Search results

Мумриков О. А. Православная культура сегодня: христианские основания экологической этики // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2013. Вып. 3 (30). С. 7-21.
In this article it’s proposed an overview of biblical and religious foundations of Christian ecological ethics, which knowledge is necessary for teachers, missionaries and catechists, who appeal to environmental subject in both practical and worldview aspect in their close interaction. The author offers to examine the measure of present raising accusations against Christianity by some philosophers and publicists of “the biblical anthropocentrism” as well as studies worldview motivations underlying orthodox ecological ethics. The guiding principles of Biblical Hermeneutics are involved as a methodological base. Biblical Hermeneutics is a science about the principles of interpretation and understanding of sacred texts, the exegetic heritage of the Holy Fathers, relating to the field of Holy Tradition of Orthodox Church and contemporary conciliar documents and publications as well. It’s also examined the issue about the development of understanding the progress, worldview motivations and goal-setting in the cognition of the surrounding world by the man and interaction with it, in Natural Science fi rst of all, in the close connection with the measure of secularization of European culture and society. The analysis of sources carried out by the author obviously shows that the reason of ecological crisis is not Christian Theology and Christian worldview but on the contrary retreat from spiritual and moral values and establishments preached by the Church or their indifferent declaring, which have nothing in common with the real life in Christ i.e. baneful conversion from Christocentrism to secular anthropocentrism which is usual for the modern society. The practical conclusion from examination of some biblical and religious aspects is the complex of closely interrelated theological and ethical principles of organizing environmentally enlightened and constructive creation, developed within the framework of the traditional Christian paradigm
anthropology, apologetics, biosphere, person, science end faith, noosphere, the image and likeness of God, Orthodox culture, the principle of responsibility, religious education
1. Borejko E. V. Ekologicheskij krizis v russkom Pravoslavii (Ecological Crysis in Modern Orthodoxy), in http://ecoforum2.narod.ru/hem22/review1.htm (Date: 12.06.2013).
2. Chirkov V. I. Sady Valaama (The Gardens of Valaam), Saint-Petersburg, 1998.
3. Gajdenko V. P. 1995, in Voprosy filosofii, in http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000096/index.shtml (Date: 12.06.2013).
5. Gavrjushin N. K. 2006, in Vinograd, vol. 15, pp. 56-60.
6. Igumnov P. 1986, in Bogoslovskje trudy. Jubileynj sbornik «300 let MDA», pp. 174-187.
7. Igumnov P. 1989, Zhurnal Moskovskoj Patriarhii, vol. 2, pp. 70.
8. John F. Hot. in Gumanitarnj ekologicheskij zhurnal, in http://ecoforum2.narod.ru/hem32/digest2.htm (Date: 12.06.2013).
9. Jurevich D. at all. 2006, in Pravoslavnaja bogoslovskaja enciklopedja, vol. 11, pp. 360-390.
10. Kaleda G., Chernyshov S. N. 1999, in Pravoslavie i ecologja, pp. 165-166.
11. Kim N. 2003, in Raj i chelovek: nasledieprepodobnogo Nikity Stifata, pp. 270-272.
12. Kivva K. V. 1999, in Pravoslavie i ekologja, pp. 311.
13. Kuraev A. 1995, in Alfa i omega, vol. 4, pp. 33.
14. Kuraev A. Dary i anafemy. Chto hristianstvoprineslo v mir (Gifts and Anathemas. What Bring Christianiy in the World), in http://azbyka.ru/hristianstvo/sut/Kuraev_Dary_31-all.shtml (12.06.2013).
15. Kurnosov A. M. 1998, in Rozhdestvenskie chtenja, 1998, pp. 345.
16. Litvinova L. 2005, in Pravoslavnaja bogoslovskaja enciklopedja, vol. 9, pp. 109-116.
17. Losskij V. N. Ocherk misticheskogo bogoslovja vostochnoj Cerkvi. Dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie (The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church. Orthodox Theology: An Introduction), Moscow, 1991.
18. Makarov D.I. Antropologja i kosmologja sv. Grigorja Palamy (The Anthropology and Cosmology of St. Grigorij Palama), Saint-Petersburg, 2003.
