/
Search results


Лютько Е. И. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2014. Вып. 2 (52). С. 137-142. — Rev. op.: Batalden S. K. Russian Bible Wars: Modern Scriptural Translation and Cultural Authority. Cambridge University Press
PDF
Лютько Е. И. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2014. Вып. 4 (54). С. 125-129. — Rev. op.: Guest M., Aune K., Sharma S., Warner R. Christianity and the University experience. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013
PDF
Лютько Е. И. Протоиерей Александр Васильевич Горский и становление научного богословия в России // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2016. Вып. 5 (72). С. 129-146. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201672.129-146
The emergence of the scholarly theology in Russia is a problem which is not solved yet in the modern historiography. The author off ers a suggestion about the key role of A. V. Gorsky (since 1860 — archpriest) in the development of the image of the scholartheologian of the second half of 19th — early 20th. He lived during the epoch of the significant shift in the development of theology in Russia. It was in that epoch emerged a higher ecclesiastical education in Russia. There had to be carried the research activity and the development of the theological discourse relevant with the challenges of the era. However, there were some essential contradictions. For example, the lack of opportunity to fully combine the ecclesiastical office with the academic vocation. Thus, some professors of the ecclesiastical academies, coming from the clergy, refrained from both monasticism and from marriage. Naturally, it was not a normative behavioral strategy in the context of the Synodal period and caused distrust of the contemporaries. However, this lifestyle promoted the institutionalization of the theology and thus contributed to the realization of the 1808–1814 system’s mission. Gorsky was the first who integrally fulfill this program of the scholarly theology. There is also an attempt to structure the elements of «scholarly theology» in the context of the Synodal period. It is possible to distinguish the following elements: 1. The estate (soslovie) identity; 2. Being outside of the church hierarchy; 3. The academic everyday life as a meaningful aspect of church ministry. The image of the scholar-theologian in Russia was strongly infl uenced by A. V. Gorsky and next generations of theologians combined those elements of Gorsky's academic practice.
Archpriest Alexander Gorsky, Russian theological scholarship, clergy estate, collective identities, the institutionalization of the scholarship, the system of the higher ecclesiastical education in Russia.

1. Agapova N. G. Povsednevnost' i paradigmy nauchnoi deiatel'nosti, in Chelovek v mire kul'tury: istoriia i kul'tura povsednevnosti: Materialy VII mezhdunarodnogo filosofsko-kul'turologicheskogo simpoziuma. Riazan', 2011. P. 16–25.
2. Aleksei (Lavrov-Platonov), arkh. Slovo pred otpevaniem zasluzhennogo professora Moskovskoi dukhovnoi akademii Petra Simonovicha Kazanskogo 16 fevralia 1878 goda, in Pravoslavnoe obozrenie. 1878. T. 1. № 3. P. 487–494.
3. Vorob'ev M. N. A. V. Gorskii i K. I. Nevostruev (k voprosu o soavtorstve), in Bogoslovskii sbornik. Moscow, 1997. № 1. P. 277–295.
4. Vostokov A. Kh. Opisanie russkikh i slovenskikh rukopisei Rumiantsevskogo muzeuma. Saint-Petersburg, 1842.
5. Vysochaishe utverzhdennoe 26 maia 1869 g. mnenie Gosudarstvennogo Soveta, ob"iavlennoe Senatu Sviateishim Sinodom «Ob ustroistve detei lits pravoslavnogo dukhovenstva» // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii II. T. 44. Otd. 1. Saint-Petersburg, 1872. № 47138.
6. Vysochaishe utverzhdennyi 30 avgusta 1814 g. proekt Ustava pravoslavnykh dukhovnykh uchilishch // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii I. T. 32. Saint-Petersburg, 1830. № 25673.
7. Gennadii (Gogolev), arkhim. Velikan uchenosti: Zhizn' i trudy protoiereia A. V. Gorskogo. Moscow, 2004.
8. Giliarov-Platonov N. P. A. V. Gorskii // Sbornik sochinenii. T. 2 / Red. K. P. Pobedonostsev. Moscow, 1899. P. 464–465.
9. Giliarov-Platonov N. P. Iz perezhitogo: Avtobiograficheskie zapiski. T. 1, 2. Moscow, 2009.
10. Glubokovskii N. N. Za tridtsat' let (1884–1914 gg.) // U Troitsy v Akademii. Moscow, 1914. P. 737-757.
11. Golubinskii E. E. Vospominaniia // Polunov A. Iu., Solov'ev I. V. Zhizn' i trudy akademika E. E. Golubinskogo. Moscow, 1998. P. 143–230.
