Search results

Марко Р. Евсевий о Константине и Никейском соборе: намерения и умолчания // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2013. Вып. 3 (47). С. 18-29.
This article is dedicated to illuminating problems associated with one of the main sources of the history of the early church up to the time of the First Ecumenical Council — The Church History and the Life of the Emperor Constantine — both written by Eusebius of Pamphilus. The author points to the fact that these works have little to say about the theological disputes which were part and parcel of the First Ecumenical Council. Eusebius, instead, fills his account with details of the disputes concerning the date of the celebration of Easter. The arian controversies which dominate the pages of the works of other early Church Fathers are passed over in silence by Eusebius. Researchers have concluded that this was precisely the intention of Eusebius since he himself belonged to the party which sympathized with the heretic Arius. The author of this article attempts to refute this argument and offers another explanation. The author points out that Eusebius always devotes special attention to events and functions organized by Constantine. These events and activities are described by Eusebius in a way which deliberately excludes theological controversies. The author concludes that Eusebius, like Constantine himself, 28 М. Рицци. Евсевий о Константине и Никейском соборе: намерения и умолчания deliberately avoids mentioning the theological disputes since both considered them of relatively little importance and that their solution should be reserved to the narrow circle of intellectuals among the early churchmen. Eusebius thought that the conservation of ecclesiastical peace and unity was of primary importance for all his fellow bishops.
Eusebius of Caesarea, Constantine the Great, First Ecumenical council, Local council, Arius, Athanasius the Alexandria, arianism, triadology, date of Easter celebration, Church of Alexandria, bishop in the Church
1. Alikin V. A. The Earliest History of the Christian Gathering. Origin, Development and Content of the Christian Gathering in the First to Third Centuries. Leiden, 2010.
2. Allace Hadrill D. S. Eusebius of Caesarea. London, 1960.
3. Barnes T. D. Athanasius and Constantius: Theology and Politics in the Constantinian Empire. Cambridge, 1993.
4. Cristofoli R. Costantino e l’Oratio ad sanctorum coetum. Napoli, 2005.
5. Dainese D. 2012. Bonamente G., Lenski N., Lizzi R., (eds.). Costantino prima e dopo Costantino. Constantine before and after Constantine. Bari, 2012, pp. 405–417.
6. De Navascues P. Pablo de Samosata y sus adversarios. Estudio historico-teologico del cristanismo antioqueno en el siglo III. Rome, 2004.
7. Di Berardino A. 1992. Bonamente G., Fusco F. (eds.). Costantino il Grande, dall’antichita all’umanesimo. Macerata, 1992. P. 362–384.
8. Drake H. A. Constantine and the bishops. The politics of intolerance. Baltimore, 2000.
9. Fischer J. A., Lumpe A. Die Synoden von den Anfangen bis zum Vorabend des Nicaenums. Paderborn, 1997.
10. Girardet K. M. 1974. Appellatio. Ein Kapitel kirchlicher Rechtsgeschichte in den Kanones desvierten Jahrhunderts. Historia, vol. 23. pp. 98–127.
11. Kaser M. Das romische Zivilprozessrecht. Munchen, 1966.
12. Lyman J. R. Christology and cosmology. Models of divine activity in Origen, Eusebius and Athanasius. Oxford, 1993.
13. Martin A. Athanase d’Alexandrie et l’Eglise d’Egypte au IVe siecle (328–373). Rome, 1996.
14. Millar F. 1971. Paul of Samosata, Zenobia and Aurelian: The Church, Local Culture and Political Allegiance in Thirdcentury Syria. Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 61, pp. 1–17.
15. Mommsen T. De collegiis et sodaliciis Romanorum, accredit inscriptio lanuvina. Kiel, 1842.
16. Perrone L. 1992. L’enigma di Paolo di Samosata. Dogma, chiesa e societa nella Siria del III secolo: prospettive di un vent’ennio di studi. Cristianesimo nella Storia, vol. 33, pp. 253–327.
17. Perry J. S. The Roman collegia: the modern evolution of an ancient concept. Leiden, 2006.
18. Pietras H. 2001. Le ragioni della convocazione del Concilio Niceno da parte di Costantino il Grande. Gregorianum, vol. 82, pp. 5–35.
19. Pietras H. 2008. Lettera di Costantino alla Chiesa di Alessandria e Lettera del sinodo di Nicea agli Egiziani (325): i falsi sconosciuti da Atanasio? Gregorianum, vol. 89, pp. 727–739.
