/

Smagina Eugenia

Hermenia as a genre of coptic liturgical literature


Smagina Eugenia (2018) "Hermenia as a genre of coptic liturgical literature ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia III : Filologiia, 2018, vol. 57, pp. 102-109 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIII201857.102-109

Abstract

This article deals with a genre known as hermenia and attested in early Coptic religious literature. Hermenia represents a compilation of verses from Psalter (with a rare addition of verses from other Biblical books) that are picked according to the occurence of the same keyword, i. e. it was a predecessor sui generis of Biblical concordance. The most extensive hermenia preserved is contained in the manuscript M 574 from the collection of Pierpont Morgan, dated to the 9th century; it serves as a source for this study. There arises the question why this genre has this particular name, literally meaning “defi nition, translation”. Comparing it with the biblical “literature of Wisdom”, we see its succession with regard to the numerical parable, where a certain number of objects and phenomena mentioned at the beginning are classifi ed according to the shared property or characteristic. In the Jewish exegesis of Tanakh, the numerical parable is transformed into a numerical midrash, where the source of material is Scripture, while the complilation is made by the shared keyword or root. A variety of a similar explanation, expanded and elaborated in a detailed way, is employed in the Manichean literature. The Coptic hermenia is presumably an abridged variant of the numerical midrash, employed by the early Coptic church with liturgical aims.

Keywords

Coptic literature, hermenia, Psalter, Biblical exegesis, numerical parable, numerical midrash, genres of early Christian literature

References

  1. Bar-Asher Siegal M. (2012) “Shared Worlds: Rabbinic and Monastic Literature”. The Harvard Theological Review, 105, 4 (October 2012), pp. 423–456.
  2. Cramer M. (1941) “Die Totenklage bei den Kopten”. Wien; Leipzig.
  3. Crum W. E. (1979) A Coptic Dictionary. Oxford.
  4. Depuydt L. (1993) Catalogue of Coptic Manuscripts in the Pierpont Morgan Library (Corpus of Illuminated Manuscripts. Vol. 4. Oriental Series 1.) Leuven.
  5. Drescher J. (1958) “The Earliest Biblical Concordances”. Bulletin de la Société d’Archéologie Copte, 15, pp. 63–67.
  6. Gottlieb I. B. (1990) “Pirqe Abot and Biblical Wisdom”. Vetus Testamentum, 40, 2, pp. 152–164.
  7. Hyvernat H. (ed.) (1922) Bibliothecae Pierpont Morgan codices Coptici photographice expressi. Vols. I–LVI. Romae.
  8. Jernstedt P. (1959) Koptskiye texty Gosudarstvennogo Muzeya izobrazitel’nykh iskusstv imeni A. S. Pushkina [Coptic Texts of Pushkin State Museum of Visual Arts]. Moscow; Leningrad.
  9. “Leviticus Rabbah”, in Midrash Rabbah. hmbw’r . Wayiqra Rabbah. Jerusalem, 1983.
  10. McKane W. (1970) Proverbs. A New Approach (The Old Testament Library). Philadelphia.
  11. Mekhilta de-Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai. Jerusalem, 1955.
  12. Quecke H. (1970) Untersuchungen zum koptischen Stundengebet (Publications de l’Institut catholique de Louvain. 3). Louvain.
  13. Roth W. M. W. (1965) “Numerical Sayings in the Old Testament. A Form-Critical Study”. Vetus Testamentum. Supplements, xiii. Leiden.
  14. Saldarini A. J. (1977) “«Form Criticism» of Rabbinic Literature”. Journal of Biblical Literature, 96, 2, pp. 257‒274.
  15. Smagina E. (2010) “K voprosu o zhanre traktata Kephalaia v kontexte iudeyskoi i rannekhristianskoi literatury” [“The Problem of the Genre of the Treatise Kephalaia in the Context of Jewish and Early Christian Literature”]. Vestnik PSTGU III: Philologia, 2010, 4 (22), pp. 54–76 (in Russian).
  16. Theodor J., Albeck Ch. (eds.) (1996) Midrash Bereshit Rabbah. Critical Edition with Notes and Commentary, 1‒3. 2nd edition, Jerusalem.
  17. Towner W. S. (1973) The Rabbinic “Enumeration of Scriptural Examples”: A Study of a Rabbinic Pattern of Discourse with Special Reference to Mekhilta D’R. Ishmael. Leiden.

Information about the author

Smagina Eugenia


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; 12 Rozhrestvenka Str., Moscow, 107031, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0001-9816-6997;
Email: esmagi54.54@mail.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.