12. Golubinskii F. A., prot. Istoriia obshchestva sostavivshegosia pod nazvaniem «Uchenykh besed» v Moskovskoi dukhovnoi akademii 1816 goda marta 1 dnia // U Troitsy v Akademii. Moscow, 1914. P. 1–10.
13. Golubtsov S. A., protodiak. Moskovskaia dukhovnaia akademiia dorevoliutsionnogo perioda. T. II: Kafedry i lichnyi sostav Akademii. Ch. 2: Biobibliograficheskii slovar' sotrudnikov Akademii. Moscow, 1987.
14. Gorskii A. V., prot. Iz pis'ma ot 18 noiabria 1842 goda k bratu Vladimiru Vladimirovichu v Pekin // U Troitsy v Akademii. Moscow, 1914. P. 402–403.
15. Gorskii A. V., prot. Dnevnik. Moscow, 1885.
16. Zhivov V. M. Razyskaniia v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kul'tury. Moscow, 2002.
17. Zhurnaly Komissii pri Sviateishem Sinode po vyrabotke proekta novogo Ustava dukhovnykh akademii 18 marta — 27 noiabria 1909 g. Saint-Petersburg., 1909.
18. Kazanskii P. S. V zashchitu russkogo dukhovenstva, in Pribavleniia k Tvoreniiam Sviatykh Ottsov. 1881. Ch. 28. Kn. 4. P. 520–564; 1882. Ch. 30. Kn. 2. P. 564–638.
19. Kazanskii P. S. Vospominaniia ob A. V. Gorskom, in Bogoslovskii vestnik. 1900. T. 3. № 11. P. 544–560.
20. Kazanskii P. S. Perepiska s Aleksandroi Nikolaevnoi Bakhmet'evoi // U Troitsy v Akademii. Moscow, 1914. P. 510–589.
21. Katanskii A. L. Vospominaniia starogo professora. S 1847 po 1913 god. N. Novgorod, 2010.
22. Kefner N. V. Nauchnaia povsednevnost' poslevoennogo pokoleniia sovetskikh istorikov: Dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. Omsk, 2006.
23. Lebedev A. P. K moei ucheno-literaturnoi avtobiografii i materialy dlia kharakteristiki besprintsipnoi kritiki // On zhe. K moei ucheno-literaturnoi avtobiografii i materialy dlia kharakteristiki besprintsipnoi kritiki: Sb. pamiati A. P. Lebedeva. Saint-Petersburg, 2005. P. 17–43.
24. Listovskii I. S. Filaret, arkhiepiskop Chernigovskii. Chernigov, 1894.
25. Mel'kov A. S. Zhiznennyi put' i nauchnoe nasledie protoiereia A. V. Gorskogo. Moscow, 2006.
26. Pisaniuk S. Uchenaia deiatel'nost' professora protoiereia Aleksandra Gorskogo. Dipl. rab. Sergiev Posad: MDA, 1996.
27. Popov S. Rektor Moskovskoi Dukhovnoi Akademii protoierei A. V. Gorskii, in Bogoslovskii vestnik. 1896. № 1–12.
28. Postnikov P. Ocherki zhizni i deiatel'nosti Aleksandra Vasil'evicha Gorskogo // U Troitsy v Akademii. Moscow, 1914. P. 254–341.
29. Rodosskii A. S. Biograficheskii slovar' studentov pervykh XXVIII kursov Sankt-Peterburgskoi Dukhovnoi Akademii: 1814–1869 gg. Saint-Petersburg, 1907.
30. Smirnov S. I. Aleksandr Vasil'evich Gorskii // Protoierei Aleksandr Vasil'evich Gorskii v vospominaniiakh o nem Moskovskoi dukhovnoi akademii. Sviato-Troitskaia Sergieva lavra, 1900.
31. Sokolov V. A. Gody studenchestva (1870–1874), in Bogoslovskii vestnik. 1916. T. 1. № 3/4. P. 385–420.
32. Solntsev N. I. Istoricheskaia kontseptsiia arkhiepiskopa Chernigovskogo Filareta (Gumilevskogo) v rabote «Istoriia Russkoi Tserkvi», in Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo. Ser. Istoriia. 2003. № 2. P. 154–161.
33. Sukhova N. Iu. «Delo protoiereia Gerasima Pavskogo»: problema «istorizma» v russkoi bibleistike, in Filaretovskii al'manakh. № 10. M., 2014. P. 88–107.
