/

St. Tikhon’s University Review . Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies

St. Tikhon’s University Review I :79

THEOLOGY

Oleg Davydenkov, archpriest

On some features of Theodore Abu Qurrah’s ecclesiology

Oleg Davydenkov (2018) "On some features of Theodore Abu Qurrah’s ecclesiology ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 11-27 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201879.11-27
Тhis article examines the ecclesiological views of the Melkite theologian Theodore Abu Qurra, namely his doctrine of church councils and the special role of bishops of Rome in the life of the church. The author of the article raises the question about the sources of Theodore’s doctrine of the special authority of the bishops of Rome and of the reasons for his interest in this subject. Abu Qurra tried to show that the ecumenical councils are the only way to discover the truth; this way was established by Scripture itself and, moreover, it reveals the true meaning of Scripture. In order to support this view, Theodore needed to neutralise the argument directed against the validity of the ecumenical councils. This argument was used by both Muslims and the non-Orthodox, who claimed that the councils were a phenomenon in the political life of Byzantium and therefore their statutes have no religious authority. In this situation, the doctrine of the Roman bishops as successors of Apostle Peter who received special powers from Christ himself, have the exclusive right to convene ecumenical councils, are endowed with the charisma to preserve intact the truth formulated by the councils and teach the faith to their fellow-bishops, appeared to be convincing enough to demonstrate that the ecumenical councils were under an external religious jurisdiction independent of the authority of emperors and affi rmed by Scripture itself.
Christian Arabs, Melkits, ecclesiology, primacy, ecumenical councils, bishops of Rome,
  1. Brock S. (1973) “An early Syriac Life of Maximus the Confessor”. Analecta Bolandiana, 1973, vol. 91, pp. 299–346.
  2. Dick, I. (ed.) (1986) Thāwudhūrus Abū Qurra. Traitésur vénération des icȏnes (Maymar fī ikrām al-yqūnāt). Jounieh (in Arabian).
  3. Garrigues J.-M. (1976) “Le sens de la primauté romaine chez le Maxime le Confessuer”. Istina, 1976, vol. 21, pp. 6–24.
  4. Griffith S. H. (1993) “Muslims and Church Councils. The Apology of Theodore AbūQurrah”. Studia Patristica. 1993, vol. 25, p. 285.
  5. Griffith S. H. (2001) “Melkites”, “Jacobites” and the Christological Controversies in Arabic in Third/Ninth-Century Syria”, in D. Thomas (ed.) Syrian Christians under Islam. The First Thousand Years. Leiden, p. 47.
  6. ḤabībibnḪidma Abū Rā’iṭa. Der dritte Brief: Rechtfertigung des Trishagionzusatzes, in G. Graf. Die Schriften des Jacobiten Habib ibnHidma Abu Ra’ita. Louvain, 1951, S. 73–79.
  7. Larchet J.-C. (1998) Maxime le Confesseur, médiateur entre l’Orient et l’Occident. Paris: Cerf (Russoan translation 2004).
  8. “Poslanie papy Agafona” [“Pope Agatho’s Epistle”], in Deianiia vselenskikh soborov [“Acts of Ecumenical Councils”], St Petersburg, 1996, vol. 4, pp. 31–55 (in Russian).
  9. Sansterre J.-M. (1980). Les moines grecs et orientaux à Rome aux époques byzantine et carolingienne (milieu du VIe s. – fi n du IXe s.). Bruxelles.
  10. Sieben H.-J. (1974) “Zur Entwicklung der Konzilsidee (VIII). Theodor Abu Qurra über «unfehlbare» Konzilien”. Theologie und Philosophie. 1974, Bd. 49, S. 489–509.
  11. Sulaymān IbnḤasanal-Ġazzī. Riposta al dissenzienti dalla fi de ortodossa, in P. Spisa (ed.) I trattati teologici di Sulaymān Ibn Ḥasanal-Ġazzī. Louvain: Peeters, 2013, pp. 41–62.

