/
Search results


Сидорова М. П. Курский архиерейский хор в 1-й пол. XX века: репертуар и стилистика нотного архива (на примере регентской коллекции Орловых) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия V: Вопросы истории и теории христианского искусства. 2018. Вып. 29. С. 130-137. DOI: 10.15382/sturV201829.130-137
This article traces the history of the formation of the Kursk episcopal choir in the first half of the 20th century. Archival documents of the Soviet period constitute the historical background of the study. The Episcopal choir was one of the most prominent and professional choirs in the Kursk diocese. Despite the fact that the practice of the famous Russian conductor and composer Alexander Archangelsky (Russ. Александр Архангельский) was widespread throughout Russia in the early 20th century, the choir did not accept the new direction. The choir maintained the tradition of male-voice choral sound and did not include female voices. As a result of radical changes in the state policy in 1917, the manner of church singing culture of the choir changed. In particular, the era of male-voice sound ended in 1932 when Znamensky Cathedral of Kursk (Знаменский кафедральный собор) was closed down and all its structural units were liquidated. The restoration of the see in Kursk in 1943 led to the revival of the Episcopal choir. However, it now had a diff erent line-up and new technical capabilities. In the fi rst half of the 1940s, the Episcopal choir, conducted by Gavriil Ivanovich Orlov (Гавриил Иванович Орлов), started the practice of mixed church-choir chanting at Sergievo-Kazansky Cathedral (Сергиево-Казанский собор) of Kursk. There arose a necessity to restore the sheet music archive lost during the repressive events of the 1930s. The article examines the features of the liturgical practice of Kursk Episcopal choir in the Soviet times. It considers the problems of the stylistic and repertory content of the sheet music archive which was restored thanks to numerous donations from collections of parish churches and connoisseurs of church singing. The article also analyses the features of the repertoire of the Episcopal choir, illustrated by the inventory of singing papers of the Orlov family of episcopal cantors. The dynasty of the cantors Ivan Matveevich Orlov and Gavriil Ivanovich Orlov is closely connected with the historical limits of Kursk Episcopal choir in the early 20th century and, to a certain extent, reflects the features of the regional element in the art of church singing of Kursk region.
culture of church singing, episcopal choir, choir conductor, sheet music archive, sheet music manuscript, church hymn, Kursk
  1. Arkhierei kurskogo kraia: XVII–XX vek, available at: http://old-kursk.ru/book/razdorsky/r005.html (data obrashcheniia 11.11.2017).
  2. Iz istorii khramov Kurskoi eparkhii, Kursk, 2013, 17, 28.
  3. Kurskii Znamenskii muzhskoi monastyr'. K 400-letiiu osnovaniia. Po blagosloveniiu Vysokopreosviashchenneishego Germana, mitropolita Kurskogo i Ryl'skogo, Kursk, 2013, 11.
  4. Zhuravlenko I. A. , ed., Po pervym slovam. Svod sochinenii i napevov Pravoslavnoi tserkvi. Izdano v Rossii, Moscow, 2002, 48.
  5. Rakhmanova M. P., ed. Russkaia dukhovnaia muzyka v dokumentakh i materialakh, Tom IX, Kniga 1: 1920–1939-e gody, Chast' I: Russkoe Pravoslavnoe tserkovnoe penie v XX veke: sovetskii period, Moscow, 2015, 834.
Sidorova Marina
Place of work: Kursk Theological Seminary; 71A Progulochnaia Str., Kursk 305021, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of Cantorial Department;
ORCID: 0000-0001-8517-527X;
Email: marina.sidorova.00@list.ru.
Сидорова М. П., Лебедева-Емелина А. В. Песнопения Дегтярева в дореволюционных изданиях: проблема доверия к нотным источникам // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия V: Вопросы истории и теории христианского искусства. 2018. Вып. 32. С. 81-111. DOI: 10.15382/sturV201832.81-111
This article studies choir concertos by Stepan Anikievich Degtyarev, analyses pre-revolution editions of his music, the degree of their proximity or distance with regard to the manuscript sources. It also discusses the liturgical context of the concerto Гряди, гряди от Ливана, невесто (Church Slavonic ‘Come, Come from Lebanon, O Bride’) and the editing of its poetic text. The article also assesses the historical significance of spiritual concertos by Degtyarev, discovered in church collections of Kursk.