20. Robertson J. Christ as mediator. A study of the theologies of Eusebius of Caesarea, Marcellus of Ancyra and Athanasius of Alexandria. Oxford, 2007.
21. Strutwolf H. Die Trinitatstheologie und Christologie des Euseb von Caesarea. Eine dogmengeschichtliche Untersuchung seiner Platonismusrezeption und Wirkungsgeschichte. Gottingen, 1999.
22. Waltzing J. P. Etude historique sur les corporations professionnelles chez les Romains, depuis les origines jusqu’a la chute de l’Empire d’Occident. Louvain, 1895–1900.
23. Weckwerth A. Ablauf, Organisation und Selbstverstandnis westlicher antiker Synoden im Spiegel ihrer Akten. Munster, 2010.
Федорова А. М. Методологические проблемы исследования взаимосвязи креативности и синестезии в музыкально- исполнительской деятельности // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2015. Вып. 4 (39). С. 149-158. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201539.149-158
The article is dedicated to the problem of researching the personal creativity manifestation in interrelation with the synesthesias phenomenon in musical performance. The article submits the critical analysis of existing approaches to the defi nition of creativity and to its practical study.
creativity, musical performance, synesthesias, systemic approach, creation

1. Aranovskij M. G. 1978 “Soznatel'noe i bessoznatel'noe v tvorcheskom processe kompozitora” (Conscious and Unconscious in Creative Process of Composer), in Voprosy muzykal'nogo stilja, Leningrad, 1978.
2. Bogojavlenskaja D. B. Psihologija tvorcheskih sposobnostej. Uchebnoe posobie dlja vuzov (Psychology of Creative Capacities. Textbook for Students), Moscow, 2002.
3. Meshherjakov B. G., Zinchenko V. P. (eds.) Bol'shoj psihologicheskij slovar' (Big Psychological Dictionary), Moscow, 2004.
4. Burgin M. C., Kuznecov V. I. Vvedenie v sovremennuju tochnuju metodologiju nauki (Introduction to Modern Precise Methodology of Science), Moscow, 1994.
5. Golovin S. Ju. Slovar' prakticheskogo psihologa (Dictionary of Practical Psychologist), Moscow, 1998.
6. Druzhinin V. N. Psihologija obshhih sposobnostej (Psychology of General Capacities), Saint-Petersburg, 2008.
7. Zajceva M. L. Sinestezijnost' kak sistemnoe svojstvo hudozhestvennogo soznanija: dis. ... d-ra iskusstvovedenija (Synesthesia as System Feature of Art Consciousness: Dissertation), Moscow, 2014.
8. Il'in E. P. Psihologija tvorchestva, kreativnosti, odarennosti (Psychology of Creation, Creativity, Endowment), Saint-Petersburg, 2009.
9. Kozlov V. V. 2008 “Radost' i pechal' tvorchestva” (Joy and Sorrow of Creation), in Chelovecheskij faktor: Social'nyj psiholog, vol. 2/16, Jaroslavl', 2008, p. 7.
10. Petrenko V. F. Osnovy psihosemantiki (Grounds of Psychosemantics), Moscow, 2010.
11. Petrenko V. F. Psihosemantika soznanija (Psychosemantics of Consciousness), Moscow, 1988.
12. Ryzhov B. N. 2013 “Vnutrennjaja struktura dejatel'nosti s pozicii sistemnoj psihologii” (Inner Structure of Activity from Position of System Psychology), in Sistemnaja psihologija i sociologija, 2013, vol. 8, pp. 5–8.
13. Ryzhov B. N. 2010 “Sistemnye osnovanija psihologii” (System Grounds of Psychology), in Sistemnaja psihologija i sociologija, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 6–43.
14. Serkin V. P. Metody psihosemantiki (Methods of Psychosemantics), Moscow, 2004.
15. Tunik E. E. Diagnostika kreativnosti. Test E. Torrensa (Diagnosis of Creativity. Test of E. Torrens), Saint-Petersburg, 1998.
16. Fedorova A. M. 2014 “Intermodal'nyj sintez i metody ideomotornoj trenirovki v muzykal'no-ispolnitel'skoj dejatel'nosti” (Intermodal Synthesis and Methods of Ideomotor Training in Musical-Performing Activity), in Psihologija i psihotehnika, 2014, vol. 12, pp. 1335–1341.