19. Moldavanov О. I. 1999, in Pravoslavie i ekologja, pp. 267-268.
20. Mumrikov О. 2012 “Chelovek v tehnicheskom mire: vyzovy 21 veka” (Human in Technical World: Challenges of XXI Century), in http://www.bogoslov.ru/text/2246328.html (Date: 12.06.2013).
21. Oldfieid R. 1990, in Globalnye i obshchechelovecheskie cennosti, pp. 196-202.
23. Sagan K. Rech, proiznesennaja 11 maja 1996 goda (Speech, Spoken on 11th May 1996), in http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot (Date: 12.06.2013).
24. Shmelev I. S. Staryj Valaam (The Old Valaam), Moskow, Saint-Petersburg, 1997.
25. Sofronij. Starec Siluan Afonskj (Elder Siluan the Athonite), Moscow, 1996.
26. White L. 1990, in Globalnye problemy i obshchechelovecheskie cennosti, pp. 188-202.
27. Zavarzin G. A. 2003, in Vestnik RAN, in http://www.ras.ru/publishing/rasherald/rasherald_articleinfo.aspx?articleid=943b0eda-844a-4469-86ed-db5b6e09b41a (Date: 12.06.2013).
28. Zenkovskij V. V. Osnovy hristianskoj filosofii (The foundations of Christian philosophy), in http://azbyka.ru/hristianstvo/sut_2/zenkovskiy_osnovy_hristianskoy_philosofii_04-all.shtml#14 (12.06.2013).
Мумриков О. А. Христианско-апологетические аспекты курса «Естественнонаучная картина мира» в рамках подготовки бакалавров по профилю «Начальноеобразование» на педагогическом факультете ПСТГУ // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2014. Вып. 4 (35). С. 23-31. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201435.23-31
In the current article it is discussed the tasks of a new course «The natural-scientifi c worldview» within the scope of training of orthodox teachers in primary school at the pedagogical department of Saint Tikhon's Orthodox University of Humanities. It is presented the structure of the subject, its author’s methodological support in the context of demands of the modern Federal state standard of primary general education (2009), «The exemplary main educational program of educational institution» (2013), educational general problems including orthodox pedagogy points of view. It is presented the necessity of organic replenishment of the current course as an abstract and systematic, theological and philosophical, Christian and apologetic element. The present approach to the university education lets help the students of the primary school form the perceptual unity of the universe, as well as the attitude to the scientifi c thinking as to the creation work and service of the Creator in realization of professional activity of an orthodox teacher on the assumption of harmonization of courses «The surrounding world», «Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture» and other subjects.
apologetics, natural-scientific worldview, conception of the modern natural science, connections between subjects, world view, science and education, science and religion, primary school, orthodox culture.

1. Barbur I. Religija i nauka: istorija i sovremennost' (Religion and Science: History and Modernity), Moscow, 2001.
2. Dokinz R. Bog kak illjuzija (God as Illusion), Moscow, 2008.
3. Zen'kovskij V. V., prot. Problemy vospitanija v svete hristianskoj antropologii (Problem of Education in Light of Christian Anthropology), Klin, 2002.
4. Kir'janov D., svjashh. Dopolnitel'nost' i problemy sovremennogo dialoga nauki i bogoslovija (Additionality and Problems of Modern Dialogue of Science and Theology), in http://www.bogoslov.ru/text/255941.html
5. Kuraev A., protodiak. 1999 “Polemichnost' Shestodneva” (Polemicity of Hexameron), in Al'fa i Omega, Moscow, 1999, vol. 1/12.
6. Lamanauskas V. 2010 “Znachenie komponenta himii v nachal'noj shkole: sravnitel'nyj analiz zarubezhnogo opyta” (Meaning of Component of Chemistry in Elementary School: Comparative Analysis of Foreign Experience), in Ivashkevich O. A. (ed.) Sviridovskie chtenija: Sb. st., Minsk, 2010. Vyp. 6.
7. Malinovskaja Ju. V. Principy postroenija i metodika realizacii propedevticheskogo kursa himii dlja 6, 7 klassov: Dis. ... kand. ped. nauk (Principles of Forming and Methodic of Realization of Propedeutical Course of Chemistry: Dissertation), Saint-Petersburg, 2002.