Oleg Davydenkov, archpriest


Academic Degree: Doctor of Theology;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities, 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: hesd of the Department of History and Literature of the Ancient Eastern Church;
ORCID: 0000-0002-2149-931X;
Email: odavydenkov@yandex.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Chumichev Alexey

Theological aspects of J. J. Overbeck’s project of Orthodoxy of the western rite

Chumichev Alexey (2018) "Theological aspects of J. J. Overbeck’s project of Orthodoxy of the western rite ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 28-40 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201879.28-40
This article deals with theological aspects of the project of revival of the Orthodoxy of the Western rite which was proposed by the former Catholic priest and theologian J. J. Overbeck, who fi rst became Protestant and then Orthodox. In 1865 Overbeck and his supporters put forward the idea of creating in England an Orthodox church practising the Western liturgical rite, corrected in accordance with the Orthodox faith. Overbeck’s project sparked a wide-ranged discussion in theological circles of that time. The main idea of the followers of the project of Western Orthodoxy, most of whom were Anglicans, was the search for a true church, which would preserve the Christian doctrine from the Apostolic times in its intact state. According to the theologian’s community, only the Orthodox church could meet such requirements. The article consists of two sections. The fi rst examines the views of Overbeck and the proponents of his project on the ecclesiological organisation of the Orthodox church, their ideas about the advantage of Orthodoxy over other Christian denominations: Catholicism and Protestantism, the identity of the faith of the contemporary Orthodox church with the doctrine of the ancient church. The second part of the study discusses the ideas of Overbeck’s community about the necessity to create anew the Western rite within the Orthodox church, the supposed place of the Orthodox communities of the Western rite among the Local Orthodox churches, and the reaction to these ideas from the world Orthodoxy.
J. J. Overbeck, ecclesiology, Orthodoxy of the Western rite, Russian Orthodox Church, Holy Governing Synod of Russia, interdenominational relations, Orthodox-Anglican dialogue
  1. Abramtcev D. (1959) J. J. Overbeck and his Scheme for the Re-Establishment of the Orthodox Church in the West. Pittsburg.
  2. Kopylova E. A. (2013) “«Delo Overbeka» v zhizni Sankt-Peterburgskogo otdela Obshchestva lyubitelej duhovnogo prosveshcheniya” [“The Overbek Case” in the life of the St. Petersburg Division of the Society of spiritual enlighteners]. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V. N. Tatishcheva. Seriya “Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie”. Tol'yatti, 2013, vol. 4 (14), pp. 167–178.

Chumichev Alexey


Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0001-8967-6856;
Email: alecssey@yandex.ru.

PHILOSOPHY

Antonov Konstantin

Philosophy of religion and philosophical theology between faith and knowledge: Russian philosophical spiritualism of the late 19th century (A. Kozlov)

Antonov Konstantin (2018) "Philosophy of religion and philosophical theology between faith and knowledge: Russian philosophical spiritualism of the late 19th century (A. Kozlov) ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 43-55 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201879.43-55
This article deals with the project of philosophy of religion and philosophical theology suggested by A.A. Kozlov, the representative of philosophical spiritualism, an influential direction of the Russian metaphysical thought of the late 19th century. Special attention is paid to the problem of relationship between faith and knowledge, religion and intellect, as well as the role of philosophical refl ection in their normalisation. The project in question is considered in the context of the Russian religious thought of that time. The article analyses the basic distinction between the “awareness of God” and “knowledge of God” proposed by Kozlov on the basis of G. Teichmüller’s ideas. The article examines his concept of religion, its structure, his understanding of the relationship between religion and rationality, his concept of church as an institute of organising religious consciousness, relations of church and the state, church and institutes of knowledge. Kozlov’s philosophical theology is dealt with in the context of his critical analysis of the ontological argument for the existence of God and Anselm’s of Canterbury formula credo ut intelligam. The fi nal section of the article shows the place of spiritualistic conceptions of religion and philosophical theologies in the discussion field of the Russian thought, their distinguishing features and signifi cance.
spiritualism, A. Kozlov, religion, philosophy of religion, philosophical theology, faith, knowledge, ontological argument of existence of God, awareness of God, knowledge of God
  1. Foma Akvinskii. Summa teologii. P. I: Voprosy 1–64 [Thomas Aquinas. Summa theologiae. P. I: Questions 1‒64]. Moscow, 2006 (in Russian).
  2. Polovinkin S. M. (2004) “Ierarkhicheskii personalizm N.O. Losskogo” [“N.O. Lossky’s Hierarchical Personalism”]. Vestnik PSTGU, 2004, vol. 3, pp. 48–80 (in Russian).
  3. Solov’ev A. P. (2006) “Problema sootnosheniia very i znaniia v russkom religiozno-fi losofskom personalizme 19 veka” [“Problem of Relationship between Faith and Knowledge in Russian Religious and Philosophical Personalism of the 19th Century”], in Iazyk nauki i iazyk religii: Tematicheskii sbornik [Language of Science and Language of Religion: Collection of Papers]. Ufa, 2006, pp. 122–136 (in Russian).
  4. Zen’kovskii V. V. (2001) Istoriia russkoi fi losofi i [History of Russian Thought]. Moscow (in Russian).