Маркова Е. А. О лирическом субъекте стихотворения "Влюбленный рассказывает о розе своего сердца" // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2017. Вып. 50. С. 26-35. DOI: 10.15382/sturIII201750.26-35
The gives a detailed examination of one of W. B. Yeats’s early poems, The Lover Tells of the Rose in Heart, with special emphasis on its lyrical subject. The study focuses on Yeats’s idea of the mask. The mask is considered to be the primary poetic device used by the poet in order to acquire the ideal self. The process of self-cognition, or “selfremaking”, turns out to be inextricably mixed with love and poetry. In their turn, love and poetry in The Lover Tells of the Rose in His Heart appear to be interrelated in a very specific way. Without love, the poetic ideal is incomprehensible; without poetry, it is inexpressible. These observations are supported and specified by the analysis of the structural features of the poem, namely its rhythm, rhyme, grammar and vocabulary. Finally, the paper discusses the symbol of the Rose in the poem. The symbol appears to be of great importance to Yeats because of its universal nature. The Rose exemplifies the idea of the Unity of Being, one of the central concepts in Yeats’s philosophy. Contrary to some other interpretations of the poem, the present paper sees the lyrical subject primarily as the poet seeking the poetic ideal, the Rose, rather than as the lover expressing his feelings to his mistress.
poetry, W. B. Yeats, Yeats’s early poems, poetic ideal, character, mask

Gorbunov A. N., Poslednij romantik. Poehziya U. B. Jejtsa, Moscow, 2015, 79-80.
Kruzhkov G. M., W. B. Yeats: Issledovanija i perevody, Мoscow, 2008.
Tolmachyov V. M., ed., Anglij skaya poehziya rubezha vekov i tvorchestvo U. B. Jejtsa, in: Zarubezhnaya literatura konca XIX — nachala XX vekov, Moscow, 2014.
Bloom H. Yeats. Oxford, 1970. P. 125
Carlisle G. The Esoteric Codex: Rosicrucianism. Raleigh, 2015.
Ellmann R. Yeats: The Man and the Masks. L., 1987.
Larrissy E. Introduction // The First Yeats. Poems by W. B. Yeats / Ed. by E. Larrissy Manchester, 2011.
Mahaffey V. States of Desire: Wilde, Yeats, Joyce, and the Irish Experiment. Oxford, 1998.
Putzel S. Reconstructing Yeats: The Secret Rose and The Wind Among the Reeds. Dublin, 1986.
Ross D. Critical Companion to William Butler Yeats. N. Y., 2009.
Sarkar S. K. W. B. Yeats. Poetry and Plays. New Delhi, 2002.
Никитская Е. А., Маркова С. В. Эмпирическое исследование проблемы профессионального выгорания педагогов, работающих с обучающимися девиантного поведения // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2018. Вып. 50. С. 102-113. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201850.102-113
The article presents results of a study of the level of job satisfaction, as well as of symptoms of professional burnout of teachers working with children with emotional and behavioural deviance in several educational institutions of Moscow. To assess the level of job satisfaction and symptoms of burnout, a questionnaire was used. 65 teachers (51%) work in classes for teenagers with behavioural and emotional deviations, 63 teachers (49%) work in regular classes. The study was based on the prerequisite that those teachers who work with diffi cult teenagers, would have a lower job satisfaction and a higher degree of burnout symptoms. The study has registered that teachers who deal with teenagers with emotional and behavioural deviations more often state that they are more dissatisfi ed with their work than those who teach in ordinary classes. Besides, the study has revealed signifi cant diff erences in the degree of expression of symptoms in each phase of the burnout. The theoretical background of the article is made up by analysis of a range of foreign and Russian sources that contain fundamentals of the topic in question; this has also allowed us to select the most relevant techniques of obtaining the looked-for information.
professional burnout, job satisfaction, deviant behavior, psychological well-being of teachers, teacher, student with deviant behavior, empirical research, professional activity, emotional deviations, behavioral deviations, personality deformation
  1. Alexopoulos E. C., Palatsidi V., Tigani X., Darviri C. (2014) “Exploring Stress Levels, Job Satisfaction, and Quality of Life in a Sample of Police Offi cers in Greece”, in Saf. Health Work, vol. 5, pp. 210–215.
  2. Bojko V. V. (2004). Energiya emocij : emocii v obshchenii. Emocii v proyavleniyah lichnosti. Sozidayushchaya i razrushayushchaya sila emocij. Metodiki dlya izucheniya emocij [Energy of Emotions: Emotions in Interactions. Emotions as Personality Features. Constructive and Destructive Power of Emotions. Diagnostic Methods]. St Petersburg (in Russian).
