/
Search results


Кострюков А. А. Предпосылки участия архиепископа Серафима (Соболева) во Всеправославном Совещании 1948 года // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2010. Вып. 2 (35). С. 52-60.
PDF
A pan-Orthodox conference of 1948, Archbishop Seraphim (Sobolev), Metropolitan Stefan (Shocks), Ecumenical movement, Church governance, Church administration
Кострюков А. А. Проблемы церковной истории XX в. на конференции "Православие в судьбе Урала и России" // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2010. Вып. 3 (36). С. 141-143.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Русская Зарубежная Церковь и автокефалия Польсокй Церкви // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2010. Вып. 4 (37). С. 17-27.
PDF
Russian Orthodox Church, Polish Orthodox Church, Patriarch Tikhon, Metropolitan Dionysius (Valedynskyi), Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky), Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky)
Кострюков А. А. К истории разделения между Московской Патриархией и Североамериканской митрополией в 1933 г. // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2011. Вып. 3 (40). С. 46-58.
PDF
The Orthodox Church in America, the Moscow Patriarchate, the Russian Church Abroad, Metropolitan Platon (Rozhdestvensky), the Metropolitan Veniamin (Fedchenkov)
Кострюков А. А. Проблемы церковной истории на ХХI ежегодной богословской конференции ПСТГУ // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2011. Вып. 3 (40). С. 149-152.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Конференция «Церковь, наука и образование в России: история и перспективы» в Московской духовной академии // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2011. Вып. 2 (39). С. 139-142.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Единство Церкви в эпоху богоборчества (ХХI Ежегодная богословская конференция ПСТГУ) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2011. Вып. 2 (39). С. 142-147.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Вопросы церковно-государственных отношений на XXII Ежегодной богословской конференции ПСТГУ // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2012. Вып. 2 (45). С. 147-150.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2012. Вып. 5 (48). С. 141-145. — Rev. op.: Корнилов А. А. «Переправимся на ту сторону…» Деятельность православного духовенства в лагере перемещенных лиц Шляйсгайм (1945– 1951 гг.). Н. Новгород; Мюнхен, 2011.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Л. Н. Парийский о церковной ситуации в Америке в середине 1940-х гг. // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2012. Вып. 6 (49). С. 65-118.
PDF
The published document is the report of L.N. Parijskiy, the employee of the Moscow Patriarchate, about results of his visit to North America. The travel of the commission consisting of metropolitan Gregory (Tchukhov) and L.N. Parijskiy, occurred in 1947. The visit’s purpose consisted in the decision of the questions concerning the restoration of the dialogue between the Moscow Patriarchy and the North American Metropolitanate. The report of Parjsky became one of the documents characterizing the church situation in America. The document informs about the situation covering parishes of Moscow Patriarchy in North America and contains characteristics of the basic leaders of Russian Orthodoxy in the USA and Canada.
the North American metropolitanate, the Russian Orthodox Church abroad, the North American Exarchate of Moscow Patriarchy, metropolitan Gregory (Tchukhov), metropolitan Benjamin (Phedchenkov), metropolitan Feofil (Pashkovsky)
Кострюков А. А. [Review] // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 2 (51). С. 142-145. — Rev. op.: Щеглов Г. Э. Хранитель. Жизненный путь Федора Михайловича Морозова. Минск: Врата, 2012
PDF
Кострюков А. А. К вопросу о подготовке канонизации царской семьи в Русской Зарубежной Церкви // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 3 (52). С. 42-51.
PDF
The article concerns the activity of the St. Petersburg Department of the Moscow Society for Religious education, targeted to give the western Christians the knowledge about the affairs’ state of the Eastern Church. The author identifies the literature published and translated by Russian theologians and members of clergy for western Christians from 1871 to 1880. She describes the work’s methods of the Department. The response of western theologians was the publication of works about the Eastern Church. Members of the St. Petersburg Department managed to fulfill designated tasks despite the short period of activity. They illuminated as much as possible the state of the contemporary Church, a church history and theology and assisted western and east Christians in the dialog’s development.
Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, emperor Nikolay II, new martyrs of Russia, metropolitan Antony (Khrapovitsky), metropolitan Anastas (Gribanovsky)
1. Semenenko-Basin. I.V. 2009. Religiovedenie, no. 3, pp. 28-38.
2. Mark, arhiep. 1997. Rus' pravoslavnaya, no. 5, p. 8.
3. Evfimiy (Logvinov), ierom. 2005. XV Ezhegodnaya bogoslovskaya konferentsia PSTGU, pp. 305-311.
4. Kosik V.I. Russkaya Tserkov' v Yugoslavii (20-40-e gg. XX veka). (The Russian Church in Yugoslavia (1920-1940 yy.). Moscow. 2000.
5. Bogdanova T. A. N. N. Glubokovskiy. Sud'ba hristianskogo uchenogo. (N.N. Glubokovskiy. The Destiny of a Christian scholar). St. Petersburg. 2010.
6. Svjatitel' Ioann (Maximovich) i Russkaya Zarubezhnaya Tserkov (St. Ioann (Maximovich) and the Russian Orthodox Church). New-York. 1996.








