/
Search results


Наумова Д. В. Диагностика видов гражданского мировосприятия молодёжи // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2017. Вып. 46. С. 108-118. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201746.108-118
The author analyzes the scientific category "civil world-view", justifies the relevance of research of this phenomenon in the modern conditions of the social world, points to the lack of diagnostic tools aimed at studying various components of the civil world view, types of civil perception of the world, types of personality with peculiarities of the content of the civil world view. The article describes the social conditions for the formation of the civil worldview of modern youth, describes the impact of these conditions on the formation of civilian views of the world. The species is considered as a manifestation of the degree of expression of the common signs of a particular phenomenon. It describes the conduct and results of a projective drawing methodology aimed at diagnosing the types of civic world-view of young people. The projective methodology makes it possible to distinguish the experience experienced by the subject, the weakly structured stimulus allows us to record in the figures the indicators of civic identity, prosocial activity and indirectly, indirectly, to determine the features of personal maturity. With the help of the classifier developed for this method, two types of civil perception of the world are distinguished: fragmentary and holistic. Specificity of the types of civil attitude is determined by the degree of expression and balance of the three components: civil identity, personal maturity and prosocial activity.
civil worldview, young people, diagnostics, projective methods, classifi er, personality, integrity of the civil worldview, fragmentation of the civil worldview, civil identity, subjectivity
  1. Anastazi A., Urbina S., Psihologicheskoe testirovanie, St. Petersburg, 2007.
  2. Ajanjan A. N., Golubeva A. N., Marcinkovskaja T. D., Poleva N. S., “Specifi ka stanovlenij a identichnosti detej i podrostkov v situacii tranzitivnosti”, in: Psihologicheskie issledovanija, 9, 50, 2016, 5, available at: http://psystudy.ru
  3. Bahtin M. M., “K fi losofi i postupka”, in: Filosofija i sociologija nauki i tehniki. Ezhegodnik 1984–1985, Moscow, 1986, 80–160.
  4. Bochaver A., “Perspektivy sovremennyh podrostkov v kontekste zhiznennoj traektorii”, in: Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija, 5, 2, 2016, 31–38.
  5. Burlachuk L. F., Slovar'-spravochnik po psihodiagnostike. 3-e izd, St. Petersburg, 2007.
  6. Volkov B. S., Volkova N. V., Metody issledovanija v psihologii: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie, Moscow, 2002.
  7. Gosudarstvennaja programma «Patrioticheskoe vospitanie grazhdan Rossij skoj Federacii na 2016–2020 gg., available at: http://government.ru/media/files/8qqYUwwzHUxzVkH1jsKAErrx2dE4q0ws.pdf
  8. Egorov I. V., “Osnovanija i principy metodiki diagnostiki grazhdanskogo mirovosprijatija lichnosti”, in: Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV. Pedagogika. Psihologija, 4 (39), 2015, 142–148.
Naumova Diana
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Place of work: Moscow City University; 2-oi Sel'skokhoziaistvennyi proezd 4, Moscow, 129226, Russian Federation;
Email: seroglazka3@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
The article is written in within the framework of the project № 15-06-10681 "Civil worldview by youth: structure, content, socio-pedagogical conditions of formation" supported by RFBR Foundation
Наумова Д. В. Взаимосвязь авторитарного синдрома и карьерных ориентаций студенческой молодёжи // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2019. Вып. 52. С. 128-136. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201952.128-136
This article deals with the question about possible relationship between the autocratic personality and career- and value-related orientations. Based on the study of relevant literature, the author of the article comes to the conclusion that there are studies that examined the problem of infl uence of several factors on the autocratic personality, among which are the level and character of education. Students of the humanities have the level of autocracy lower than those who study science. The content of education also affects the level of autocracy. Thus, if students are taught dialogical thinking, the level of autocracy is lower. In the course of professionalisation, the personality builds certain career orientations. Students are in such a stage of the professionalisation, where they internalise basics of their profession and assimilate standards and values of the profession, as well as adjust their career orientations. Cultural traditions also infl uence the development of value-related orientations in career. This study was carried out with participation of students from Russia, mainly those who study the humanities. The author of the article made use of techniques for measuring the autocratic syndrom by T. Adorno and career orientations of “Anchors of a Career” by E. Shein. In the course of the study, it was discovered that the core of the autocratic syndrom with the group in question is made up by such features as autocratic aggression and autocratic submission, stereotypes, and the “complex of power”. The leading career orientations of young people are challenge, stable work, autonomy, integration of the lifestyle. The article makes the conclusion that such career orientations as challenge, stable work and service can be incorporated into the structure of the autocratic syndrom and are additional implicit characteristics of an autocratic personality.
young people, career orientations, values, attitudes, autocratic syndrom, authoritarianism, adept, professionalisation, career, socialisation
  1. Blau M. (1994) “Razlichnye tochki zreniia na sotsial'nuiu strukturu i ikh obshchii znamenatel'” [Diverse Points of View on the Social Structure and their Common Denominator], in V. Dobren'kov (ed.) Amerikanskaia sotsiologicheskaia mysl': Teksty [Americal Sociological Thought: Texts]. Moscow, pp. 8–29 (in Russian).
  2. Egorov I. (2017) Grazhdanskoe mirovospriiatie molodezhi: fenomenologiia, diagnostika i psikhologo- pedagogicheskie usloviia formirovaniia [Civil World Outlook of Young People: Phenomenology, Diagnostics and Psycholo-Pedagogical Conditions of Formation]. Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Gulevich O. (2007) Psikhologiia mezhgruppovykh otnoshenii [Psychology of Relations within a Group]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Mogilevkin E., Novgorodov A. (2011) “Issledovanie vedushchikh motivov kar'ernogo samoopredeleniia u studentov vuza” [Study of Leading Motives in Career Choice among University Students]. Territoriia novykh vozmozhnostei. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa, № 1, pp. 61–78 (in Russian).
Naumova Diana
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Psychological Sciences;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Department of Psychology Institute for Pedagogics and Psychology of Education, Moscow City University;
Post: Associate Professor;
ORCID: 0000-0001-7427-0079;
Email: seroglazka3@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.