  3. Christen M., Iyer G., Soberman D. (2006) “Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Eff ort: A Reexamination Using Agency Theory”, in: J. of Marketing, vol. 70, pp. 137–150.
  4. Cordes C. L., Dougherty T. W., Blum M. (1997) “Patterns of Burnout among Managers and Professionals: A Comparison of Models”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 18, pp. 685–701.
  5. Ferguson K., Frost L., Hall D. (2012) “Predicting Teacher Anxiety, Depression, and Job Satisfaction”. Journal of Teaching and Learning, vol. 8, pp. 27–42.
  6. Freudenberger H. J. (1974) “Staff Burnout”. Journal of Social Issues, vol. 30, pp. 159–165.
  7. Ge C., Fu J., Chang Y., Wang L. (2011) Factors Associated with Job Satisfaction among Chinese Community Health Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Public Health, november.
  8. Jennings P. A., Greenberg M. T. (2009) “The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Relation to Student and Classroom Outcomes”. Review of Educational Research, vol. 79, pp. 491–525.
  9. Kokkinos C. M., Davazoglou A. M. (2009) “Special Education Teachers Under Stress: Evidence from a Greek National Study”. Educational Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 407–424.
  10. Locke E. A. (1976) “The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction”, in Dunnette M. D. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Educational Psychology. Chicago, 1976. P. 54.
  11. Maslach C., Jackson S. E., Leiter M. P. (1997) “Maslach Burnout Inventory: Third Edition”, in: Wood R. J., Zalaquett C. P. (eds.) Evaluating Stress: A Book of Resources. 3. Lanham, pp. 191–218 .
  12. Maslach D., Jackson S. (1981) “The Measurement of Experienced Burnout”, in: J. Occup. Behav., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 99–113.
  13. Nojani M. I., Arjmandnia A. A., Afrooz G. A., Rajabi M. (2012). “The Study on Relationship between Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction in Teachers Working in General, Special and Gifted Education Systems”, in: Procedia. Social and Behavioral. Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 2900–2905.
  14. Rozanova V. A. (2008) Psihologiya upravleniya [Organisational Psychology]. Moscow (in Russian).
  15. Tsouloupas C. N., Carson R. L., Matthews R., Grawitch M. J., Barber L. K. (2010) “Exploring the Association between Teachers’ Perceived Student Misbehaviour and Emotional Exhaustion: The Importance of Teacher Effi cacy Beliefs and Emotion Regulation”. Educational Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 173–189.
  16. Vodop'yanova N., Starchenkova E. (2008). Sindrom vygoraniya: diagnostika i profi laktika. [Burnout Syndrome: Diagnostic and Prevention]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
Nikitskaya Ekaterina
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; 12 Akademika Volgina Str., Moscow, 117437, Russian Federation;
Post: associate professor;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3187-6534;
Email: katamax@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Markova Svetlana
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Place of work: Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education in Moscow; 9/4, Mohovaya Str., Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation;
Post: Senior Research Fellow;
ORCID: 0000-0002-3765-4070;
Email: Clairmarkova@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
The work was carried out with the financial support of The Russian humanitarian science Foundation, the project №17-06-00796.
Арко А. К. Избрание и подготовка священнослужителей в антиохийской Церкви во второй половине IV в. согласно диалогу «De sacerdotio» cв. Иоанна Златоуста // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2022. Вып. 100. С. 24-44. DOI: 10.15382/sturI2022100.24-44
The dialogue De sacerdotio is the first patristic text in which author tries to sketch the theology of the priesthood, namely as a synthesis of the ideals of strict ascetic life characteristic of monasticism and the life of the Christian community (metaphoricly – the desert and the city), personal holiness and service for the benefit of the Church, a synthesis of anthropological and ethical ideals of Hellenism and Christian faith and behaviors that follow from this. The dialoge was written by John Chrysostom during the Antiochian period of his life, the first years of his priestly ministry. First of all it emphasizes the great dignity of the sacrament of the priesthood, as well as the need to choose for this those whom God has called for priestly ministery, who are morally and intellectually prepared to respond to the specific situation of the Church and society in which the priest should serve. In the second half of the fourth century, Christianity was already the predominant religion in Antioch, although pagan elements were still present, along with Jewish and Manichean. The role of the Church in society was increasing and was becoming very important, as important tasks and responsibilities were entrusted to the Church then. However, it is clear from the words of John Chrysostom that many chose priesthood in pursuit of a career and an honorable place in society, and not as a response to the vocation of God and in a desire to operate for the benefit of the Body of Christ. Some of the worthy and experienced monks refused the priesthood in turn preferring, a quiet eremitic life. So, a correct understanding of the priesthood and preparation for such a ministry were extremely important, since the Church was facing serious challenges of mass adherence to it and therefore the question of how to prepare catechumens for Baptism and how to instruct believers, finding a special approach for everyone, as well as how to avoid scandals and derision of the Church by pagans because of unworthy priests.
