Stylite, St. Theodore of Sykeon and St. John the Almsgiver, London, 1948.
26. Tarchnischvili M. Geschichte der kirchlichen georgischen Literatur, Città del Vaticano, 1955 (Studi e testi, vol. 185).
27. Tūmā Bīṭār, archim. Al-KWiddisūn al-mansiyyūn fī al-turāth al-anṭākī, Bayrūt, 1995.
Milakovich Zhanna
Moiseeva Sof'ia
Моисеева Е. В. От греха к спасению. «Delectatio» в философии блаженного Августина // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2015. Вып. 5 (61). С. 59-72. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201561.59-72
The article focuses on the notion of delight and its development in Saint Augustine’s early works. Delight, «delectatio», is an inner characteristic of human will where the latter takes its power in order to transform wishes into acts. Even though it may appear a secondary concept, delight is, in fact, a key point for the understanding of Augustine’s doctrine of salvation. The present study shows how the idea of delight appears and grows together with the concept of will. The study is based on the material from three books: De musica, De diversis quaestionibus 83 (questions 68-70) and Ad Simplicianum. We will see how and why Augustine uses the notion of delight to resolve the question of the co-existence of free will and divine grace. Book VI of De musica is taken as the starting point, because there we see for the first time how human will is connected to delight and what role will and delight play in soul’s salvation without any reference to divine grace. Questions 68–70 from De diversis quaestionibus 83 show the influence that the reading of Paul’s Epistle to Romans exerted on Augustine’s position. Ad Simplicianum outlines the new vision of the relationship between will and grace based on the idea that delight is an inner engine of the will.
St. Augustine, delight, will, sin, salvation, grace, habit, God.

1. Babcock W. S. 1979 “Augustine’s interpretation of Romans (A.D. 394–396)”, in Augustinian Studies, 1979, vol. 10, pp. 55–74.
2. Bochet I. Saint Augustin et le désir de Dieu, Paris, 1982.
3. Bochet I. Firmament de l’Écriture, Paris, 2004.
4. Bourke V. J. Joy in Augustine’s Ethics. Villanova, 1978.
5. Chapman E. Saint Augustine’s Philosophy of Beauty, New York, 1939.
6. De Lubac H. Surnaturel. Etudes historiques, Paris, 2010.
7. Finaert G., Thonnard F.-J. 1947 “Introduction”, in Dialogues philosophiques IV. La musique. Bibliothèque Augustinienne, Paris, 1947, vol. 7.
8. Gilson E. Introduction à l’étude de saint Augustin, Paris, 1969.
9. Mayer C. 1998 “Delectatio (delectare)”, in Mayer C. (ed.) Augustinus Lexikon, Bâle, 1998, vol. 2, col. 267–285.
10. Prendiville J. G. 1972 “The Development of the Idea of Habit in the Thought of Saint Augustine”, in Traditio, 1972, vol. 28, pp. 29–99.
11. Solignac A. 1988 “Les excès de l’ intellectus fi dei dans la doctrine d’Augustin sur la grâce”, in Nouvelle Revue Théologique, 1988, vol. 110, pp. 825–849.
12. Torchia J. 1990 “Pondus meus amor meus. The Weight-Metaphor in St. Augustine Early Philosophy”, in Augustinian Studies, 1990, vol. 21, pp. 163–176.
13. Van Bavel T. J. 1993 “Fruitio, Delectatio and Voluptas”, in Augustinus, 1993, vol. 37, pp. 499–510.
14. Fokin A P. 2005 “Kratkij ocherk uchenija blazhennogo Avgustina o sootnoshenii svobodnogo chelovecheskogo dejstvija i bozhestvennoj blagodati v spasenii (po sochinenijam 386–397 gg.)” (Short Survey on Teaching of St. Augustine about Correlation of Free Human Action and God’s Grace in Salvation (on Works of 386–397)), in Fokin A P. (ed.) Blazhennyj Avgustin. Traktaty o razlichnyh voprosah: bogoslovie, jekzegetika, jetika, Moscow, 2005, pp. 8–40.
Моисеева С. А. III Сиро-арабский симпозиум (Университет Святого Духа, Каслик, Ливан) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2015. Вып. 5 (45). С. 145-146.