Кострюков А. А. ХХIII Ежегодная богословская конференция ПСТГУ и проблемы церковной истории ХХ века // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 3 (52). С. 147-150.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Экзарх Болгарской Церкви митрополит Стефан и Московская Патриархия // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 5 (54). С. 31-43.
PDF
The article covers the last period of church-administrative activity of the Sofia’s metropolitan Stephаn (Shokov). The author describes the testimonies of contemporaries about the character and personal qualities of this ambiguous hierarch. In 1945–1948 metropolitan Stephan was the exarch of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church and participated in the Meeting of heads and representatives of Autocephalous Orthodox Churches in 1948. The author considers the circumstances of the dismissal of metropolitan Stephаn and his exile as especially important and interesting ones. The meeting of 1948 became the critical event in the exarch’s destiny. Being the supporter of ecumenism, metropolitan Stephen tried unsuccessfully to convince Patriarch Alexis of his rightness in order not to allow the condemnation of ecumenical contacts by the Moscow meeting. However Moscow looked on ecumenism differently in those days. In Moscow the Soviet management aspired to establishment of the centre of World Orthodoxy and tried to cite the Moscow Patriarchy against Constantinople that was under the influence of the USA and the Great Britain. As the Constantinople Patriarchy approved the ecumenical movement, the Moscow Patriarchy has been forced to take of an opposite position. Therefore, the participation of the Russian Church and Churches of the socialist countries in the ecumenical movement was impossible. Metropolitan Stephan, supporting the superiority of the Moscow Patriarchy in the World Orthodoxy, supported the active participation of all Local Churches in the ecumenical movement. The communistic management applied the maximum force to the exarch in order he has not made undesirable statements at the meeting. The fate of metropolitan Stephan has been decided after this meeting. In 1948 he was fired and exiled. The Moscow Patriarchy did not exclude the possibility of moving of metropolitan Stephаn to Russia and his location in any monastery. However metropolitan Stephаn remained in Bulgaria. The destiny of the exarh confirms once again, that the independent position of the hierarch threatened him with full elimination from a church-public life in those years.
he Russian Orthodox Church, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Alexis I, metropolitan Stephаn (Shokov), the Meeting of the heads and representatives of Local Orthodox Churches in 1948, the Affairs’ Counc
1. Bojkikeva A. Bolgarskaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov'. Istoricheskij ocherk (Bulgarian Orthodox Church. Historical Survey). Sofija: 2005.
2. Blhova M. (2009) “Bolgarskaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov' (1945-1953): rol' Jekzarha Stefana v vozrozhdenii Cerkvi” (Bulgarian Orthodox Church (1945–1953): Role of Exarch Stefan in the Rebirth of the Church), in Gosudarstvo, religija, cerkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 191-214.
3. Blhova M. (2009) “Jekzarh Stefan i novaja vlast': primirenie i protivostojanie” (Exarch Stefan and the New Power: Reconciliation and Confrontation), in Cerkov' v istorii Rossii, M., 2009, vol. 8, pp. 378-387.
4. Jovanovich M. Russkaja jemigracija na Balkanah 1920-1940 (Russian Emigration on Balkans 1920–1940). M., 2005.
5. Kadkandzhieva D. Blgarskata Pravoslavna Crkva i drzhavata: 1944-1953 (Bulgarian Orthodox Church and State). Sofija. 1997;
6. Kosik V. (2003) “Russkaja Cerkov' v Bolgarii (1940-1950-e gody)” (Russian Church in Bulgaria (1940–1950)), in Slavjanovedenie. 2003. № 6.
7. Kostrjukov A. (2010) „Predposylki uchastija arhiepiskopa Serafima (Soboleva) vo Vsepravoslavnom soveshhanii 1948 goda“ (Premises of Participation of Archbishop Serafim (Sobolev) in the Allorthodox Council of 1948), in Vestnik PSTGU: II, 2010, vol. 2 (35).
8. Lazov D. Ekzarh Stefan I: zhivot, apostolstvo i tvorchestvo (Exarch Stefan I: Life, Apostoly and Work). Sofija. 1947.
9. Pantev A. i dr. 100-te naj vlijatelni blgari v nashata istorija (Centenary of Bulgarian Influence in Our History). Sofija. 1997;
10. Pis'ma Patriarha Aleksija I v Sovet po delam Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi pri Sovete narodnyh komissarov — Sovete ministrov SSSR. 1945-1963 gg. (Letters of Patriarch Alexiy I to the Council for Cases of Russian Orthodox Church by Council of People’s Ministers of USSR, 1945–1963), vol. 1. M., 2009.
11. Stefan, mitr. (1938) „Nel'zja bol'she molchat'“ (We Can Keep Silence Any More), in Cerkovnaja zhizn'. 1938, vol. 2.
12. Shkarovskij M. Istorija russkoj cerkovnoj jemigracii (History of Russian Church Emigration). SPb, 2009.
13. Shpiller I. Vospominanija ob o. Vsevolode Shpillere (Memoires about f. Vsevolod Shpiller).
Кострюков А. А. К истории воссоединения с Московским Патриархатом приходов Западноевропейского экзархата в послевоенные годы (1945–1946) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 6 (55). С. 72-84.