patristics, John Chrysostom, Antioch, 4th century, sacrament of priesthood, education, comprehending vocation to priesthood, moral and intellectual education of priests
  1. Arko A. (2012) “Bazilij Veliki — Ad adolescentes v kontekstu odnosa cerkvenih očetov do antične kulture in šolstva”. Bogoslovni vestnik, vol. 72, pp. 167–178.
  2. Bonner S.F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome. From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.
  3. Brändle R. (2008) “This Sweetest Passage: Matthew 25:31–46 and Assistance to the Poor in the Homilies of John Chrysostom”, in S.R. Holman (ed.) Wealth and Poverty in Early Church and Society. Holy Cross Studies in Patristic Theology and History, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, pp. 127–139.
  4. Broc-Schmezer C. (2006) “De l’aumône faite au pauvre à l’aumône du pauvre: Pauvreté et spiritualité chez Jean Chrysostome”, in P. Delage (ed.) Les pères de l’Église et la voix des pauvres: Actes du Iie Colloque de la Rochelle (2–4 septembre 2005), La Rochelle: Histoire et Culture, pp. 131–148.
  5. Brottier L. (1991) “‘Et la fournaise devint source’. L’épisode des trois jeunes gens dans la fornaise (Dn 3) lu par Jeane Chrysostome”. Revue d’histoire et de phylosophie religeuses, vol. 71/3, pp. 309–327.
  6. Caltabiano M. (1996) “Litterarum lumen. Ambienti culturali e libri tra il IV e il V secolo”. Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum, Roma: Institutum Patristicum Agugustinianum, vol. 55.
  7. Carrara P. (1999) “Educazione dei fi gli nella tradizione patristica”, in M. Naldini (ed.) Matrimonio e famiglia. Testimonianza dei primi secoli, Bologna: EDB, pp. 122–142.
  8. Cioffi A. (1996) “Aretè e prove della vita in Giovanni Crisostomo”, in L’etica cristiana nei secoli III e IV: eredità e confronti. XXIV Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità cristiana (Roma, 4–6 maggio 1995), Roma: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum, pp. 503–511.
  9. Criscuolo U. (1993) “Libanio. I latini e l’impero”, in F. Conca, I. Gualandri, G. Lozza (eds) Politica, cultura e religione nell’impero romano (secoli IV–VI) tra Oriente e Occidente. Atti del secondo convegno dell’Associazione di Studi Tardoantichi (Milano, 11–13 ottobre 1990), Napoli: M. D’Auria, pp. 153–169.
  10. Croucelle P. (1974) Connais-toi toi-mê me; de Socrate à saint Bernard. Paris: É tudes augustiniennes.
  11. De Lubac H. (1978) “Le Dialogue sur le Sacerdoce de saint Jean Chrysostome”. Nouvelle Revue Théologique, vol. 100, pp. 822–831.
  12. Dorries H. (1973) “Die Erneuerung des kirchlichen Amtes im vierten Jahrhundert. Die Schrift De sacerdotio des Johannes Chrysostomus un ihre Vorlage, die Oratio de fuga sua des Gregor von Nazianz”, in B. Moeller, G. Ruhrbach (eds) Bleibendes im Wandel der Kichengeschichte, Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 1–46.
  13. Dudley M. (1993) “Danger and Glory. Priesthood in the Writings of John Chrysostom”. Studia patristica, vol. 27, pp. 162–165.
  14. French D. R. (1998) “Rhetoric and the Rebellion of A.D. 387 in Antioche”. Historia, vol. 47, pp. 468–484.
  15. Leduc F. (1969) “Le theme de la vaine gloire chez saint Jean Chrysostome”. Proche Orient Chrétien, vol. 19, pp. 3–32.
  16. Loсhbrunner M. (1993) Über das Priestertum: Historisch-systematische Untersuchung zum Priesterbild des Johannes Chrysostomus. Bonn: Borengässer.
