Search results

Добрушина Е. Р., Поляков А. Е. Корпус церковнославянского языка: возможности, методы создания, перспективы // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2013. Вып. 1 (31). С. 32-44.
In May 2012 the Corpus of the Church Slavonic Language became available online within the framework of the Russian National Corpus. The paper describes the process of compiling the Corpus as well as methods of resolving various problems, such as orthographic representation, grammatical tagging and metatext markup.
Church Slavonic, Russian, corpus linguistics, frequency dictionary, grammatical dictionary, morphology, inflection, text analysis, liturgical language, information system, database
1. Dobrushina E. R., Ivanova-Allenova T. Ju., Poljakov A. E. 2012 “Korpus Cerkovnoslavjanskih tekstov v sostave NKRJa, pervaja versija: problemy i reshenija” (Corpus of Church-Slavonic Texts in NKRJ, First Version: Problems and Solutions), in Materialy konferencii «El’Manuscript-12. Informacionnye tehnologii i pis'mennoe nasledie», Petrozavodsk, 2012.
2. Dobrushina E. R., Kraveckij A. G., Poljakov A. E. Instrukcija k Korpusu cerkovnoslavjanskih tekstov (Instruction to Corpus of Church-Slavonic Texts), Moscow, 2013.
3. Alipij (Gamanovich), ieromon. Grammatika cerkovno-slavjanskago jazyka (Grammar of Church-Slavonic Language), Jordanville, 1964.
Dobrushina Ekaterina
Poliakov Aleksei
Полякова М. А. Место cura sui в западных концепциях образования (παιδεĩα, humanitas, Bildung) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2015. Вып. 3 (38). С. 80-93. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201538.80-93
The article deals with the conceptualization of category cura sui in contemporary studies of Italian scientists, who, in general, continue to develop the traditions of interpretation of the concept put forward by M. Heidegger and M. Foucault. According to the author, the interpretation cura sui, presents F. Cambi, F. Caputo, M. Gennari and other researchers, gives reason to see it close historical-genetic and ontological relations with the Greek category παιδεĩα, Roman humanitas and the German and the European concept of Bildung, which we perceive as education and self-education. At the same time, Bildung — category, which carries the mystico-religious roots, it is tangible in the German-speaking and Russian-speaking traditions, referring to the reconstruction in man the divine image as the main goal and the method of teaching. Such interpreters Bildung as F. Kambi and M. Borelli, note emerging in modern interpretations of the concept of reduction and simplification, which, from their point of view, unacceptable.
cura sui, form (forma), image (Bild), mysticism, ethos, παιδεĩα, humanitas, Bildung, education.

1. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod: osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki (History and Method: Grounds of Philosophical Hermeneutics), Moscow, 1988.
2. Ivanchenko G. V. Zabota o sebe: istorija i sovremennost' (Care on Self: History and Modernity), Moscow, 2009.
3. Jeger V. Rannee hristianstvo i grecheskaja pajdejja (Early Christianity and Greek Paideia), Moscow, 2014.
4. Kornetov G. B. Istorija obrazovanija i pedagogicheskoj mysli: Uchebno-metodicheskij kompleks (History of Education and Pedagogical Thought: Teaching-Methodic Complex), Moscow, 2002.
5. Kornetov G. B. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie. Shkola: puti obuchenija i vospitanija rebenka (Pedagogic. Education. School: Ways of Education of Child), Moscow, 2014.
6. Dvoreckij I. H. (ed.) Latinsko-russkij slovar' (Latin-Russian Dictionary), Moscow, 2005.
7. Lehcier V. L. 2005 “Zabota o sebe i problema filosofskogo obrazovanija” (Care on Self and Problem of Philosophical Education), in Ideja universiteta i topos mysli. Materialy konferencii 3–5 oktjabrja, 2005 g. Samara, 2005, pp. 51–65.
8. Lehcier V. L. «Zabota o sebe» i problema filosofskogo obrazovanija (“Care on Self and Problem of Philosophical Education”), in http://hpsy.ru/public/x4111.htm).