PDF
The article covers the circumstances of the consolidation of parishes of Russian tradition in the West European exarchate with the Moscow Patriarchy in 1945. The author has analyzed the subsequent circumstances that assisted the parties with the rupture of relations in 1946. On the basis of the documents the author has drawn the conclusion about the primary fragility of the first consolidation that was hasty made, nonmetering specific jurisdictional features of the West European exarchate. Serious problems on the way to unity have arisen in August, 1945, when the representative of the Moscow Patriarchy, metropolitan Nicolay (Jarushevich), had arrived to Paris. Objections against the consolidation have run as follows: the Church in the USSR continued to be in enslavement by the atheistic government. Despite the arguments of association’s opponents, metropolitan Evlogy has agreed to be the part of the Moscow Patriarchy. The next months the positions of the opponents have become stronger because of metropolitan Evlogy who remained the exarch of both Ecumenical and Moscow Patriarchs. In February, 1946 at the ceremony of ordination, bishop Nikon (Greve) has sworn not to Moscow, but to the Constantinople patriarch. The decree of the Presidium of the Supreme council of the USSR from June, 14th, 1945 about citizenship that was granted to Russian emigrants in France became the serious strike on the unity. In the Exarchate the delimitation between those who has accepted the Soviet citizenship and those who has refused has begun. Thus the diocesan council, being afraid of freedom’s infringement, prepared a soil for the future separation from the Moscow Patriarchy. In July, 1946 the diocesan council made the memorandum that the policy of the further rapprochement with the USSR and the Moscow Patriarchy threatened the Exarchate with split. After metropolitan Evlogy’s death the division became the accomplished fact.
the parishes of the West European Exarchate of Russian tradition, the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, the Moscow Patriarchy, the Ecumenical Patriarchy, Patriarch Alexius I, metropolitan Evlogy (Georgievsky), metropolitan Nicolay (Jarushevich), metropolit
1. Kosik V. Russkoe cerkovnoe zarubezh'e (Russian Church Emigration). M., 2008.
2. Niv'er A. Pravoslavnye svjashhennosluzhiteli, bogoslovy i cerkovnye dejateli russkoj jemigracii v zapadnoj i central'noj Evrope. 1920–1955 (Orthodox Clerics, Theologians and Church Figures of Russian Emigration in Western and Central Europe. 1920–1955). M.; Parizh, 2007.
3. Popov A. Rossijskoe pravoslavnoe zarubezh'e: istorija i istochniki (Russian Orthodox Emigration: History and Sources). M., 2005.
4. Solov'ev I. Cerkovno-istoricheskij vestnik, 1999, vol. 4–5.
5. Cypin V., prot. Istorija Russkoj Cerkvi 1917–1997 (History of Russian Church 1917–1997). M., 1997.
6. Shkarovskij M. Russkaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov' v XX veke (Russian Orthodox Church in XX Century). M., 2010.
7. Shkarovskij M. Russkaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov' pri Staline i Hrushheve (Russian Orthodox Church by Stalin and Khrushchev). M., 2005.

Кострюков А. А. Конференция «Подвиг новомученикови исповедников Церкви Русской XX века» в Ярославле // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2013. Вып. 6 (55). С. 159-161.
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Епископ Нолинский Александр (Малинин): забытый исповедник // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2014. Вып. 2 (57). С. 82-89. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201457.82-89
The article describes life of Vyatka diocese vicar bishop of Nolinsk Alexander (Malinin). Currently fates of hierarch who was ordained in 1920–1930 isn’t investigated. One of the problems in biography of bishop Alexander is mistake of Metropolitan Elevfery (Bogoyavlensky). He called this hierarch John in his book “A week in Patriarhiya”. As a result, bishop Alexander was mentioned twice in all directories — under his own name and under name “bishop John of Glazov”. Life of bishop Alexander was almost unknown. But his biography was managed to establish. According to an investigative case he was arrested two weeks later, after bishop’s ordination in the night from 10-th to 11-th of December. He was arrested because he said reckless statement during his ordination. In his speech he spoke about persecution of the Church and bishop’ arrests. This speech was pronounced in the in the presence of foreign hierarch — Elevfery (Bogoyavlensky). Bishop Alexander was blamed of trying to transmit information abroad about persecution of the Orthodox Church. He was senteneed to three years in camps. He died when he arrived of the place. In the article is concluded that we should approach to source (such as “A week in Patriarhiya”) with precautions. Moreover, author pay attention that until recently name of bishop Alexander absented in passionless of casualties of Communist repressions. So, we must explore feats of Martyrs and Russian confessors more actively.
Moscow Patriarchate, Spirit academy in Kazan, Pokrov monastery in Moscow, New Russian Martyrs, the book “A week in Patriarhiya”, Patriarch Sergy (Stragorodsky), Metropolitan Elevfery (Bogoyavlensky), Metropolitan Manuil (Lemeshevsky), bishop Alexander

1. Emel'janov N. (2008) “30 000 za Hrista postradavshih v Baze dannyh PSTGU. Analiz podviga russkogo naroda” (30000 Victims for Christ in Database of PSTGU. Analysis of the Feat of Russian People), in Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii «1917-j: Cerkov' i sud'by Rossii. K 90-letiju Pomestnogo Sobora i izbranija Patriarha Tihona», M.: PSTGU. 2008, pp. 221–231.