Antonov Konstantin


Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Lihov per., Moscow, 127051 Russian Federation;
Post: Head of the Department of Philosophy of religion;
ORCID: 0000-0003-0982-2513;
Email: konstanturg@yandex.ru.

*According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.

This article is written within the project "Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology in Russian Religious Thought of XIX - XX Century", supported by St. Gregory The Theological Charity Foundation.
Korostichenko Ekaterina

Evolutionary humanism and religion as interpreted by Michael Schmidt-Salomon

Korostichenko Ekaterina (2018) "Evolutionary humanism and religion as interpreted by Michael Schmidt-Salomon ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 56-73 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201879.56-73
This article discusses the conception of the modern German theorist and populariser of evolutionary humanism Michael Schmidt-Salomon. Along with the study of the original texts, the article contains criticism of his ideas. It shows that Schmidt- Salomon’s conception, though based on the ideas of Julian Huxley, the founder of evolutionary humanism, as well as on the ideas of other theorists of humanistic and anticlerical direction, is an independent construction, consistent in its naturalistic approach and its focus on practical applicability. Many statements make their author close to R. Dawkins, but Schmidt-Salomon manages to refrain from excessive biologising in his views on the human nature. The concept of “mainstream culture”, which is used by the author to formulate the problem of spreading the humanist worldview and to propose its solution, deserves special attention. Despite certain lack of thoroughness as to ethical problems, Schmidt-Salomon’s evolutionary humanism can be viewed as an example of the present-day practical philosophy.
humanism, evolutionary humanism, religion, anti-clericalism, secularism, liberal thought, ethics, Dawkins, Schmidt-Salomon
  1. Baab F. (2013) Was ist Humanismus? Geschichte des Begriffes, Gegenkonzepte, säkulare Humanismen heute. Regensburg.
  2. Dennett D. (2006) Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York.
  3. Dawkins R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Russian translation 2013).
  4. Dawkins R. (2006) The God Delusion. Bantam Press. (Russian translation 2008).
  5. Durkheim E. Elementarnye formy religioznoi zhizni [The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life], in V.I. Garadzha (ed.) Religievedenie [Religious Studies]. Moscow 1995, pp. 36–42 (in Russian).
  6. Fink H., Kahl J., Schmidt-Salomon M. (2007) Was heißt Humanismus heute? Ein Streitgespräch zwischen Joachim Kahl und Michael Schmidt-Salomon. Aschaff enburg.
  7. Humanistenquote, 2004, available at https://fowid.de/meldung/humanistenquote-2004 (08.10.2018).
  8. Humanistenquote, 2007, available at https://fowid.de/meldung/humanistenquote-2007 (08.10.2018).
  9. Huxley J. (1941) The Uniqueness of Man. London.
  10. Karimov A. R. (2013) “Tsennosti sovremennogo svetskogo gumanizma” [“Values of PresentDay Secular Humanism”], in T. M. Shatunova (ed.) Gumanizm i sovremennost’: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-obrazovatel’noi konferentsii (8–9 noiabria 2013 goda) [Humanism and Our Time: Materials of International Scientifi c and Educational Conference, 8‒9 November, 2013]. Kazan’, pp. 47–51 (in Russian).
  11. Konashev M. B. (2012) Evoliutsionisty i religiia [Evolutionists and Religion]. St Petersburg (in Russian).
  12. Korostichenko E. I. (2015) “Organizatsii nemetskikh svobodomysliashchikh v sovremennuiu epokhu (vtoraia pol. 20 — nach. 21 v.)” [“Organisations of German Liberal Thinkers in the Present-Day Period (Latter Half of the 20th — early 21st Centuries”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 7: Filosofiia. 2015, vol. 3, pp. 83–99 (in Russian).
  13. Krotov V. (1997) “Kul’tura chelovechnosti ili novaia partiinost’?” [“Culture of the Humane or New Factionalism?”]. Zdravyi smysl. 1997, vol. 4, pp. 82–85 (in Russian).
  14. Kurtts P. (2003) “Sovmestimy li nauka i religiia?” [“Are Science and Religion Compatible?”]. Zdravyi smysl. 2003, vol. 26, pp. 31–34 (in Russian).
  15. Leitbild, available at https://diehumanisten.de/politik/Leitbild (08.10.2018).
  16. Marx K. K kritike Gegelevskoi filosofii prava [Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right], in K. Marx, F. Engels. Sochineniia [Works]. Moscow, 1955, vol. 1 (in Russian).
  17. Religionszugehörigkeiten in Deutschland 2016, available at https://fowid.de/meldung/religionszugehoerigkeiten-deutschland-2016 (08.10.2018).
  18. Schmidt-Salomon M. “Irgendwie sind wir doch alle Humanisten...” Über die soziale Verankerung und die Entwicklungspotentiale des Humanismus in Deutschland, available at http://www.schmidt-salomon.de/irgendhuman.pdf (20.06.2018).
  19. Schmidt-Salomon M. (2005) “Leitkultur Humanismus und Aufklärung. Jenseits von Fundamentalismus und Beliebigkeit”. Atheismus und Humanismus. 2005. Ss. 27–35.
  20. Schmidt-Salomon M. (2006) Manifest des evolutionären Humanismus. Plädoyer für eine zeitgemäße Leitkultur. Aschaff enburg.
  21. Trofi mova Z. P. (2006) Angliiskoe svobodomyslie v 20 veke [English Liberal Thought in the 20th Century]. Moscow (in Russian).
  22. Wangerin C. Atheistische Buskampagne unerwünscht, available at https://www.jungewelt.de/aartikel/122098.atheistische-buskampagne-unerw%C3%BCnscht.html (08.10.2018).