9. Stepin V. S. (ed.) Novaja filosofskaja jenciklopedija (New Philosophical Encyclopedia), Moscow, 2001.
10. Pichugina V. K. 2014 “Antichnyj i sovremennyj antropologo-pedagogicheskij proekt zabotjashhegosja o sebe cheloveka” (Antique and Modern Anthropological-Pedagogical Project of Human, Caring on Himself), in Izvestija VGPU, 2014, vol. 4/89, pp. 175–179.
11. Pichugina V. K. Antropologicheskij diskurs «zaboty o sebe» v antichnoj pedagogike (Anthropological Discourse of “Self-Care” in Antique Pedagogic), Moscow, 2014.
12. Pichugina V. K. 2013 “Antropologicheskij diskurs «zaboty o sebe» Marka Tullija Cicerona” (Anthropological Discourse of “Self-Care” of Marcus Tullius Cicero), in Istoriko-pedagogicheskij zhurnal, Nizhnij Tagil, 2013, vol. 2, pp. 158–168.
13. Poljakova M. A. 2014 “K voprosu o pedagogicheskoj interpretacii koncepta humanitas” (To Question about Pedagogical Interpretation of Concept Humanitas), in Alma mater: Vestnik vysshej shkoly, 2014, vol. 4, pp. 99–102.
14. Sergeev K. A. Renessansnye osnovanija antropocentrizma (Renaissance Grounds of Anthropocentrism), Saint-Petersburg, 2007.
15. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub’ekta (Hermeneutics of Subject), in http://www.universalinternetlibrary.ru/book/28840/ogl.shtml).
16. Hajdegger M. Bytie i vremja (Being and Time), in http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Haid_BtVr/08.php).
17. Fasmer M. Jetimologicheskij slovar' (Etymological Dictionary), in http://vasmer.narod.ru.
18. Borrelli M. 2010 “La fine della Bildung e della Paideia occidentale”, in Topologik: rivista internazionale di Scienze Filosofi che, Pedagogiche e Sociali, 2010, vol. 8, pp. 1–11.
19. Borrelli M. 2012 “La Paideia dell’Occidente”, in Topologik: rivista internazionale di Scienze Filosofiche, Pedagogiche e Sociali, 2012, vol. 12, p. 35.
20. Cambi F. 2011 “La «Bildung»: una categoria pedagogica significativa anche in Italia” in Topoligik, 2011, vol. 10, pp. 2–14.
21. Cambi F. 2008 “La cura in pedagogia: note critiche”, in Corricolo verticale e nuova professionalità docente nella scuola primaria e secondaria, Firenze, 2008, pp. 1–7.
22. Cambi F. Manuale di storia della pedagogia, Roma, Bari, 2009.
23. Caputo F. 2014 “La cura pedagogica come relazione di aiuto”, in Topologik — Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Filosofihe, Pedagogiche e Sociali, 2014, vol. 15, pp. 115–138.
24. 2005 “Cura di sé e pratiche autobiografiche“, in Sarsini D. Percorsi dell’autobiografia, Milano, 2005, pp. 39–52.
25. 2011 “Das Ende der Bildung und der abendländischen Paideia“, in Topologik, 2011, vol. 10, pp. 171–183.
26. Dizionario di filosofia, in http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/paideia_(Dizionario-di-filosofia)/.
27. Dizionario etimologico online, in http://www.etimo.it.
28. 2011 “Echi della Bildung nel marxismo italiano“, in Topologik, 2011, vol. 10, pp. 36–51.
29. Gennari M. 2014 “La nascita della Bildung“, in Studi sulla formazione, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 131–149.
30. 2006 “Heidegger e la pedagogia“, in Studi sulla formazione, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 7–15.
31. La cura di sé come processo formativo, Roma, Bari, 2010.
32. 2006 “La scrittura come «cura di sé»”, in Quaderni di didattica della scrittura, 2006, vol. 6, pp. 27–34.