  17. Malingrey A.-M. (ed.) (1980) Jean Chrysostome. Sur le sacerdoce (Dialogue et Homélie). Sources chétiennes. Vol. 272. Paris: Les éditions du Cerf.
  18. Meyer L. (1933) Saint Jean Chrysostome maître de perfection chrétienne. Paris: Beauchesne.
  19. Molac P. (2005) “Des sources nazianzéennes au Discours sur le sacerdoce de saint Jean Chrysostome”. Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique, vol. 150, pp. 169–174.
  20. Monaci Castagno A. (1990) “Paideia classica ed esercizio pastorale nel IV secolo. Il concetto di “Synesis” nell’opera di Giovanni Crisostomo”. Rivista di storia e letteratura religiosa, vol. 26, pp. 429–459.
  21. Nardi C. (1996) “Motivi diatribici in Giovanni Crisostomo”, in L’etica cristiana nei secoli III e IV: eredità e confronti. XXIV Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità cristiana (Roma, 4–6 maggio 1995), Roma: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum, pp. 471–472.
  22. Nardi C. (2005) “Il De pueris di Giovanni Crisostomo: passione educativa e gusto del racconto”, in Giovanni Crisostomo. Oriente ed Occidente tra IV e V secolo. XXXIII Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità cristiana (Roma, 6-8 maggio 2004). Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum. Vol. 93. Roma: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum, pp. 73–85.
  23. Orosz A. (2005) “La diff érence fondamental entre l’ascèse monastique et les tâches des prêtres (De sacerdotio VI.5–8)”, in Giovanni Crisostomo: Oriente e Occidente tra IV e V secolo. XXXIII Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità cristiana (Roma, 6–8 maggio 2004). Studia Ephemerides Augustinianum. Vol. 93, Roma, pp. 593–605.
  24. Pasquato O. (1992) “Ideale sacerdotale e formazione al sacerdozio del giovane Crisostomo: evoluzione o continuità”, in S. Felici (ed.) La formazione al sacerdozio ministeriale nella catechesi e nella testimonianza di vita dei Padri. Convegno di studio e di aggiornamento, Facoltà di lettere cristiane e classiche (Roma, 15–17 marzo 1990), Roma: Las, pp. 59–93.
  25. Pernot L. (2009) “Introduction: les manifestes grecs”, in P. Galand-Hallyn, V. Zarini (eds) Manifestes littéraires dans la latinité tardive. Poétique et rhétorique. Actes du Colloque international (Paris, 23–24 mars 2007), Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, pp. 11–14.
  26. Rentinck P. (1970) La cura pastorale in Antiochia nel IV secolo. Analecta Gregoriana. Roma: Università Gregoriana editrice.
  27. Roda S. (1985) “Fuga nel privato e nostalgia del potere nel IV sec. D.C. Nuovi accenti di un’antica ideologia”, in M. Mazza, C. Giuff rida (eds) La trasformazione della cultura nella Tarda Antichità. Atti del Convegno (Catania, 27 settembre — 2 ottobre 1982), Roma: Jouvence, pp. 95–108.
  28. Saba G. F. (2012) Il Dialogo sul sacerdozio di Giovanni Crisostomo: sintesi tra paideia classica e paideia greca? Bologna: Dehoniana libri.
  29. Sandwell I. (2007) Religious Identity in Late Antiquity. Greek, Jews and Christians in Antioche. Cambridge: CUP.
  30. Simonetti M. (2002) “Origene dalla Cappadocia ai capaddoci”, in M. Girardi, M. Marini (eds) Origene e l’alessandrinismo capaddoce (III–IV secolo), Bari: Edipuglia, pp. 13–28.
  31. Vacchina M. G. (1996) “San Giovanni Crisostomo: l’etica del fi losofo cristiano come pratica dell’agape”, in L’etica cristiana nei secoli III e IV: eredità e confronti. XXIV Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità cristiana (Roma, 4–6 maggio 1995), Roma: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum, pp. 513–522.
  32. Zincone S. (2009) “Religione e società, città e campagna nell’ambiente antiocheno di Giovanni Crisostomo”. Annali di storia di esegesi, vol. 26, pp. 65–79.
Arko Alenka
Academic Degree: Doctor of Theology;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Catholic Major Seminary “Mary — Queen of Apostles”; Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation;
Post: professor;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3652-946X;
Email: alenka.arko@mail.ru.