Korostichenko Ekaterina


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation;
Post: researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0002-7018-6301;
Email: klinkot@yandex.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

RELIGIOUS STUDIES

Zakharova Kseniya

From the history of Russian religious studies: the concept of Urmonotheismus in Russian academic theological philosophy

Zakharova Kseniya (2018) "From the history of Russian religious studies: the concept of Urmonotheismus in Russian academic theological philosophy ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 77-97 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201879.77-97
This article is devoted to Urmonotheismus, a concept that views faith in one God as the initial form of religious consciousness and the subsequent development of religious ideas in paganism as degradation. Arguments and facts in support of the concept of Urmonotheismus can be divided into the four groups: 1) arguments that appeal to the Bible; 2) evidence of monuments of ancient peoples; 3) testimonies of ethnographers about tribes that are at primitive levels of development; 4) philosophical arguments, particularly the argument that the idea of unity was simpler for primitive man than the idea of plurality. The article shows the infl uence of Kudryavtsev-Platonov, the first Russian founder of the concept in question, on the representatives of the subsequent academic theological tradition, namely archimandrite Khrisanf (Retivtsev), N. P. Rozhdestvensky, A. I. Pokrovsky, A. I. Vvedensky, archpriest Timofey Butkevich, I. P. Nikolin, as well as on teachers of theological disciplines at universities: archpriest Alexander Klitin, archpriest Iakov Galakhov and archpriest Nikolay Bogolyubov. The article also discusses the Russian receptions and criticism of Western scholars in this sphere. Besides, the article shows how far ahead the representatives of the Russian pre-revolutionary science were of the Western scholars, e.g. A. Lang and W. Schmidt. Finally, the article deals with the criticism of the conception of Urmonotheismus in Russia and abroad as well as with the attitude of contemporary religious scholars to it.
Urmonotheismus, academic theological tradition, Kudryavtsev-Platonov, heathendom, uncivilized peoples, records of ancient religions, Max Muller
  1. Antonov K. M. (2014) “Idei Vil’gel’ma Shmidta v istorii rossiiskogo religiovedeniia: polemika, apologiia, retseptsiia” [“Ideas of Wilhelm Schmidt in the History of Russian Religious Studies: Polemic, Apology, Reception”, in K. M. Antonov (ed.) «Nauka o religii», «Nauchnyi ateizm», «Religiovedenie»: aktual’nye problemy nauchnogo izucheniia religii v Rossii 20 — nachala 21 v. [“Religious Science”, “Scientifi c Atheism”, “Religious Studies”: Topical Issues in the Scientific Study of Religion in Russia in the 20th — early 21st Centuries”]. Moscow, pp. 148–166 (in Russian).
  2. Afanas’ev A., priest (2017) “Kritika R. Pettatstsoni v otnoshenii kontseptsii pramonoteizma V. Shmidta” [“R. Pettazzoni’s Criticism of W. Schmidt’s Conception of Urmonotheism”]. Khristianskoe chtenie. 2017, vol. 1, pp. 144–151 (in Russian).