33. Mortari L. Aver cura della vita della mente, Firenze, 2002.
34. Oniga R. L’idea latina di HUMANITAS, in www.indire.it).
Полякова М. А. На пути к религиозному обучению населения в эпоху реформации: история создания Краткого катехизиса Мартина Лютера // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2016. Вып. 4 (43). С. 68-80. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201643.68-80
The article deals with the origin and history of writing a Small catechism by the founder of the reformation, Martin Luther. At fi rst, the author analyzes the catechism as a genre of religious and educational literature and identifies key periods in a special type of didactic manual, and describes its characteristic features. Further, we consider the basic stages of folding of the catechism of Martin Luther. The author notes a number of significant events that influenced the course of the reformation, the religious and educational views of Luther. In their series, such as the invention of printing and its role in the events of the reformation, the reformer interaction with representatives of other religious teachings (community «Czech brothers»), low education of the population in matters of faith (revealed by the Visitation of 1527). Also, mention of some separate editions of the catechisms of Luther and works close them by genre, stand out their features. The Small catechism is characterized not only from the standpoint of «the Bible for the laity» (Luther’s phrase), but is treated as a special didactic manual of the Christian faith. The author comes to the conclusion that the small catechism contains the essential features of the textbook and in combination with the Large catechism (written for teachers and pastors), illustrative tables and list of basic prayers represents educational-methodical complex, aimed not only at mastering the basics of the faith, but also a communion of believers to life in Christian community that is fully consistent with the objectives and program of the reformation.
catechism, catechesis, dialogue, sermon, Decalogue, Creed, prayer, Haustafel

1. Ieger V. Rannee khristianstvo i grecheskaia paideiia. Moscow, 2014.
2. Kolb R. Nebol'shaia, no zamechatel'naia kniga. URL: ihtik.lib.ru/2013.05_ihtik_relig.
3. Korzo M. A. Ukrainskaia i belorusskaia katekheticheskaia traditsiia kontsa XVI–XVIII vv.: stanovlenie, evoliutsiia i problema zaimstvovanii. Moscow, 2007.
4. Liuter M. Bol'shoi katekhizis: Kniga Soglasiia / K. Komarov, per. Minsk, 1996.
5. Liuter M. Kratkii katekhizis / K. Komarov, per. Minsk, 1996.
6. Liuter M. O poklonenii Prichastiiu // Trudy Liutera / V. Volodin, per. s nem. URL:http//www.lhf.ru.
7. Poliakova M. A. Pedagogicheskaia programma Martina Liutera: istoki, soderzhanie, nachalo realizatsii. Saarbriukken, 2014. P. 1.3; 2.2.
8. Poliakova M. A. Gumanisticheskie i reformatsionnye cherty pedagogicheskogo ideala Chelio Sekondo Kurione // Istoriko-pedagogicheskii zhurnal. 2014. № 2. P. 149–161.
9. Filicheva N. I. Nemetskii literaturnyi iazyk. Moscow, 1992.
10. Khailer F. Religiozno-istoricheskoe znachenie Liutera // Sotsio-logos / V. V. Vinokurov, A. F. Filippov, per. s angl., nem., frants.; sost., obshch. red. i predisl. M., 1991. P. 315–345.
11. Chikolini L. S. Gumanisticheskie i reformatsionnye idei Chelio Sekondo Kurione // Kul'tura epokhi Vozrozhdeniia. L., 1986. P. 112–127.
12. Shmidt K. Istoriia pedagogiki Karla Shmidta, izlozhennaia vo vsemirno-istoricheskom razvitii i v organicheskoi sviazi s kul'turnoiu zhizn'iu narodov. T. 2.: Osnovy khristianstva i ego vospitaniia. Moscow, 1880.