8. Men' A. Istorija religii: v poiskah Puti, Istiny i Zhizni (History of Religion: in Search of the Way, Truth and Life), Moscow, 1991, vol. 1: Istoki religii (Origins of Religion).
9. Mumrikov Oleg, svjashh. Koncepcii sovremennogo estestvoznanija: hristiansko-apologeticheskij aspekt. Uchebnoe posobie dlja duhovnyh uchebnyh zavedenij (Concepts of Modern Nature Science: Christian-Apologetic Aspect. Handbook for Spiritual Schools), Sergiev Posad, Moscow, 2014.
10. Osipov A. I. Put' razuma v poiskah istiny (Way of Mind in Search of Truth), Saint-Petersburg, 2007.
11. Turovcev T. A. Tvorenie i preobrazhenie (Creation and Transformation), Saint-Petersburg, 2008.
12. Florenskij P., svjashh. 1999 “U vodorazdelov mysli. Obratnaja perspektiva“ (At Divide of Thought. Rear Perspective), in Sochinenija, Moscow, 1999, vol. 3/1.
13. Jel'konin D. B. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy (Selected Psychological Works), Moscow, 1989.
14. Jaki S. L. “Shestodnev: kosmogenezis, soblazn konkordizma” (Hexameron: Cosmogeneis, Temptation of Concordism), in Biblija o tvorenii i bytii mira, in http://www.spbda.ru/theology/cont/sixday.php.
15. Gould S. J. 1992 “Impeaching a Self-Appointed Judge (Review of Phillip Johnson’s Darwin on Trial)”, in Scientific American, 1992, vol. 267.
16. Haught John F. Is Nature Enough? Meaning and Truth in the Age of Science, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Мумриков О. А. Литургия для детей в современной приходской практике Русской Православной Церкви // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2015. Вып. 2 (37). С. 23-29. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201537.24-29
In the present article it is considered biblical, historical and theological as well as canonical grounds of getting today more widespread practice of particular serving of liturgy for children in parishes of Russia. It is analyzed the demand of this kind of servings in the light of Orthodox pedagogy. It is systematized existing approaches of servings for children at the parish, diocesan and church levels taking into consideration the context of problems of church socialization and family churching in the whole, including problems having reflected in church resolutions and documents. Celebration of Eucharist as the central sacrament of the Church and Divine liturgy taking into consideration child’s perception implies responsiveness of many peculiarities. In view of these facts in the present article it is discussed necessary conditions and positive perspective of systematical development of the practice in Russian Orthodox Church. The author comes to a conclusion of the importance to regulate the forming practice from the direction of Supreme Ecclesiastical Authority.
Eucharist, liturgy, Orthodox pedagogy, Orthodox mission, parish community, liturgy for children, church socialization

1. Ioann (Ziziulas), Metrolopitan of Pergam. Cerkov' i Evharistija. Sbornik statej po pravoslavnoj jekklesiologii (Church and Eucharist. Collection of Articles on Orthodox Ecclesiology), Bogorodice-Sergieva pustyn', 2009.
2. His Holiness Kirill, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia. Vnimanie k prihodjashhim v hram — nasha objazannost' (Attention to Those Who Enter the Church Is Our Duty), in http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3748144.html
3. His Holiness Kirill, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia. Doklad na Eparhial'nom sobranii g. Moskvy 23 dekabrja 2014 g. (Report on Diocese Conference of Moscow 23 December 2014), in http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3889092.html
4. Kulomzina S. S. Chto znachit molit'sja Bogu? (What Does It Mean to Pray God), Moscow, 2002.
5. Uspenskij N. D. 1981 “Vizantijskaja liturgija (istoriko-liturgicheskoe issledovanie)” (Byzantine Liturgy (Historical-Liturgical Study)), in Bogoslovskie trudy, Moscow, 1981, vol. 22, p. 83.
6. Shaporev N., svjashh. 2014 “Osobennosti reguljarnogo provedenija missionerskih liturgij na prihode” (Features of Regular Serving of Missionary Liturgies in Parish), in Moskovskie eparhial'nye vedomosti, Moscow, 2014, vol. 9–10, pp. 143–145.