  3. Afanasyev A. (2018) Bogoslovskiy analiz kritiki religiovedcheskikh kontseptsiy Wilgelma Shmidta (1898–1954) [Theological Analysis of the Critique of Religious Concepts by Wilhelm Schmidt (1898–1954)]. Saint-Petersburg.
  4. Elbakian E. S. (2015) “Sovremennoe rossiiskoe religiovedenie — v gore i v radosti” [“Modern Russian Religious Studies — in Trouble and in Joy”]. Religiovedcheskie issledovaniia. 2015, vol. 1 (11), pp. 191–199 (in Russian).
  5. Elizarenkova Ia. (ed.) (1999) Rgveda. Moscow (in Russian).
  6. Fursov V. A. (2016) “Ucheniye yepiskopa Khrisanfa (Retivtseva) o pervonachal’nom monoteizme i retseptsiya dannogo ucheniya v tvorchestve V. S. Solov’yeva” [The doctrine of Bishop Chrysanth (Retivtsev) about the initial monotheism and the reception of this doctrine in the works of V. S. Solovyov]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016, vol 4 (66), pp. 192–195.
  7. Galakhov I., archpriest (2008) Religiovedenie: bogoslovsko-fi losofskoe issledovanie [Religious Studies: Theological and Philosophical Research]. Moscow (in Russian).
  8. Krasnikov A. N. (2007) Metodologicheskie problemy religiovedeniia [Methodological Problems of Religious Studies]. Moscow (in Russian).
  9. Kryvelev I. A. “Pramonoteizma teoriia” [“Theory of Urmonotheism”], in E. M. Zhukov (ed.) Sovetskaia istoricheskaia entsiklopediia [Soviet Historical Encyclopaedia], vol. 11, pp. 523–524 (in Russian).
  10. Lessing G. (1995) “Vospitaniye chelovecheskogo roda” [Education of the human race]. “Liki kul’tury”: Al’manakh. Moscow, 1995, pp. 479–499.
  11. Men’ A. V. (1991–1992) Istoriia religii. V poiskakh Puti, Istiny i Zhizni [History of Religion. In Search of the Way, Truth and Life]. Moscow (in Russian).
  12. Pettazzoni R. (1922) Dio. Formazione e sviluppo del monoteismo nella storia delle religioni. L’essere celeste nelle credenze dei popoli primitive. Rome.
  13. Pettazzoni R. (1923) “La formation du monothéisme”. Revue de l’histoire des religions. 1923, vol. 88, pp. 192–229.
  14. Platon. Sobranie sochinenii [Plato. Collected Works]. Moscow, 1994 (in Russian).
  15. Platon. Sochineniia [Plato. Works]. St Petersburg, 2007 (in Russian).
  16. Pozdnyakov A. A. (2017) “Filosofiya religii A. I. Vvedenskogo” [The A. I. Vvedensky’s Philosophy of Religion]. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke [Context and refl ection: philosophy about the world and man]. 2017, vol. 6.2A, pp. 218–236.
  17. Rudolf K. (1986) “Kulturkreiselehre”, in The Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 8, p. 398.
  18. Shakhnovich M. M. (2015) “Etos istorii nauki: o rekonstruktsii rossiiskogo religiovedeniia sovetskogo perioda” [“Ethos of the History of Science: On the Reconstruction of the Russian Religious Studies of the Soviet Period”]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2015, vol. 1 (33), pp. 185–197 (in Russian).
  19. Zubov A. B. (1997) Istoriia religii. Kniga pervaia: Doistoricheskie i vne-istoricheskie religii: Kurs lektsii [History of Religion. Book 1: Prehistoric and Non-Historic Religions: Lectures] Moscow (in Russian).
  20. Zubov A. B. (2015) “Pramonoteizma teoriia” [“Theory of Urmonotheism”], in Bol’shaia rossiiskaia entsiklopediia [Large Russian Encyclopaedia]. 2015, vol. 27, p. 385 (in Russian).

