/
Search results


Урусова Е. А., Хусяинов Т. М. Особенности влияния модели родительской семьи на дальнейшие межличностные отношения (на примере девушек, воспитанных в полной и монородительской материнской семье) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2017. Вып. 47. С. 117-129. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201747.117-129
This article deals with child-parent relationship between fathers and daughters in twoparent and single-parent families where the contact between the father and daughter is limited. The article emphasises the signifi cance of the role of the positive example in relationships between parents and its infl uence on the nature of interpersonal contacts with people of the same and the opposite genders. The article analyses the model of the parent family, the subjective evaluation of the father’s involvement in the upbringing and the type of relationship with him as factors aff ecting the interaction with people of the same and the opposite genders. The authors point out the fact that girls brought up in singlemother families tend to evaluate relations with their fathers as bad saying that he did not take part in their upbringing, the communication with him being very rare. It is established that the frequency of contacts with the father, his participation in the upbringing and the nature of relationship with him are linked to the model of the family. It is shown that girls’ relationships with the same and the opposite genders are infl uenced not only by the family type (two- or single-parent) but also by the evaluation of the relationship with the father.
family model, parent family, incomplete family, single-parent family, family relationships, parent-child relationship, relationship with father, interpersonal interaction, gender relations, image of partner
  1. Antonov A. I., “Institucional'nyj krizis sem'i i semejno-demografi cheskih struktur v kontekste social'nyh izmenenij i social'nogo neravenstva”, in: Sem'ja i demografi cheskie issledovanija, 1, 2014, available at: https://riss.ru/demography/demography-sciencejournal/5273/
  2. Bendas T. V., Gendernaja psihologija: uchebnoe posobie, St. Petersburg, 2006.
  3. Danilova S. S., “Sociologicheskij analiz problem odinokih materej v malom gorode (na primere Ivanovskoj oblasti)”, in: Zhenshhina v rossijskom obshhestve, 1, 2009, 49–57.
  4. Dement'eva I. F., “Negativnye faktory vospitanija detej v nepolnoj sem'e”, in: Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 11, 2001, 108–118.
  5. Dokuchaeva S. O., “Vlij anie roditel'skoj sem'i na postroenie supruzheskoj sem'i v sledujushhem pokolenii”, in: Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie, 3, 2005, 41–55.
  6. Dymnova T. I., “Zavisimost' harakteristik supruzheskoj sem'i ot roditel'skoj”, in: Voprosy psihologii, 2, 1998, 47–56.
  7. Egorova N. Ju., Kuramshev A. V., “Sovremennaja rossij skaja sem'ja: osnovnye tendencii”, in: Social'no-gumanitarnye znanija, 4, 2008, 106–118.
  8. Egorova N. Ju., Janak A. L., “Otcovskaja sem'ja kak novyj klient social'noj raboty”, in: Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Serija: Social'nye nauki, 2 (34), 2014, 42–46.
  9. Zamaraeva Z. P., Novoselov V. M., “Osobennosti transformacii instituta otcovstva v sovetskij period”, in: Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija, 6, 2012, 53–56.
  10. Ivanchenko V. A., “Determinanty processa socializacii podrostkov iz semej s nepolnoj semejnoj strukturoj”, in: Social'no-gumanitarnoe znanie: istorija i problemy sovremennosti: monografija. St. Louis, 2015, 84–105.
  11. Il'in E. P., Diff erencial'naja psihofi ziologij a muzhchiny i zhenshhiny, St. Petersburg, 2006.
  12. Isupova O. G., “Social'nyj smysl materinstva v sovremennoj Rossii”, in: Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 3, 2000, 98–107.
  13. Kalina O. G., Holmogorova A. B., “Vlij anie obraza otca na emocional'noe blagopoluchie i polorolevuju identichnost' podrostkov”, in: Voprosy psihologii, 1, 2007, 15–26.
  14. Kapustina V. A., “Nekotorye aspekty vospitanij a lichnosti v nepolnoj sem'e (po materialam issledovanij rossij skih i zarubezhnyh avtorov)”, in: Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru, 3, 2011, available at: http://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2011/n3/47081.shtml
  15. Karabanova O. A., Psihologij a semejnyh otnoshenij i osnovy semejnogo konsul'tirovanija, Moscow, 2007, 17–27.
  16. Kochubej B. I., Muzhchina i rebenok, Moscow, 1990.
  17. Pushkareva N. L., “Materinstvo v novejshih sociologicheskih, fi losofskih, psihologicheskih koncepcij ah”, in: Jetnografi cheskoe obozrenie, 5, 1990, 48–59.
  18. Romanov P. V., “Social'naja zashhishhennost' gorodskoj monoroditel'skoj sem'I”, in: Mir Rossii. Sociologija. etnologija, 2, 2004, 66–95.
  19. Saralieva Z. H., Balabanov S. S., Kuz'mina L. M., “Social'nye roli sovremennyh rossij skih muzhchin”, in: Zhenshhina v rossij skom obshhestve, 3, 2011, 86–93.
  20. Semenova L. Je., Kozhina E. V., “Gendernye osobennosti sub'ektivnogo smysla roditel'stva v period rannej i srednej vzroslosti”, in: Knjazeva T. N., ed., Psihologicheskie issledovanija razvitija lichnosti: vozrastnoj, gendernyj i professional'nyj aspect, N. Novgorod, 2014, 128–138.
  21. Semenova L. Je., Urusova E. A., “Gendernaja specifi ka motivov sozdanij a sem'i v predstavlenij ah starshih podrostkov”, in: Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija, 1–1, 2015, 1548. available at: https://www.science-education.ru/article/view?id=18144
  22. Sizova I. L., «Novoe otcovstvo» v svete tradicij i innovacij semejnoj politiki v Evrope”, in: Sociologija i social'naja antropologija, 15, 1, 2012, 86–102.
  23. Harlamenkova N. E., “Rol' otca v diff erenciacii gendernoj identichnosti”, in: Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 3, 28, 2007, 56–64.
  24. Husjainov T. M., Janak A. L., “Postanovka problemy nepolnoj i izbytochnoj zanjatosti odinokih roditelej v kontekste balansa sem'i i raboty (na primere monoroditel'skih otcovskih semej v Rossii)”, in: Sociodinamika, 1, 2016, 75–91, DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.1.17455. available at: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17455.html
Urusova Ekaterina
Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, department of classical and practical psychology; 61, 46, Vitebskaja str., 603 059, Nizhnij Novgorod, Russian Federation;
Email: UK1801@yandex.ru.
Khusyainov Timur
Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: Lobachevsky State University, department of philosophy; 25/12 Bol'shaja Pecherskaja str., 603 155, Nizhnij Novgorod, Russian Federation;
Email: timur@husyainov.ru.