Search results

Волженина Е. В. Русский символизм в поисках будущего // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2014. Вып. 1 (56). С. 97-106. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201456.97-106
Article is devoted to the vision of the future by Russian symbolists: what they were afraid of and what they dreamed about. On the basis of rich journalism heritage of symbolism author analyzed projects of the future proposed by poets, who wrote on the subject most frequently and profoundly: D. S. Merezhkovskij , A. A. Blok, Viach. I. Ivanov, Andrei Belyi. Analysis of each individual project, conceptualized in the best way by D. S. Merezhkovskij, was carried out. Author revealed a range of problems that were conceived by symbolism in its quest for an ideal future: problem “people and intellectuals”, traditional for the Russians by the beginning of 20th century, the role of the artist and art in the future, “the forthcoming ham”, and creating a new man. A comparison of positions on different issues of the symbolists was completed in the article. It was found that the impetus and direction of symbolists’ quest for the future were awoken by their comprehension of the key contradiction of the epoch. In the article this contradiction is described with a ternary opposition “personality—mass—society”. Thus, despite differing views on some problems (e.g. cancellation of problem “people and intellectuals” by D. S. Merezhkovskij), a total understanding of contradiction “personality—mass— society” was common: the future belongs to a free person, transformed, in any event, into a new man. Also, the article discusses the fate of the elements of creative practice of the symbolists. The main conclusion of the author concerned about symbolists’ future projects is that the heritage of symbolism, devoted to the topic, wasn’t assimilated by descendants, while new methods of creative behavior, developed by the symbolists and targeted at a mass audience, have become a part of life.
symbolism, Andrei Belyi, A. A. Blok, V. Ia. Briusov, Z. N. Gippius, Viach. I. Ivanov, D. S. Merezhkovskij

1. Voskresenskaja M. A. Simvolizm kak mirovidenie Serebrjanogo veka: Sociokul'turnye faktory formirovanija obshhestvennogo soznanija rossijskoj kul'turnoj jelity rubezha XIX –XX vekov (Symbolism as World Vision of the Silver Age: Social-Cultural Factors of Forming of Social Consciousness of Russian Cultural Elite of Boundary of XIX–XX Centuries), Tomsk, 2003.
2. Erohina T. I. Lichnost' i tekst v kul'ture russkogo simvolizma (Person and Text in the Culture of Russian Symbolism), Jaroslavl', 2009.
3. Zhukockaja Z. R. Svobodnaja teurgija: kul'turfilosofija russkogo simvolizma (Free Theurgy: Culture Philosophy of the Russian Symbolism), M., 2003.
4. S. A. Vengerova (red.). Russkaja literatura XX veka (1890–1910) (Russian Literature of XX Century (1890–1910)), M., 2000, vol. 1.
5. Careva N. A. Russkij simvolizm: osnovnye principy i istoriosofija (na materialah tvorchestva Dm. Merezhkovskogo, V. Brjusova i A. Belogo) (Russian Symbolism: Main Principles and Historiosophy (on Materials of Work of Dm. Merezhkovskij, V. Brjusov and A. Belyj)), Vladivostok, 2005.
6. Paperno I. (1994) “The Meaning of Art: Symbolist Theories”, in Creating Life: The aesthetic utopia of Russian Modernism, Stanford (California), 1994.