Zakharova Kseniya


Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3455-6851;
Email: xenzah@yandex.ru.
Krihtova Tatiana

Easter cakes on Instagram. Spectalisation of Easter by young russian women

Krihtova Tatiana (2018) "Easter cakes on Instagram. Spectalisation of Easter by young russian women ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 98-114 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201879.98-114
This article deals with several meanings and interpretations of the Easter celebration among present-day Moscow residents. In 2016, the survey “Great Saturday” was conducted with the aim of discovering the main reasons for visiting church at Easter and before Easter. The research group used the hashtag #куличи2016 in questionnaires and posters that could be seen by respondents in the territory where the survey was being carried out. This was made with the aim of seeing the respondent’s posts in social networks and, thus, seeing this day “through their eyes”. It was found out that the bulk of photos were posted by women on maternal leave. Most pictures show festive food in a clearly seen layout. This illustrates the fact that for these users of social networks Easter serves as an opportunity for making their life spectacular, which, in turn, is necessary for creating a more comfortable milieu for themselves.
Easter, spectalisation, food anthropology, digital anthropology, anthropology of religion, gender, motherhood, rituals
  1. Arutiunov S. A. (1981) Etnografi ia pitaniia narodov stran zarubezhnoi Azii [Ethnography of Cuisine of Peoples of Asia Abroad]. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Barthes R. (1994) Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected Works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Chernova Zh., Shpakovskaia L. (2013) “Diskursivnye modeli sovremennogo rossiiskogo roditel’stva” [“Discourse Patterns of Present-Day Russian Parenthood”]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve. 2013, vol. 2 (67) (in Russian)..
  4. Chernova Zh., Shpakovskaia L. (2010) “Molodye vzroslye: supruzhestvo, partnerstvo i roditel’stvo. Diskursivnye predpisaniia i praktiki v sovremennoi Rossii” [“Young Adults. Married Life, Partnership and Parenthood. Discourse Precepts and Practices in Modern Russia”]. Laboratorium. Zhurnal sotsial’nykh issledovanii. 2010, vol. 3 (in Russian)..
  5. Debord G. (1983) Society of the Spectacle. Detroit.
  6. Douglas M. (2003) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London.
  7. Gde vziat’ idei dlia bloga i biznesa, i kak naiti tselevuiu auditoriiu? available at http://www.blogimam.com/2016/11/gde-vzyat-idei-dlya-bloga-i-najti-vashu-celevuyu-auditoriyu (08.10.2018).
  8. Goody J. (1982) Cooking, Cuisine and Class: A Study in Comparative Sociology. Cambridge.
  9. Kolozaridi P. V. (2017) “Roditeli i gadzhety v bol’shom gorode” [“Parents and Gadgets in a Big City”]. Shagi / Steps. 2017, vol. 3, № 2 (in Russian).
  10. Kolozaridi P. V., Il’in A. (2015) “Messendzhery v gorodskoi srede: gibridnye formy i novye praktiki” [“Messengers in City Environment: Hybrid Forms and New Practices”]. Shagi / Steps. 2015, vol. 1, № 3 (in Russian).
  11. Kto takie INSTA-mamy i zachem oni eto delaiut? available at http://elle.ua/otnosheniya/semya/kto-takie-insta-mamyi-i-zachem-oni-eto-delayut (22.02.2018).
  12. Kulichi po retseptu E. Molokhovets, available at https://www.gastronom.ru/recipe/27454/kulichipo-receptu-e-molohovec (22.02.2018).
  13. Kulich, retsept iz Knigi o vkusnoi i zdorovoi pishche, available at http://www.kuh-nya.ru/baking/50-vipkulihi/419-kulich-retsept-iz-knigi-o-vkusnoj-i-zdorovoj-pishche.html (22.02.2018).
  14. Kulich u Sokolovykh, available at www.pravmir.ru/semya-vstrechaet-pasxu-kulichi (22.02.2018).
  15. Marvin H. (1974) Cows, Pigs, Wars and Witches — The Riddles of Culture. New York.
  16. Miller D. et al. (2016) How the World Changed Social Media. London.
  17. Petrova K. Domashniaia zhena: Pochemu v XXI veke ne stydno byt’ domokhoziaikoi, available at http://www.wonderzine.com/wonderzine/life/life/231938-modern-housewife (22.02.2018).
  18. Politsiia i RPTs: Paskhal’nye sluzhby v Moskve pobili rekord // Russkaia sluzhba BBC 12.04.2015, available at https://www.bbc.com/russian/russia/2015/04/150411_russia_easter (10.05.2018).
  19. Prutskova E. (2016) “Kulichi i / ili Prichastie: tipologiia pravoslavnykh veruiushchikh, uchastvuiushchikh v osviashchenii paskhal’noi pishchi” [“Easter Cakes or Communion: Typology of Orthodox Believers Participating in Sanctifying of Easter Food”]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia. 2016, vol. 2 (in Russian).
  20. Rheingold H. (2000) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge (Massachusetts).
  21. Simmel G. (1984) Soziologie der Mahlzeit in das Individuum und die Freiheit. Berlin.
  22. Sotsial’nye seti v Rossii, zima 2015–2016. Tsifry, trendy, prognozy, available at http://blog.branalytics.ru/socialnye-seti-v-rossii-zima-2015-2016-cifry-trendy-prognozy (22.02.2018).
  23. Tokarev S. A. (1970) “K metodike etnografi cheskogo izucheniia material’noi kul’tury” [“On Techniques of Ethnographic Study of Material Culture”]. Sovetskaia etnografiia. 1970, vol. 4, pp. 3–17 (in Russian).
  24. Vesennii spisok, chtoby byt’ schastlivoi, available at https://organicwoman.ru/vesenniy-spisok/ (08.10.2018).
  25. Vesennii to do list (Chast’ 4), available at http://www.pyatnizza.com/ywk/to-do-list-in-spring-4/ (08.10.2018).
  26. Zabezhinskii I. Kulich i paskha, babushkiny retsepty, available at http://www.pravmir.ru/babushkiny-recepty-kulich-i-pasxa (22.02.2018).