PDF
Моисеева С. А. Конференция "Arabica sunt, non leguntur... - Арабская Библия: Свидетельство рукописей" (Лёвенский католический университет, Бельгия) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2015. Вып. 5 (45). С. 147-148.
PDF
Фролов Д. В., Моисеева С. А. Камень в Евангелии от Матфея // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2016. Вып. 4 (49). С. 96-116. DOI: 10.15382/sturIII201649.96-116
The article deals with the image of stone in the Gospel of Matthew against the background of the Old Testament. Textual analysis is combined in the article with the attention paid to the early and medieval exegetical tradition. The search for the intertextual relations between the Old and the New Testament proved very fruitful in respect to the notion of stone which has great and multifaceted symbolic value in the Tanakh. It is a chosen substance symbolically related to the genesis of the chosen people, it is a special matter for building the Temple, the monument, etc. Most stone contexts in Matthew, and their number is the greatest among the Gospels, belong to one of the semantical groups: stone — the people, stone — temptation, stone — foundation, stone — Christ, stone — the key to the typology. The basis for the symbolic meaning of stone in Matthew, as could be predicted, lies in the Old Testament although a lot of motifs taken from undergo a process of re-symbolization so as to fit in the Christian ideology. The study shows that stone contexts in the Gospel are not separate units but form a kind of mosaic picture where one item supports and explains the others. Two ideas already crystallized in Matthew — “live” stones and succession of Testaments — form it seems the center of the symbolical value of the image of stone in the New Testament although it is not limited to them.
the Gospel of Matthew, New Testament, Old Testament, the Bible, stone, rock, image, motif, symbolic value, context, interpretation, exegetics

1. Afraat, persidskii mudrets. Takhvity o liubvi i vere / Sviashch. L. Grilikhes, G. Kessel', per. // Bogoslovskii vestnik. 2003. № 3. P. 31–69.
2. Afraat, persidskii mudrets. Takhvity ≪O poste≫ i ≪O molitve≫ / Prot. L. Grilikhes, G. Kessel', per. // Bogoslovskii vestnik. 2004. № 4. P. 28–68.
3. Bibleiskie kommentarii ottsov Tserkvi i drugikh avtorov I–VIII vekov: Novyi Zavet / Per. s angl., grech., lat. i sir.; Simonetti M., red. / Rus. izd. pod red. Iu. R. Varzorina. Tver', 2007. T. Ia: Evangelie ot Matfeia 1–13; T. Ib: Evangelie ot Matfeia 14–28.
4. Voiku S. Ioann Zlatoust: Sochineniia. Pripisyvaemye // Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia. Moscow, 2010. T. 24. P. 199–204.
5. Fokin A. R. Ieronim Stridonskii // Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia. Moscow, 2009. T. 21. P. 336–370.
6. Frolov D. V. Obraz kamnia v Piatiknizhii: Bytie // Obraz i simvol v iudeiskoi, khristianskoi i musul'manskoi traditsii. Moscow, 2015. P. 15–40.
7. Frolov D. V. Semantika motiva kamnia v Korane // Semantika obraza v literaturakh Vostoka. Moscow, 1998. P. 102–120.
8. Aphraatis Sapientis Persae Demonstrationes / J. Parisot, ed. P., 1894. (Patrologia Syriaca; 1/1).
9. Augustinus Hipponensis. Epistola CXXX // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Latina / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1845. T. 33. Col. 493–507.
10. Augustinus Hipponensis. Sermo СССLII // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Latina / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1865. T. 39. Col. 1549–1560.
11. Bibliography for an Exegetical and Patristic Examination of Matthew 16:18 // URL: https://bible.org/seriespage/bibliography-exegetical-and-patristic-examination-matthew-1618 (data obrashcheniia: 15. 10. 2016).
12. Dupont J. Il n’en sera pas laisse pierre sur pierre (Mc 13,2; Lc 19,44) // Biblica. 1971. Vol. 52. P. 301–320.
13. Ephrem de Nisibe. Commentaire de l’Evangile concordant, ou Diatessaron / L. Leloir, introd., trad., not. Paris, 1966. (Sources chretiennes; 121).
14. Frolov D. The Notion of Stone in the Book of Genesis // Russian Oriental Studies: Current Research on Past & Present Asian and African Societies / V. Naumkin, ed. Leiden; Boston, 2004. P. 263–269.
15. Hieronymus Stridonensis. Commentaria in Evangelium S. Matthaei // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Latina / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1845. T. 26. Col. 15–218.
