/
Search results


Буланенко М. Е. Уроки И.В. Киреевского для современной философии // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2017. Вып. 74. С. 44-66. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201774.44-66
In his later writings Russian Slavophile philosopher Ivan V. Kireevsky gives an outline of a positive Christian philosophy. Its prerequisite is the spiritual integrity of the knowing reason that enables one to acquire the adequate cognitive access to the reality as a whole. Spiritual integrity originates in the Eastern historical type, whereas the Western type is marked by the lack of spiritual unity and the dominance of formal reasoning that distort the apprehension of the reality. Spiritual integrity is only possible on the grounds of the Orthodox Christian faith that opens to a human person the genuine communion with God. However, in his own works Ivan V. Kireevsky does not mention any specifically Christian subject (such as original sin and redemption ). Besides that, his typological approach to history and his central philosophical concepts (such as spiritual integrity and faith) display some rather serious shortcomings. Nevertheless, a positive Christian philosophy along the lines of Ivan V. Kireevsky still has a potential for further constructive development, but that would require a careful refinement of its theoretical foundations and central concepts.
I.V. Kireevsky, S.N. Trubetskoy, Hegel, Schelling, the West, Russia, Eastern Christian tradition, German idealism, typological approach, critique of rationalism, integral reason, faith, foundations of philosophy, Christian philosophy
  1. Antonov K.M. Filosofiia I.V. Kireevskogo: antropologicheskii aspekt (The philosophy of I.V. Kireevskii: its anthropological aspect). Moscow, 2006.
  2. Bocheński J.M. Formale Logik. Freiburg, München, 1956.
  3. Bredshou D. Aristotel' na Vostoke i na Zapade. Metafizika i razdelenie khristianskogo mira. M., 2012 (Russian translation of: Bradshaw D. Aristotle East and West: metaphysics and the division of Christendom. New-York, 2004).
  4. Gaiser K. Platons ungeschriebene Lehre. Studien zur systematischen und geschichtlichen Begründung der Wissenschaften in der Platonischen Schule. Stuttgart, 1963.
  5. Gulyga A.V. Nemetskaia klassicheskaia filosofiia (The German classical philosophy). Moscow, 2001.
  6. Gvozdev A.V. Sviatootecheskie korni antropologii i gnoseologii I.V. Kireevskogo (The anthropology and gnoseology of Ivan Kireyevsky and their roots in the teaching of Fathers of the Church). Vestnik PSTGU. Seriia I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia, vol. 15, p. 142-167.
  7. Katasonov V.N. Khristianstvo. Kul'tura. Nauka (Christianity. Culture. Science). Moscow, 2012.
  8. Khomiakov A.S. Sochineniia v dvukh tomakh. Tom 1. Raboty po istoriosofii (Writings in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Works in the philosophy of history). Moscow, 1994.
  9. Kireevskii I.V. Kritika i estetika (Art critique and aesthetics). Moscow, 1979.
  10. Kutschera F., von. Die Idee der Autonomie in der neuzeitlichen Geistesgeschichte. Paderborn, 2016.
  11. Kutschera F., von. Wert und Wirklichkeit. Paderborn, 2010.
  12. Louth A. St John Damascene: tradition and originality in Byzantine theology. Oxford, 2002.
  13. Müller E. Russischer Intellekt in europäischer Krise: Ivan V. Kireevskij (1806 – 1856). Köln, Graz, 1966.
  14. Patnem Kh. Razum, istina i istoriia. M., 2002 (Russian translation of: Putnam H. Reason, truth and history. New York, 1981).
  15. Rose M.C. The Christian Platonism of C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, and Charles Williams, in: D.J. O’Meara. (ed.) Neoplatonism and Christian thought. Albany, 1982. P. 203-212.
  16. Trubetskoi S.N. Sochineniia (Writings). Moscow, 1994.
  17. Ware K. Scholasticism and Orthodoxy: theological method as a factor in the schism. Eastern Churches Review, vol. 5, p. 16-27.
Bulanenko Maxim, диакон
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Institute of History Archaeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the Far East FEB RAS, Room 45, 89 Pushkinskaya St, Vladivostok, Russia 690001;
Post: Associated professor of the Department of Philosophy;
ORCID: 0000-0002-4977-9559;
Email: bulanenko@list.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.
Буланенко М. Е. О двух подходах к изучению истории философии (ответ проф. К.М. Антонову) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2018. Вып. 76. С. 147-151. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201876.147-151
This paper is a polemic answer to professor K. Antonov published in the volume 74 of this Journal
Kireevsky, history of philosophy, german idealism, Hegelianism, faith
Bulanenko Maxim, диакон
Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Philosophy;
Place of work: Institute of History Archaeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the FEB RAS, Room 45, 89 Pushkinskaya St, Vladivostok, Russia 690001;
Post: Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy;
ORCID: 0000-0002-4977-9559;
Email: bulanenko@list.ru. *According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.