Krihtova Tatiana


Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0003-2572-8316;
Email: krihtova@gmail.com.
The article was made in framework of the project "The Invisible Religion" by T. Lukman: Origins of the Concept and the Possibility of Application for the Analysis of Contemporary Russian Orthodoxy "with the support of the Development Foundation of the STOU.

DISCUSSION

Shokhin Vladimir

Is it easy to conquer the fortress of rational theology?

Shokhin Vladimir (2018) "Is it easy to conquer the fortress of rational theology? ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 117-131 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI201879.117-131
This paper deals with a certain new attempt to dismantle rational theology, which is in line with innumerable exercises of this kind after Heideggerean criticism of “ontotheology” with addition of “household arguments”. The author of the paper carries out a detailed analysis of this attempt from historical and logical points of view, demonstrating its weakness and outlining further topics in this fi eld of knowledge.
rational theology, revelation, analytic philosophy, postmodernism, “ontotheology”, Eastern Christianity, God
  1. Afonasin E. V. (ed., transl.) (2014). Kliment Aleksandriiskii. Stromaty. Kn. 4–7 [Clement of Alexandria. Stromata. Books 4‒7]. St. Petersburg, 2014.
  2. Barth K. (1934) Nein! Antwort an Emil Brunner. München.
  3. Brunner E. (2009) “Priroda i blagodat’” [“Nature and Grace”], in K. Gestrikh (ed.), K. I. Ukolov (ed., transl.) Sravnitel’noe bogoslovie: nemetskii protestantizm XX veka: Teksty s kommentariiami [Comparative Theology: German Protestantism of the 20th Century: Texts with Commentary]. Moscow, p. 276–316 (Russian translation).
  4. Crisp O. (ed.) (2009) A Reader in Contemporary Philosophical Theology. London; New York.
  5. Flint Th. P., Rea M. C. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford, 2011 (Russian translation 2013).
  6. Gaginskii A. M. (2018) “Skrytye predposylki ratsional’noi teologii” [“Hidden Prerequisites of Rational Theology”]. Filosofskii zhurnal. 2018, vol. 11/1, pp. 111–124.
  7. Gestrikh K. (2009) “Problema nepreodolennoi estestvennoi teologii” [“Problem of the Overcome Natural Theology”], in K. Gestrikh (ed.), K. I. Ukolov (ed., transl.) Sravnitel’noe bogoslovie: nemetskii protestantizm XX veka: Teksty s kommentariiami [Comparative Theology: German Protestantism of the 20th Century: Texts with Commentary]. Moscow, pp. 322–364.
  8. Gumerov A., priest (ed.) (2014) Saint Athanasius of Alexandria. Select Works. Moscow.
  9. Konacheva S. A. (2010) Bytie. Sviashchennoe. Bog. Khaidegger i filosofskaia teologiia XX veka [Being. Sacred. God. Heidegger and Philosophical Theology of the 20th Century]. Moscow.
  10. Kryshtop L. E. (ed., transl.) (2016) Immanuel Kant. Lektsii o filosofskom uchenii o religii (redaktsiia K. G. L. Pelitsa) [Immanuel Kant. Lectures on Philosophical Theology]. Moscow.
  11. Mikhailov P. B. (2007) “Estestvennoe bogopoznanie v grecheskoi patristike” [“Natural Theosophy in Greek Patrisrics”]. Filosofiia religii: Al’manakh 2006–2007. Moscow, pp. 247–263.
  12. Plantinga A. (1980) Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee (WI).
  13. Rea M. (ed.) (2009) Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology. Oxford.
  14. Shokhin V. K. (2015) “Teizm ili deizm? Razmyshleniia nad metafi zicheskoi teologiei Richarda Suinberna” [“Theism or Deism? Refl ections on Richard Suinburne’s Metaphysical Theology”]. Voprosy filosofii, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 64–76.
  15. Suinburne R. (1991) The Existence of God. Clarendon Press (Russian translation 2014).
  16. Taliaferro C., Meister C. (eds.) (2010) The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology. Cambridge.
  17. Turner D. (2004) Faith, Reason and the Existence of God. Cambridge.
  18. Ubaghs G. C. (ed.) (2006) Heidegger M. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 11: Identität und Differenz. Frankfurt am Main.