2. Istorija ierarhii Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi (History of Hierarchy of Russian Orthodox Church), M.: PSTGU, 2006.
3. M[itropolit] M[anuil]. (ed.) Russkie Pravoslavnye ierarhi perioda s 1893 po 1965 gody (vkljuchitel'no) (Russian Orthodox Hierarchs of the Period 1893–1965 (Inclusive)), Kujbyshev, 1966.
4. M. V. Shkarovskij i D. P. Anashkin (eds.). Pravoslavnoe cerkovnoe soprotivlenie v SSSR: Biograficheskij spravochnik. 1927–1988 gg. (Orthodox Church Resistance in USSR: Biographical Reference Book. 1927–1988), M.: Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija (ROSSPJeN), 2013.
5. Cypin V., prot. Istorija Russkoj Cerkvi. 1917–1997 (History of Russian Orthodox Church. 1917–1997), M., 1997, vol. 9.
Кострюков А. А. «Памяти Господней добрый хранителю» // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2015. Вып. 3 (64). С. 157-160. — Rev. op.: Бирюкова Ю. А., Овчинников П., свящ. Подвиг служения священномученика Захарии (Лобова), епископа Аксайского, архиепископа Воронежского и Задонского (1865–1937). Ростов-на-Дону: Антей, 2014
PDF
Кострюков А. А. «Чужой хлеб больше чем горек» Письма архимандрита Феодосия (Мельника) архимандриту Антонию (Синькевичу) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2015. Вып. 5 (66). С. 115-140. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201566.115-140
Archimandrite Theodosius (Melnik) was the cellarer of Metropolitan Anthonii (Khrapovitskii) who was the head of the Russian Church Abroad. Archimandrite Theodosius was with his spiritual father and his teacher, Metropolitan Anthonii and shared all the sorrows that have fallen in exile. They lived in Serbia. Then Sremski Karlovci was the center of life of the Russian Orthodox Church. Archimandrite Theodosius become a witness of the important events taking place in Russian Church Abroad and the Serbian Orthodox Church. Letters written by Archimandrite Theodosius in 1933 — 1938 years are published here. The last letter was written after the death of Metropolitan Anthonii. The letters contained information about the life of Metropolitan Anthonii. In his letters, Archimandrite Theodosius assess a personality — Metropolitan Anastasii (Gribanovskii), Metropolitan Nestor (Anisimov), Archpriest Michael Polsky, Yuriy Grabbe, Peter Lopuchin. The letters describe important events in the life of the Russian Orthodox Church, for example, in 1921 Karlovci Council; ) in 1936 the reconciliation of the Russian Church Abroad with Metropolitan Evlogii (Georgievskii) and with Metropolitan Platon (Rozhdestvenskii); in 1938 the preparation of the Second Karlovci Council. All the letters are written to Archimandrite Anthonii (Sinkevich) who served in the Russian Spiritual Mission in Jerusalem. In 1951 Archimandrite Anthony became Archbishop Los Angeles and West American. These letters are kept in the archives of the Russian Ecclesiastical Mission in Jerusalem (Moscow Patriarchate).
the Russian Church Abroad, the Serbian Orthodox Church, Karlovci Council, Second Karlovci Council, the Russian Ecclesiastical Mission in Jerusalem, Metropolitan Anthonii (Khrapovitskii), Metropolitan Evlogii (Georgievskii), Metropolitan Nestor (Anisimov)
Кострюков А. А. К истории взаимоотношений между Русской Зарубежной Церковью и Константинопольской Патриархией в 1920-1924 гг. // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2011. Вып. 6 (43). С. 58-69.
PDF
The Russian Orthodox Church abroad, the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Serbian Church, Patriarch Meletios IV, Patriarch Gregory VII, "pan-Orthodox Congress" of 1923, the Renovationist schism
Кострюков А. А. О некоторых причинах неудачи православия западного обряда // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2016. Вып. 2 (69). С. 80-98. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201669.80-98
The article is devoted to the history of orthodoxy of the western rite. Movement to Orthodox Church began in 1930, when catholic priest L. Vinart turned into orthodoxy. This priest was interested in orthodoxy and carried away for a group of clergy. Vinart had many disciples. This group used Latin divine service with some changes. Later the western rite was distributed by two clerics — archimandrite Dionysius (Shambo) and priest Evgraph Kovalevsky. The part of orthodox christians was under guidance of Russian Orthodox Church. Other part was under guidance of Patriarchate of Moscow. However, distribution of the western rite in postwar years was finished. In the article reasons of failure of this missionary project are analyzed. Among this reasons: the absence of aid from Patriarchate of Moscow, the conflicts between the branches of Russian orthodoxy in emigration and great mistakes that was made by archpriest Evgraph Kovalevsky (bishop John).
Russian Orthodox Church, Russian Orthodox Church abroad, French Orthodox Church, the western rite in orthodoxy, holy hierarch John (Maximovich), venerable Sylvan of Athos, archimandrite Irinaeus (Vinart), archimandrite Dionysius (Shambo), archpriest Evgr

1. Burega V. 2006 “Zhizn' i cerkovnaja dejatel'nost' arhimandrita Dionisija (Shambo)” (Life and Church Activity of Archimandrite Dionisius (Shambo)), in Cerkov' i vremja, 2006, vol. 3/36, pp. 116–162.