16. Ioannes Chrysostomus. Homiliae in Mattheum // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Graeca / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1862. T. 57–58.
17. Ioannes Chrysostomus. Interpretatio in Danielem prophetam // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Graeca / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1859. T. 56. Col. 193–246.
18. Iustinus Philosophus et Martyr. Dialogus cum Triphone // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Graeca / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1857. T. 6. Col. 481–800.
19. Jonge M., de. Mt 27,51 in Early Christian Exegesis // Harvard Theological Review. 1986. Vol. 79. N 1–3. P. 67–79.
20. Luz U. Das Evangelium nach Matthaus. Dusseldorf etc., 2002. Tl. 2. (Evangelisch-Katolischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testamenten).
21. Mali F. Das “Opus imperfectum in Matthaeum” und sein Verhaltnis zu den Matthauskommentaren von Origenes und Hieronymus. Innsbruck; Wien, 1991.
22. Metzger B. M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. L.; N. Y., 1971.
23. Opus imperfectum in Matthaeum // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Graeca / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1859. T. 56. Col. 611–946.
24. Origenes Werke / M. Rauer, E. Klostermann, Hrsg. Leipzig, 1930. Bd. 9; 1933. Bd. 11; 1941. Bd. 12. (Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten drei Jahrhunderte; 35, 38, 41).
25. Tertullianus. Adversus Iudaeos // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Latina / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1844. T. 2. Col. 595–642.
26. Tertullianus. Adversus Marcionem // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Latina / J. P. Migne, ed. Parisiis, 1844. T. 2. Col. 239–524.
27. The Commentaries of Isho‘dad of Merv, Bishop of Hadatha (c. 850 A. D.) / M. D. Gibson, ed., transl. Cambridge, 1911. Vol. 1: The Gospels: Translation; Vol. 2: Matthew and Mark in Syriac.
28. The Patristic Exegesis of the Rock of Matthew 16:18 / W. Webster, comp. URL: http://www.christiantruth.com/articles/fathersmt16.html (data obrashcheniia: 15. 10. 2016).
29. Theophylactus Bulgarorum. Enarratio in Evangelium Matthaei // Patrologiae cursus completus. Ser. Graeca / J. P. Migne, ed. P., 1864. T. 123. Col. 139–488.
Frolov Dmitrii
Moiseeva Sof'ia
Моисеева С. А. Рецепция античной традиции consolatio в средневековой арабо-христианской литературе // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2017. Вып. 51. С. 66-79. DOI: 10.15382/sturIII201751.66-79
This paper deals with three texts written in the genre of “consolation”, or consolatio, by the medieval Christian Arab authors Elias al-Jawhari, Severus ibn al-Muqaff a, and Elias bar Shinaya of Nisibis. The goal of this study is to reveal their connection to works of the Arab tradition, including the treatise by the Muslim Arab philosopher al-Kindi. This treatise serves as a link connecting the works of al-Jawhari, ibn al- Muqaff a and bar Shinaya with the Ancient Greek consolatio. The analysis off ered in the paper leads to the conclusion that Christian Arab writers adopted the literary form of the epistolary treatise, but modifi ed its content. All of the three authors theologise the content of consolatio, but choose diff erent strategies. Elias bar Shinaya brings the problem to a generalised ethical level considering it in the context of virtues and vices and organising the material mainly as a collection of sayings and short stories. Elias al-Jawhari and Severus ibn al-Muqaff a try to combine the argumentation typical for ancient consolations with arguments based on texts known to the Christian reader, fi rst and foremost Biblical. Furthermore, Elias al-Jawhari mostly employs themes from the Old Testament that could also be relevant for Muslim readers, whereas Severus ibn al-Muqaff a actively synthesises Classical and Christian material. The latter allows us to suggest the development of a theoretic treatise in the genre of consolatio, containing Christian content for the fi rst time. This paper also puts forward the idea that this phenomenon may be related to the powerful impetus gained by Arab writers during the so-called Abbasid Renaissance.
consolatio, philosophy, grief, sorrow, affl iction, Classical Antiquity, Arabic Christian literature, Elias al-Jawhari, Elias bar Shinaya of Nisibis, Severus ibn al-Muqaff a, Abu Yusuf Yaqub ibn Ishaq al-Kindi

Adamson P. Arabic Ethics and the Limits of Philosophical Consolation // Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and its Afterlife / H. Baltussen, ed. Swansea, 2013. P. 177–196.