Shokhin Vladimir


Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Academic Rank: Professor;
Place of work: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences; Goncharnaya Str. 12/1, Moscow 109240, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of the Sector of Philosophy of Religion;
ORCID: 0000-0002-2111-8740;
Email: vladshokhin@yandex.ru.

*According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.

BOOK REVIEWS

Veviurko Il'ia

Rev. of Die Nag-Hammadi-Schriften in der Literatur- und Theologiegeschichte des frühen Christentums / J. Schröter, K. Schwarz, Hrsg. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017. 296 S. + ind.

Veviurko Il'ia (2018) Rev. of Die Nag-Hammadi-Schriften in der Literatur- und Theologiegeschichte des frühen Christentums / J. Schröter, K. Schwarz, Hrsg. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017. 296 S. + ind., Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 135-143 (in Russian).

PDF

Veviurko Il'ia


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0002-1225-7474;
Email: vevurka@mail.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Posternak Andrey, priest

Rev. of The Lambeth Conference: Theology, History, Polity and Purpose / P. Avis, B. M. Guyer, eds. N. Y.: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017. 437 p.

Posternak Andrey (2018) Rev. of The Lambeth Conference: Theology, History, Polity and Purpose / P. Avis, B. M. Guyer, eds. N. Y.: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017. 437 p., Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 144-149 (in Russian).

PDF

Posternak Andrey, priest


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in History;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Dean of the faculty of History;
ORCID: 0000-0003-1310-3503;
Email: posternakav@inbox.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.

Vrublevskaya Polina

Rev. of Rass F. D. Die Suche nach Wahrheit im Horizont fragmentarischer Existenzialität — Eine Studie über den Sinn der Frage nach Gott in der Gegenwart in Auseinandersetzung mit Gianni Vattimo, John D. Caputo und Jean-Luc Nancy. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017. XIV, 227 S.

Vrublevskaya Polina (2018) Rev. of Rass F. D. Die Suche nach Wahrheit im Horizont fragmentarischer Existenzialität — Eine Studie über den Sinn der Frage nach Gott in der Gegenwart in Auseinandersetzung mit Gianni Vattimo, John D. Caputo und Jean-Luc Nancy. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017. XIV, 227 S., Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 149-153 (in Russian).

PDF

Vrublevskaya Polina


Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0001-7005-9591;
Email: pvrublevskaya@gmail.com.
Nosachev Pavel

Exorcism and present-day religiosity — Rev. of Giordan G., Possamai A. Sociology of Exorcism in Late Modernity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. IX, 127 p.

Nosachev Pavel (2018) "Exorcism and present-day religiosity". Rev. of Giordan G., Possamai A. Sociology of Exorcism in Late Modernity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. IX, 127 p., Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2018, Iss. 79, pp. 154-161 (in Russian).

PDF

Nosachev Pavel


Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Higher School of Economics; 20 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, Moscow, 101000 Russian Federation;
Post: associated professor;
ORCID: 0000-0002-0884-4705;
Email: pavel_nosachev@bk.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.