Degtyarev; choral concerto; library of the Bishop’s Choir in Kursk; editions of Seliverstov, Kireev, Goltinson; choirmaster’s copies, editing of church chants
  1. Artemova E. G. (2015) Dukhovno-muzykal'naia kul'tura Peterburga rubezha XIX–XX vekov [Spiritual and Musical Culture of Petersburg of the Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries]. Moscow (in Russian).
  2. Chernysheva T. A. (2015) “Deiatel'nost' arkhiereiskogo (mitropolich'ego) khora v kontse XIX — nachale XX vv.” [“Activities of the Archpriest (Metropolitan) Choir in the Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries]. Khristianskoe chtenie, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 251–295 (in Russian).
  3. Gardner I. A. (1982) Bogosluzhebnoe penie Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi [Liturgical Singing of the Russian Orthodox Church. History]. Vol. 2. New York.
  4. Kutasevich A. V. (2014) “Muzykal'no-tematicheskie paralleli v tvorchestve Stepana Degtiareva i Artema Vedelia. Fenomen zaimstvovaniia i voprosy avtorstva sochinenii” [“Musical and Thematic Parallels in Creative Works by Stepan Degtyarev and Artem Vedel’. Phenomenon of Borrowing and Problems of Authorship”]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriia 5, 2014, vol. 1 (13), pp. 104–119 (in Russian).
  5. Kutasevich A. V. (2016) “Dukhovno-muzichnі tvori Stepana Degtiar'ova u kiїvs'kikh rukopisnikh notnikh zіbranniakh. Do 250-rіchchia vіd dnia narodzhennia Stepana Degtiar'ova” [“Spiritual and Musical Works by Stepan Degtyarev in Kiev Manuscript Note Collections. For the 250 Anniversary of Stepan Degtyarev”]. Chasopis Natsіonal'noї Muzichnoї Akademії Ukraїni іmenі P. І. Chaikovs'kogo. 2016, vol. 4 (33), pp. 4–24 (in Russian).
  6. Lebedeva-Emelina A. V. (2004) Russkaia dukhovnaia muzyka epokhi klassitsizma (1765–1825): Katalog proizvedenii [Russian Spiritual Music of the Period of Classicism (1765‒1825): Catalogue of Works]. Moscow, pp. 353–457 (in Russian).
  7. Levashev E. M. (1986) S. A. Degtiarev, in Istoriia russkoi muzyki [History of Russian Music]. Vol. 4. Moscow (in Russian).
  8. Lopukhin A. P. Tolkovaia Bibliia Vetkhogo i Novogo Zaveta [Bible with Commentary. Old and New Testaments], available at: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Lopuhin/tolkovaja_biblia/ (09.11.2018) (in Russian).
  9. Pletneva A. A., Kravetskii A. G. (2005) Tserkovnoslavianskii iazyk: Uchebnoe izdanie dlia obshcheobrazovatel'nykh uchebnykh zavedenii, dukhovnykh uchilishch, gimnazii, voskresnykh shkol i samoobrazovaniia [The Church Slavonic Language. Handbook for Secondary Schools, Theological Colleges, Gymnasiums, Sunday Schools and Self-Study]. Moscow, 2005 (in Russian).
  10. Pomestnyi sobor Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi 1917–1918 godov [Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church of 1917‒1918], in M. P. Rakhmanova, S. G. Zvereva (eds.) Russkaia dukhovnaia muzyka v dokumentakh i materialakh [Russian Spiritual Music in Documents and Materials]. Vol. 3. Moscow, 2002 (in Russian).
  11. Rytsareva M. G. (2006) Dukhovnyi kontsert v Rossii vtoroi poloviny XVIII veka [Spiritual Concerto in Russia of the Second Half of the 18th Century]. St Petersburg (in Russian).