Мумриков О. А. Ойкумена в Священном Писании: о необходимости учета культурно-исторического контекста в современной библейской апологетике // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2017. Вып. 46. С. 24-33. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201746.24-33
This article deals with a problem of the harmonious combination of biblical and modern views on the world-universe-oecumene and aims to demonstrate that ignoring the cultural and historical context of the events described (such as the Flood, the settlement of ancient peoples) can lead to a possibility of the crisis of faith. This danger of cognitive dissonance and the crisis of faith is particularly possible if too simplistic an approach to teaching the course “Foundations of the Orthodox Culture” takes place in the secondary school, and to religious education in the Sunday school, as well in other spheres of missionary and catechetical work. In the fi rst hand, it pertains to the study and explanation of the fi rst chapters of the Book of Genesis, which always provoke interest with any readers. However, following the tradition of serious attention to the historical and cultural context, already established by early Christian commentators of the Bible, it is possible to preserve the traditional literal and historical understanding of the meaning of events that took place in the biblical universe-oecumene, to look at them through the eyes of their contemporaries and authoritative Orthodox commentators of divinely inspired texts. Moreover, this approach, namely the cultural-historical and semantic accomodation, forestalls the cognitive dissonance, ideological crisis of faith and marginalization.
biblical apologetics, universe, Great Flood, catechism, Orthodox culture, Orthodox worldview, Orthodox mission, Orthodox pedagogy, oecumene, exegesis
  1. Alferov Timofei, sviashch., Dve kosmogonii. Evoliutsionnaia teoriia v svete sviatootecheskogo ucheniia i argumentov kreatsionnoi nauki, Moscow, 1999.
  2. Beliaev L. A., “Geografi ia bibleiskaia”, in: Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia, Moscow, 3, 2005, 649–652.
  3. Beliaev L. A., Merpert N. Ia., “Arkheologiia bibleiskaia”, in: Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia, Moscow, 3, 2001, 506.
  4. Eluel U. i Kamfort F., eds., Bol'shoi bibleiskii slovar', Moscow, 2007.
  5. Vert'ianov S., Proiskhozhdenie zhizni. Ocherk estestvoznaniia. Fakty. Gipotezy. Dokazatel'stva, Moscow, 2003.
  6. Gerodot, Istoriia, Leningrad, 1972.
  7. Golovin S. L., Vsemirnyi Potop: mif, legenda ili real'nost'? Populiarnoe vvedenie v bibleiskii katastrofizm, Moscow, 2000.
  8. Ditmar A. B., Rubezhi oikumeny: Evoliutsiia predstavlenii antichnykh uchenykh ob obitaemoi zemle i prirodnoi shirotnoi zonal'nosti, Moscow, 1973.
  9. Ieronim Stridonskii, Evreiskie voprosy na Knigu Bytiia, Moscow, 2009.
  10. Klavdii Ptolemei, “Geografi ia (otryvki)”, in: Drevnii Vostok v antichnoi i rannekhristianskoi traditsii (Indiia, Kitai, Iugo-Vostochnaia Aziia), Moscow, 2007, 212–247.
  11. Lomonosov M. V., “Iavlenie Venery na Solntse: Pribavlenie”, in: Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Trudy po fizike, astronomii i priborostroeniiu 1744–1765 gg., Moscow, Leningrad, 1955, 4, 373–374.
  12. Morris G., Bibleiskie osnovaniia sovremennoi nauki, St. Petersburg, 1995.
  13. “Nekotorye teksty po geografi i”, in: Antichnaia geografiia, Moscow, 1953, 238–262.
  14. Strabon, Geografiia, Moscow 1994.
  15. “Khristianskaia topografiia (otryvki)”, in: Drevnii Vostok v antichnoi i rannekhristianskoi traditsii (Indiia, Kitai, Iugo-Vostochnaia Aziia), Moscow, 2007, 315–319.