2. Zhun'evi K. 2002 “Popytka sozdanija gallikanskoj Cerkvi: Katolicheskaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov' Francii (ESOF). Istoricheskaja spravka” (Attempt of Creating of the Gallican Church: Catholic Orthodox Church of France. Historical Inquiry), in Al'fa i Omega, 2002, vol. 4/34, pp. 328–345.
3. Kovalevskij E., prot. 1962 “Pravoslavie vo Francii” (Orthodoxy in France), in Cerkovnaja zhizn', 1962, vol. 1–6, pp. 44–52.
4. Kostrjukov A. Russkaja Zarubezhnaja Cerkov' v 1939–1964 gg.: Administrativnoe ustrojstvo i otnoshenija s Cerkov'ju v Otechestve (Russian Church Abroad in 1939–1964: Administrative Structure and Relations with Church in Motherland), Moscow, 2015.
5. Mazyrin A., diak. 2006 “K istorii vysshego upravlenija Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi v 1935–1937 gg.” (To History of High Administration of the Russian Orthodox Church in 1935–1937), in XVI Ezhegodnaja bogoslovskaja konferencija PSTGU: Materialy: V 2 t., Moscow, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 161–172.
6. Niv'er A. Pravoslavnye svjashhennosluzhiteli, bogoslovy i cerkovnye dejateli russkoj jemigracii v Zapadnoj i Central'noj Evrope 1920–1995 (Orthodox Clergy, Theologians and Church Figures of the Russian Emigration in West and Central Europe 1920–1995), Moscow, 2007.
7. Puchkin D. Latinskij obrjad v Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi (Latin Ritus in the Orthodox Church), in: http://www.spasi.ru/biblt/pch1.htm (date: 20.12.2015)).
8. Slesarev A. Pravoslavie zapadnogo obrjada: istoricheskij put' ot cerkovnoj missii k raskolu (Orthodoxy of the West Ritus: Historical Way from Church Mission to Schism) (URL: http: //rusk.ru/st.php?idar=113631 (data obrashhenija 20.12.2015)).
9. Slesarev A. Starostil'nyj raskol v istorii Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi (1924–2008) (Old Style Schism in the History of Orthodox Church (1924–2008)), Moscow, 2009.
10. Kovalevsky M. Orthodox et Occident: Renaissance d’une eglise locale, Paris, 1990.
11. Sidenko A. L’archimandrite Denis Chambault: un Français au sein de l’orthodoxie occidentale, Paris, 2015.
Кострюков А. А. Дарование автокефалии Православной Церкви в Америке в свете документов церковных архивов // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2016. Вып. 3 (70). С. 93-103. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201670.93-103
In 1970 the Patriarchate of Moscow gives autocephaly to Orthodox Church in America. This event is not suffi ciently reflected in the literature and many documents on this subject are not available. On materials of Russian and foreign archives some details of granting of autocephaly is shown. In particular, the Patriarchate of Moscow for a long time was refusing from reconciliation with North American metropolia on its terms. In the end of 1960s the situation did not change. The Patriarchate of Moscow began to fear that North American metropolia will draw together with Ecumenical Patriarch Aphinogor. In these conditions Church authority of Moscow had make concessions of North American metropolia. Besides, after antichurch reforms of Khrushchev Patriarchate of Moscow can’t support its American parishes. The guidance of Russian Church believed that giving these parishes to American Church solved fi nancial problems.
Orthodox Church in America, the Patriarchate of Moscow, Patriarch Aphinogor, Patriarch Alexis the First, Metropolitan Irinaeus (Bekish), Metropolitan Nikodim (Rotov), Archpriest A. Shmeman, Protopresbyter I. Maindorf.

1. Gurevich A. 2008 “Opyt sozdanija vremennoj samostojatel'noj arhiepiskopii Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi Francii i Zapadnoj Evropy: uroki istorii” (Experience of Creating of Temporary Independent Archdiocese of Orthodox Church of France and Western Europe: History Lessons), in Problemy istorii Russkogo zarubezh'ja: Materialy i issledovanija, Moscow, 2008, vol. 2, pp. 135–152.
2. Pavel (Fokin), archim. (ed.) Zhiznennyj put' arhiepiskopa Vashingtonskogo i Aljaskinskogo Antonina (Pokrovskogo), ego lichnye vospominanija i perepiska (Life Way of Archbishop of Washington and Alaska Antonin (Pokrovskij), His Personal Memories and Correspondence), Moscow, 2007.
3. Kostrjukov A. Russkaja Zarubezhnaja Cerkov' v 1925–1938 gg. Jurisdikcionnye konflikty i otnoshenija s moskovskoj cerkovnoj vlast'ju (Russian Church Abroad in 1925–1938. Jurisdictional Conflicts and Relations with Moscow Church Autorities), Moscow, 2011.