Badawi A. La transmission de la philosophie grécque au monde arabe. Paris, 1968. (Études de philosophie médievale; 56).
Badawi A. Traités philosophiques par al-Kindī, al-Fārābī, ibn Bajjah, ibn ʽAdyy. Beirut, 1983.
Borodai T. Iu., Uteshenie fi losofi ei, in: Novaia f losofskaia entsiklopediia (New Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Moscow, 2010, t. 4, 151.
Cassarino M. Traduzioni e traduttori arabi dell’VIII all’XI secolo. Roma, 1998.
Druart T.-A. Al-Kindī’s Ethics // Review of Metaphysics. 1993. Vol. 47. P. 329–357.
Elia di Nisibi. Il libro per scacciare la preoccupazione (Kitāb daf‘ al-hamm) / P. La Spisa, D. Righi, introd.; S. Kh. Samir, ed.; A. Pagnini, trad. Torino, 2007. 2 t. (Patrimonio Culturale Arabo Cristiano; 9–10).
Favez C. La Consolation latine chrétienne. Paris, 1937.
Gentry F. G. Consolation Literature // Brill’s Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World New Pauly / F. G. Gentry, еd. Leiden; Boston, 2006. Vol. 1. P. 1011–1015.
Gregg R. Consolation Philosophy: Greek and Christian Paideia in Basil and the Two Gregories. Cambridge (MA), 1975. (Patristic Monograph Series; 3).
Griffith S. H. The Muslim Philosopher al-Kindi and his Christian Readers: Three Arab Christian Texts on «The Dissipation of Sorrows» // Bulletin of the John Rylands Library. 1996. Vol. 78(3). P. 111–127.
Gutas D. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture, the Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbasid Society (2nd–4th / 8th–10th Centuries). London; New York, 1998.
Holloway P. A. Consolation in Philippians: Philosophical Sources and Rhetorical Strategy. Cambridge, 2004. (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series; 112).
Ignatenko A. A., V poiskakh schast’ia: Obshchestvenno-politicheskie vozzreniia araboislamskikh filosofov srednevekov’ia, Moscow, 1989.
Jayyusi-Lehn G. The Epistle of Ya‘qub ibn Ishaq al-Kindi on the Device for Dispelling Sorrows // British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 2002. Vol. 29. P. 121–135.
Jean Chrysostome. Lettres à Olympias / A.-M. Malingrey, introd., trad. Paris, 1947. (Sources chrétiennes; 13).
Johann H.-T. Trauer und Trost: Eine quellen- und struckturanalytische Untersuchung der philosophischen Trostschriften über den Tod. München, 1968.
Kassel R. Untersuchungen zur griechischen und römischen Konsolationsliteratur. München, 1958. (Zetemata; 18).
Kerasidi N. Kh., Zhanr utesheniia v drevnegrecheskoi literature, in: Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki, 1990, no. 1, 128–136.
Kierdorf W. Laudatio Funebris: Interpretation und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan, 1980.
Landron B. Chrétiens et Musulmans en Irak: Attitudes Nestoriennes vis-à-vis de l’Islam. Paris, 1994.
Lattimore R. Themes in Greek and Latin Epitaphs. Urbana, 1942.
Levi Della Vida G. Il Conforto delle Tristezze de Elia al-Gawharī (Vat. ar. 1492) // Mélanges Eugène Tisserant. Vatican, 1964. Vol. 2. P. 345–397.
Losev A. F., Istoriia antichnoi estetiki. Khar’kov–Moscow, 2000, t. 8, кn. 1.
Mestiri S., Dye G. Al-Kindi: Le moyen de chasser les tristesses et autres textes éthiques. Paris, 2004.
Moiseeva S. A., Iliia al’-Dzhaukhari (Elias al-Jawhari), in: Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia, Moscow, 2009, no. 22, 301–302.
Nakhov I. M., Tragicheskii katarsis i zhanr utesheniia, in: Voprosy klassicheskoi fi lologii, Moscow, 1984, no. 8, 74–88.
Plutarch’s Moralia: In Fifteen Volumes
. Cambridge; London, 1959. Vol. 7 / P. H. De Lacy, B. Einarson, transl.