  16. Eratosfen, “Geografiia (fragmenty)”, in: Antichnaia geografiia, Moscow, 1953, 84–99.
  17. Iunker R., Sherer Z., Istoriia proiskhozhdeniia i razvitiia zhizni, Minsk, 1997.
Mumrikov Oleg, archpriest
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
Email: omumrikov@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Мумрикова Л. И. Духовно-просветительский центр в современном православном образовательном пространстве России // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2017. Вып. 47. С. 18-31. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201747.18-31
This article deals with the emergence and development of parochial spiritual and educational centres in Russia, beginning from large monasteries and parishes, rural folk houses. It identifi es directions of their activities as centres for spiritual and moral education, for making children, young people and the elderly familiar with the Orthodox tradition, church way of life and church milieu through various forms of work. The article proposes a model of operating of a spiritual and educational centre by means of organising liturgical life, missionary, social, educational, youth-oriented and leisurerelated work. It states that all directions of work of a spiritual and educational centre should be family-oriented. Both children and parents can obtain spiritual education in a parallel way, can participate in joint missionary and leisure activities, exercise works of mercy. The article comes to the conclusion that such approach allows us to implement the principle of cooperation between the church, family, school and society with maximal completeness and payoff , to create around the centre a stable Orthodoxoriented community.
Orthodox education, Orthodox educational space, centre for religious education, Sunday school, model activities of centre for religious education, missionary activity, leisure activity, spiritual and moral education
  1. Kirill, Svjatejshij Patriarh Moskovskij i vseja Rusi, Doklad na Arhierejskom soveshhanii 2.02.2010 g., available at: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/1061651.html
  2. Kirill, Svjatejshij Patriarh Moskovskij i vseja Rusi, Doklad na ezhegodnom Eparhial'nom sobranii duhovenstva goroda Moskvy 28.12.2012 g., available at: http://p2.patriarchia.ru/2017/01/04/1239320017/doklad2016.docx
  3. Mumrikov O., svjashh., “Liturgij a dlja detej v sovremennoj prihodskoj praktike Russkoj pravoslavnoj Cerkvi”, in: Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psihologija, 2 (37), 2015, 24–29.
  4. Mumrikov O., svjashh., “Duhovno-prosvetitel'skie centry: aktual'nost' i perspektivy”, in: Vestnik PSTGU Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psihologija, 3 (18), 2010, 13–20.
  5. Mumrikov Oleg, svjashh., “Koncepcij a vospitatel'noj i dosugovoj raboty s molodezh'ju”, in: Moskovskie eparhial'nye vedomosti, 11–12, 2014, 116–121.
  6. Naumova N. N., “Narodnyj dom kak forma social'noj diakonii Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi: vchera i segodnja”, in: Irkutskij istoriko-ekonomicheskij ezhegodnik, Irkutsk, 2013, 381–387.
  7. Obrazovatel'naja koncepcija Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi. Proekt dokumenta, available at: http://www.bogoslov.ru/text/4871067.html
  8. Oficial'nyj sajt Donskogo hrama g. Mytishhi, available at: http://www.donsloboda.ru
  9. Oficial'nyj sajt duhovno-prosvetitel'skogo centra «Zapoved'», available at: http://zapovedelnat.blogspot.ru/p/blog-page_27.html
  10. Oficial'nyj sajt duhovno-prosvetitel'skogo centra «Kirillica», available at: http://kirillica-center.ru/index.php
  11. Oficial'nyj sajt duhovno-prosvetitel'skogo centra «Uspenskij», available at: http://dpc-uspenskii.cerkov.ru/
  12. Oficial'nyj sajt Eparhial'nogo duhovnoprosvetitel'skogo centra imeni sv. Gurij a Kazanskogo, available at: http://www.pravchelny.ru/spiritual_center/
  13. Oficial'nyj sajt Sinodal'nogo оtdela religioznogo obrazovanija i katehizacii Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi, available at: https://pravobraz.ru/v-eparxiyax-rossii-dejstvuyut-nemenee-5790-voskresnyx-shkol-dlya-detej/
  14. Polozhenie o dejatel'nosti voskresnyh shkol (grupp) dlja detej Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi na territorii Rossij skoj Federacii v novoj redakcii, available at: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/4830214.html
  15. Polozhenie o rabote Pravoslavnogo duhovnoprosvetitel'skogo centra «Zapoved'», available at: http://zapovedelnat.blogspot.ru/p/blogpage_27.html
  16. Skljarova T. V., “Pravoslavnoe obrazovanie v sovremennoj Rossii: struktura i soderzhanie”, in: Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psihologija, 1 (40), 2016, 9–16.