  12. Semenov D. S. (2015) “Slovar' pravoslavnogo russkogo tserkovnogo peniia. 2-ia red.”, in M. P. Rakhmanova (ed.) Russkaia dukhovnaia muzyka v dokumentakh i materialakh, vol. 9. Moscow, pp. 944–947.
  13. Shestnadtsat' dukhovnykh kontsertov anonimnykh avtorov iz rukopisnogo sbornika kontsa XVIII — nachala XIX v. Rekonstruktsiia i redaktsiia Antona Viskova [Sixteen Spiritual Concertos of Anonyme Authors from a Manuscript Collection of the Late 18th — Early 19th Century. Reconstruction and Edition by Anton Viskov]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2015 (in Russian).
  14. Trushin Anatolii, priest. S. A. Degtiarev. K 250-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia kompozitora [S. A. Degtyarev. For the 250th Anniversary of the Composer], available at: http://www.mepar.ru/library/vedomosti/91/2177 (09.11.2018) (in Russian).
  15. Zheltov M. S., priest. Pravdoliubov Sergii, archpriest. Bogosluzhenie Russkoi Tserkvi. X–XX vv. [Church Service in the Russian Church. 10th — 20th Centuries], available at: http://kievorthodox.org/site/worship/1132 (09.11.2018) (in Russian).
Sidorova Marina
Place of work: Kursk Theological Seminary; 71A Progulochnaia Str., Kursk 305021, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of Cantorial Department;
ORCID: 0000-0001-8517-527X;
Email: marina.sidorova.00@list.ru.
Lebedeva-Emelina Antonina
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in Art Criticism;
Academic Rank: Senior Research Fellow;
Place of work: State Institute for Art Studies; 5 Kozitskii Pereulok, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation;
Post: Senior Researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0003-0803-6879;
Email: lebedeva-emelina@list.ru. *According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.
Thanks to the keyholder of the Bishops ’Monastery of the Kursk city, the regent of the bishop’s choir, Archpriest Alexander Lobanov, and the regent of the Ascension Church of Kursk, the head of the Ascension children's and youth choir, Svetlana Kostina for providing music materialsThanks to Alexey Alexandrovich Naumov.
Сидорова М. И., Добрушина Е. Р. Число предиката в конструкциях типа «те/все, кто пришёл/ пришли» и падеж вершины – корпусное исследование // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2019. Вып. 59. С. 22-35. DOI: 10.15382/sturIII201959.22-35
This article deals with patterns in the choice of the grammatical number of the predicate in synonymous constructions of the type te, kto prishel vs. te, kto prishli ‘those who came’ (singular vs.plural of the verb) in Russian. It contains a statistical, grammatical and semantic analysis of sentences with these structures based on examples from the Russian National Corpus. We investigate both constructions with predicates expressed by verbs and constructions with predicates expressed by adjectives, participles, predicatives, as well as by adjectival pronouns. The article presents results of our analysis of the occurrence of these constructions in texts by various authors of the 19th — 21st centuries and reveals a previously unknown regularity, namely the dependence of the number of the predicate on the case of the head pronoun. It also checks the hypotheses about the dependence of the number of the predicate on its semantics, tense and part of speech, none of which having been confi rmed. The authors of the article are concerned with the character of sentences with predicate in the plural in terms of the language standard, since such sentences are often regarded as substandard by the school language standard, which is discordant with the opinion of authoritative linguistic reference literature. The school standard and scientifi c codifi cation disagree here, this being the reason why the study of the actual usage is particlularly interesting. Corpus analysis demonstrates that both the system and the usage are in line with the less rigid variant of standard-language restrictions, which leads to specifi c hypercorrectness in editorial practice. This is a term introduced by the authors to refer to correcting the already correct variant for the variant which is also correct and preferable from a subjective point of view of the editor, but does not refl ect the author’s intention.