Riet S., van. Joi et bonheur dans le traité d’al-Kindī sur l’art de combattre la tristesse // Revue Philosophique de Louvain. 1963. Vol. 61. N 69. P. 13–23.
Ritter H., Walzer R. Uno scritto morale inedito di al-Kindī (Temistio Peri alupias?) // Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei: Memorie dell Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche. Ser. 6. 1938. Vol. 16. P. 5–63.
Salama-Carr M. La traduction à l’époque abbaside: L’école de Hunayn ibn Ishāq et son importance pour la traduction. Paris, 1990.
Salazar C. F. Consolatio as Literary Genre // Brill’s Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World New Pauly / C. F. Salazar, еd. Leiden; Boston, 2003. Vol. 3. P. 704–706.
Samir Kh. S. Bibliographie du dialogue islamo-chrétien: Élie de Nisibe (Iliyyā al-Nāṣībī) (975–1046) // Islamochristiana. 1977. Vol. 3. P. 257–286.
Samir Kh. S. Ce que l’on sait de la «Medicina Moeroris et Curatio Doloris» de Sawīrus ibn al-Muqaff a (Xe siècle) // Le Muséon. 1976. Vol. 89. P. 339–352.
Samir Kh. S. Le «Daf‘ al-Hamm» d’Élie de Nisibe: Date et circonstances de sa rédaction // Orientalia Lovaniensa Periodica. 1987. Vol. 18. P. 99–119.
Samir Kh. S. The Role of Christians in the Abbasid Renaissance in Iraq and in Syria (750–1050) // Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph. 2005. Vol. 58. P. 541–572.
Severus ibn al-Muqaff aʽ. Affl iction’s Physic and the Cure of Sorrow / R. Y. Ebied, M. J. L. Young, ed., transl. Louvain, 1978. 2 vol. (Corpus scriptorum christianorum orientalium; 396–397. Ser. Arab.; 34–35).
Zvirevich V. T., O soderzhanii traktata Tsitserona “Uteshenie”, in: Izvestiia Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 3: Obshchestvennye nauki, 2010, n. 2 (77), 155–162.
Моисеева С. А. Международная конференция "От Oriens Christianus к исламскому Ближнему Востоку" (Свободный университет Берлина) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2018. Вып. 57. С. 151-153.
PDF
Moiseeva Sofia
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov per., Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation; Research Centre “The Orthodox Encyclopaedia”; Russian Orthodox Church, 10A/1 Nizhnyaya Syromyatnicheskaya Str., Moscow, 105120, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-7559-948X;
Email: vost.moisseeva@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Моисеева С. А. Летняя школа «JewsEast» (Бохум, июль — август 2018) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2018. Вып. 57. С. 154-155.
PDF
Moiseeva Sofia
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov per., Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation; Research Centre “The Orthodox Encyclopaedia”; Russian Orthodox Church, 10A/1 Nizhnyaya Syromyatnicheskaya Str., Moscow, 105120, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-7559-948X;
Email: vost.moisseeva@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Моисеева С. А. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2019. Вып. 61. С. 135-139. — Rev. op.: Schadler P. John of Damascus and Islam: Christian Heresiology and the Intellectual Background to Earliest Christian-Muslim Relations. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2018. X, 264 pp. (History of Christian-Muslim Relations; 34).
PDF
Moiseeva Sofia
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov per., Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation; Research Centre “The Orthodox Encyclopaedia”; Russian Orthodox Church, 10A/1 Nizhnyaya Syromyatnicheskaya Str., Moscow, 105120, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-7559-948X;
Email: vost.moisseeva@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Моисеева С. А., Штефан В. В. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2019. Вып. 61. С. 140-145. — Rev. op.: Exegetical Crossroads: Understanding Scripture in Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the Pre-Modern Orient / G. Tamer, R. Grundmann, A. E. Kattan, K. Pinggéra, eds. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2018. viii, 399 pp. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam — Tension, Transmission, Transformation; 8).
PDF
Moiseeva Sofia
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov per., Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation; Research Centre “The Orthodox Encyclopaedia”; Russian Orthodox Church, 10A/1 Nizhnyaya Syromyatnicheskaya Str., Moscow, 105120, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-7559-948X;
Email: vost.moisseeva@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Shtefan Vladislava
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov per., Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0001-8015-4859;
Email: shtefanvv.0812@gmail.com.
