/
Search results


Афиногенов Д. Е. Арианские споры в гомилиях патриарха Фотия (гомилии XV и XVI) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2014. Вып. 4 (59). С. 28-39. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201459.28-39
In his two homilies dedicated to the Arian controversy (the only surviving of the original five) Photios uses different methods to actualize the matter for the broad Byzantine public, mainly in connection with the patriarch’s main concern during his fi rst tenure: the polemics against Iconoclasm. The Arianism was chosen as a purely logical juxtaposition to the latter, where the real gradual progress of iconoclast tendencies is compared to a theoretical construction of Arianism which has little to do with the actual developments in the IVth century. The comparison of the Iconoclast heresiarch John the Grammarian to Arius is chiefly aimed at justifying the permanent deposition of Iconoclast priests even in case of repentance, declared by the Patriarch Nikephoros in 815 and carried out by Methodios in 843. The triadological considerations in the Homily XVI do not in fact pertain to anti- fi lioque polemics, but rather represent a traditional Eastern conception. This, as well as the intense and negative attention to the Council of Sardica suggest the date 861, when Photios had to argue against the applicability of this council’s 10th canon to his promotion to patriarch from a layman.
S. Photios of Constantinople, Byzantine literature, Arian controversy, Anti-Latin polemic, Council of Sardica

1. Afinogenov D. E. (1997) “Patriarshestvo sv. Mefodija I (843–847): bor'ba za preemstvennost' v Vizantijskoj Cerkvi“ (Period of Patriarch St. Methodius I (843–847): Struggle for Succesion in Byzantine Church), in Vizantijskij vremennik, 1997, vol. 57, pp. 130–156.
2. Afinogenov D. (2003–2004) “The new edition of «The Letter of the Three Patriarchs»: problems and achievements”, in Symmeikta, 2003–2004, vol. 16, pp. 9–33.
3. Afinogenov D. (2010) “The condemnation of Anthony of Syllaion in 814: the procedure and the political context”, in Nomos. Kwartalnik Religioznawczy, 2010, vol. 71/72, pp. 9–16.
4. Afinogenov D. Mnogosložnyj Svitok: the Church Slavonic translation of the Letter of the Three Oriental Patriarchs to Emperor Theophilos, Parsis, 2014.
5. Alexander P. The Patriarch Nicephorus of Constantinople, Oxford, 1958.
6. Chryssostalis A. (2009) “La reconstitution d’un vaste traité iconophile écrit par Nicéphore de Constantinople (758–828)”, in Semitica et Classica, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 203–215.
7. Dvornik F. (1953) “The Patriarch Photius and Iconoclasm”, in Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 1953, vol. 7, pp. 67–97.
8. Jugie M. De processione Spiritus Sancti ex fontibus revelationis et secundum orientales dissidents, Rome, 1936.
9. Mango C. (1977) “The Liquidation of Iconoclasm and the Patriarch Photius”, in Iconoclasm. Papers given at the Ninth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Birmingham, 1977, pp. 133–140.