Search results

Бакулин И. И. Присутствие Христа в Евхаристии, согласно взглядам И. де Моншёйа // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2016. Вып. 5 (67). С. 33-44. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201667.33-44
In the article we analyse the concept of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist of French theologian Y. de Montcheuil. Не did not published his article about the problem of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist till his death, that’s why his view on this problem stayed nearly unknown till the end of the 20th century. But in his article he formulated the crucial points of the new way of thinking about the real presence, which gave birth to the various alternative non-thomistic concepts of the real presence: ideas of transignification and transfinalization. We highlight the main problems of the traditional Catholic doctrine of the real presence in the 20th century and examine de Montcheuil’s concept in the context of the the offi cial teaching of Catholic Church in the 20th century. We explain why de Montcheuil’s concept could hardly be adopted in the context of the traditional Catholic doctrine of the real presence. Also we note, that some ideas of de Montcheuil are very close to the concept of the real presence of famous Russian theologian father Sergiy Bulgakov, who wrote his works about the Eucharist before de Montcheuil. We analyze de Montcheuil’s concept of the real presence from the Orthodox point of view and conclude that it is incompatible with the mainstream of patristic thought.
Catholicism, systematic theology, real presence, Eucharist, transubstantiation, transignifi cation, transfinalization, Yves de Montcheuil.

1. Bulgakov S., prot. Evkharisticheskii dogmat, in On zhe. Evkharistiia. Moscow, 2005. pp. 188–205.
2. Malitskii N. Evkharisticheskii spor na Zapade v IX v., in Uchenye trudy Petrogradskoi dukhovnoi akademii. Sergiev Posad, 1917. Vol. 8. Part. 1–2; Vladimir, 1917. Part. 3.
3. Colombo C. Ancora sulla dottrina della transustanziazione e la fi sica moderna, in Scuola cattolica. 1956. Vol. 84. P. 263–288.
4. Colombo C. Theologia, fi lisofi a e fi sica nella doctrina della transustanziazione, in Scullo cattolica. 1955. Vol. 83. P. 89–124.
5. Denzinger H; Schonmetzer A. Enchiridion Symbolorum, defi nitionum et declarationum de rebus fi dei et morum. Barcione; Fribourgi Brisgoviae; Romae; Neo-Eboraci, 1965.
6. Foullioux E. Yves de Montcheuil, philosophe et theologien jesuite (1900–1944). P., 1995.
7. Grumett D. Yves de Montcheuil: action, justice, and the kingdom in spiritual resistance to Nazism, in Theological Studies. 2007. Vol. 68. P. 618–640.
8. Kilmartin Е. J. The Euсharist in the Wеst, Historу and Thеologу. Сollegeville, 1998.
9. Masi R. Teologia eucaristia e fi sica contemporanea, in Doctor communis. 1955. Vol. 8. P. 31–51.
10. McCord A. M. Some later medieval theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Gilles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford, 2010.
11. Montcheuil Y. de. L’eucharistie dans le Nouveau Testament, in Melanges theologiques. P., 1951. P. 23–48.
12. Montcheuil Y. de. La Raison de la Permanence du Christ sous les Especes eucharistiques d’apres saint Bonaventure et saint Thomas, in Recherche de Science Religieuse. 1939. P. 29.
P. 352–364.
13. Montcheuil Y. de. Signifi cation eschatologique du Repas eucharistique, in Recherches de Science Religieuse. 1946. T. 33. P. 10–43.
14. Schillebeeckx E. The Eucharist. L., 1968.
15. Selvaggy F. Realta fi sica e sostanza sensibile nella dottrina eucaristica, in Gregorianum. 1956. Vol. 37. P. 16–33.
16. Sesboue B. Yves de Montcheuil (1900–1944) Precurseur en theologie. P., 2006.
17. Vollert С. The Eucharist: Controversy on Transubstantiation, in Theological Studies. Baltimore, 1961. Vol. 22. P. 391–425.
Bakulin Ivan
Academic Degree: graduate student;
Place of work: Sts Cyril and Methodius’ Church Post-Graduate and Doctoral School 4/2-1 Piatnitskaia ul., Moscow 115035, Russian Federation;
Email: email: backulinivan@mail.ru.