Моисеев М. В. Послания митрополита Каффы в Москву в 1542 г. (исследования и публикация текстов) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2020. Вып. 94. С. 97-111. DOI: 10.15382/sturII202094.97-111
This article makes public the letters from Metropolitan of Kaff a Basilios to Ivan IV, as well as to an unnamed Russian metropolitan. These documents were fi rst brought by the merchant of sultan’s treasury Adrian Greek at the beginning of 1542. He was executing diplomatic duties and, as it seems now, was also the one who presented interests not only of sultan but also of ecumenical patriarch Jeremiah (1521–1545). The importance of these documents is conditioned by the fact that they include the earliest mention of the metropolitan of Kaff a as well as by the fact that they immediately come from the chancellery of this hierarch. The analysis of this document allowed us to make a conclusion about a multifaceted process of forming the complex, the so-called Greek documentation of the Ambassador’s offi ce (Russ. Посольский приказ). It was shown that the first “Greek” Ambassadorial book (посольская книга) is a creation of a later period because the inventories of the Ambassador’s offi ce show a diff erent chronological interval of documents contained in it. Our study points to a more complicated character of selecting and copying charters for the Ambassadorial books. One of the diffi cult issues in the hisotory of making embassy’s registers is the necessity to clarify the reasons why deacons and clerks copied charters of Ottoman sultans and Eastern hierarchs sometimes into “Turkish”, sometimes “Greek” Ambassadorial books. The reasons for the lacuna of 1520‒1548 in the 1st “Greek” Ambassadorial book could be connected not only with the factors pointed to by S. M. Kashtanov, but also with the change in the intra-chancellery ideas about belonging of epistles of Eastern Orthodox hierarchs to the documentation of Russian-Turkish relations. The publication of these epistles allows one to broaden the source base for the study of the history of Orthodoxy in the Crimean Peninsula during the Ottoman reign.
diplomatic correspondence of Ivan the Terrible, diplomatic correspondence, Kaffa, Metropoly of Kaffa, Ottoman Empire, Crimean Khanate, Ambassadorial books
  1. Aibabina E., Bocharov S. (2002) “Grecheskie pravoslavnye tserkvi srednevekovoi Kaff y” [Greek Orthodox churches of mediaeval Kaffa], in Pravoslavnye drevnosti Tavriki [Orthodox antiquities of Taurica]. Kiev. Pp. 159–168 (in Russian).
  2. Bachinskii A., Erusalimskii K., Kochekovskaia N., Moiseev M. (2018) “Diplomaticheskaia perepiska Ivana Groznogo: problemy avtorstva, khraneniia i bytovaniia” [Diplomatic correspondence of Ivan the Terrible: Problems of authorship, archiving and existence]. Rossiiskaya istoriia, 2, pp. 111–129 (in Russian).
  3. Bennigsen A., Lemers’e-Kel’kezhe Sh. (2009) “Osmanskie pridvornye kuptsy i torgovlia moskovitskimi mekhami vo vtoroi polovine XVI v.” [Ottoman court merchants and trade by Muscovite furs in the second half of the 16th century], in I. Mustakimov, A. Sitdikov (eds) Vostochnaia Evropa Srednevekov’ia i rannego Novogo vremeni glazami frantsuzskikh issledovatelei [Eastern Europe of the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times in interpretation of French explorers]. Kazan. Pp. 314–340 (in Russian).
  4. Bert’e-Delagard A. (1920) “Issledovanie nekotorykh nedoumennykh voprosov srednevekov’ia v Tavride” [A study of some diffi cult questions of the Middle Ages in Taurica]. Izvestiia Tavricheskoi uchenoi arkhivnoi komissii, 57, pp. 1–135 (in Russian).
  5. Dziubinski A. (2005) Stosunki dyplomatyczne polsko-tureckie w latach 1500–1572 w kontekście miẹdzynarodowym. Wrocław.
  6. Efi mov A. (2013) “Kristianskoe naselenie Kryma v 1630-e gg. po osmanskim istochnikam” [Christian population of Crimea in the 1630s according to Ottoman sources]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriia: Istoriia. Filologiia. Kul’turologiia. Vostokovedenie, 9 (110), pp. 134–143 (in Russian).