  17. Skljarova T. V., Janushkjavichene O. L., Vozrastnaja pedagogika i psihologija, Moscow, 2004.
  18. Ushinskij K. D. Voskresnye shkoly (pis'mo v provincij u), in Sobr. soch. T. 2: Pedagogicheskie stat'i 1857–1861 gg. M.; L., 1948, 489–512.
Mumrikova Larisa
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Education;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Senior Lecturer;
Email: lmumrikova@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Мумриков О. А. Профессор Московской духовной академии С.С. Глаголев (1865-1937) о естественно-апологетических задачах высших духовных школ: актуальность тезисов сто лет спустя // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия IV: Педагогика. Психология. 2018. Вып. 48. С. 79-91. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201848.79-91
As is well known, 2017 marks 100 years since the beginning of persecutions of Orthodox Christians in Russia, 100 years since the inception of the Regional Council of the Russian Church, as well as 80 years since the beginning of a new phase of mass repression in the USSR. This article discusses the theological and apologetic heritage of the prominent public fi gure, educationalist, renowned professor of Moscow Theological Academy Sergey Sergeyevich Glagolev (1865–1937; Russ. Сергей Сергеевич Глаголев), who was a member of the Regional Council of 1917–1918 and was repressed and executed in 1937. Having analysed a range of sources, namely speeches to students, articles in the Theological Bulletin (Богословский вестник) of Moscow Theological Academy as well as other works, this paper aims to demonstrate the signifi cance and relevance of Professor S. Glagolev’s ideas for the fruitful development of Orthodox scientifi c apologetics in the context of the system of religious education and catechism. Glagolev’s apologetic legacy is marked by a harmonious synopsis of scientifi c conceptions, Biblical revelation and the ecclesiastical tradition, which implies the development of relevant apologetic patterns based on this synthesis. The patterns of this synopsis, in their turn, serve the main purpose, namely the building of the integrated Christian worldview in the 21st century.
apologetic patterns, persecution of Russian church, scientifi c apologetics, Moscow Theological Academy, Orthodox mission, religious education, catechesis, scientifi c and religious dialogue, Church and school, Christian worldview
  1. “Glagolev Sergej Sergeevich”, in: Biografi cheskij spravochnik «Za Hrista postradavshie», available at: http://www.pstbi.ccas.ru/bin/db.exe/docum/no_dbpath/ans/newmr/?TYZCF2JMTdG6Xbu1eu0XfeiZcW0FdS0XdOYUYOLUcuKZceXb
  2. Glubokovskij N. N., Hronologij a Vethogo i Novogo Zaveta, Moscow, 1996.
  3. Grigorij Nisskij , svt., O zhizni Moiseja zakonodatelja, ili o sovershenstve v dobrodeteli, Moscow, 1999.
  4. Kazarjan A. T., “Glagolev Sergej Sergeevich”, in: Pravoslavnaja jenciklopedija, Moscow, 2006, XI, 536–538.
  5. Kiselev A., diak., Istorija Moskovskoj Duhovnoj Akademii (1870–1900). Chast' II: Letopis' nauchnoj zhizni akademii, Zagorsk, 1974.
  6. Kolyvanov G. E., “Golubinskij Dmitrij Fedorovich”, in: Pravoslavnaja jenciklopedija. Moscow, 2006, XI, 718–719.
  7. Lomonosov M. V., “Javlenie Venery na Solnce: Pribavlenie”, in: Polnoe sobranie sochinenij . T. 4. Trudy po fizike, astronomii i priborostroeniju 1744–1765 gg. Moscow-Leningrad, 1955, 373–374.
  8. Mumrikov O., svjashh., “Estestvennonauchnaja apologetika kak celostnaja disciplina: obshhij obzor”, in: Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psihologija, Moscow, 4 (15), 2009, 28–41.
  9. Mumrikov O., svjashh., Koncepcii sovremennogo estestvoznanija: hristiansko-apologeticheskij aspekt. Uchebnoe posobie dlja duhovnyh uchebnyh zavedenij, Sergiev Posad-Moscow, 2014.
Mumrikov Oleg, archpriest
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation;
Email: omumrikov@yandex.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
The article is written in 2018 within the framework of the project "Church and School in Russia in the period 1900-1918" supported by PSTGU Development Foundation.