4. Kostrjukov A. A. (ed.) 2012 “L. N. Parijskij o cerkovnoj situacii v Amerike v seredine 1940-h gg.” (L. N. Parijskij about Church Situation in America in Middle of 1940s), in Vestnik PSTGU. Ser. II: Istorija. Istorija Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi, 2012, vol. 6/49, pp. 65–118.
5. Russkaja Pravoslavnaja Cerkov' v Severnoj Amerike. Istoricheskaja spravka (Russian Orthodox Churhc in North America. Historical Inquiry), Dzhordanvill', 1954.
6. Skurat K. Istorija Pomestnyh Pravoslavnyh Cerkvej (History of Local Orthodox Churches), Moscow, 1994, vol. 2.
7. Juvenalij, mitr. Chelovek Cerkvi (Man of Church), Moscow, 1998.
Кострюков А. А. ≪Нам не нужны ни старая, ни новая Церковь…≫ // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2016. Вып. 3 (70). С. 141-145. — Rev. op.: Церковные расколы в Донской области в 1920–1930-е гг.: Сборник документов и материалов / Л. В. Табунщикова, А. В. Шадрина. — Ростов-на-Дону: Антей, 2015
PDF
Кострюков А. А. "Церковь снова будет светом во тьме" // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2017. Вып. 76. С. 141-144. — Rev. op.: Ершова А. А. "В тюрьме в 1920 году". Воспоминания. М.: Культурно-просветительский фонд "Преображение". Свято-Филаретовский православно-христианский институт. 2017
PDF
Кострюков А. А. Святитель Серафим (Соболев) и «Дело князя Лобанова-Ростовского» // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2018. Вып. 82. С. 107-134. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201882.107-134
Archbishop Seraphim Sobolev (proclaimed a saint in 2016) is known as an ascetic and defender of Orthodoxy. This publication deals with an unexplored period of life of this hierarch. During the confl ict between authorities of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad and head of West European diocese metropolitan Eulogy (Georgievsky), the brochure “Turmoil of Carlovci” (Russ. «Карловацкая смута») was spread. Among various accusations against the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, it contained insinuations against archbishop Seraphim. In particular, the author of the brochure accused him of an unfair excommunication of prince Lobanov-Rostovsky. Drawing on to the letters of Lobanov-Rostovsky that were found in the State Archive of the Russian Federation, the author of the publication came to a conclusion that these remarks about the holy hierarch are unfair. The struggle for infl uence over the parish of St. Nicholas in Sofi a became a cause of the confl ict. Lobanov-Rostovsky held tactless conversations as he was displeased with the fact that archbishop Seraphim became close to the family of M. Zyzykin. These conversations stained the reputation of bishop Seraphim and his younger brother hieromonk Sergius. As a result, Lobanov-Rostovsky was excommunicated until he showed repentance. Episcopal Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad discussed this confl ict in 1925. Head of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky) decidedly supported archbishop Seraphim. Episcopal Synod also took the side of the bishop. They confi rmed that archbishop Seraphim’s decision was fair. The confl ict ended with the reconciliation between archbishop Seraphim and prince Lobanov-Rostovsky in the summer of 1925.
Saint Seraphim (Sobolev), metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky), metropolitan Eulogy (Georgievsky), M. Zyzykin, I. Lobanov-Rostovskiy, Russian emigration in the 20th century, Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, Orthodox Church of Bulgaria, West European exarchate of parishes of Russian tradition, Russian church of St. Nicholas in Sofia
  1. Kiprian (Kern), arhim., Pravoslavnoye pastirskoe sluzhenie, St. Petersburg, 1996.
  2. Kostryukov A., Arhiepiskop Serafim (Sobolev): zhizn, sluzhenie, ideologiya, Moscow, 2011.
  3. Kostryukov A., Plamen ognenniy. Zhizn I naslediye arhiepiskopa Serafima (Soboleva), Moscow, 2015.
  4. Kostryukov A., Russkaya Zarubezhnaya Tserkov v 1939–1964 гг. Administrativnoye ustroystvo I otnosheniya s Tserkoviyu v otechestve, Moscow, 2015.
Kostryukov Andrey
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Likhov Pereulok, office 219, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Leading Research Fellow, Research Centre for Contemporary History of Russian Orthodox Church; Associate Professor, Department of General and Russian Church History and Canon Law;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4334-1035;
Email: a.kost@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Кострюков А. А. Наступает время творческого собирания всех живых духовных сил // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2018. Вып. 82. С. 149-152. — Rev. op.: Юго-Восточный Русский Церковный Собор 1919 года / Сб. документов под ред. Ю. А. Бирюковой. М.: Изд. Новоспасского монастыря, 2018.