  7. Erusalimskii K. (2018) Na sluzhbe korolia i Rechi Pospolitoi [At the service of the king and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]. Moscow; St Petersburg (in Russian).
  8. Filiushkin A. (2006) Tituly russkikh gosudarei [The titles of Russian rulers]. Moscow; St Petersburg (in Russian).
  9. Kamentseva E. (2003) Khronologiia [Chronology]. Moscow (in Russian).
  10. Kashtanov S. (2004) “Sostav i soderzhanie dokumentov “grecheskikh” posol’skikh knig № 1 i 2 [Composition and content of documents of “Greek” Ambassador’s books № 1 and 2], in S. Kashtanov (ed.) Rossiia i grecheskii mir v XVI veke, 1, pp. 8–40 (in Russian).
  11. Kashtanov S. (2004) “Kodikologicheskaia struktura “grecheskoi” posol’skoj knigi № 1 [Codicological structure of “Greek” Ambassador’s book № 1], in S. Kashtanov (ed.) Rossiia i grecheski mir v XVI veke. Moscow, 1, pp. 41–83 (in Russian).
  12. Meier M. (2003) “Rossiia i Osmanskaia imperiia ot nachala XVI v. do 1569 g. Formirovanie obshchikh granits dvukh gosudarstv” [Russia and the Ottoman Empire from the beginning of the 16th century to 1569. Formation of borders of the two states], in M. Mejer, S. Oreshkova (eds) Ot Stambula do Moskvy [From Istanbul to Moscow]. Moscow. Pp. 91–116 (in Russian).
  13. Moiseev M. (2018) “Perepiska Rossii s Nogaiskoj Ordoi v pravlenie Ivana Groznogo: dokumentooborot i arkhivatsiia poslanii” [Correspondence between Russia and Nogai Horde in the reign of Ivan the Terrible: Document management and archiving of epistles]. Srednevekovye tiurko-tatarskie gosudarstva, 10, pp. 75–83 (in Russian).
  14. Mashkova L. (2017) “Russkie posol’skie knigi: nachalo formirovaniia” [Russian Ambassadorial books: The beginning of their formation], in Velikoe stoianie na reke Ugre i formirovanie Rossiiskogo tsentralizovannogo gosudarstva: lokal’nye i global’nye konteksty. Materialy Vserossiiskoi s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchnoi konferentsii (30 marta — 1 aprelia 2017 g., Kaluga) [The Great Stand on the Ugra River and the formation of the Russian centralised state: local and global contexts. Conference proceedings]. Kaluga. Pp. 232–250 (in Russian).
  15. Öztürk Y. (2019) “Altinordu imaparatorluğ’undan Osmanlı imaparatorluğ’na bir doğu Avrupa beşkenti Kefe”. Crimean Historical Review, 1, pp. 45–70.
  16. Rogozhin N. (1994) Posol’skie knigi Rossii kontsa XV — nachala XVII vv. [Ambassador’s books of Russia in the late 15th — early 17th centuries]. Moscow (in Russian).
  17. Volodikhin D. (2016) “Tsarev prikhod” na Oku 1541 goda” [Tzar’s advent the the Oka-river in 1541]. Istoriia voennogo dela: issledovaniia i istochniki. 2016. Spetsial’nyi vypusk V. Stoianie na reke Ugre 1480–2015, II, pp. 482–494 (in Russian).
  18. Zaitsev I. (2016) “O pravakh khristian v Krymskom khanstve. Iarlyk khana Sakhib-Gireia krymskim khristianam (1772 g.)” [On the rights of Christians in the Crimean Khanate. The edict of Khan Sakhib Giray to Crimean Christians (1772)], in Krym: problemy` istorii [Crimea: The problems of history]. Moscow. Pp. 63–82 (in Russian).
  19. Zaitsev I. (2019) “Khristianskie narody. Pravoslavie i inoslavie. Kultura krymskikh khristian” [Christian nations. Orthodoxy and non-Orthodoxy. Culture of Crimean Christians], in A. Iurasov (ed.) Istoriia Kryma [History of Crimea]. Moscow. Pp. 475–481 (in Russian).
Moiseev Maksim
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Place of work: Association of Museums “Museum of Moscow”; 2 Zubovskiy Bul’var, Moscow 119021, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk State University; 2 Pirogova Str., Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of the Sector; Senior Researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0003-0421-8982;
Email: maksi-moisee@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.