34. Sukhova N. Iu. «Dukhovnaia uchenost'» v Rossii v pervoi polovine XIX v., in Filaretovskii al'manakh. 2012. № 8. P. 31–54.
35. Sukhova N. Iu. Dukhovno-uchebnaia reforma 1808–1814 gg. i stanovlenie vysshei dukhovnoi shkoly v Rossii, in Vertograd nauk dukhovnyi. Moscow, 2007. P. 15–52.
36. Sukhova N. Iu. Sistema nauchno-bogoslovskoi attestatsii v Rossii v XIX — nachale XX v. Moscow, 2009.
37. Tarasenko A. F. Zhizneopisanie Filareta (Gumilevskogo D. G.) // Filaret (Gumilevskii), svt. Istoriko-statisticheskoe opisanie Khar'kovskoi eparkhii. T. 1. Khar'kov, 2006. P. 9–46.
38. Feofilakt, igumen. Biblioteka Moskovskoi Dukhovnoi Akademii, in Bogoslovskie trudy. Iubileinyi sbornik. Moskovskaia Dukhovnaia Akademiia: 300 let (1685–1985). Moscow, 1986. P. 247–263.
39. Filaret (Gumilevskii), svt. Pis'ma 50 k・ A. V. Gorskomu, in Pribavleniia k Tvoreniiam Sviatykh Ottsov. 1884. Ch. 33.
40. Filaret (Drozdov), svt. Mneniia, otzyvy i pis'ma. Moscow, 1905.
41. Filaret (Drozdov), svt. Sobranie mnenii i otzyvov. Tom dopolnitel'nyi. Saint-Petersburg, 1887.
42. Friz G. L. Soslovnaia paradigma i sotsial'naia istoriia Rossii, in Amerikanskaia rusistika: vekhi istoriografii poslednikh let. Imperatorskii period: Antologiia. Samara, 2000. P. 121–162.
Лютько Е. И. Становление конфессионального богословия в России (XVIII – первая половина XIX вв.) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2017. Вып. 78. С. 46-64. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201778.46-64
This article looks at a text dealing with theology as a text dealing with the reality that stands behind this text. Based on examples of three Russian church hierarchs who tried to systematise theology in the 18th and 19th centuries — Archbishop Feofan (Prokopovich), St. Philaret (Drozdov), St. Innocent (Borisov) — the paper reveals and interprets the following issues: gradual penetration of categories of history, administration and church service into the structure of theology; rejection of the socalled natural theology (theologia naturalis), which takes place at the beginning of the 19th century. Proceeding from Foucauld’s methodology, we come to a conclusion about the emergence of confession in the Russian Empire of the fi rst half of the 19th century. This was an integrated and distinct social body, the key category of which was theology. Theology unites the social space of the confession by means of three key narratives: the identity (a complex of historical disciplines), administration (the canon law, or “theologia rectrix”, and pastoral theology), participation practices (liturgics). At the end of the period in question, the category of “Church” emerges within the theological system. On the one hand, this fact refl ects the completion of the process of constructing the confession; on the other hand, it is a sign of the emergence of ecclesiology, the new practice of theological discourse that came to be dominant in the following period.
russian theology, canon law, confessional theology, historical identity, liturgics, church history, ecclesiology
  1. Birkner H. J., “Natürliche Theologie und Off enbarungstheologie. Ein theologiegeschichtlicher Überblick”, in: Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 3(3), 1961, 279–295.
  2. Blaschke O., “Das 19. Jahrhundert: Ein Zweites Konfessionelles Zeitalter?”, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 26(1), 2000, 38–75.
  3. Collis R., The Petrine Instauration: Religion, Esotericism and Science at the Court of Peter the Great, 1689–1725, Brill, 2011.
  4. Conser W. H., Church and Confession: Сonservative Theologians in Germany, England, and America, 1815–1866, Mercer University Press, 1984.
  5. Esiukov A. I., “Mirovozzrenie russkogo cheloveka «dukhovnogo china»: arkhiepiskop Feofilakt (F. G. Rusanov)”, in: Iazyk i kul’tura Russkogo Severa: k voprosu o regional’noi iazykovoi kartine mira, Arkhangel’sk, 2013, 271–284.
  6. Fuko M., Bezopasnost’, territoriia, naselenie. Kurs lektsii, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1977–1978 uchebnom godu, St. Petersburg, 2011.
  7. Fuko M., Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’: rozhdenie tiur’my, Moscow, 1999.
  8. Fuko M., Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiia gumanitarnykh nauk, St. Petersburg, 1994.
  9. Khondzinskii P., “«Pole» konfessionalizatsii: opyt prilozheniia teorii k russkoi dukhovnoi traditsii”, in: Vestnik PSTGU, Seria II, 2(63), 2015, 9–17.