13. Digitale Bibliothek — Munchener Digitalisierungszentrum. URL: http://www.digitalesammlungen.de.
14. Enchiridion. Der kleine Catechismus fur die gemeine pfarherr vnd Prediger. URL: http://www.digitale-sammlungen.de.
15. Martin Lutero, Il Piccolo Catechismo / A cura di Fulvio Ferrario. Torino, 2004.
16. Martin Luther. Tischreden. Stuttgart, 2005.
Поляков А. А. Деисты и деизм в зеркале европейской религии и культуры XVI - XVIII веков. // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2019. Вып. 85. С. 122-133. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201985.122-133
This article analyses the history of the terms deist and deism in the European philosophical thought of the 16th — 18th centuries. It studies the meanings of the terms deist and deism which were given in foreign and Russian encyclopaediae, dictionaries and treatises of the period in question. It also demonstrates dynamics in the development of these terms as they were understood by preceding scholars. The article cites the terminology used by English, French, and German thinkers, among whom were both philosophers and theologians. Theologians’ interest in the deist thought is explained by the fact that in the above-mentioned period there was no clear understanding which domain the phenomenon of deism should be attributed to. The article also gives a detailed list of defi nitions of the terms deist and deism as well as their chronology, which makes up a signifi cant contribution to the study of the topic. The author of the article argues that despite the lack of a uniform understanding of the religious philosophy of deism, various authors outlined several general concepts, due to which the universally accepted defi nitions appeared. Besides, during these centuries clear views started to develop as to the multifaceted character of the deist thought, which resulted in the necessity to establish boundaries between various types of both deism itself and adjacent types of religious philosophy. The latter include atheist and theist philosophies, which, depending on specific authors, became close to or remote from one another. The conclusion of the paper summarises the main perspectives in viewing deism in the 16th — 18th centuries.
deism, deist, deist philosophy, interpretations of deism, history of deism, religious philosophy
  1. Betts C. (1984) Early Deism in France. From the So-Called ‘deistes’ of Lyon (1564) to Voltaire’s Lettres Philosophiques (1734). Hague.
  2. Ellenzweig S. (2005) “The Faith of Unbelief: Rochester’s “Satyre,” Deism, and Religious Freethinking in Seventeenth-Century England”. Journal of British Studies, 44 (1), pp. 27–45.
  3. Force J. (1996) “Samuel Clarke’s Four Categories of Deism, Isaac Newton, and the Bible”, in: Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: A Pan-American Dialogue. Boston. Pp. 53–74.
  4. Gogotskii S. (2015) Filosofskii leksikon. Sochineniia v shesti tomah [Philosophical Lexicon. Works, in 6 vols], vol. 2. Kiev (in Russian).
  5. Hudson W. (2009) The English Deists: Studies in Early Enlightenment. London.
  6. Largest Religious Groups in the United States of America, 2001, available at: https://www.adherents.com/rel_USA.html (accessed 04.10.2019).
  7. Palin D. (2000) “Should Herbert of Cherbury be Regarded as a «Deist»?”. The Journal of Theological Studies, 51 (1), pp. 113–149.
  8. Prince M. (2013) “Religio Laici v. Religio Laici: Dryden, Blount, and the Origin of English Deism”. Modern Language Quarterly, 74 (1), pp. 29–66.
  9. Sokolov V. (2007) “Deism”, in: Bolshaia rossiiskaia entsiclopedia [Unabridged Russian Encyclopaedia]. Moscow. P. 429 (in Russian).
  10. Waligore J. (2014) “Christian Deism in Eighteenth Century England”. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 75 (3), pp. 205–222.
Polyakov Andrew
Place of work: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2/1 Goncharnaia Str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation;
Post: Junior researcher;
ORCID: 0000-0003-1065-1352;
Email: Beatit10@yandex.ru.
The author is grateful to his supervisor Doctor of Philosophy,Professor Institute of Philosophy, Vladimir Kirillovich Shokhin for valuable advices and recommendations while writing this article.
Полякова М. А. Памяти Виталия Григорьевича Безрогова // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2019. Вып. 55. С. 139-146.
Poliakova Mariia
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Place of work: «Russian New Universitу»;
Post: Калуга 248002, ул. Ст. Разина: д. 89, кв. 62;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3580-9718;
Email: mariap71@rambler.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.