Russian language, syntax, grammar, сorpus linguistics, dependent clause, relative clause, agreement, agreement in number, predicate, Standard Russian
  1. Alekhina M. (1989) Sintaksis slozhnogo predlozheniia sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo iazyka [Syntax of the Complex Sentence of the Contemporary Standard Russian]. Moscow, 1989 (in Russian).
  2. Babaitseva V., Maksimov L. (1987) Sovremennyi russkii iazyk v trekh chastiakh. Ch. 3: Sintaksis. Punktuatsiia [Contemporary Russian Language, in Three Parts. Pt. 3: Syntax. Punctuation]. Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Graudina L., Itskovich V., Katlinskaia L. (2004) Grammaticheskaia pravil’nost’ russkoi rechi. Stilisticheskii slovar’ variantov [Grammatical Correctness of the Russian Speech. Stylistic Dictionary of Variants]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Kholodilova M. (2015) “Soglasovanie s vershinoi otnositel’nykh konstruktsii i obosoblennykh imennykh oborotov v russkom iazyke”. Russkii iazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, vol. 30, № 2, pp. 74–97 (in Russian).
  5. Kholodilova M. (2017) “Otnositel’nye predlozheniia” [Relative Clauses], in Materialy k korpusnoi grammatike russkogo iazyka. Vyp. II. Sintaksicheskie konstruktsii i grammaticheskie kategorii [Materials for the Corpus Grammar of the Russian Language, 2: Syntactic Patterns and Grammatical Categories]. Moscow, pp. 205–279 (in Russian).
  6. Panov M. (ed.) (1968). Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo iazyka. Narodnye govory [Phonetics of the Contemporary Russian Language. Urban Varieties]. Moscow (in Russian).
  7. Pozharitskaia S., Dobrushina E. (2017). “Orfoepicheskii vzgliad na nekotorye variantnye iavleniia russkogo literaturnogo iazyka v epokhu korpusnoi lingvistiki” [Orthoepic View on Certain Variable Phenomena of the Russian Standard Language in Era of Corpus Linguistics], in Komp’iuternaia lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii [Computational Linguistics and Intellect Technologies], vol. 2. Moscow, pp. 372–384 (in Russian).
  8. Shvedova N. (ed.) (1980) Russkaia grammatika [Russian Grammar]. Moscow (in Russian).
  9. Sidorova M. (2014) “Zakonomernosti vybora edinstvennogo ili mnozhestvennogo chisla glagola v konstruktsiiakh tipa te, kto prishel / te, kto prishli” [Patterns in the Choice of the Singular vs. Plural Verb in Constructions te, kto prishel / te, kto prishli”], in M. Remneva et al. (eds.) Russkii iazyk: istoricheskie sud’by i sovremennost’ [Russian Language: History and Modern Time]. Moscow, pp. 313–314 (in Russian).
  10. Sidorova M. (2017) “Osobennosti vybora konstruktsii tipa te/vse, kto prishel/prishli v tekstakh raznykh avtorov na baze NKRIa” [Features of the Choice of Constructions of the Type te/vse, kto prishel/prishli in Texts of Various Authors Based on Russian National Corpus”, in XXVII Ezhegodnaia bogoslovskaia konferentsiia PSTGU: Materialy [27th Annual Theological Conference of St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities]. Moscow, pp. 275–276 (in Russian).
Sidorova Mariya
Student status: Graduate student;
Academic Degree: Doctor* of Pharmaceutical Sciences;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 9 Building 2, Ilovayskaya St., Moscow 115184, Russian Federation;
Post: postgraduate of the Department of general linguistics and slavic studies;
ORCID: 0000-0001-6092-5097;
Email: mariya.sid@gmail.com. *According to ISCED 2011, a post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences (D.Sc.) is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates.
Dobrushina Ekaterina
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philology;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s University for the Humanities; 9 Ilovaiskaya Str., Moscow, 109651, Russian Federation;
Post: Head of the Department of General linguistics and Slavistics;
ORCID: 0000-0001-5630-9291;
Email: edobrush@gmail.com. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Russian foundation of fundamental research 9-012-00200