PDF
Kostryukov Andrey
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Likhov Pereulok, office 219, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Leading Research Fellow, Research Centre for Contemporary History of Russian Orthodox Church; Associate Professor, Department of General and Russian Church History and Canon Law;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4334-1035;
Email: a.kost@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Кострюков А. А. "Врачу, исцелися сам" (Лук. 4, 23). Профессор С. В. Троицкий против «восточного папизма» Константинополя // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2019. Вып. 87. С. 141-148. DOI: 10.15382/sturII201987.141-148
Sergei Victorovich Troitsky is a prominent theologian and canonist, doctor of theology of the University of Belgrade. Heritage of this scholar is in demand now, though many of his articles are not known to the reading public. The letter which is published here belongs to an important event in the history of the church. In 1965, patriarch Athenagoras (Spyrou) of Constantinople excluded from his jurisdiction the Exarchate of Russian Orthodox Parishes of Western Europe which was ruled by archbishop Georgy (Tarasov). In patriarch Athenagoras’ proclamation, there was advice for archbishop Georgy to go over under the authority of patriarch of Moscow Alexy I. It might have seemed that this event was an important victory of Moscow diplomacy. However, contemporaries, S. V. Troitsky among them, paid attention to the formulations of the proclamation of Constantinople Patriarchy. According to these formulations, Constantinople established its rights upon the diaspora in the whole world. Troitsky in his letter to Metropolitan Nikodim (Rotov), head of the Department for External Church Relations, makes a point that these claims of Constantinople are unfounded. Besides, he mentions the danger of the new policy of Phanar. For example, for the Orthodox it will be harder to have a dialogue with Anglicans and Old Catholics, who left Roman Church just because of its claims for global power. Now the same situation takes place in the Orthodox Church as well. Troitsky proposed to prepare a brochure with criticism against the policy of Constantinople. Such a brochure would be useful because Troitsky’s articles on this topic were scattered in various foreign journals and had been forgotten by that time. Troitsky also discusses canonic measures that should be taken against archbishop Georgy (Tarasov), who refused to affi liate with the Moscow Patriarchate.
patriarch Alexy I of Moscow, patriarch Athenagoras of Constantinople, metropolitan Nikodim (Rotov), archbishop Georgy (Tarasov), archimandrite Siluan (Strizhkov), Sergei Troitsky, Church of Constantinople, Patriarchate of Moscow, Exarchate of Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe, diaspora, Russian emigration
  1. Troitskii S. (1923) “Iurisdiktsiia Tsarigradskogo Patriarkha v oblasti diaspory” [Jurisdiction of Patriarch of Constantinople in the Field of Diaspora]. Tserkovnye vedomosti, 1923, vol. 11–12, p. 7; vol. 17–18, pp. 8–12 (in Russian).
  2. Troitskii S. (1924) “«Dymnoe nadmenie mira» i Tserkov’” [“«Fumous Pride of the World» and the Church”]. Tserkovnye vedomosti, 1924, vol. 15–16, pp. 16–17; vol. 17–18, pp. 8–9; vol. 21–22, pp. 6–9; vol. 23–24, pp. 8–10 (in Russian).
  3. Troitskii S. (1932) Razmezhevanie ili raskol [Faction or Schism]. Paris (in Russian).
  4. Troitskii S. (1933) Khristianskaia fi losofi ia braka [Christian Philosophy of Marriage]. Paris (in Russian).
  5. Troitskii S. (1937) Mitropolit Sergii i primirenie russkoi diaspory [Metropolitan Sergy and Reconciliation in Russian Diaspora]. Sremski Karlovci (in Russian).
  6. Troitskii S. (1947) “O granitsakh rasprostraneniia prava vlasti Konstantinopol’skoi Patriarkhii na «Diasporu»” [On the Limits of Extending Constantinople’s Right to Power over “Diaspora”]. Zhurnal Moskovskoi Patriarkhii. Vol. 11, pp. 34–45 (in Russian).
  7. Troitskii S. (1949) “Po povodu neudachnoi zashchity lozhnoi teorii” [On a Failed Attempt to Defend a False Theory]. Zhurnal Moskovskoi Patriarkhii, 1949, vol. 12, pp. 29–54 (in Russian).
Kostryukov Andrey
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Likhov Pereulok, office 219, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Leading Research Fellow, Research Centre for Contemporary History of Russian Orthodox Church; Associate Professor, Department of General and Russian Church History and Canon Law;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4334-1035;
Email: a.kost@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Кострюков А. А. Православная Сибирь в преддверии «Хамодержавия» // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2019. Вып. 90. С. 151-154. — Rev. op.: Белоус П. В. Тобольская епархия в годы Первой мировой войны (1914 – 1918). Тюмень: Издательство Тюменского государственного университета. 2018. – 288 с.
PDF
Kostryukov Andrey
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Likhov Pereulok, office 219, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Leading Research Fellow, Research Centre for Contemporary History of Russian Orthodox Church; Associate Professor, Department of General and Russian Church History and Canon Law;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4334-1035;
Email: a.kost@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Кострюков А. А. К вопросу о взаимоотношениях Сербской и Русской Зарубежной Церквей в 1960 – 1980-е гг. // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2020. Вып. 92. С. 144-157. DOI: 10.15382/sturII202092.144-157
This article studies the problems in relations between the Serbian Church and the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad. In the 1920s and 1930s, Russian refugees were supported by the Serbian Church, and the Russian Church Abroad was granted canonical status. Good relations between the churches continued afterwards as well. However, in the 1960s and 1980s, the party of “zealots” (Russ. ревнители) gained considerable influence in the Russian Church Abroad, accusing the Orthodox world of apostasy and advocating a resolute severance with the local churches, including the Serbian Church. At the same time, many priests valued their relations with world Orthodoxy. The opposition of the two parties is linked to the attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad towards bishop Dionysius (Milivojevich), who separated from the Serbian Church in 1963 and established the so-called “Free Serbian Orthodox Church”. At fi rst, the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad was ready to fully support the new split, but in 1967 it condemned the new discord. Nevertheless, later representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, including metropolitan Filaret (Voznesensky) made harsh statements against the legitimate Serbian Church. For its part, the Serbian Church avoided conflict with the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad and continued to protect it. In the early 1970s, Moscow Patriarchate was preparing to condemn the Russian Church Abroad. The issue was discussed at the Local Council in 1971, and it was decided to abandon it. A representative of the Serbian Church, who was present at the Council, also opposed the condemnation of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad. This attitude on the part of the Serbian Church was also observed later, in the 1990s too, when relations between Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian Church Abroad were particularly difficult.
Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, Moscow Patriarchate, Serbian Orthodox Church, Local Council of 1971, “Serbian Free Orthodox Church”, metropolitan Filaret (Voznesensky), metropolitan Nikodim (Rotov), bishop Dionysius (Milivojevich)
  1. Kassia, nun (T. Senina) (ed.) (2007) Stolp ognennyi. Mitropolit N’iu-Iorkskii i Vostochno- Amerikanskii Filaret (Voznesenskii) i Russkaia Zarubezhnaia Tserkov’ (1964–1985) [The Pillar of Fire. Metropolitan of New York and West America Filaret and Russian Church Abroad (1964‒1985]. St Petersburg (in Russian).
  2. Kosik V. (2000) Russkaia Tserkov’ v Yugoslavii (20–40-e gg. XX veka) [Russian Church in Yugoslavia (1920s — 1940s). Moscow (in Russian).
  3. Kosik V. (2012) Khorvatskaia Pravoslavnaia Tserkov’ (ot organizatsii do likvidatsii) (1942– 1945). Vzgliad iz ХХI veka [Croatian Orthodox Church (from establishment to dissolution) (1942‒1945)]. Moscow (in Russian).
  4. Kostryukov A. (2007) Russkaia Zarubezhnaia Tserkov’ v pervoi polovine 1920kh godov. Organizatsiia tserkovnogo upravleniia v emigratsii i ego otnosheniia s Moskovskoi Patriarkhiei pri zhizni Patriarkha Tikhona [Russian Orthodox Church in the First Half of the 1920s. Organisation of Church Administration in Emigration and its Relations with Moscow Patriarchate during Time of Patriarch Tikhon]. Moscow (in Russian).
  5. Kostryukov A. (2011) Russkaia Zarubezhnaia Tserkov’ v 1925–1938 gg. Iurisdiktsionnye konfl ikty i otnosheniia s moskovskoi tserkovnoi vlast’iu [Russian Church Abroad in 1925‒1938. Jurisdiction Conflicts and Relations with Moscow Church Authorities]. Moscow (in Russian).
  6. Kostryukov A. (2018) Russkaia Zarubezhnaia Tserkov’ v 1939–1964 gg. Administrativnoe ustroistvo i otnosheniya s Tserkov’iu v Otechestve [Russian Church Abroad in 1939‒1964. Administrative Structure and Relations with the Church in the Homeland]. Moscow (in Russian).
  7. Psarev A. (2012) Razvitie mirovozzreniia Russkoi Zarubezhnoi Tserkvi v otnoshenii Pomestnykh Tserkvei i inoslaviia [Development of Worldview of Russian Church Abroad as to Local Churches and Heterodoxy], in Deyaniia IV Vsezarubezhnogo Sobora Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi Zagranitsei [Acts of the 4th General Council of Russian Orthodox CHurch Abroad]. Moscow, pp. 180–205 (in Russian).
  8. Shkarovskii M. (2009) Istoriia russkoi tserkovnoi emigratsii [History of Russian Church Emigration]. St Petersburg (in Russian).
  9. Shkarovskii M. (2019) Pravoslavnye Tserkvi Iugo-Vostochnoi Evropy mezhdu dvumia mirovymi voinami [Orthodox Churches of South-Eastern Europe between Two Waorld Wars]. Moscow (in Russian).
Kostryukov Andrey
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Likhov Pereulok, office 219, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Leading Research Fellow, Research Centre for Contemporary History of Russian Orthodox Church; Associate Professor, Department of General and Russian Church History and Canon Law;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4334-1035;
Email: a.kost@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Кострюков А. А. Как не потеряться в «джунглях зилотства»? // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II: История. История Русской Православной Церкви. 2020. Вып. 94. С. 173-176. — Rev. op.: Бочков П., свящ. Обзор неканонических православных юрисдикций ХХ–ХХI вв. СПб: Свое издательство. 2018. Т. 1–4. Изд. 2-е, испр. и доп.
PDF
Kostryukov Andrey
Academic Degree: Doctor of Sciences* in History;
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Place of work: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for Humanities; 6/1 Likhov Pereulok, office 219, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation;
Post: Leading Research Fellow, Research Centre for Contemporary History of Russian Orthodox Church; Associate Professor, Department of General and Russian Church History and Canon Law;
ORCID: 0000-0003-4334-1035;
Email: a.kost@mail.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.