  10. Khondzinskii P., “Razreshenie ekklesiologicheskikh problem russkogo bogosloviia XVIII — nachala XIX V. V trudakh sviatitelia Filareta, mitropolita Moskovskogo”, in: Filaretovskii al’manakh, 6, 2010, 115–120.
  11. Khondzinskii P., Sviatitel’ Filaret Moskovskii: bogoslovskii sintez epokhi, Moscow, 2010.
  12. Letham R., “Amandus Polanus: A Neglected Theologian?”, in: The Sixteenth century journal, 1990, 463–476.
  13. Sukhova N. Iu., “«Dukhovnaia uchenost’» v Rossii v pervoi polovine XIX v.”, in: Filaretovskii al’manakh, 8, 2012, 31–54.
  14. Sukhova N. Iu., “Dukhovno-uchebnyi proekt sviatitelia Innokentiia (Borisova) 1830-kh gg.”, in: Vestnik PSTGU, Seria II, 39, 2011, 18–34.
  15. Sukhova N. Iu., “Sluzhitel’ Slova Bozhiia v nauchno-obrazovatel’nom prostranstve i v zhizni Tserkvi: opyt rossiiskoi dukhovnoi shkoly XIX – nachala XKh vv.”, in: Evangelie v kontekste sovremennoi kul’tury, 1, Belgorod, 2016, 309–317.
  16. Sukhova N. Iu., “Sviashchennoe Pisanie i Predanie v ekklesiologii sviatitelia Filareta (Drozdova)”, in: Materialy XIX Ezhegodnoi Bogoslovskoi konferentsii Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 1, 2009, 105–110.
  17. Sukhova N. Iu., “Uchastie Sviatitelia Filareta (Drozdova) v razvitii akademicheskogo bogosloviia XIX veka”, in: Filaretovskii al’manakh, 2, 2006, 46–71.
  18. Sukhova N. Iu., “Zapiski sviatitelei Innokentiia (Borisova) i Filareta (Drozdova) o Dukhovnykh shkolakh”, in: Filaretovskii al’manakh, 6, 2010, 43–91.
  19. Sukhova N. Iu., Kontseptsii bogoslovskogo obrazovaniia sviatitelei Filareta (Drozdova) i Innokentiia (Borisova)”, in: Filaretovskii al’manakh, 7, 2011, 231–244.
  20. Uait D. M., “Edinoverie i kontseptsiia konfessionalizatsii: diskursivnye zametki”, in: Quaestio Rossica, 4, 2016, 177–189.
  21. Ukolov K. I., “Vopros o statuse bogosloviia kak nauke v nemetskom protestantizme (Shleiermakher, Trel’ch, Tillikh)”, in: Vestnik PSTGU, Seria I, 2(26), 2009, 39–57.
  22. Ziemann B., “Säkularisierung, Konfessionalisierung, Organisationsbildung. Aspekte der Sozialgeschichte der Religion im langen 19. Jahrhundert”, in: Archiv für Sozialgeschichte, 47, 2007, 485–508.
Lyutko Eugene
Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Junior Research Fellow in Research Centre for the History of Theology and Theological Education of St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities;
Email: e.i.lutjko@gmail.com.
Лютько Е. И. Мишель Фуко и современная англиканская экклесиология // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2019. Вып. 83. С. 143-147. — Rev. op.: Ogden S. G. The Church, Authority, and Foucault: Imagining the Church as an Open Space of Freedom (Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies). London and New York: Routledge, 2017. X + 180 p.
PDF
Lyutko Eugene, диакон
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-2859-3886;
Email: e.i.lutjko@gmail.com.
Лютько Е. И. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2019. Вып. 88. С. 155-159. — Rev. op.: Michelson P. L. Beyond the Monastery Walls: The Ascetic Revolution in Russian Orthodox Thought, 1814–1914. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2017. XII, 319 p.
PDF
Lyutko Eugene, диакон
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-2859-3886;
Email: e.i.lutjko@gmail.com.
Лютько Е. И. Англиканское духовенство и университетское образование накануне Викторианской эпохи // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2020. Вып. 92. С. 167-170. — Rev. op.: Slinn S. The Education of the Anglican Clergy, 1780–1839. Studies in Modern British Religious History. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2017. X + 276 p.
PDF
Lyutko Eugene, диакон
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-2859-3886;
Email: e.i.lutjko@gmail.com.